1 ux rate of lactate-CH(3), lactate-CH(2)D and lactate-CHD(
2)
was calculated as 0.0033, 0.0071, and 0.0.012 umol/10(6)cells
2 Iodine
absorption was calculated as the ratio of urinary iodine excretion (UIE)
3 Accuracy was calculated as slide-level agreement (e.g., parasite prese
4 Adherence was calculated as the percentage of doses taken on time of th
5 Cumulative
BP was calculated as the area under the curve (mm Hgxyears) from
6 tween method prediction and ground truth for COVID-19
cases was calculated as 0.92 for PO (P < .001), 0.97 for PHO (P < .
7 Potential renal acid load (PRAL; mEq/
d)
was calculated as a DAL proxy to characterize participants' d
8 ation Index (CCI), covering the first 7 postoperative
days,
was calculated as a measure for early cumulative postoperativ
9 0(6) breast cancer (MCF-7) cells and the limit of
detection was calculated as 148 cells mL(-1).
10 BP variability in the time
domain was calculated as the SD.
11 An equivalent
dose was calculated as 9.6E-02 mSv/MBq for [(55)Co]Co-DOTATATE.
12 DR was calculated as the proportion of PSMA PET-positive patient
13 Vaccine
efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robust Poi
14 Diuretic
efficiency was calculated as net fluid balance per total furosemide equi
15 EMW was calculated as the difference between the interval from QR
16 The density of the
enzyme was calculated as distribution volume using a 2-tissue-compar
17 Refractive
error was calculated as sphere plus half negative cylinder, while A
18 rium end-to-end distances, and the viscosity scaling
factor was calculated as the ratio of zero-shear viscosities, each a
19 versus energy, the direct band gap E(g) of PbPdT thin
films was calculated as 3 eV.
20 Free leptin index (
FLI)
was calculated as the ratio of leptin to soluble leptin recep
21 Activity
fragmentation was calculated as the reciprocal of the average activity bout
22 The frontal cortex binding potential (BP(ND)(
frontal))
was calculated as (V(T)(frontal)/V(T)(cerebellum)) - 1.
23 The Global Dispersion Score (
GDS)
was calculated as the average score of all the pixels of the
24 The relative change in Pa(CO(2)) in the first 24
hours was calculated as (24-h post-ECMO Pa(CO(2)) - pre-ECMO Pa(CO(
25 HRR was calculated as the maximal HR achieved minus the HR at: 30
26 Hysteresis was calculated as the ratio of the area enclosed by the press
27 In addition to richness and diversity, a dysbiosis
index was calculated as the ratio of the sum of relative abundances
28 Liver-attenuation-index (
LAI)
was calculated as difference between liver- and spleen-attenu
29 Lipid core burden index (
LCBI)
was calculated as the fraction of pixels with the probability
30 The likelihood to be helped or harmed (
LHH)
was calculated as ratio of NNH to NNT.
31 was found between 5 and 400 ng/mL, and the detection
limit was calculated as 22 ng/mL (n = 6) using the 3 Sb/m formula.
32 n the modified electrode, and the limits of detection (
LOD)
was calculated as 0.1 nM (S/N = 3) using differential pulse v
33 The RO(2):GFR (ms/mL/
min)
was calculated as RO(2) (T2*, ms) divided by GFR (mL/min).
34 Microvascular resistance (
MR)
was calculated as coronary pressure divided by flow velocity.
35 5-HT2AR
occupancy was calculated as the percent change in cerebral 5-HT2AR bind
36 The refractive prediction error (
PE)
was calculated as the difference between the postoperative re
37 QA-
PFS was calculated as progression-free survival function x the 3-
38 Lift use
prevalence was calculated as the percentage of patients that met inclusi
39 isit-associated length of stay and cost from all
procedures was calculated as an estimate of public health relevance if p
40 The right-to-left
ratio was calculated as 1.55 : 1 for right colon tumours and 2.17 :
41 The
risk was calculated as the number of events divided by the number
42 A concordance
score was calculated as [Formula: see text] so that a higher score
43 Best
spirometry was calculated as the average of 2 highest measurements at le
44 LA
stiffness was calculated as the ratio of echocardiographic E/e'-to-LA r
45 Relative
survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to expected
46 Cumulative exposure to
tacrolimus was calculated as the area under curve of trough concentratio
47 into our registration method, by which the optimal
template was calculated as part of the registration process, providing
48 This was calculated as the depth of hypotension below a MAP of 65
49 Q-
TWiST was calculated as muTOX x TOX + TWiST, with muTOX calculated
50 asure was the mean absolute distance (MAD) in months,
which was calculated as the mean of the absolute values of the diff