ライフサイエンスコーパス: waist

1 tional 19 loci newly associated with related waist and hip circumference measures (P < 5 x 10(-8)).

2 ssed and measurements of height, weight, and waist and hip circumference taken.

3 ric traits (body mass index, height, weight, waist and hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio).

4 egs), (2) noneffector body parts (chests and waists), and (3) face parts (upper and lower faces).

5 e distribution mapping beyond the laser beam waist are described.

6 procedures were performed with and without a waist belt (a weight-lifter belt applied tightly and inf

7 e effect of increasing abdominal pressure by waist belt on reflux in patients with reflux disease.

8 ity such as body mass index >/= 30 kg/m(2) , waist circumference >/=102 cm or increased parietal wall

9 ts with type 2 diabetes aged >18 years, with waist circumference >94 (males) or >80 (females) cm, ser

10 y) with body mass index (in kg/m(2)) >29 and waist circumference >98 cm were randomly assigned to a v

11 -0.02)] with the HOMA-IR in subjects with a waist circumference </=88 cm in women or </=102 cm in me

12 calorie-restricted diet for 6 wk to obtain a waist circumference <102 cm followed by a weight-mainten

13 ing at least 2000 m away had 0.26 cm smaller waist circumference (-0.52 to 0.01).

14 reductions in body weight (-0.8 to -1.2 kg), waist circumference (-1.1 to -1.9 cm), and mean arterial

15 n of bodyweight (-4.85 [-8.21 to -1.48]) and waist circumference (-3.31 [-5.95 to -0.67]) than partic

16 Reductions in waist circumference (-4.1 cm; 95% CI, -6.0 to -2.3 cm),

17 (-7.6 +/- 0.3 compared with 0.4 +/- 0.5 kg), waist circumference (-6.2 +/- 0.4 compared with 0.9 +/-

18 diposity alleles were associated with higher waist circumference (0.454 cm [0.267, 0.641] 50% vs. 50%

19 The diets similarly reduced waist circumference (11-13 cm), abdominal subcutaneous f

20 8 years), body mass index (BMI) (2-8 years), waist circumference (4-8 years), and body fat (8 years).

21 ger increases were seen in women for BMI and waist circumference (7-8%), but trends in skinfolds were

22 BMI (25.0 [21.2-29.3] vs 23.1 [19.5-27.6]), waist circumference (83.0 [73.5-95.4] vs 79.0 [68.5-91.0

23 facilities close to home had 1.22 cm smaller waist circumference (95% CI -1.64 to -0.80), 0.57 kg/m(2

24 ntal caries and restorations, and obesity by waist circumference (adjusted for snacking and sex).

25 ith sedentary time (B = 4.04, P = 0.006) and waist circumference (B = 1.59, P < 0.001), whereas waist

26 ct of birth weight on sedentary time through waist circumference (B: 1.30; 95% bias-corrected CI: 0.9

27 er BMI (beta -0.22 kg/m(2), -0.25 to -0.20), waist circumference (beta -0.54 cm, -0.61 to -0.48), and

28 MI (beta 0.19 kg/m(2), 95% CI 0.14 to 0.24), waist circumference (beta 0.41 cm, 0.28 to 0.54), and wh

29 95% CI: -0.60, -0.13) at 2-8 years, smaller waist circumference (beta = -1.81 cm; 95% CI: -3.13, -0.

30 95% CI: -2.91, -0.34, n = 142), and smaller waist circumference (beta = -2.02; 95% CI: -3.71, -0.32,

31 49; 95% CI 1.30-4.77), a steeper increase of waist circumference (beta=2.41; 95% CI 1.19-3.63) and in

32 ndicators of body-mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)), waist circumference (cm), whole body fat (kg), and obesi

33 = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.13-1.61; Ptrend < 0.0001), waist circumference (HR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.39-1.99; Ptrend

34 When high waist circumference (HWC), a measurement of adult obesit

35 +/- 1.56; HF: 2.97 +/- 1.02; P = 0.029) and waist circumference (LF: 9.36 +/- 4.02 cm; HF: 7.86 +/-

36 n = 509; P = .038) and satiety with abnormal waist circumference (n = 271; P = .016).

