ライフサイエンスコーパス: voluntary contraction

1 rhythmic handgrip exercise (EX; 15% maximal voluntary contraction).

2 erate rhythmic forearm exercise (10% maximal voluntary contraction).

3 g to zero at around one-third of the maximum voluntary contraction.

4 lling to zero at around one-third of maximum voluntary contraction.

5 their maximum muscle activity from a maximal voluntary contraction.

6 on strengths likely to come close to maximum voluntary contraction.

7 onal elbow torques from 0% to 20% of maximum voluntary contraction.

8 ic handgrip (20 s) at 10% and 70% of maximum voluntary contraction.

9 llows the cessation of a prolonged isometric voluntary contraction.

10 ic isometric calf exercise at 20% of maximum voluntary contraction.

11 target muscle was contracting at 10% maximum voluntary contraction.

12 gy accounted for by decomposition similar to voluntary contractions.

13 y of motor unit ensembles in macaques during voluntary contractions.

14 itment and rate coding of motor units during voluntary contractions.

15 , and mechanical properties of single MUs in voluntary contractions.

16 ting the neural strategies controlling human voluntary contractions.

17 s of the firing of single motor units during voluntary contractions.

18 dorsal interosseous muscles in humans during voluntary contractions.

19 e, and firing rate associated with sustained voluntary contractions.

20 itiate (GO) ballistic index finger isometric voluntary contractions.

21 ch motor units are recruited during repeated voluntary contractions.

22 muscle fatigue processes induced by maximal voluntary contractions.

23 4 weeks of strength training with isometric voluntary contractions.

24 he fatigue associated with sustained maximal voluntary contractions.

25 single-leg knee-extensor trials (60 maximal voluntary contractions; 3 s contraction, 2 s relaxation)

26 single-leg knee-extensor trials (60 maximal voluntary contractions; 3 s contraction, 2 s relaxation)

27 nt isometric knee extensions (20% of maximal voluntary contraction; 50 s contractions, with 10 s brea

28 ed increases in function [i.e., 1-RM/maximal voluntary contraction (60 degrees )] and VL thickness (p

29 force control tasks at 20% of their maximal voluntary contraction across four different visual gain

30 normal changes in motor cortical maps during voluntary contraction after SCI can be reshaped by senso

31 input from Ia afferents is regulated during voluntary contraction after the injury remains largely u

32 entric needle electrodes, ensuring by slight voluntary contraction and electrical nerve stimulation t

33 -0.446; p < 0.01 to 0.001), as were maximal voluntary contraction and electrically evoked peak twitc

34 tric knee extension protocols involving both voluntary contraction and electrically stimulated contra

35 participants with SCI decreased during hand voluntary contraction and further decreased during addit

36 -8.4 kg) were measured for isometric maximum voluntary contraction and MAS of the knee flexors using

37 uing isometric handgrip (IHG) at 30% maximum voluntary contraction and postexercise muscle ischaemia

38 idated psychomotor performance test (maximum voluntary contraction and visuomotor pinch/release testi

39 followed by knee extension maximal isometric voluntary contractions and evoked contractions.

40 ed small corticospinal responses and maximal voluntary contractions and larger reticulospinal gain co

41 The estimation of MU filters from voluntary contractions and their application to elicited

42 nsity surface electromyograms during maximal voluntary contractions and tracked from before to after

43 of static one-legged exercise (20 % maximal voluntary contraction) and 7 min dynamic cycling (20 % m

44 of static one-legged exercise (20 % maximal voluntary contraction) and 7 min dynamic cycling (20 % m

45 ring an isometric handgrip test (30% maximum voluntary contraction) and a cold pressor test.

46 ring rhythmic handgrip exercise (15% maximum voluntary contraction) and during a control non-exercise

47 (five 1.5 min work cycles, 10-30% of maximal voluntary contraction) and dynamic (three 5 min workload

48 hreshold (P = 0.00112, Delta = 1.09% maximal voluntary contraction) and self-sustained firing duratio

49 during isometric contractions at 25% maximum voluntary contraction, and used to determine discharge c

50 ngth assessed via dynamometry during maximum voluntary contractions, and gastrocnemius voluntary acti

51 years) performed finger flexion (7 % maximal voluntary contraction at 0.67 Hz) under cuff ischaemia.

52 l rhythmic handgrip exercise (45% of maximal voluntary contraction at 1 Hz for 3 min) under the same

53 in six men, determined experimentally using voluntary contractions at several combinations of ankle

54 neurones declines with time during a maximal voluntary contraction, at least for many muscles, it is

55 static one-legged contraction at 25% maximal voluntary contraction before (control) and after partial

56 grip exercise at 15%, 30% and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction by venous occlusion plethysmograph

57 ntracortical inhibition was decreased during voluntary contraction compared with rest but there was n

58 -reflex size increased in both groups during voluntary contraction compared with rest, but to a lesse

59 emained unchanged in SCI participants during voluntary contraction compared with rest.

