ライフサイエンスコーパス: water maze

1 ns acquired analogous versions of the Morris water maze.

2 classical spatial memory task in the Morris water maze.

3 essed by novel object recognition and Morris water maze.

4 pal function, enhancing memory in the Morris water maze.

5 groups performed comparably and well in the water maze.

6 S1 null mice when tested with the radial-arm water maze.

7 in a reversal learning version of the Morris water maze.

8 mance in novel object recognition and Morris water maze.

9 ng memory when investigated using the Morris water maze.

10 prevents retention of spatial memory in the water maze.

11 2weeks and 3months post-anesthesia in Morris water maze.

12 l-object recognition tests and in the Morris water maze.

13 slices or spatial performance in the Morris water maze.

14 partially rescued memory performance in the water maze.

15 quisition and retention phases of the Morris water maze.

16 ed spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze.

17 to classify spatial strategies in the Morris water maze.

18 on of spatial learning as assessed by Morris water maze.

19 ound deficits in performance in the Circular water maze.

20 ination task and a visually cued task in the water maze.

21 ed by the impaired performance in the Morris water maze.

22 nd mecamylamine prevented acquisition of the water maze.

23 were tested for spatial learning in a Morris Water Maze.

24 re training improved acquisition on a Morris water maze.

25 ction and cognitive impairment in the Morris water maze.

26 ed swimming and navigational learning in the water maze.

27 st subjected to eight learning sessions in a water maze.

28 did not impair navigational learning in the water maze.

29 ols, but failed to affect performance in the water maze.

30 patial memory was tested by using the Morris water maze.

31 rt for the hAPP model and use of the virtual water maze.

32 hidden platform in a virtual reality Morris water maze.

33 in the delayed-match-to-place version of the water maze.

34 and impaired spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

35 rained in a matching-to-place version of the water maze.

36 as well as during acquisition in the Morris water maze.

37 ry task deficits were assessed in the Morris water maze.

38 s in a hidden platform version of the Morris water maze.

39 anced non-spatial cue learning on the Morris water maze.

40 d by two behavioral tests, Y maze and Morris water maze.

41 ng and memory were then tested in the Morris water maze.

42 triggered by spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

43 aKO mice exhibited preserved learning on the water maze.

44 ts, and they learned faster to navigate in a water maze.

45 sufficient to improve the performance in the water maze.

46 on of long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

47 t EEG activity and impairments in the Morris water maze.

48 rats underwent training for 1 d in a Morris water maze.

49 performance on the stress-associated Morris water maze.

50 t and long-term spatial memory in the Morris water maze.

51 contextual fear conditioning and the Morris water maze.

52 h learning and memory deficits in the Morris Water Maze.

53 jury, and improved performance in the Morris water maze 4 weeks after injury.

54 al. present a virtual version of the Morris water maze (a common test of spatial learning and memory

55 long-term memory consolidation in the Morris water maze, a function of TA-CA1 synapses.

56 uded a virtual reality version of the Morris water maze, a task involved participants having to swim

57 ted with deficits in spatial learning in the water maze, a task that requires the integrity of the hi

58 ocentric spatial navigation using the Morris water maze, a task well known to require dorsal hippocam

59 to the hidden platform version of the Morris Water Maze, a test of spatial learning that, in mice, is

60 When examined by Morris water maze, AC8 KO mice showed normal reference memory.

61 rolipram showed a significant improvement in water maze acquisition and retention of both cue and con

62 hicle or rolipram (0.03 mg/kg) 30 min before water maze acquisition or cue and contextual fear condit

63 ry 2 min, either prior to, or after, initial water maze acquisition training.

64 5) was mutated to Ala) mice were tested in a water maze after chronic naltrexone administration.

65 ts indicate that impaired performance in the water maze after hippocampal damage reflects more than a

66 in behavioral flexibility in both the Morris water maze and a delayed nonmatch to place T-maze task,

67 spatial memory task analogous to the Morris water maze and a mirror-tracing procedural memory contro

68 l outcomes as assessed by Rotarod and Morris Water Maze and a reduction in positive Fluoro-Jade B sta

69 and found that spatial memory assayed by the water maze and contextual fear conditioning often does n

70 e Camk2a gene resulted in severe deficits in water maze and contextual fear learning, whereas mice wi

71 mutant mice showed severe deficits in Morris water maze and contextual fear memory tasks, whereas mic

72 tion during the reversal phase of the Morris water maze and deficits in a delayed nonmatch to place T

73 gical function was assessed using the Morris water maze and foot fault tests.

