コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ty (higher local rainfall and lower climatic water deficit).
2 hanced tolerance of the transgenic plants to water deficit.
3 Stomatal closure is generally induced by water deficit.
4 ific expression patterns were not changed by water deficit.
5 t on ABA signalling in the plant response to water deficit.
6 es including salt stress, osmotic stress and water deficit.
7 a precipitation-induced decline in climatic water deficit.
8 re shifting downslope to maintain a constant water deficit.
9 ontrol of photosynthesis during growth under water deficit.
10 Dalpha3 alter plant response to salinity and water deficit.
11 manner in response to ABA, high salinity and water deficit.
12 d from completing germination by dormancy or water deficit.
13 can execute growth arrest when challenged by water deficit.
14 hic seedling is arrested under conditions of water deficit.
15 l and molecular mechanisms to survive severe water deficit.
16 mperature or in detached leaves subjected to water deficit.
17 scription in response to low temperature and water deficit.
18 ect wall extensibility maintain growth under water deficit.
19 le in adapting plant growth to conditions of water deficit.
20 f TF networks involved in plant responses to water deficit.
21 erant maize and for modeling grain yields in water deficit.
22 ain abortion causes large yield losses under water deficit.
23 plants also displayed enhanced tolerance to water deficit.
24 concentration or leaf water potential under water deficit.
25 sponses of the growth of different organs to water deficit.
26 a results in enhanced performance under soil water deficits.
27 cid and impaired stomatal closure induced by water deficits.
28 y pertain to warmer ecosystems with periodic water deficits.
29 acks, longer growing seasons, and associated water deficits.
30 epair are not routine and mainly occur under water deficits.
31 otypically similar responses to various soil water deficits.
32 case of carbon shortage or under very severe water deficits.
34 : the response of isoprene emission to plant water deficit; a possible relationship between concentra
35 idopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to concurrent water deficit (abiotic stress) and infection with the pl
38 large consequences for plant modeling under water deficit and for the design of breeding programs.
39 ollowed over 25 to 30 d under four levels of water deficit and in four hybrids in two experiments.
40 to sample ordered structures because milder water deficit and macromolecular crowding induce high al
41 cutin monomer amount (by 65%), whereas both water deficit and NaCl altered the proportional amounts
42 as activated in response to a combination of water deficit and nematode stress, with 50 specifically
43 -resistance (i.e., lower transpiration(min), water deficit and SLA), but these trends were most clear
46 BADH1 and BADH15 mRNA were both induced by water deficit and their expression coincided with the ob
47 acids in leaves and nodules increased during water deficits and coincided with a decline in N2 fixati
49 ryza sativa) cultivars to high temperatures, water deficit, and agricultural field conditions by syst
50 riven stresses such as extreme temperatures, water deficit, and ion imbalance are projected to exacer
51 The signals mediating the WUE response under water deficit are not fully elucidated but involve the p
52 Regional warming and consequent increases in water deficits are likely contributors to the increases
54 ing strong support for leaf vulnerability to water deficit as an index of damage under natural drough
55 itions into six scenarios of temperature and water deficit as experienced by maize (Zea mays L.) plan
57 after stomatal closure (transpiration(min)), water deficit (% below turgid saturation), and specific
58 rences in functional strategies to cope with water deficit between resprouters (dehydration avoiders)
61 GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water deficit, but that (ii) site-to-site variations in
62 berellin (GA) lead to increased tolerance to water deficit, but the underlying mechanism is unknown.
63 robably because plants are able to withstand water deficits, but they lack the rapid response of arid
64 idday leaf water potential (PsiM) under soil water deficit by closing their stomata, anisohydric spec
69 f mechanisms that regulate root growth under water deficit conditions and highlights the spatial diff
70 to, pea and sunflower - were evaluated under water deficit conditions in order to associate the diffe
71 d progeny in primary roots under control and water deficit conditions simulated by polyethylene glyco
75 274 indica genotypes grown under control and water-deficit conditions during vegetative growth, we ph
77 rns to survive severe drought, but prolonged water deficit, coupled with insect damage, may hamper fr
78 e climate [i.e. 35-year mean annual climatic water deficit (CWD)] and competition (i.e. tree basal ar
79 ure, actual evapotranspiration, and climatic water deficit (deficit) over the contiguous US during th
81 A comparative transcriptome analysis of soil water deficit drought stress treatments revealed the sim
82 ially under abiotic constraints such as soil water deficit (drought [D]) and high temperature (heat [
84 est in western Amazonia experienced a strong water deficit during the dry season of 2005 and a closel
85 ronments in the glasshouse, contrasting soil water deficit, elevated temperature and their interactio
86 4)CO2 pulse-chase experiments confirmed that water deficit enhanced carbon (C) export to the roots, a
87 hopeiensis exhibits exceptional tolerance to water-deficit environments and is therefore an excellent
91 ion in soybean (Glycine max) L. Merr. during water deficits has been associated with increases in ure
93 en exceeds water intake, resulting in a body water deficit (hypohydration) and electrolyte losses.
