ライフサイエンスコーパス: water quality

1 ncerns about the impact of global warming on water quality.

2 Ds) offers low-cost and mobile evaluation of water quality.

3 cteria, a WHO-approved indicator of drinking water quality.

4 s of water were used to assess the impact of water quality.

5 viruses in water is vital for protection of water quality.

6 y to adapt to the operational conditions and water quality.

7 and its spatial distribution affects coastal water quality.

8 dy area showed high seasonal fluctuations in water quality.

9 ctices are expected to have large impacts on water quality.

10 adopting BKPyV as an indicator organism for water quality.

11 iazotrophic taxa, with no net improvement in water quality.

12 on to estimation and management of microbial water quality.

13 w insight into factors that control drinking water quality.

14 ng the monetary impact of efforts to improve water quality.

15 tly inform even nonprofessional users of the water quality.

16 al alteration of soil by wildfire can affect water quality.

17 ce is recommended for further improvement of water quality.

18 species susceptible to the deterioration of water quality.

19 Escherichia coli, can be indicative of poor water quality.

20 alence of harmful algal blooms that threaten water quality.

21 oxicity, exposure pathways, air quality, and water quality.

22 eographical extent of the recovery from poor water quality.

23 can be used to develop strategies to improve water quality.

24 ir leachates can have significant impacts on water quality.

25 emical properties, soil type, and irrigation-water quality.

26 to downstream systems, contributing to poor water quality.

27 ment steps as mitigation strategy to improve water quality.

28 onments for removing pathogens and improving water quality.

29 treatment is an important aspect in terms of water quality.

30 can result in severe degradation of product water quality.

31 ify mechanisms by which urbanization impacts water quality.

32 rovide ecosystem services that help maintain water quality.

33 rship with child growth and household stored water quality.

34 efforts to mitigate the impacts of runoff on water quality.

35 ess hydrologic systems and impact downstream water quality.

36 own to cause detrimental loss of the product water quality.

37 study challenges to maintaining private-well water quality.

38 nitation access on child health and drinking water quality.

39 capacity to tolerate documented declines in water quality.

40 nal care products) pollutants across various water qualities.

41 entiate hydrological processes that affected water quality: (1) in the upper watershed, runoff dilute

42 measurement technologies can monitor surface water quality almost continuously, creating high-frequen

43 decaying aquatic plants), and its impacts on water quality along the Central California coast.

44 use their performance was less influenced by water quality, although future efforts must increase the

45 importance for environmental monitoring and water quality analysis providing a potential means of ra

46 In this study, the well-known Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) was upd

47 ovel experimental approach of spatiotemporal water quality analysis to trace water mass movements and

48 ple heavy metal ion detection and simplified water quality analysis.

49 after each lettuce juice addition to measure water qualities and determine HAAs and THMs using US-Env

50 onsider it as a reference pathogen to assess water quality and as a possible bioterrorism agent.

51 in urban systems is imperative to improving water quality and better managing eutrophication.

52 Water quality and biotic recovery were documented in Bro

53 t than private latrine access for protecting water quality and child health.

54 the methodology is demonstrated using source water quality and climate data in three case study locat

55 is important for agricultural productivity, water quality and climate.

56 lture can be holistically managed to improve water quality and close nutrient loops.

57 It is informed using water quality and diarrhea data from Hubli-Dharwad, Indi

58 lationships among meteorological parameters, water quality and diarrheal disease counts in two urban

59 of wetland restoration and climate change on water quality and ecosystem productivity.

60 Water quality and fishing pressure had minimal effect on

61 This information is vital for evaluating water quality and health implications, determining the i

62 tion should be included in future studies of water quality and health.

63 n unintended increases in impacts to air and water quality and human health.

64 erlying potable aquifer may adversely impact water quality and human health.

65 ed in inappropriate antibiotic use, but poor water quality and inadequate sanitation exacerbate the p

66 gical integrity detects small changes in the water quality and indicates a possible physiological dam

67 n environmental analysis because they impact water quality and introduce potential (eco)toxicological

68 cation of LSWT has numerous consequences for water quality and lake ecosystems, so quantifying this a

69 ially disrupts ecosystem services related to water quality and may negatively impact ecosystem functi

70 help lead to incremental steps that protect water quality and minimize health risks.