37 (odds ratio, 4.90; 95% CI, 1.06-22.63), and waist circumference (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00-1.55

38 syndrome revealed associations for elevated waist circumference (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.99) and e

39 Waist circumference (P = 0.03), neck circumference (NC,

40 3.3% vs. 17.1 in controls, p = 0.02), higher waist circumference (prevalence risk ratio 83.3/20.3, 4.

41 ss index (r = 0.482, 95%CI: 0.445~0.518) and waist circumference (r = 0.466, 95%CI: 0.432~0.500), exc

42 belt, intragastric pressure correlated with waist circumference (r = 0.682; P = .008), with the rang

43 onship between time to referral and baseline waist circumference (r=0.5, P=0.001), body mass index (r

44 ciation was accounted for mostly by attained waist circumference (reduction of 61%) and by the biomar

45 t the P wave was genetically correlated with waist circumference (rG=0.47; P=0.02).

46 ervals (CI) = -0.012; 0.002), p = 0.190], or waist circumference (WC) and sleep duration [(unstandard

47 sociated with abdominal obesity, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR), have

48 ass index (FMI), percent body fat (%BF), and waist circumference (WC) at 7 years.

49 ine the association of birth weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC) on cardiovascular disease (CVD)

50 GPRS-obesity) with body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) was modified by sleep character

51 Height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) were self-measured and reported

52 e found that changes in body weight (BW) and waist circumference (WC) were significantly different ac

53 indices including body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were used to determine general

54 the age- and sex-specific z-scores for BMI, waist circumference (WC), and blood pressure (BP) (n app

55 Systolic blood pressure, waist circumference (WC), and fasting blood sample (tota

56 analysis of baseline body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and type II diabetes mellitus

57 esity-related traits [body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)

58 t are associated with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or the waist-to-hip ratio adju

59 istical analyses were body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), serum adipokines, cytokines, a

60 rtension, and between body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR),

61 TL: BMI -0.00478 (95% CI -0.00749--0.00206), waist circumference -0.00211 (95% CI -0.00325--0.000969)

62 .80 kg (95% CI: -1.61, 0 kg), P = 0.05], and waist circumference [MD: -2.08 cm (95% CI: -3.97, -0.20

63 l change (Delta) in body weight (BW), WC, or waist circumference adjusted for BMI (WCBMI) and possibl

64 arge meta-analysis of waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference adjusted for body mass index (BMI),

65 r HOMA-IR showed reduced body mass index and waist circumference after consumption of the LFHCC contr

66 inflammatory markers in the blood as well as waist circumference and % body fat were lower post inter

67 ignificant differences in the predicted mean waist circumference and BMI between the low- and high-ex

68 nitrate, respectively) had slower growth in waist circumference and BMI but not height.

69 fast-food outlet was weakly associated with waist circumference and BMI, mostly among women.

70 iomarkers were associated with reductions in waist circumference and BMI.

71 ed with abnormal LV geometry, and increasing waist circumference and body fat were associated with wo

72 les <0.0001] and with further adjustment for waist circumference and body mass index [1.26 (1.07, 1.4

73 o be stronger for hip circumference than for waist circumference and for fat-free mass than for fat m

74 l within the range associated with differing waist circumference and likely to be relevant to the ass

75 me was independently associated with smaller waist circumference and lower BMI and body fat percentag

76 We observed similar associations for both waist circumference and percent body fat.

77 Conversely, after adjustment for BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were signi

78 ncing BMI and central adiposity, measured as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio both adjusted

79 /-0.08, and 80% had central obesity based on waist circumference and WHR criteria.

80 A decrease in waist circumference at 4-8 years was observed with a 10-

81 ssed at ages 5 and 7 years, and fat mass and waist circumference at age 7.

82 s were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and waist circumference at baseline (plus baseline ISI for 1

83 nge in pressure between smallest and largest waist circumference being 15 mmHg.

84 kinfolds (triceps and subscapular), BMI, and waist circumference between US adults.

85 index z score (2.0 versus 1.6, P < 0.0001), waist circumference centile (96th versus 90th, P < 0.000

86 Waist circumference centile was associated with portal i

87 rther accounting for body mass index change, waist circumference change, or respective abdominal adip

88 concentrations as well as blood pressure and waist circumference did not differ significantly between

89 centrations, eating behaviors and changes in waist circumference during follow-up.

90 Treatment Panel III, with a modification of waist circumference for Asians.

91 paring the fourth with the first quartile of waist circumference gave an RR of 1.95 (95% CI = 1.46-2.