74 ction was assessed using the modified Morris Water Maze and footfault tests.

75 f cognition like object recognition task and water maze and in brain microdialysis studies at lower d

76 n the real-space version of the human Morris water maze and in its corresponding computer version.

77 ed rats was found to improve learning in the water maze and in object-place recognition.

78 n their respective control cohorts in Morris water maze and in step-down fear conditioning.

79 sules improved performance in the radial-arm water maze and increased spine densities on dendrites of

80 Morris water maze and modified neurological severity scores wer

81 Modified Morris water maze and neurological severity score (mNSS) test w

82 e show normal spatial learning in the Morris water maze and normal context-dependent fear conditionin

83 ts and male C57Bl/6J mice were tested in the water maze and novel object recognition tasks.

84 ansgenic mice, memory was assessed by Morris water maze and novel object recognition.

85 or performance in the hidden sessions of the water maze and passive avoidance memory retention.

86 ptors, the observed behavior in the rotarod, water maze and peripheral nerve injury tests was possibl

87 head-turning reflex, visible platform Morris water maze and Rotarod measurements were conducted to te

88 had severe spatial cognitive deficits in the water maze and seizures worsened performance.

89 The Morris water maze and the Barnes maze are the most commonly use

90 aired performance in both the virtual Morris water maze and the CANTAB paired associates learning.

91 trained to spatially navigate in the Morris Water Maze and then exposed to CIE vapor or air 16 h a d

92 on the first day of reversal training in the water maze and they extinguish conditioned fear more slo

93 n P10 include locomotor activity, the Morris water mazes and response to apomorphine.

94 reversal learning, as measured using Morris water-maze and fear-conditioning assays.

95 its in hippocampal-dependent spatial (Morris water maze) and associative (contextual fear conditionin

96 learning strategies in long-term reference (water maze) and working memory (Y-maze) tasks presented

97 Affective (elevated plus-maze), cognitive (water-maze), and reproductive (sexual) behavior was exam

98 n memory flexibility, assessed in the Morris water maze, and a significant disruption of long-term po

99 hy controls in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning.

100 y using contextual fear-conditioning, Morris water maze, and novel object recognition tests.

101 layed memory enhancement in radial arm maze, water maze, and object recognition tests.

102 On PD 52, subjects were tested on the Morris water maze, and on PD 60, open field activity levels wer

103 ke responses to an open field, learning in a water maze, and reactivity to forced swimming were asses

104 d of training on the spatial version of the water maze, and retention was examined 24 h later.

105 bited a spatial memory deficit in the Morris water maze, and the p47(phox) mutant mice exhibited impa

106 cy to find the target platform in the Morris water maze as compared to vehicle-treated animals.

107 enhanced learning performance in the Morris water maze as learning ability was associated with highe

108 mes in motor (rotarod) and cognitive (Morris water maze) assays compared to controls.

109 Cognitive function was assessed via Morris water maze at 2 and 13 weeks postoperatively.

110 and tested memory performance in the Morris water maze at 21 months of age.

111 shown that this mouse shows deficits on the water maze at 52 weeks of age.

112 arning and memory were assessed using Morris water mazes at 3 and 4 months of losartan treatment.

113 ehicle controls in a reference-memory Morris water-maze behavior test that approximately correlated w

114 Morris water maze behavioral test revealed that infection with

115 A visually guided water maze behavioral test under dim light showed signif

116 ype III NRG1 improves deficits in the Morris water-maze behavioral task.

117 US-induced learning impairment in the Morris water maze but not an enhanced depletion of hippocampal

118 had impaired reversal learning in the Morris water maze compared to their wild-type littermates, whic

119 r spatial learning performance in the Morris water maze compared with control WT littermates.

120 al recovery on elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, concomitant with reductions in elevated proi

121 r activity, novel object recognition, Morris water maze (cued, hidden platform, reduced platform), a

122 BMS-241027 had beneficial effects on Morris water maze deficits, tau pathology, and neurodegeneratio

123 show contextual fear conditioning and Morris water maze deficits.

124 recognition, cued, hidden and reduced Morris water mazes, delayed probe trials and response to apomor

125 In the Morris water maze, DKO mice showed defective acquisition and me

126 AC-260584 enhanced performance in the water maze during a probe test without a platform after

127 length was inversely correlated with Morris water maze escape latencies (r = -0.757, P < 0.001), and

128 ciate a particular spatial location with the water maze escape platform or food reward is NR2A indepe

129 sensitivity, but did not have any effects on water maze escape, place preference or locomotor activit

130 The 20-mug dose also enhanced water maze escape.

131 f reference memory and working memory in the water maze failed to provide evidence that perirhinal le

132 e platform technique, and behavioral (Morris water maze, fear conditioning, open field) and biochemic

133 potentiation [LTP]), and behavioral (Morris water maze, fear-conditioning) approaches.

