ライフサイエンスコーパス: was calculated as

1 The 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP) for (CF3)2CFCN was calculated as 1490, a factor of 15 less than that of SF6.

2 The total cardiac clearance of amitriptyline was calculated as 0.316 L/h.

3 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio (APRI) was calculated as = 100*(aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/upp

4 Recovered S. aureus was calculated as cfu/g.

5 Polyp burden was calculated as the sum of the diameters of polyps.

6 Myocardial CCL was calculated as the ratio between insoluble and soluble col

7 The organic selenium content was calculated as the difference between total Se and inorgan

8 Choroidal vascular density (CVD) was calculated as a percent area occupied by choroidal vessel

9 ographic analysis, mean density in the region of the defect was calculated as a percentage relative to the native bone de

10 The amphetamine-induced change in BPND (DeltaBPND) was calculated as the difference between BPND in the postamph

11 Incremental increase in cancer detection was calculated as the percentage of mammographically occult B

12 Adipose DI was calculated as ATIS: (1/GlyRa x fasting insulin) x first-p

13 Percent difference was calculated as (interobservation difference/mean)x100.

14 The individual mealtime protein distribution was calculated as the CV (i.e., SD divided by the mean) of gr

15 NA were carried out and the value of (G + C)/(A + T) of DNA was calculated as about 0.77 for various DNA samples.

16 Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - matched odds ratio) x 100%.

17 Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 100x(1-OR).

18 The inactivation energy of the enzyme was calculated as 218kJmol(-1).

19 The time to the cataract event was calculated as the time between recruitment and the date o

20 Urinary sodium excretion was calculated as the mean of two 24-h urine excretions.

21 Fidelity was calculated as the similarity between pairs of foraging zo

22 Ejection fraction (%) was calculated as changes between 0 and 120 minutes.

23 The mean single-nephron GFR was calculated as the GFR divided by the number of nephrons (

24 The LLN of SPECT HMR with UM and that of planar HMR was calculated as 5.5 and 1.6, respectively.

25 Planar HMR was calculated as per standard guidelines (manual traditional

26 Incidence was calculated as the number of new cases divided by the corr

27 ential pulse voltammetry (DPV) whose lowest detection limit was calculated as 0.001ngmL(-1).

28 Protein distribution across meals was calculated as the CV of protein ingested per meal, with l

29 99m)Tc-tetrofosmin CZT SPECT and (13)N-ammonia PET, and MFR was calculated as a ratio of hyperemic over resting MBF.

30 LV-MV ring mismatch was calculated as the ratio of LV to ring size (LV end-diasto

31 nsidered clinically worthwhile and relevant to the patient, was calculated as the probability that a random patient in th

32 Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated as a composite end point of progressive events

33 Precision was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-20% r

34 RP progression was calculated as the loss of EZ width over time for all pati

35 Regional treatment response, DeltaR(r), was calculated as the difference in regional gas distribution

36 ffspring were observed in both species, and an entropy rate was calculated as a quantitative measure of degree of predict

37 The medication administration error rate was calculated as the number of observed doses administered (

38 The yield of each reaction was calculated as the percentage of initial sucrose converted

39 The LPIR score, a correlate of insulin resistance, was calculated as a weighted combination of size and concentr

40 oversizing to angiographic reference vessel diameter (RVD) was calculated as (nominal stent diameter-RVD)/RVDx100 (%).

41 A total brain score was calculated as the summed scores in the individual regions

42 The sensitivity of the developed sensor was calculated as 2.6Hz/pg.

43 he residual lesion (standardized uptake value ratio [SUVr]) was calculated as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVm

44 Patient follow-up time was calculated as the time from hospital discharge until the

45 The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) was calculated as the difference between the IOP and ICP.

46 VE was calculated as 1 - adjusted odds ratio of vaccination in c

47 Vt was calculated as the time-weighted average over the first 48

48 Loss of economic welfare was calculated as the amount of deadweight loss in excess of

49 Second, the procedure-specific cost variation burden, which was calculated as the aggregate sum of absolute cost differen

50 Simulated diagnostic yield was calculated as initial screening yield x positive predicti