ライフサイエンスコーパス: vocational

1 on in either competitive employment or other vocational activities and sociodemographic characteristi

2 icipation in competitive employment or other vocational activities in a large group of patients with

3 's findings indicate a small but significant vocational advantage accruing to recipients of evidence-

4 lly, paid employment was tracked weekly, and vocational and clinical services were measured monthly.

5 ent and mental health treatments can improve vocational and mental health recovery for this populatio

6 and functional recovery (regaining baseline vocational and residential status) was rated.

7 ositive and Negative Syndrome Scale; social, vocational, and family functioning using the World Healt

8 s been shown to be more effective than other vocational approaches in improving competitive work over

9 cognitive and emotional function and disrupt vocational attainment.

10 Cochlear implantation offers hearing and vocational benefits to children and adults who lose thei

11 en's self-concept development, readiness for vocational choices, actual choices made, work-force entr

12 l care medicine again, evidencing the strong vocational component in its practice, which seems to pre

13 ena such as crime, eminence, and educational-vocational development, such a multifaceted approach is

14 Although psychological, social, and vocational disabilities contribute to mood dysfunction i

15 ver had a close relationship and the rate of vocational disability were also nearly identical.

16 Cumulative incidences of completed vocational education, high school education, higher educ

17 node-positive disease, older age, basic and vocational educational levels, and living alone were ass

18 havioural interventions, and assistance with vocational evaluation and training.

19 This chapter reviews the vocational experiences of women as they have been reveal

20 ve and negative symptoms and adequate social/vocational functioning (fulfillment of age-appropriate r

21 bipolar disorder may be necessary to enhance vocational functioning after a depressive episode.

22 or recovery (which involved good social and vocational functioning as well as symptomatic remission)

23 ssion of symptoms and having good social and vocational functioning during the previous 2 years.

24 y was to examine the cognitive predictors of vocational functioning in the context of a controlled cl

25 ined improvement in both symptoms and social/vocational functioning) when examined decades after an i

26 sociated with full recovery, adequate social/vocational functioning, and symptom remission.

27 performance was associated with academic and vocational functioning.

28 iated with full recovery and adequate social/vocational functioning; a schizoaffective diagnosis pred

29 urocognition and community (e.g., social and vocational) functioning (six studies), 2) all known stud

30 to decline across adulthood, but social and vocational impairments remain.

31 the CAINS scales were related to real-world vocational, independent living, and social/familial func

32 ensions of human abilities, personality, and vocational interests play critical roles in structuring

33 oyment programs that use the place-and-train vocational model have important effects on obtaining com

34 long-terms costs in loss of educational and vocational opportunities, and the development of serious

35 effective than vocational services for every vocational outcome, with 85 (55%) patients assigned to I

36 rs following TBI were associated with a poor vocational outcome.

37 based supported employment services on three vocational outcomes: labor force participation, earnings

38 Vocational performance was assessed over a 24-month foll

39 oach to ensure that social, educational, and vocational plans are in place to support physical and me

40 l program costs or of work earnings to total vocational program and mental health treatment costs.

41 calculated as the ratio of work earnings to vocational program costs or of work earnings to total vo

42 tively make career decisions is the focus of vocational psychologists.

43 The present review organizes the vocational psychology literature published between 2007

44 The review focuses first on vocational psychology's rich tradition of theoretically

45 field are challenging the assumptions within vocational psychology.

46 s associated with the absence of a degree or vocational qualification (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for

47 mily history of substance use disorder, good vocational record, absence of an anxious cluster persona

48 n competitive work than those in traditional vocational rehabilitation (65% compared with 33%), worke

49 nd provide ongoing support, and (2) enhanced vocational rehabilitation (EVR), in which stepwise vocat

50 ns with other psychosocial approaches (e.g., vocational rehabilitation and case management), identify

51 nt in the context of a clinical trial of two vocational rehabilitation approaches.

52 Vocational rehabilitation delivered to patients at risk

53 seases, and clinicians may refer patients to vocational rehabilitation for help.

54 r from schizophrenia, and recent advances in vocational rehabilitation have been shown to be effectiv

55 compared supported employment to traditional vocational rehabilitation in 100 unemployed persons with

56 this service to be an effective approach for vocational rehabilitation in mental health that deserves

57 When provided after job loss, the impact of vocational rehabilitation is short term.

58 A social and vocational rehabilitation model of treatment is needed t

59 fects of the model compared with traditional vocational rehabilitation over 5 years.

60 brief historic overview of the state-federal vocational rehabilitation program in the United States.

61 was undertaken to determine the efficacy of vocational rehabilitation provided to persons with rheum

62 mployment (SE) models combining clinical and vocational rehabilitation services to establish competit

63 nistered to 150 patients upon entry into the vocational rehabilitation trial.

64 niques that blend cognitive remediation with vocational rehabilitation, and integration of health pro

65 linical trial by comparing two approaches to vocational rehabilitation.

66 t performance or the longer-term outcomes of vocational rehabilitation.

67 duals with ASD will be important for optimal vocational rehabilitation.

68 to 150 patients drawn from a larger study of vocational rehabilitation.

69 ntal group received two 1.5-hour sessions of vocational rehabilitation; those in the control group re

70 (median, 0 D; Q1/Q3, -1.1/0.8 D) or primary vocational school (median, 0 D; Q1/Q3, -0.9/1.1 D) versu

71 3/0.3 D) versus those who finished secondary vocational school (median, 0 D; Q1/Q3, -1.1/0.8 D) or pr

72 out graduation, high school with graduation, vocational school, some college, and graduate/profession

73 ed from secondary (34.8%) or primary (34.7%) vocational schools and than in those without any profess

74 compared with 43 (28%) patients assigned to vocational services (difference 26.9%, 95% CI 16.4-37.4)

75 x European centres to receive IPS (n=156) or vocational services (n=156).

76 onal rehabilitation (EVR), in which stepwise vocational services are delivered by rehabilitation agen

77 IPS was more effective than vocational services for every vocational outcome, with 8

78 aluated the effectiveness of 2 approaches to vocational services for persons with severe mental disor

79 models tailored by integrating clinical and vocational services were more effective than services as

80 Patients assigned to vocational services were significantly more likely to dr

81 fectiveness of IPS compared with traditional vocational services, which has favored IPS.

82 aining competitive employment with effective vocational services.

83 rventions that enhance survivors' social and vocational skills should be considered.

84 obal function above 60 (45% versus 10%), and vocational status (employed or in education 3.2 years ve

85 CIT compared with CAT adjusted for age, sex, vocational status, and income.

86 ionship with increased physical activity and vocational status.

87 CI 0.89-0.99) and compulsory schooling plus vocational training (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.97).

88 n combination with other treatments, such as vocational training.

89 ith altruistic behavior and with filling the vocational void caused by retirement.