ライフサイエンスコーパス: wearer

1 ience as an audiologist and as a hearing aid wearer.

2 step, which imposes large peak forces on the wearer.

3 tentials (eVEPs) in Argus II retinal implant wearers.

4 in a population of symptomatic contact lens wearers.

5 the denture and affects up to 50% of denture wearers.

6 ving 4,663 SCL years yielded 187 CIEs in 168 wearers.

7 ciated with corneal staining in contact lens wearers.

8 ater for contact lens wearers than spectacle wearers.

9 al length between spectacle and contact lens wearers.

10 rts of Fusarium keratitis among contact lens wearers.

11 earers and 33 (9.2%) were gas-permeable lens wearers.

12 dry eye is high, especially in contact lens wearers.

13 one quarter of patients were orthokeratology wearers.

14 may assist in the management of contact lens wearers.

15 possible to optimize outcome for hearing aid wearers.

16 te and related symptoms reported by some PAL wearers.

17 m levels were significantly lower in denture-wearers.

18 ars of age) of 21 children who were not lens wearers.

19 alents; P < 0.001) than did non-contact lens wearers.

20 yopia progression between SVL and former PAL wearers (0.06 D; P = 0.50).

21 y eye disease (52.3%), followed by spectacle wearers (23.9%) and clinical emmetropes (7.1%).

22 nter, retrospective chart review of 3549 SCL wearers (8-33 years at first observed visit, +8.00 to -1

23 to wear spectacles; however, most spectacle wearers (81%) had inadequate correction.

24 fidence interval = 7.55-20.26) and spectacle wearers (adjusted odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence inte

25 ions compared with those of non-contact lens wearers, although the exact cause(s) of this increased s

26 7+/-9 years; range, 5-33 years) contact lens wearers and 20 age-matched control subjects.

27 Overall, 327 (90.8%) were hydrogel lens wearers and 33 (9.2%) were gas-permeable lens wearers.

28 ness was 46.3 +/- 4.7 microm in contact lens wearers and 50.9 +/- 4.7 microm in control subjects (P =

29 ol group, whereas 88% of former contact lens wearers and 77% of former glasses wearers were strongly

30 ural rehabilitation programs for hearing aid wearers and cochlear implant recipients have recently be

31 kscatter did not differ between contact lens wearers and control subjects (P > 0.05).

32 l infection, commonly occurs in contact lens wearers and may lead to vision impairment.

33 the adjusted difference between contact lens wearers and spectacle wearers was not statistically sign

34 ilm thinning rates in 20 normal contact lens wearers, and spectra were captured at a rate of 4.5 per

35 rry vision symptoms reported by contact lens wearers are caused by poor quality of the retinal image

36 perior implant locus may help the prosthesis wearer better control horizontal eye movements, which ar

37 research has shown that multifocal spectacle wearers (bifocal and progressive addition lenses [PALs])

38 Wearers carrying an IL-12B SNP had an increased risk of

39 Thirty-nine neophytes and soft contact lens wearers completed the study.

40 Corneal staining in contact lens wearers continues to be a frequent, but not well underst

41 Edentulous denture-wearers eat fewer fruits and vegetables than do comparab

42 Twenty corneas of 20 daily contact lens wearers (>10 years' duration) and 20 corneas of 20 age-m

43 Contact lens wearers had a significantly higher aqueous humor flow ra

44 It is well documented that contact lens wearers have much higher incidences of corneal infection

45 udicated to consensus by reviewers masked to wearer identity, age, and SCL parameters.

46 y eye disease classification in contact lens wearers is moderate.

47 ecreased corneal sensitivity in contact lens wearers is not accompanied by decreased nerve fiber bund

48 If the diet of denture-wearers is to be improved, psychosocial factors, as well

49 eye disease primarily affecting contact lens wearers, is caused by free-living amebae, Acanthamoeba s

50 Twelve contact lens wearers (mean age, 32.7 years; four males) inserted etaf

51 In this database of soft contact lens wearers, myopia progression was common for subjects in t

52 eyes (64 % of these were habitual spectacle wearers), need for improvement was present in the young

53 Ten wearers of silicone hydrogel contact lenses were asked t

54 measured hearing aid outcome in 173 elderly wearers of single-channel, linear, in-the-ear hearing ai

55 sive set of outcome measures from 53 elderly wearers of two-channel, wide-dynamic-range compression,

56 None was a corneal-contact lens wearer, one had previous cataract surgery and another su

57 C (0.87 mg/dL) were also lower among denture-wearers (p < 0.05).

58 of serious infections, such as contact lens wearers (P = 0.21) or patients with human immunodeficien

59 onths were not different between PAL and SVL wearers (P = 0.92).

60 From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between

61 A series of symptomatic contact lens wearers presenting consecutively to a large hospital cli

62 In contrast, among dentate denture-wearers, prevalence ranged from 18.7% in >/= 65-year-old

63 The contact lens wearers removed their lenses 12 to 24 hours before the e

64 n sweat, tears, or saliva as indicators of a wearer's health status.

65 ectrochemical biosensor that conforms to the wearer's skin.

66 Rigid gas permeable wearers should avoid exposing their lenses to tap water

67 chlamydia and conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers should be treated with antibiotics.

68 n on top of a block, 20 long-term multifocal wearers stepped down (from different block heights) onto

69 thinner in corneas of long-term contact lens wearers than in control subjects.

70 orneal sensitivity was lower in contact lens wearers than it was in control subjects (P = 0.05) and d

71 was 0.06 D per year greater for contact lens wearers than spectacle wearers.

72 cal environment imposes a heat stress on the wearer that is itself a safety risk.

73 matically after the perspiration to keep the wearer warm.

74 e between contact lens wearers and spectacle wearers was not statistically significant (95% confidenc

75 e of carrots and tossed salads among denture-wearers was, respectively, 2.1 and 1.5 times less than f

76 emporal keratocyte densities in contact lens wearers were 22,122 +/- 2,676 cells/mm(3) (mean +/- SD)

77 xamined by confocal microscopy (contact lens wearers were excluded).

78 Both eyes of 20 adapted contact lens wearers were imaged when they wore two types of silicone

79 Contact lens wearers were most likely to report dry eye disease (52.3

80 d lenses from nine asymptomatic contact lens wearers were processed in a manner similar to controls.

81 Four hundred fifteen contact lens wearers were recruited and enrolled in this phase of a l

82 adjustment for age and gender, contact lens wearers were shown to be more likely to experience frequ

83 ntact lens wearers and 77% of former glasses wearers were strongly satisfied with LASIK at year 3.

84 Fifty non-contact lens wearers were studied.

85 lated from the cornea of a soft contact lens wearer who had keratitis.

86 n may be advantageous for elderly multifocal wearers who have a high risk of falling.

87 modifiable risk behaviors identified in RGP wearers who wore lenses for both orthokeratology and non

88 Controls were RGP contact lens wearers with no history of AK who were at least 12 years

89 obial keratitis were less likely to occur in wearers with the nonmutated IL-6 haplotype (severity OR,

90 ely to fall than are nonmultifocal spectacle wearers, with this risk further increasing when negotiat