1 Allocation was computer generated and unmasked to participants and thera
2 Allocation was computer generated.
3 Randomisation was stratified by site,
and was computer-generated with permuted blocks of three patients
4 The randomisation code (permuted block
design)
was computer generated and stratified by region.
5 ge-stratified randomisation scheme with block size of
eight was computer-generated off-site at WHO.
6 The randomisation
list was computer-generated by a non-study statistician with seque
7 The randomisation
list was computer-generated using blocks of four and six.
8 , maintained and concealed centrally by pharmacy
personnel,
was computer-generated using fixed blocks of 10.
9 The structure of
R*
was computer generated by moving helix 6 from its position in
10 Randomisation was computer generated (1:1:1:1 ratio).
11 Randomisation was computer generated and stratified by site, implemented wi
12 Randomisation was computer generated by the study sponsor, implemented by a
13 Randomisation was computer generated centrally and allocated by telephone c
14 Randomisation was computer generated centrally by the independent Clinical
15 Randomisation was computer generated in permuted blocks of six and was stra
16 Randomisation was computer generated with a block size of three at each sit
17 Randomisation was computer generated with random permuted block size 2 and
18 Randomisation was computer generated, accessed via an interactive voice-res
19 Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using
20 Randomisation was computer generated, with permuted blocks of size eight, a
21 Randomisation was computer generated.
22 The allocation sequence for
randomisation was computer generated, with a block size of eight per site.
23 Randomisation was computer-generated and stratified by centre with blocks o
24 Randomisation was computer-generated and stratified by centre, type of prim
25 Randomisation was computer-generated centrally in blocks of four, stratifie
26 Randomisation was computer-generated with stratification by HIV-1 RNA (<50
27 Randomization was computer generated and balanced by site.
28 Randomization was computer-generated and stratified by site.
29 Randomization was computer-generated, and allocation was assigned by pharma
30 Randomization was computer-generated, with centralized allocation concealme
31 d according to study centre and with no other
restrictions,
was computer generated by an investigator who was uninvolved
32 The randomisation
schedule was computer generated in blocks of four and stratified by st
33 The randomisation
schedule was computer generated in random permuted blocks, stratified
34 The randomisation
schedule was computer generated, used permuted blocks of four and six,
35 The random allocation
schedule was computer-generated and central randomisation (by telephon
36 The allocation
schedule was computer-generated and randomisation, with permuted block
37 The random allocation
schedule was computer-generated; patients and treating physicians were
38 The random allocation
sequence was computer generated.
39 The randomisation
sequence was computer generated with a blocked randomisation procedure
40 The randomisation
sequence was computer generated with permuted blocks of size 4 and 6 a
41 The randomisation
sequence was computer generated, and all patients and investigators we
42 The randomisation
sequence was computer generated, blocked, and stratified by use of tic
43 The randomisation
sequence was computer generated, with block sizes of two, four, or six
44 The allocation
sequence was computer-generated by PATH with block sizes of three.
45 The allocation
sequence was computer-generated centrally and concealed to all personn
46 The randomisation
sequence was computer-generated and stratified by general practice.
47 The randomisation
sequence was computer-generated and stratified by participating centre
48 Randomization
sequence was computer-generated, and patients were blinded to treatmen
49 Assignment was done with a randomisation list
that was computer generated at GlaxoSmithKline, and was stratified
50 se system, according to a block randomisation schedule
that was computer generated by the sponsor.