71 practices is recommended as a way to improve water quality and protect and encourage re-establishment

72 as urban and crop cover, typically degrades water quality and reduces freshwater biodiversity, there

73 f can salinize freshwaters and threaten lake water quality and the many ecosystem services lakes prov

74 n their source watersheds, as it affects raw water quality and thus the costs of water treatment.

75 bioassays for their suitability to benchmark water quality and to assess efficacy of water treatment

76 d water for specific applications depends on water quality and usage requirements.

77 rvices, incorporating thermal, hydrological, water quality, and carbon sequestration functions, were

78 e used long-term datasets of fish abundance, water quality, and climatic factors to assess the threat

79 sses, which provide nursery habitat, improve water quality, and constitute a globally important carbo

80 unction, and causes a constellation of flow, water quality, and ecological symptoms collectively know

81 cations in clinical diagnosis, monitoring of water quality, and food safety.

82 world, the evidence of the effect of IWS on water quality, and how the typical contexts in which IWS

83 valve molluscs quality depends mainly on the water quality, and then by a series of factors such as w

84 ement BMP was associated with improved beach water quality, and this appears to be the first report o

85 ply augmentation, flood protection, improved water quality, and urban amenities; and (4) long-term hy

86 o a legacy of wildfire impacts on downstream water quality, aquatic ecology, and drinking water treat

87 to improve nutrition status, sanitation, and water quality are important to reduce enteric infections

88 The effects of wildfire on drinking water quality are not well understood, especially in ter

89 case for universal screening of private well water quality around arsenic, the most toxic and widespr

90 lations to take charge of their own drinking water quality as they patiently wait for the pipe to fin

91 ence of fecal input, potentially confounding water quality assays.

92 outine environmental monitoring and drinking water quality assessment since the guideline value set b

93 viral load measurements as well as air- and water-quality assessment.

94 rations for using alternative indicators for water quality assessments with a particular focus on det

95 be used as a portable device to monitor the water quality at any location.

96 gineering design, and ecology to improve the water quality benefits of green infrastructure.

97 Environmental Protection Agency estimates of water quality benefits, fuel-switching benefits, and reg

98 on) in order to improve soil N retention and water quality benefits.

99 In the USA, impacts to drinking water quality, biogeochemical cycles, and aquatic ecosys

100 y functions, such as food web production and water quality, but an increasing frequency and intensity

101 )-catalyzed recrystallization, can influence water quality by causing the incorporation/release of en

102 n unprecedented opportunity to improve urban water quality by equipping stormwater systems with low-c

103 ioretention are increasingly used to improve water quality by filtering chemical contaminants that ma

104 Degradation of water quality by intensified mammoth activity around the

105 l utility of bivalve augmentation to improve water quality by removing hydrophobic trace organic comp

106 merging strategy to deliver improved surface water quality by responsive operation according to real-

107 d soil organic matter (SOM) benefits air and water quality by sequestering large masses of C and N.

108 V), an emerging indicator of microbiological water quality, by a quantum dot-based MB.

109 ating the thermally induced (5-60 degrees C) water quality changes in anoxic sandy sediments.

110 We evaluated water quality characteristics in the northern Raton Basi

111 response profiles is that under many typical water quality conditions, MLR- and BLM-based criteria ar

112 predictions difficult under any given set of water quality conditions.

113 ystem engineers in many estuaries, influence water quality, construct habitat, and provide food for h

114 en monitoring is important and necessary for water quality control.

115 tection Agency (USEPA) recommended BLM-based water quality criteria (WQC) for Cu in freshwater.

116 odels for predicting the threshold values of water quality criteria (WQC) for other transition metals

117 ) in the Delaware River currently exceed the Water Quality Criteria of 16 pg/L for the sum of PCBs du

118 ds and stream conductivity exceeding federal water quality criteria.

119 FIB at concentrations exceeding recreational water quality criteria; (2) small drains can trap dry we

120 This may have implications for water-quality criteria in systems containing Fe- and Al-

121 In contrast to other forms of water quality data analysis, the application of SPARROW

122 le is known about the correspondence between water quality data collected by local monitoring agencie

123 e, we gathered physiochemical and biological water quality data from 2010 to 2016 to evaluate charact

124 ars of high-resolution aerial monitoring and water quality data to elucidate the patterns and drivers

125 corporates downscaled global climate models, water quality data, quantitative microbial risk assessme

126 correlation pattern between isotopologue and water quality data, this comparatively large range highl

127 be derived for other regions from background water quality data.