134 When tested in the Morris water maze for spatial orientation abilities, whereas AP

135 ing and memory using the T-maze, Y-maze, and water maze, hippocampal-dependent spatial memory tasks.

136 In the Morris water maze, IDUA(-/-) mice exhibited impaired proficient

137 t change performance in the T maze or in the water maze in adult males or females.

138 e assessed cognitive function as measured by water maze in the Fischer/Brown Norway (FBN) rat, compar

139 memory deficits, as determined in the Morris water maze, in aged mice.

140 erformance measures of animals in the Morris Water Maze include the escape latency, and the cumulativ

141 Performance in object recognition, Y-maze, water maze, inhibitory avoidance, and contextual-cued fe

142 ly better on the object recognition, Y-maze, water maze, inhibitory avoidance, and cued fear conditio

143 The Morris Water Maze is a widely used task in studies of spatial l

144 s1Rhr/Ts65Dn mice, performance in the Morris water maze is identical to euploid, demonstrating that t

145 performance, as quantified by reduced Morris water maze latencies on Days 29-32 post-ICH.

146 modestly impaired social behaviors, enhanced water maze learning abilities, and increased synaptic in

147 nt models of cognitive aging have focused on water maze learning and have demonstrated an age-associa

148 c vocalizations, and deficits in reversal of water maze learning were detected only in some cohorts,

149 Fear conditioning and water maze learning were impaired in En2 null mutants.

150 it deficits in pattern separation but not in water maze learning.

151 ared performance in recognition with that in water maze learning.

152 atial memory test in the forms of the Morris water maze (MWM) and contextual fear conditioning at 85

153 The mutant mice learn the Morris water maze (MWM) as well as WT but show deficiency in re

154 The Morris water maze (MWM) is a test of spatial learning for roden

155 ace and match-to-place version of the Morris water maze (MWM) over seven consecutive days, and a yawn

156 gnitive function was assessed using a Morris water maze (MWM) paradigm.

157 Beam balance, beam walking, and Morris water maze (MWM) performances were assessed over post-tr

158 The Morris water maze (MWM) retrograde amnesia test was conducted o

159 APP(E693Q) mice were studied in the Morris water maze (MWM) task at 6 and 12 months of age.

160 mpairment in the ability to learn the Morris water maze (MWM) task compared to age-matched wild-type

161 To investigate this we utilized Morris water maze (MWM) testing in a group of young (3 months)

162 erity score (mNSS), footfault and the Morris water maze (MWM) tests.

163 impairment in marble burying (MB) and Morris water maze (MWM) tests.

164 We used the Morris water maze (MWM) to test for time of day differences in

165 navigate in spatial tasks such as the Morris water maze (MWM) using a local cue-based reference frame

166 ng and memory were measured using the Morris water maze (MWM), hippocampal metabolites were measured

167 and memory deficits, as determined by Morris water maze (MWM), in aged mice.

168 significantly reduced performance in Morris Water Maze (MWM), long-term memory (LTM) contextual fear

169 ce showed impaired performance in the Morris water maze (MWM), which was accompanied by lower express

170 ical dysfunction was assessed using a Morris water-maze (MWM), a 28-point scale, and a corner test at

171 ampus-dependent working memory in the Morris water maze, novel object recognition, and contextual fea

172 Water maze, open field, and rotarod performance was test

173 cation-specific object memory but not Morris water maze or contextual fear conditioning.

174 By using a Morris water-maze paradigm, we found that CD rats learned a wat

175 Both average latency analysis of Morris water maze performance and assessment of 24-hour memory

176 taPP/PS1 mice develop deficits in radial-arm water maze performance and novel object recognition as e

177 bited a significant impairment in radial arm water maze performance compared with sham KI mice or inj

178 se are necessary to reliably improve spatial water maze performance in aging female mice.

179 Exercise alone improved spatial water maze performance in young mice, whereas both exerc

180 r impaired (AI) groups based on their Morris water maze performance relative to young-adult (Y) anima

181 decreased locomotor activity, inferior cued water maze performance, decreased running wheel ability,

182 nly before testing, modafinil did not affect water maze performance.

183 clear anxiolytic actions and did not affect water-maze performance.