60 hirty 1-sec contractions/min) at 30% maximal voluntary contraction during six 1-minute stages: freely

61 rate rhythmic handgrip exercise (15% maximum voluntary contraction), during a control non-exercise va

62 Five subjects performed six bouts of rapid voluntary contractions every 1.5 s for 42 s (28 contract

63 n) or rhythmic handgrip (50% and 30% maximal voluntary contraction) exercise, followed by 2-minute po

64 When initially activated during voluntary contraction, firing rates of motor neurons inc

65 we simulated synthetic HDsEMG signals during voluntary contractions followed by simulated motor evoke

66 isometric handgrip exercise (35% of maximal voluntary contraction) followed by postexercise ischaemi

67 grip sustained to fatigue at 40 % of maximum voluntary contraction, followed by 2 min of circulatory

68 y heating, 2 min IHG exercise at 40% maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 2 min post-exercise i

69 d finger to match 25%, 50% or 75% of maximal voluntary contraction for that finger.

70 Quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction force and fat-free mass assessed b

71 egorized as techniques that quantify maximum voluntary contraction force and those that assess evoked

72 isometric contraction at 10% of the maximal voluntary contraction force before and after each of two

73 t limit the repetitive evaluation of maximum voluntary contraction force in intensive care unit patie

74 fort level (10%, 25%, and 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force of each individual finger),

75 t with the scaling determined by the maximal voluntary contraction force of the motor effector.

76 Quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction force was 58.3 +/- 3.3 kg for the

77 petition maximum (1RM) and maximal isometric voluntary contraction force, body composition (dual-ener

78 urae was performed for 2 min at 30 % maximum voluntary contraction force.

79 %) at low contraction levels (<5% of maximum voluntary contraction force; MVC).

80 tent static handgrip (SHG; at 45% of maximal voluntary contraction; four 5-second contractions per mi

81 corded from the vastus lateralis (VL) during voluntary contractions held at 25% maximal knee extensor

82 (10%, 27.5%, 45%, 62.5%, and 80% of maximal voluntary contraction in a hand-held dynamometer).

83 ith rest, the D1 inhibition decreased during voluntary contraction in controls but it was still prese

84 nerves were tested at rest, and during tonic voluntary contraction in humans with and without chronic

85 tion, we examined motor cortical maps during voluntary contraction in humans with chronic cervical SC

86 us and heteronymous nerves is altered during voluntary contraction in humans with SCI, resulting in l

87 of rhythmic handgrip exercise at 20% maximal voluntary contraction in normoxia (NormEx) and isocapnic

88 ibration increased the motor map area during voluntary contraction in SCI participants.

89 participants showed similar MEPs and maximal voluntary contractions in biceps but smaller responses i

90 aviour of the motor neuron pool during rapid voluntary contractions in humans is presented.

91 ppress but not to execute rapid index finger voluntary contractions in individuals with SCI compared

92 tic stimulation and the magnitude of maximal voluntary contractions in targeted muscles increased on

93 e right FDI muscle at rest as well as during voluntary contraction increased for at least 10 min afte

94 llowing rhythmic contractions at 60% maximum voluntary contraction, is smaller in young black African

95 lts show that (i) quadriceps volume, maximum voluntary contraction isometric torque and patellar tend

96 l loads relative to the individual's maximum voluntary contraction (MAS%MVC) and a single absolute lo

97 13 units during the first 30 s of a maximal voluntary contraction (mean train duration, 9.6 +/- 1.2

98 eg IRT (4 x 2-min/2-min rest, at 20% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) 3 days/week).

99 al magnetic stimulation (TMS) during maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and corticospinal responsive

100 ax) to assess neuromuscular fatigue [maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and evoked contractile force

101 erior (TA) contraction at 10% of its maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and, (3) a TA contraction at

102 uscle contractions at 10, 20 and 40% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) before and during ascorbic a

103 sions at 10, 30, 50 and 70% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force in three sessions, eac

104 ip contractions at 20, 40 and 60% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) immediately followed by eith

105 motor cortex during 10% of isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) into elbow flexion or extens

106 The maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the reinnervated muscles

107 xamine the effect of a plantarflexor maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) on Achilles tendon moment ar

108 andgrip performed at 33 % or 45 % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) produced intensity-dependent

109 Eight subjects performed 30 % maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) static knee extension and fl

110 ring isometric PF exercise at 85% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque.

111 the muscle belly at rest and during maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) trials at ankle angles of -1

112 on contractions at 10%, 40%, and 70% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) using high-density surface e

113 Knee extensor maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was evaluated.

114 s-sectional area (CSA) and isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were evaluated.

115 ntractions at 20, 40, 60, and 80% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with 20 trials at each level

116 imilar between groups (5, 15 and 25% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)).