92 Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference greater than 90 cm in men and greate

93 Higher waist circumference in adulthood is an especially strong

94 and subsequent 5-y change in body weight and waist circumference in humans.

95 20)), type 2 diabetes (P=2.8 x 10(-13)), hip/waist circumference in men (P=1.1 x 10(-9)), schizophren

96 ent of changes in these covariates, the mean waist circumference increased by 0.2 cm in men and 2.4 c

97 The mean waist circumference increased by approximately 2 cm (in

98 were similar if adjustment was performed for waist circumference instead of BMI or if additional adju

99 as since been validated in many studies, and waist circumference is now a criterion for the diagnosis

100 Additionally, in separate models, waist circumference measurements (using the Internationa

101 Complete case sample sizes were 401 917 (waist circumference models), 401 435 (BMI), and 395 640

102 y obese men, dietary weight loss targeting a waist circumference of <102 cm improved retinal microvas

103 Several studies showed that the waist circumference of US adults has increased over the

104 yceride weighted GRS and body mass index and waist circumference on fasting triglyceride levels in In

105 Central obesity, defined by increased waist circumference or waist:hip ratio (WHR), is associa

106 baseline levels and trajectories of BMI and waist circumference over time using linear mixed modelin

107 oss was indifferent, exercise attenuated the waist circumference rebound with the greatest effect in

108 After adjusting for age at enrollment, race, waist circumference standardized by body mass index, cur

109 We used body mass index and waist circumference to define general obesity and abdomi

110 ed: 1) periodontitis; 2) body mass index; 3) waist circumference to height (WHTR) ratio for central a

111 these factors related to changes in BMI and waist circumference using econometric fixed-effects mode

112 ung cancer risk (for the highest category of waist circumference vs. the lowest, hazard ratio = 1.25,

113 ummary relative risk for a 10-cm increase in waist circumference was 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1

114 Mean body mass index was 30.8+/-7.1 kg/m(2), waist circumference was 102+/-17 cm, WHR was 0.91+/-0.08

115 95% bias-corrected CI: 0.94, 1.72), and when waist circumference was controlled for, the effect of bi

116 similar in both groups, but the reduction in waist circumference was higher in the MED/LC group (-6.9

117 Waist circumference was measured in units of 0.1 cm foll

118 circumference (B = 1.59, P < 0.001), whereas waist circumference was positively associated with seden

119 associations were generally consistent when waist circumference was used as the measure of adiposity

120 ctions in triglycerides, blood pressure, and waist circumference were also reported.

121 Body weight, BMI and waist circumference were assessed weekly and body compos

122 d sex in a linear mixed model, reductions in waist circumference were greater in the LALI (-3.9 cm [9

123 Both BMI and waist circumference were inversely associated [regressio

124 Height, weight, and waist circumference were measured at baseline and every

125 Ox-LDL mediated 13.9% of the association of waist circumference with triglycerides and only 1-3% of

126 n and adiposity indexes (body mass index and waist circumference) were assessed.

127 adiposity (body weight, body mass index, or waist circumference), cases of T2D, cases of cardiovascu

128 fat by computed tomography scan (in lieu of waist circumference).

129 nges in adiposity (body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference).

130 igher values of 1.32 (95% CI, 1.25-1.41) for waist circumference, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.14) for waist/

131 When stratified by waist circumference, ALA continued to be inversely assoc

132 increase of both systolic blood pressure and waist circumference, and a reduction in the probability

133 rement may be beneficial for blood pressure, waist circumference, and alcohol consumption in the Chin

134 of dietary pulse consumption on body weight, waist circumference, and body fat by conducting a system

135 Increasing body mass index, waist circumference, and body fat were associated with g

136 Es, particularly BDE-153, and decreased BMI, waist circumference, and body fat.

137 ibitors and anthropometric measures [height, waist circumference, and body mass index (BMI)] during a

138 , smoking, alcohol, physical activity, diet, waist circumference, and body mass index.

