戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                     The quality of the predicted PET images was assessed by 2 nuclear medicine specialists using a 5-poin
2 and 32 eyes with poorly defined fovea, ocular cycloposition was assessed by 2 observers using 5 fundus photographs and 5
3 nternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); sexual function was assessed by 5-item version of the International Index of
4                                          Photo-based ptosis was assessed by a masked oculofacial plastic surgeon at the e
5                   The role of ATF6alpha in target induction was assessed by acute knockdown using islet cells from Atf6al
6                                                      Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and e
7                                                    Accuracy was assessed by analysis of SRM (Standard Reference Material)
8                                 Intestinal barrier function was assessed by analyzing immunofluorescence localization of
9           Chromatin accessibility in cT(FH) and T(FR) cells was assessed by assay for transposase-accessible chromatin se
10                  The discriminative power of the risk model was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver opera
11                                              Biased agonism was assessed by comparing k(tau) values for arrestin recruitm
12                                The effectiveness of the BTS was assessed by comparing radiologic images with histologic r
13                     The predictive performance of the model was assessed by comparing the predicted PK profiles and param
14                            Docetaxel drug-target engagement was assessed by confocal anti-tubulin immunofluorescence to q
15                                                Colonization was assessed by culture and quantitative polymerase chain rea
16 hand by photoplethysmography, and cardiac autonomic balance was assessed by determining heart rate variability.
17 nducing cardiomyopathy, and cardiac function and remodeling was assessed by echocardiography 10 weeks after surgery.
18                                                        Diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaires every 4 years.
19                                        Endothelial function was assessed by forearm blood flow (FBF) response to acetylch
20                                AM opsonophagocytic capacity was assessed by functional assays in vitro, whereas flow cyto
21                                  Disease status at sampling was assessed by gastroscopy, histology (resection margin [R]
22 The presence of methanogens in vascular and cardiac tissues was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence, fluorescent in s
23   The interaction between 25(OH)D3 and magnesium or calcium was assessed by investigating 1) joint compared with separate
24 idant properties were evaluated, and the peptidomic profile was assessed by LC-MS/MS.
25 ulation who consumed Thai local rice contained heavy metals was assessed by means of probabilistic approach.
26                     Finally, the stability of the composite was assessed by means of recyclability tests.
27                                             Kidney function was assessed by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GF
28                             Pre-corneal tear film stability was assessed by measuring the tear break-up time (TBUT) and t
29                                 Renal/TEC metabolic fitness was assessed by monitoring the expression of drivers of oxida
30 Methods: The biodistribution and dosimetry of (68)Ga-Tuna-2 was assessed by PET/CT in 13 individuals with type 2 diabetes
31  of regional genes and a retinal enhancer RNA at this locus was assessed by qPCR.
32 verter-defibrillator-only risk for first and subsequent HHF was assessed by QRS morphology in on-treatment analysis using
33                                            Urinary function was assessed by residual urine volume, maximal flow rate (MFR
34                                               Risk behavior was assessed by standardized questionnaires.
35                                        Medication adherence was assessed by telephone from responses to the question, "Di
36                                           Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating charact
37               The competing risk of noncardiovascular death was assessed by the cumulative incidence function for cardiov
38 ne of these deaths was due to gastric adenocarcinoma, which was assessed by the investigator as related to ruxolitinib tr
39 rater agreement in assessments of e-consult appropriateness was assessed by the kappa statistic.
40                              Potential for lung recruitment was assessed by the recently described recruitment to inflati
41                                               Heterogeneity was assessed by the relative dispersion (SD/mean) and gravita
42                                   The primary outcome, IPV, was assessed by the Severity of Violence Against Women Scale
43                                                       HRQoL was assessed by the Short Form (SF)-12 health survey with men
44                                             Aerobic fitness was assessed by the time for a 3-kilometer run test, and anae
45         Target recruitment to RNA-induced silencing complex was assessed by using anti-Argonaute2 RNA immunoprecipitation
46                 Agreement between quantitative measurements was assessed by using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass corre
47 mittee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage at each criterion level was assessed by using Cohen kappa statistics.
48                                            Microbial growth was assessed by visual assessment and molecular sequencing.
49                                                        Pain was assessed by von Frey assay and dorsal root ganglia (DRG)
50  gastric epithelial cells of H pylori-infected INS-GAS mice was assessed by whole-exome sequencing.