128 The water quality decline and loss of an established brook t

129 Water quality deteriorated substantially between source

130 agricultural sustainability while mitigating water quality deterioration.

131 This study documents water quality during the September 2013 extreme flood in

132 p an integrated assessment model linking the water quality effects of cropland conservation investmen

133 and biofuels, can create undesired secondary water-quality effects.

134 hallow groundwater aquifers and affect local water quality, either from those deep HVHF injection sit

135 to conventional tillage (CT), its impact on water quality, especially nitrate (NO3(-)) loss remain c

136 , although there may be increased impacts to water quality (eutrophication) when using biomass from a

137 Assessment of water quality evolution in the thousands of existing and

138 The impacts also include reductions in water quality, fish yields, and availability of water fo

139 a disproportionate impact on enclosed beach water quality for five reasons: (1) dry weather surface

140 mmit to identify options to improve drinking-water quality for N.C. residents served by private wells

141 11.3%) was then used to evaluate the product water quality from the large-scale DCMD treatment of oil

142 es of denitrification, wetlands restored for water quality functions often fall below expectations.

143 ons to water utilities to strategically meet water quality goals while reducing energy demands.

144 ions, but formal interaction testing between water quality groups and filaggrin status was not statis

145 Cd-PHE, and Cd-PHQ mixtures at the Canadian Water Quality Guideline concentrations would produce 7.5

146 le mortality rates at Canada's environmental water quality guideline concentrations.

147 data will be critical for the development of water quality guidelines for Ni in the marine environmen

148 ssments and in the development of regulatory water quality guidelines in Europe, and in 2007 the Unit

149 ge, while child weight-for-age and household water quality had nonlinear relationships that leveled o

150 LAGOS-NE was used to quantify whether lake water quality has changed from 1990 to 2013, and whether

151 While degraded water quality has long been known to influence underwate

152 servation practices, related improvements in water quality have been challenging to measure in larger

153 auses is challenging because improvements in water quality have coincided with climatic variations ov

154 Results show persistent secondary water quality impacts related to the biodegradation of m

155 nities for improved energy recovery, averted water quality impacts, and carbon storage.

156 s to increased eutrophication and associated water quality impacts.

157 e water supply, and not only on point-of-use water quality improvements, as is often seen during chol

158 Drinking water quality in a community water system is closely lin

159 to test alternative hypothesized controls on water quality in a pit lake over approximately 8 years.

160 products be included in programs monitoring water quality in areas with FPB use.

161 e effects to gauge progress toward improving water quality in estuaries.

162 her research to improve our understanding of water quality in IWS.

163 However, it is unclear whether or how water quality in lakes across diverse ecological setting

164 pounds reflects nutrient loss and influences water quality in large rivers.

165 ally reactive nitrogen pool that can degrade water quality in N-sensitive waters.

166 ranted to unravel the wider implications for water quality in natural wetlands.

167 m may be the best option for improving beach water quality in Newport Bay and other urban-impacted en

168 - was accounted for by large improvements in water quality in northern England.

169 ese findings have important implications for water quality in remote, high-elevation, mountain catchm

170 used as bioindicators for the assessment of water quality in rivers and streams.

171 ng did not reveal any adverse effects on the water quality in the distribution system or in tanks fro

172 roviding water intermittently can compromise water quality in the distribution system.

173 ugh dense vegetation is important to protect water quality in the environment, especially for water b

174 Degradation of coastal water quality in the form of low dissolved oxygen levels

175 Water quality in the Yamuna was very poor (e.g., anoxia

176 A major challenge for assessment of water quality in tropical environments is the natural oc

177 respective amphibian tissues due to varying water quality in urban and agricultural ponds.

178 ces is needed to reduce N export and improve water quality in urban water systems.

179 unique behaviors affect distribution system water quality in ways that are different than during nor

180 ther changes were accounted for by improving water quality, increasing temperatures or variations in

181 enabling simultaneous depictions of several water quality indicators at very high spatial resolution

182 < 0.05), a result supporting their roles as water quality indicators.

183 laria, HIV, schistosomiasis, sanitation, and water-quality indicators.