184 g mice displayed improved performance in the water maze, preservation of the dendritic structure in t

185 ce memory, as assessed by performance on the water maze probe trial, was correlated with reduced hipp

186 Tests using a Morris water maze procedure indicated that IPN lesions produced

187 without obliterating memory retrieval in the water maze, produces an as large strategy shifting/memor

188 tely following massed training in the Morris water maze, PTK/ZK impaired spatial memory retention tes

189 beacons were hung directly over each of the water maze quadrants, equidistant from each other (multi

190 e to the level of healthy controls in Morris water maze, radial arm water maze, and fear conditioning

191 The radial arm water maze (RAWM) contains six swim paths (arms) extendi

192 lted in improved cognition on the radial arm water maze (RAWM) test and decreased the level of hyperp

193 Radial arm water maze (RAWM) testing for working memory indicated t

194 t in the eight-arm radial-arm version of the water maze (RAWM) that allows repeated assessment of lea

195 FMI), and working memory (using a radial arm water maze, RAWM).

196 assessed using elevated plus maze and Morris water maze, respectively.

197 improved spatial learning performance in the water maze, restored resting-state functional connectivi

198 in cue and contextual fear conditioning and water maze retention.

199 The water maze revealed significant learning (but not motor)

200 In the Morris water maze, rifampicin at 1 mg/day improved memory of th

201 dult-born neurons as spatial learning in the water maze sculpts the dendritic arbor of adult-born neu

202 volume, cortex gray matter volume and Morris water maze search-time preference (r=0.71).

203 Intact rats trained in a Morris water maze showed increased c-Fos expression (vs home ca

204 etter on a spatial memory task in the Morris water maze, showing improved learning curves across days

205 xtual fear extinction and reversal of Morris water maze spatial learning and memory, suggesting that

206 g on PD 45, subjects were tested on a Morris water maze spatial learning task.

207 adult Sprague Dawley rats were trained on a water maze spatial task at two different water temperatu

208 the novel-object recognition test and Morris water-maze spatial task compared to sham.

209 present the novel findings that longitudinal water-maze spatial training produces a significant, albe

210 no alteration in long-term potentiation and water maze, suggesting that Smad4 is not required for sp

211 sks, namely delayed-matching-to-place in the water maze, T-maze alternation and working memory in the

212 learning and memory (hidden platform Morris water maze, T-maze spontaneous alternation, and pavlovia

213 d cognitive deficits as revealed in a Morris water maze task (MWM).

214 arning strategy selection after a cue-guided water maze task and competition testing performed 1 or 2

215 ed on a working memory version of the Morris water maze task and navigation takes place in a visually

216 cells, acquired the spatial reference memory water maze task as well as controls, despite impairments

217 ir spatial memory performances in the Morris water maze task compared with young controls) with 7alph

218 l learning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze task during 1-5 days after exposure to anesth

219 ovel environments and performance of a novel water maze task during which normal rats learned the spa

220 ernation in the T maze for working memory, a water maze task for escape, the elevated plus maze for a

221 reas those with the best memory in a spatial water maze task remapped the least.

222 of memory in a delayed-match-to-place radial water maze task that can be used to assess proactive int

223 When we ran a spatial discrimination water maze task using two visually identical beacons, Gr

224 tial learning in a delayed matching to place water maze task was also not affected by the loss of FMR

225 e animals were also markedly impaired in the water maze task, a measure of spatial memory.

226 NR2A mutants acquired the SRM version of the water maze task, and the SRM component of the radial maz

227 ts in the rate of acquisition of the regular water maze task, but again had significant deficits in t

228 cognition learning and spatial learning in a water maze task, demonstrating the importance of GLP-1 s

229 xhibit deficits in performance of the Morris water maze task, suggesting that PtdIns(4,5)P(2) dyshome

230 In this study, using the Morris water maze task, we demonstrate that IL-13-deficient mic

231 d mild spatial memory deficits in the Morris water maze task.

232 to controls during acquisition of the Morris water maze task.

233 y on a hidden platform version of the Morris water maze task.

234 ns when rats are trained in the conventional water maze task.

235 pocampus after we trained rats in the Morris water maze task.

236 nation ability and improvements on a virtual water maze task.

237 form poorly in the delayed matching to place water-maze task (DMTP).

238 the ReRh, we found normal acquisition of the water-maze task (vs sham-operated controls) and normal p

239 ze paradigm, we found that CD rats learned a water-maze task more quickly than rats fed with a regula

240 memory in a hippocampal-dependent radial arm water-maze task without inducing mossy fiber sprouting o

241 In rats having learned the water-maze task, lidocaine-induced inactivation of the R

242 oline supplementation on a matching-to-place water-maze task, which was also accompanied by a decreas

243 Wistar rats following a platform search in a water-maze task.

244 with impaired spatial memory, as measured in water maze tasks.