139 ures were associated with lower BMI z-score, waist circumference, and fat mass in boys during early c

140 for age, sex, smoking, LDL-cholesterol, BMI, waist circumference, and HOMA-insulin resistance (HOMA-I

141 th status as estimated from body mass index, waist circumference, and insulin resistance assessed usi

142 , lower BMI, lower C-reactive protein, lower waist circumference, and lower odds of hypertension and

143 We measured child body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and percent body fat at 8 y of age.

144 Body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2), waist circumference, and percent body fat were measured

145 ne the relationship between body mass index, waist circumference, and percent body fat with conventio

146 s inversely associated with body mass index, waist circumference, and percent body fat, while 2,5-dic

147 index (BMI), BMI z score, body composition, waist circumference, and percentage body fat] in childre

148 between 3 fatness measures (body mass index, waist circumference, and percentage of body fat) and the

149 tion among overweight, obesity, weight gain, waist circumference, and periodontitis are reviewed.

150 smoking status, frequency of dental visits, waist circumference, and recreational physical activity.

151 outcome measures were changes in bodyweight, waist circumference, and self-reported target behaviours

152 were fairly similar trends in levels of BMI, waist circumference, and skinfold thicknesses in men in

153 ubjects, after adjusting for site, age, sex, waist circumference, and sleep duration (P = 0.06 for et

154 h additional adjustment for body mass index, waist circumference, and sleep duration, AHIREM was only

155 final model explaining FLI best through BMI, waist circumference, and the Lac:Man ratio.

156 e standard deviation higher body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio gave RRs of 1.2

157 en body size (body mass index [BMI], height, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio) and body fa

158 mellitus, glycohemoglobin, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist:hip ratio).

159 ucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, waist circumference, anxiety, quality of life, and daily

160 her they were consistent with information on waist circumference, arm circumference, and leg lengths,

161 Although high BMI and waist circumference, as estimates of total and abdominal

162 tering patients and was associated with BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, heart rate, HbA1c,

163 Waist circumference, body mass index, fasting plasma glu

164 ic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, body mass index, smoking status, an

165 ty to fast-food outlets were associated with waist circumference, body-mass index (BMI), and body fat

166 at mass, fat percentage, fat mass index, and waist circumference, but not for fat-free mass.

167 eline and 12 and 24 mo included body weight, waist circumference, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM),

168 Body mass index, waist circumference, fat percentage, and glycated hemogl

169 t height, body composition (body-mass index, waist circumference, fat, and lean mass), and cardiometa

170 lycerides, fasting glucose, body mass index, waist circumference, heart rate (HR) and diabetes, but w

171 mposite of seven biomarkers [blood pressure, waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), insulin res

172 ifestyle factors, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference, higher omentin concentrations were

173 In addition, the D group reduced BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and body fat per

174 -shaped association, whereas height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, fat mass, and fa

175 le, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, waist circumference, or prevalence of overweight or obes

176 adjustment for skin type, fracture history, waist circumference, outdoor free play, neighborhood inc

177 Metabolic traits such as waist circumference, triglyceride, high-density lipoprot

178 Metabolic traits such as waist circumference, triglyceride, high-density lipoprot

179 was computed from the following components: waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL-c, glucose, and

180 dex, physical activity, body fat percentage, waist circumference, triglycerides, total cholesterol, a

181 ciated with blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, type-2 diabetes mell

182 Body mass index, waist circumference, waist to height ratio, systolic BP,

183 ese three lncRNAs and body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist to hip ratio and fasting insu

184 work stress was associated with higher BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, alanine transamina

185 vely examined the effect of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and 10-year weight

186 and height, weight, body mass index, hip and waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectric

187 ciations with measures of central adiposity (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-he

188 F risk for 1-SD increases in epicardial fat, waist circumference, waist/hip ratio, and body mass inde

189 found that central adiposity, as measured by waist circumference, was associated with worse global lo

190 iet quality, and adiposity (body mass index, waist circumference, weight status, and central weight s

191 I), a genetic predisposition score including waist circumference-associated single nucleotide polymor

192 g age, but increased with increasing BMI and waist circumference.

193 more pronounced in individuals with a normal waist circumference.

194 102 cm in men but not in those with a larger waist circumference.

195 effects on LDL cholesterol, bodyweight, and waist circumference.

196 nt dosage effect was observed for weight and waist circumference.

197 a subset of traits with body mass index and waist circumference.

198 bly associated with change in body weight or waist circumference.

199 ified the effect of SMAD2 rs11082639 on high waist circumference.

200 PUFAs was not associated with 5-y change in waist circumference.

201 UFAs was not associated with a 5-y change in waist circumference.

202 Twenty-five healthy, normal-weight men (waist circumference: <94 cm) and 54 abdominally obese me

203 rence: <94 cm) and 54 abdominally obese men (waist circumference: 102-110 cm) participated.