184 Collecting reliable and actionable water quality information in low-resource settings, howe

185 Dispensers are a source-based water quality intervention with promising uptake results

186 raised questions about the effectiveness of water quality interventions and other environmental inte

187 reviews and results from blinded studies of water quality interventions have raised questions about

188 Assessing the health impact of water quality interventions in low-income settings: conc

189 the results of blinded versus open trials of water quality interventions, describe evidence from a re

190 European legislation focusing on water quality is expected to broaden to encompass severa

191 in the U.S., suffers from varying degrees of water quality issues fueled by both point and nonpoint n

192 assesses logistics, and considers potential water quality issues.

193 In order to assess water quality it is essential to have methods available

194 ays provides useful context to those setting water quality limits.

195 ew viral-based assays could become important water quality management and research tools.

196 It is therefore imperative that water quality management strategies account for the impa

197 ater and energy resources through energy and water quality management systems (EWQMSs) have tradition

198 o integrate a broader perspective into local water quality management, in the Chesapeake Bay and in t

199 gene quantification may be useful for beach water quality management.

200 a subset of substances to assess the surface water quality may be sufficient, but a comprehensive scr

201 findings highlight the significant role that water quality may have on Hg bioaccumulation within terr

202 Predictive, nowcast models of beach water quality may help reduce beach management errors an

203 High frequency water quality measurements, increasingly obtained by in

204 improved source," which does not account for water quality measurements.

205 lated to watershed size, land use and cover, water quality measures (conductivity, dissolved organic

206 th seasonal and climatic factors, additional water quality measures, and treatment data may enhance p

207 implications on the space and time scales of water quality mitigation efforts.

208 pplying the empirical U.S. Geological Survey water-quality model SPARROW to investigate whether spati

209 scale, spatially distributed, process-based, water quality modeling of nutrient pollution.

210 n inform location-specific interpretation of water quality monitoring data and decision making.

211 complements to chemical analyses in standard water quality monitoring efforts would allow for more co

212 new analytical tools for on-line and on-site water quality monitoring has become particularly urgent.

213 chlorine sensor is of great significance for water quality monitoring in less developed areas where f

214 infrared imaging spectroscopy can facilitate water quality monitoring in this highly dynamic and hete

215 Microbial water quality monitoring is crucial for managing water r

216 Carbon Analyzer (TOCA) and the Colorimetric Water Quality Monitoring Kit (CWQMK), respectively.

217 data from any remote location to the central water quality monitoring station.

218 The water quality monitoring that is critical to the managem

219 The utility of in vitro assays in water quality monitoring was evident from both the quant

220 ies are required, for instance, in medicine, water quality monitoring, and the food industry.

221 ortance in clinical analysis and in food and water quality monitoring.

222 g, bioaccumulation studies and environmental water quality monitoring.

223 y serve as a basis for a future platform for water quality monitoring.

224 ng fecal contaminants for improved microbial water quality monitoring.

225 ld-deployable molecular diagnostic tools for water quality monitoring.

226 quantification of muPAD assays for in-field water quality monitoring.

227 system relies primarily on a system of fixed water-quality monitoring stations, but the limited spati

228 Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for water-quality monitoring.

229 water wells that may be targeted for further water-quality monitoring.

230 upling climate projections with a hydrologic/water quality network model of the contiguous United Sta

231 gest Sb leaching is primarily dependent upon water quality, not container type.

232 Livestock production impacts air and water quality, ocean health, and greenhouse gas (GHG) em

233 s in agricultural watersheds may enhance the water quality of coastal ecosystems, whereas fertiliser

234 basin, which are suspected of impacting the water quality of its estuary.

235 and management efforts over recent decades, water quality of lakes in the Midwest and Northeast U.S.

236 teria (FIB) are used to assess the microbial water quality of recreational waters.

237 rient removal processes, while improving the water quality of the receiving water body, can also prod

238 ent effects of meteorological conditions and water quality on diarrheal risk.

239 ance were used to determine the influence of water quality on treatment plant operation and subsequen

240 MFC definition, as promising tools to asset water quality or other measurable parameters.

241 Studies rarely reported stored water quality or sanitary risks and few achieved robust

242 as nutrient pollution sources could improve water quality outcomes, while allowing cities to enjoy t

243 hnologies aim for a continuous monitoring of water quality, overcoming periodic analytical sampling,

244 tter-explained the short-term variability in water quality parameters and bacterial community composi

245 rm, and measurement of chemical and physical water quality parameters for samples collected from wate

246 2O emission monitoring data as well as other water quality parameters from the plant.

