ライフサイエンスコーパス: was assessed with

1 Maternal folate intake was assessed with a food frequency questionnaire validated ag

2 Participant satisfaction was assessed with a Likert-scale questionnaire.

3 he 3 modality performances were evaluated and image quality was assessed with a Likert-scale questionnaire.

4 tical applicability of the assay, reported here as MS-AFST, was assessed with a panel of clinical isolates that were sele

5 The sublingual microcirculation was assessed with a Sidestream Dark Field imaging device befo

6 thesis of no significant difference between pulse sequences was assessed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test by using a Holm

7 Significance of correlations among variables was assessed with analysis of variance followed by linear reg

8 ty-acquired pneumonia, and pneumonia associated with sepsis was assessed with and without simvastatin.

9 Risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted fo

10 Motor alignment was assessed with double Maddox rods and prism and alternate

11 cy was tested in an external test set, and predictive power was assessed with equivocal patients.

12 METHODS AND Patient-reported hrQoL was assessed with EuroQol questionnaire and visual analogue s

13 Morphology of the nuclear envelope was assessed with immunofluorescence on cultured fibroblasts.

14 of SP and TLRs in the nasal mucosa and local airway neurons was assessed with immunohistochemistry.

15 Additional prognostic value of the biomarkers was assessed with incremental discrimination improvement.

16 In vivo biodistribution of anti-CD47-QD was assessed with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometr

17 Pain response was assessed with International Bone Metastases Consensus End

18 Interreader agreement was assessed with kappa statistics and the intraclass correla

19 Treatment response was assessed with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 1 month aft

20 Frailty was assessed with modified Fried's criteria.

21 rompt treatment and long-term survival for each rhythm type was assessed with multivariable hierarchical modified Poisson

22 The T cell-stimulatory capacity of the fusion proteins was assessed with naive and Bet v 1-specific T cells.

23 -weighted MR imaging in the determination of fibrosis stage was assessed with Obuchowski measures.

24 Vascular inflammation was assessed with positron emission tomography-computed tomog

25 tion acoustic startle reflex paradigm, while hearing status was assessed with prepulse inhibition (PPI) and auditory brai

26 Viability was assessed with reference to biochemical changes in the per

27 Their performance was assessed with respect to the analysis of N2O emissions fr

28 e impact of F. johnsoniae on the tadpole surface microbiome was assessed with shotgun metagenomics.

29 calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), and matrix was assessed with statistical estimates of bias and linearity

30 Reader variability was assessed with statistical estimates of repeatability and

31 g to all human FcgammaR types and their functional isoforms was assessed with surface plasmon resonance.

32 Disease progression was assessed with the CMT Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS), a reliab

33 Baseline symptom burden was assessed with the COPD assessment test.

34 HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality-of-life instrumen

35 Reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

36 Quality of life was assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnair

37 ician-adjudicated events over the 12 months after discharge was assessed with the kappa statistic.

38 At ages 4 and 10 y, restrictive feeding was assessed with the parent-reported Child Feeding Questionn

39 Additive interaction was assessed with the relative excess risk due to interaction

40 Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and the reco

41 idity and the percentage of reduction of tumor on pathology was assessed with the Spearman rank correlation.

42 Diet was assessed with the use of 3 consecutive 24-h dietary recal

43 Dietary intake was assessed with the use of a validated 192-item semiquantit

44 Fruit intake was assessed with the use of a validated food-frequency quest

45 Intake of 28 food groups was assessed with the use of food-frequency questionnaires.

46 Dietary intake during the week before enrolment was assessed with the validated Block Kids Food Screener.

47 Efficacy was assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

48 ith isolated mild traumatic brain injury (comparison group) was assessed with transthoracic echocardiogram.

49 Esthetics outcome was assessed with VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic

50 Response was assessed with WHO, RECIST, mRECIST, and EASL methods acco