204 s index (BMI): rg = 0.20, P = 3.12 x 10(-9); waist circumference: rg = 0.20, P = 2.12 x 10(-7)).

205 nd percentage of body fat from bioimpedance; waist circumference; overweight and obesity; height; BP;

206 )), body weight, percentage of body fat, and waist circumference] and glucose and insulin metabolism

207 Biweekly body weight (BW), body length (BL), waist circumstance (WC), and body mass index (BMI) were

208 negatively correlated with body mass index, waist circumstance, and HbA1c (all P < 0.05), but not wi

209 Thanks to the small ( 2.6 mum) waist diameter of the MFC, the resulting interference is

210 m-up and top-down forcing, analogous to wasp-waist dynamics, but occurring across multiple trophic le

211 eeds in three stages: a local constriction ("waist formation"), pulsation-which increases waist longi

212 Furthermore, we show that the location of waist formation, and thus fission, is determined by phys

213 tors (hemoglobin A1c level, body mass index, waist-height ratio, and mean arterial blood pressure).

214 BMP-9 was associated negatively with Waist hip ratio (WHR), fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-ho

215 ty, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR), have been previously identified,

216 Totally, 32 body mass index (BMI)- and 14 waist-hip ratio (WHR)-associated single nucleotide polym

217 expressed in adipose and is associated with waist-hip ratio adjusted for BMI.

218 er body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio gave RRs of 1.22 (95% confidence interva

219 mass index in 152,893 men and 171,977 women, waist-hip ratio in 93,480 men and 116,741 women).

220 ciated with higher BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, alanine transaminase, white blood cell

221 ect of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and 10-year weight change on the risk o

222 king status, triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, waist-hip ratio, attention deficit hyperactivity disorde

223 king status, triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, waist-hip ratio, childhood cognitive ability, neuroticis

224 ncluding height, weight, body-mass index and waist-hip ratio.

225 S) for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, BMI, waist-hip-ratio, insulin resistance and height, as well

226 Body mass index and WHR as waist/hip circumference (in centimeters).

227 The waist/hip ratio (WHR), plaque index, bleeding on probing

228 a Breast Study found that obesity (increased waist/hip ratio) was linked to an increased incidence of

229 circumference, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08-1.14) for waist/hip ratio, and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.17-1.27) for body m

230 ases in epicardial fat, waist circumference, waist/hip ratio, and body mass index.

231 unique evidence of ID for handgrip strength, waist/hip ratio, and visual and auditory acuity (ID betw

232 defined by increased waist circumference or waist:hip ratio (WHR), is associated with increased card

233 n, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist:hip ratio).

234 s in body mass, BMI, percentage of body fat, waist:hip ratio, and leptin in the LGI-diet group than i

235 waist formation"), pulsation-which increases waist longitudinal stresses-and transverse rupture.

236 fracture was noted fluoroscopically when the waist of the balloon released and by a sudden drop in in

237 In particular, we find there exists a beam waist offset whereby the resulting vorticity suppresses

238 maller than the dimensions of the laser beam waist, onto the sample surface, thus oversampling the re

239 but remained significant after adjusting for waist, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoki

240 e age-matched controls with multidirectional waist-pull perturbations while walking on a treadmill.

241 The median balloon:waist ratio was 1.17 (1-1.71), and the median inflation

242 itively charged residues within the external waist region were mutated and shown to generally lower D

243 Body mass index, waist circumference, waist to height ratio, systolic BP, and diastolic BP.

244 ia showed a strong negative correlation with waist to hip ratio (Spearman's r abdomen -0.986, p<0.000

245 body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist to hip ratio and fasting insulin.

246 Subcutaneous abdominal fat and waist to hip ratio decreased significantly more in the h

247 ease risk factors, including blood pressure, waist to hip ratio, fasting blood glucose and triglyceri

248 nt of the MI risk score (ie, blood pressure, waist to hip ratio, hemoglobin A1c level, and the ratio

249 ct (LAP), body adiposity index (BAI) and the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were significantly associat

250 mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), systolic blood pressure (S

251 Waist-to-height ratio (WtHR) can easily identify childre

252 n urinary arsenic concentration with BMI and waist-to-height ratio were observed when either creatini

253 adjustment for BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were significantly positively asso

254 waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio) and hypertension were attenuated

255 Liver fat content correlated with waist-to-height ratio, alanine transaminase, uric acid,

256 arsenic concentration in relation to BMI and waist-to-height ratio.