247 asured delta(2)H and delta(18)O, nitrate and water quality parameters, on board a small, high-speed b

248 firmed the importance of both phages as main water quality parameters.

249 Wildfire effects on water quality, particularly nutrient levels and forms, c

250 gh concentrations and suggests impairment of water quality, particularly since 2011.

251 This field research investigated the water quality performance of a traditional bioretention

252 Life cycle direct and indirect water quality pollution impacts were assessed and compar

253 int sources and has the potential to improve water quality predictions resulting in more accurate est

254 concentrations could impact significantly on water quality production and, in particular, on pathogen

255 not provide sufficient improvement of beach water quality, prompting further assessment.

256 ting a progressive populace facing stringent water quality regulations) were interviewed.

257 cts of Fe(2+)-catalyzed recrystallization on water quality requires knowing the time scale over which

258 ected areas, catchment management to improve water quality), restoration, as well as global and natio

259 s and flooding can cause dramatic changes in water quality resulting in large mortality events in est

260 rent patterns of freshwater biodiversity and water quality risk.

261 r treatment plant (WWTP) discharges may pose water quality risks at the downstream DWTP, but addition

262 Despite improvements in water quality, sanitation, and hygiene, as well as in th

263 paper-like test-strips would make affordable water quality sensors at ultralow concentrations a reali

264 asurements, increasingly obtained by in situ water quality sensors, are extending that transformation

265 y of eDNA and the effects of temperature and water quality should be considered in protocols for wate

266 11, which alone exceeded the 64 pg/L federal water quality standard for the sum of PCBs in two of 120

267 Intended water quality standards for EE2 set a much needed global

268 anes were higher than New York State Ambient Water Quality Standards for the protection of human heal

269 Due to the development of new ballast water quality standards for viruses, this study aimed to

270 ave adopted BLM-based Cu criteria into their water quality standards on a state-wide basis, which app

271 astewater effluent to meet existing drinking water quality standards, many utilities face skepticism

272 , Cu, and Se that are often far in excess of water quality standards.

273 We found that a microbial water quality test costs 21.0 +/- 11.3 USD, on average,

274 Using 42926 microbial water quality test results from 32 surveillance agencies

275 ectral range, as well as an absorption-based water quality test, showing the versatility of the syste

276 Because the economics of water quality testing are poorly understood, the extent

277 scenario, might provide better control over water quality than the status quo conditions.

278 printing", in a first application to monitor water quality that results from fluids used in hydraulic

279 cal nature of the plant, soil properties and water quality that together determine uptake, translocat

280 e vast majority of samples exceeded relevant water quality thresholds, generally by 2-3 orders of mag

281 efits provided to people, and potentially to water quality through reduction of stormwater volume by

282 Major floods adversely affect water quality through surface runoff, groundwater discha

283 ortance of freshwater bivalves for improving water quality through the removal of E. coli.

284 ogic model of anthropogenic impacts to urban water quality to include exchange with the subsurface.

285 use (as measured by improvement in household water quality to meet international standards) ranged fr

286 er and for interventions to improve drinking water quality to prevent diarrhea.

287 acts of this development, from its effect on water quality to the influence of increased methane leak

288 uality, while beaches having a deteriorating water quality trend or low FIB exceedance rates are less

289 We quantified water quality trends in 2913 lakes using nutrient and ch

290 lls/particles in large dilute samples (e.g., water quality, urine analysis), or high-throughput scree

291 ttent piped water supply exhibiting seasonal water quality variability vulnerable to climate change.

292 s determined by binding thresholds on DOC, a water quality variable predicted to change markedly with

293 e to which water sources were monitored, how water quality varied by source type, and institutional r

294 itating a freshwater ecosystem and improving water quality via reduction of E. coli in contaminated f

295 Improved water quality was coincident with a 2013 bird exclusion

296 Child growth and water quality were not associated with individual househ

297 m a natural subsurface reservoir on soil and water quality were studied.

298 ow related dominating factor affecting beach water quality, while beaches having a deteriorating wate

299 step to reducing nitrogen load and improving water quality will be containment and careful management

300 ique could allow for real-time assessment of water quality without the need for expensive laboratory