117 graded handgrip exercise (5, 15, 25% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)).

118 finger against resistance at 10-20 % maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and (b) abduction of the in

119 voked and voluntary exercise at 30 % maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), followed by post-exercise c

120 extensor contractions normalised to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), pre and post disuse.

121 muscle strength was measured during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC).

122 s exercised at an intensity > 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC).

123 and contractions at either 5% or 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC).

124 (iMM) masseters, activated at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC).

125 calf plantar flexor exercise at 30 % maximum voluntary contraction (MVC).

126 about 50 % over 60 s of a sustained maximum voluntary contraction (MVC).

127 monitored during (a) 15 s HG at 30% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC); (b) LBNP at -10 and -30 mmH

128 exercise at intensities relative to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); however, whether a sex diff

129 a fatigue task involving repetitive maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of finger flexor muscles.

130 ultifinger maximal force production (maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) for two sites of force appli

131 muscle contraction (10%, 25%, 50% of maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) were evaluated.

132 ce levels (i.e., 5%, 25%, and 50% of maximum voluntary contraction: MVC).

133 TP); (ii) mild handgrip exercise (5% maximum voluntary contraction; MVC); (iii) moderate handgrip exe

134 d 18 older (65+ yrs) adults produced maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and steady submaximal forc

135 participants performed 200 handgrip maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) with simultaneous recordin

136 ntation of the primary motor cortex, maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs), and the StartReact respon

137 etch intervention and after a set of maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs).

138 maximal test (5 min of intermittent maximal voluntary contractions, MVCs), and a submaximal test (co

139 ary contraction of the hand with and without voluntary contraction of a proximal arm muscle.

140 arm muscles can be selectively modulated by voluntary contraction of contralateral arm muscles, like

141 tary contraction of the FDI with and without voluntary contraction of the biceps brachi (BB).

142 Motor map area increased during voluntary contraction of the FDI (120.7%) and further in

143 ts; however, motor map area decreased during voluntary contraction of the FDI (69.5%) and further dec

144 nts with larger decreases in map area during voluntary contraction of the FDI were those with larger

145 interosseous (FDI) muscle at rest and during voluntary contraction of the FDI with and without volunt

146 tor maps in a hand muscle at rest and during voluntary contraction of the hand with and without volun

147 In addition, voluntary contraction of the left FDI (i.e. contralatera

148 omyography (EMG) as the participant executed voluntary contractions of the extensor carpi radialis (E

149 de contributes more to rFE during submaximal voluntary contractions of the human quadriceps.

150 subjects performed three sets of 10 maximum voluntary contractions of the right quadriceps muscle.

151 The effect of externally paced voluntary contractions on tremor frequency was also char

152 ruitment, with contractions at 12.5% maximal voluntary contraction once every 4 s and (2) high fibre

153 ecruitment, with contractions at 25% maximal voluntary contraction once every 8 s.

154 While voluntary contraction (or attempted contraction) of the

155 (2) 2-minute isometric handgrip (40% maximal voluntary contraction) or rhythmic handgrip (50% and 30%

156 ng conditions, handgrip exercise (5% maximum voluntary contraction) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP; end

157 During sustained handgrip (30% maximum voluntary contraction), peak renal vasoconstriction was

158 tunnel syndrome demonstrated reduced maximum voluntary contraction pinch strength (P < 0.01) and a re

159 two different stimuli: moderate (15% maximal voluntary contraction) rhythmic handgrip exercise or ade

160 force development (32%, 512 +/- 260% maximum voluntary contraction/sec vs. 754 +/- 189% maximum volun

161 ary contraction/sec vs. 754 +/- 189% maximum voluntary contraction/sec, p < 0.01), and endurance time

162 Maximum voluntary contractions (strength) of the plantar flexors

163 rrelated with changes in the H-reflex during voluntary contraction, suggesting an association between

164 tical maps in humans with chronic SCI during voluntary contraction, suggesting that sensory input can

165 for transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary contraction suggests that it first excites axo

166 and after a 30-second sustained 50% maximum voluntary contraction task.

167 ntation of the primary motor cortex, maximal voluntary contractions, the StartReact response (a short

168 d static handgrip exercise at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction to fatigue with postexercise circu

169 ic handgrip performed at 25% and 40% maximum voluntary contraction, under control (no drug), parasymp

170 ic resistance exercise at 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction until exhaustion, second to compar

171 The svEMG area correlated with maximal voluntary contraction values in both groups, suggesting

172 2, rhythmic handgrip exercise at 35% maximum voluntary contraction was performed with progressive upp

173 grip exercise at 15%, 30% and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction were slightly but not significantl

174 three respiratory cycles at 40 % of maximum voluntary contraction whereas BP did not change signific

175 r loads expressed as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction, which are more suitable for sport

176 e recordings were performed in humans during voluntary contractions with an intramuscular electrode -