257 rvey, we regressed body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratios on urinary arsenic concentrations

258 avorable body fat distribution, with a lower waist-to-hip ratio (-0.004 cm [95% CI -0.005, -0.003] 50

259 67, 0.641] 50% vs. 50%; P = 2E-6) and higher waist-to-hip ratio (0.0013 [0.0003, 0.0024] 50% vs. 50%;

260 o 0.15), bodyweight (1.03 kg, 0.24 to 1.82), waist-to-hip ratio (0.006, 0.003 to 0.010), and an odds

261 t two tertiles vs highest tertile of mAHEI), waist-to-hip ratio (1.44, 1.27-1.64 for highest vs lowes

262 = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.39-1.99; Ptrend < 0.0001), waist-to-hip ratio (HR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.31-1.91; Ptrend

263 For women, only waist-to-hip ratio (HR for highest versus lowest fifth =

264 s attenuated after additional adjustment for waist-to-hip ratio (ORHIV, 1.29; 95% CI, .95-1.76).

265 uated after additional adjustment for either waist-to-hip ratio (ORstavudine, 1.30; 95% CI, .85-1.96)

266 he association of a polygenic risk score for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) adjusted for body mass index (B

267 nship of obesity patterns defined by BMI and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and total and cardiovascular mo

268 triglycerides (TG), fasting insulin (FI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in 4,721 individuals from the N

269 of post-diagnosis body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with late all-cause mortality a

270 ons between combined measurements of BMI and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with mortality and incident cor

271 dy mass index (BMI), height and BMI-adjusted waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

272 ex 33.8%; low-density lipoprotein 31.4%; and waist-to-hip ratio 29.7%.

273 ndex (BMI), waist circumference (WC), or the waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI (WHRBMI), the follow

274 In total, 20 of the 49 waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI loci show significan

275 CI 0.037, 0.086; P = 8.1 x 10(-7)) but lower waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI, a marker of abdomin

276 a genetic predisposition score including the waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI-associated single nu

277 We identify 49 loci (33 new) associated with waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index (BMI), a

278 st causal associations of central adiposity (waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index [WHRadjB

279 A genetic predisposition to higher waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index was asso

280 with indexes of JNK signaling activity, IL6, waist-to-hip ratio and hsCRP.

281 1 cm decrease in height, a 0.003 increase in waist-to-hip ratio and increase in BMI by 0.14 kg/m(2) f

282 on studies, including large meta-analysis of waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference adjusted for

283 iposity, measured as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio both adjusted for BMI.

284 confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 1.12] for waist-to-hip ratio to 1.37 [95% CI: 1.33 to 1.42] for le

285 1.37; I(2)=89%) and per 0.1-unit increase in waist-to-hip ratio was 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.

286 ndex [BMI], height, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio) and body fat composition (total body

287 height, weight, waist and hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio).

288 sting glucose concentration, bodyweight, and waist-to-hip ratio, and an increased risk of type 2 diab

289 sting glucose concentration, bodyweight, and waist-to-hip ratio, and an increased risk of type 2 diab

290 ody mass index, hip and waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and bioelectrical impedance-derived

291 se A positivity, and the interaction of age, waist-to-hip ratio, and length of the Barrett's oesophag

292 ome-wide association studies (GWAS) for BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and other adiposity traits have iden

293 s of central adiposity (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio) and hyper

294 glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, bodyweight, waist-to-hip ratio, BMI, and risk of type 2 diabetes, us

295 Equation', included age, fS-pIGFBP-1, S-ALT, waist-to-hip ratio, fP-Glucose and fS-Insulin (adjusted

296 nd that of abdominal obesity, as measured by waist-to-hip ratio, have distinct biological backgrounds

297 Allowing for duration, sex, waist-to-hip ratio, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, and

298 Children with psoriasis had higher waist-to-hip ratios (0.85 vs. 0.80; P < 0.002) and insul

299 rom the UK10K, testing for associations with waist-to-hip ratios.

300 body parts (hands, arms, legs, feet, chests, waists, upper faces, and lower faces).