245 ntion in the inhibitory avoidance and Morris water maze tasks.

246 In the Morris Water Maze test (MWM), mGluR5 knock-out mice exhibited m

247 lso showed a decreased acquisition time in a water maze test along with less exploratory activity dur

248 itine improved behavioral performance in the water maze test and reduced neurodegeneration, abnormal

249 induced cognitive impairment as shown in the water maze test and step-down test.

250 In the Morris water maze test GluD1 KO mice showed no difference in ac

251 e performed the hippocampus-dependent Morris water maze test on mice.

252 Morris water maze test showed that both CCI and S-CCI produced

253 lve a cognitive challenge such as the Morris water maze test significantly better than APP, with perf

254 sease resulted in retained cognition (Morris water maze test), decreased amyloid-beta plaque burden,

255 NEIL1 exhibit impaired memory retention in a water maze test, but no abnormalities in tests of motor

256 odynamic efficacy was evaluated using Morris Water Maze Test, Radial Arm Maze Test and AChE activity

257 l learning and memory, as measured by Morris water maze test, whereas free DHA had no effect.

258 emory impairment as determined by radial arm water maze test, which is associated with enhancement of

259 spatial learning as determined by the Morris water maze test.

260 improved spatial learning in the radial arm water maze test.

261 ent in memory deficit assessed by the Morris water maze test.

262 eased spatial reference memory in the Morris water maze test.

263 and fastened neurocognitive recovery in the Water-Maze test (15/26 vs 9/26 mice with competence to p

264 etter spatial memory retention in the Morris water-maze test compared with vehicle-treated animals (C

265 In addition, Morris water maze testing showed increased latency to locate a

266 4 weeks prior to and then throughout spatial water maze testing.

267 s in contextual fear-conditioning and Morris water maze tests compared with wild-type controls.

268 ce performed poorly on the T-maze and Morris water maze tests, which measure short- and long-term spa

269 logical severity score, footfault and Morris water maze tests.

270 also exhibited preserved memory function in water maze tests.

271 ceptors, and decreased memory performance in water maze tests.

272 ts exhibited movement characteristics in the water maze that were similar to movement characteristics

273 he extent to which performance in the Morris water maze - the most frequently used behavioral assay o

274 the hidden-platform component of the Morris water maze, the visual deficits described herein may rep

275 y gender and age) navigated a virtual Morris water maze to find a hidden platform; navigation to a vi

276 All rats underwent testing in the Morris water maze to test spatial memory at 25 days of age (imm

277 production of IL-13, whereas neither Morris water maze-trained IL-4 nor trained IL-13-deficient mice

278 he hippocampus, which was impaired in Morris water maze-trained IL-4- and IL-13-deficient mice.

279 of CA1 pyramidal cells in the hippocampi of water maze-trained rats vs. controls.

280 Moreover, Morris water maze-trained wild-type mice were able to increase

281 before cue and contextual fear conditioning, water maze training and a spatial working memory task.

282 ent addressing this issue, we tested whether water maze training influences the gene expression respo

283 Although water maze training itself also regulated nearly 1800 ge

284 inistration was provided in conjunction with water maze training, combined treatment had no effect on

285 ved CREB or control virus, before undergoing water maze training.

286 expression was not increased in response to water maze training.

287 Retention of spatial memory in the water maze was enhanced by ingestion of (-)epicatechin,

288 learning and long-term memory in the Morris water maze was impaired by BDE-47 exposure in female Mec

289 Spatial learning in the Morris water maze was profoundly impaired in high-dose animals.

290 d to locate a submerged platform in a Morris water maze was recorded.

291 Using a Morris water maze, we demonstrate that the deletion of mouse Ap

292 ed groups to locate the hidden platform in a water maze with either 1 of 3 or 3 of 3 predictive landm

293 gation scores of the real-space human Morris water maze with its corresponding 2D computer version.

294 and strong motivation observed in the Morris water maze without requiring foot shock or food deprivat

295 etention (but not acquisition) in the Morris water maze, without influencing contextual fear-motivate

296 Visual function was assessed with the cued water maze (WM) behavioral test and the optokinetic refl

297 tested for learning and memory using Morris water maze (WM).

298 We used water-maze (WM) training as a spatial learning paradigm

299 erseveration in several assays including the water maze, Y-maze reversal task, and the novel object r

300 evidenced by poor performance in the Morris water maze, Y-maze, novel objective recognition, step-do