94 , and we suggest that the persistence of the water deficit (i.e., the drought time-scale) could be pl
97 ncreasing occurrence of high temperature and water deficit in both agricultural production systems an
99 on with the differential growth responses to water deficit in different regions of the elongation zon
102 though all species respond similarly to leaf water deficit in terms of enhanced levels of ABA and clo
104 perature effect to the historic frequency of water deficit in the southwestern United States predicts
105 Some of them also accumulate in response to water deficit in vegetative tissues, which leads to a re
108 ngly, bos1 plants have impaired tolerance to water deficit, increased salinity, and oxidative stress.
109 A) has been implicated as a key component in water-deficit-induced responses, including those trigger
115 st subjected to a 100-millimeter increase in water deficit lost 5.3 megagrams of aboveground biomass
116 ayed onset of wilting in plants experiencing water deficit, lower transpiration rates, and improved w
118 these proteins opens the question of whether water deficit modulates their conformation and whether t
123 to investigate the effects of end of season water deficit on phenolic content in drought tolerant an
124 were significantly up-regulated in leaves of water deficit plants, in accordance with the increase in
130 ated in response to diverse stresses such as water deficit, root-knot nematode (RKN) infection, and U
131 pment and in vegetative tissues subjected to water deficit, salinity, low temperature, or abscisic ac
133 ptation of maize (Zea mays) primary roots to water deficit showed that cell elongation is maintained
134 s experiencing greater increases in climatic water deficit since the 1930s, based on a hydrologic mod
135 s (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants subjected to water deficit, sodium chloride (NaCl), or abscisic acid
136 Dehydration largely refers to intracellular water deficits stemming from hypertonicity and a disturb
138 rice cultivars with contrasting responses to water deficit stress and wheat cultivars well adapted to
140 ater scarcity and the increasing severity of water deficit stress are major challenges to sustaining
141 tivity to ABA and to reduce water loss under water deficit stress but had no effect on leaf size.
142 , rice growth is seriously constrained under water deficit stress compared with other dryland cereals
143 fferent positions along the nodal root under water deficit stress in wheat, whereas they were relativ
144 wild-type plants under normal conditions and water deficit stress indicated that over-expression of A
145 greater amounts of water during the imposed water deficit stress, resulting in a more favorable plan
153 he genetic control of rooting behavior under water-deficit stress is essential to breed climate-robus
156 control conditions, 106 were detected under water-deficit stress, and 76 were detected for trait pla
157 bundance maintained PS levels in response to water-deficit stress, while 40% showed impaired ribosome
163 in nonstressed cotton at sunrise compared to water-deficit stressed cotton, potentially predisposing
166 robic methanogen to study the acclimation of water-deficit stresses which de novo synthesize betaine
168 eters of transgenic plantlets subjected to a water deficit suggested that plants from line TS4T8An di
170 ss-of-function mutations result in increased water deficit tolerance and higher integrated WUE by red
172 ntially more stable to expression changes by water deficit treatment than other genotype-specific exp
173 Exogenous ureides applied to the soil and water-deficit treatments inhibited N2 fixation by 85% to
174 L.) as a global food crop and the impact of water deficit upon grain yield, we focused on functional
175 ion to the tolerance of transgenic plants to water deficit was also supported by the increase in tran
176 ne (pLP6) of a gene which is repressed under water deficit was isolated from a loblolly pine (Pinus t
177 western US show that high pre-fire climatic water deficit was related to increased post-fire tree mo
179 sent a revised aridity index for quantifying water deficit (WD) in terrestrial environments using too
180 relate to spatial and temporal variation in water deficit, we analyze data from three forest dynamic
181 atform with contrasting temperature and soil water deficit, we determined the periods of sensitivity
182 showed that annual rainfall and accumulated water deficit were the main drivers of the distribution
183 rocesses, determines the sink strength under water deficit, whereas photosynthesis determines source
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。