ライフサイエンスコーパス: weight-bearing

1 an objective clinical measure for return to weight bearing.

2 artment-specific but not strictly related to weight bearing.

3 omedial foot pain, which was made worse with weight bearing.

4 scle undergoing remodeling due to changes in weight bearing.

5 adiograph of both knees were obtained during weight bearing.

6 e the wrist with the stability necessary for weight bearing.

7 n including knee radiographs obtained during weight bearing.

8 necessary and sufficient for sensitivity to weight-bearing.

9 n weight bearing (femur and humerus) and non-weight bearing (2(nd) lumbar vertebra and calvarium) bon

10 py-confirmed radiographs of the TF joint and weight-bearing, 30 degrees flexion, axial views of the P

11 bed when disuse was interrupted by 10 min of weight bearing (-61%).

12 e evaluated before and 2 weeks after altered weight bearing achieved with overpronation of one foot.

13 re associated with pain, specifically during weight-bearing activities.

14 during skeletal growth and on maintenance of weight bearing and balance training in the later years.

15 This may be related to weight bearing and epiphyseal maturation and should not

16 les, i.e. loss of external strain related to weight bearing and internal strain related to activation

17 of pain in the hip that usually worsens with weight bearing and leads to functional disability involv

18 Articular cartilage enables weight bearing and near friction-free movement in the jo

19 g is preferred, and allowing early protected weight bearing and rehabilitation of children with ambul

20 Therefore, weight-bearing and periodic high-intensity loading exerc

21 fferent functional zones and in the anterior weight-bearing and posterior non-weight-bearing regions

22 ension), disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of weight bearing, and disuse interrupted by 10 min/day of

23 with time, but only at the higher levels of weight-bearing, and independently of training.

24 vement, (2) ordinal scales of paw placement, weight-bearing, and limb flexion, and (3) the lowest lev

25 rns in articular cartilage are higher in the weight-bearing anterior medial condyle as compared with

26 In the first, weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral knee rad

27 demonstrated, limitation of the conventional weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) knee radiograph, in

28 Subjects were then asked about knee pain and weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral knee radiogra

29 Radiographic films (weight-bearing anteroposterior and skyline views) were r

30 Participants underwent standard weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiography and post

31 were asked about knee pain and had bilateral weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiography to defin

32 ing on the surface of articular cartilage in weight-bearing areas was estimated by digital imaging.

33 However, the low-weight-bearing articular cartilage from these patients s

34 opsy samples were also removed from the high-weight-bearing articular cartilage of the femoral condyl

35 Biopsy samples were obtained from the low-weight-bearing articular cartilage of the intercondylar

36 MIA treatment produced weight bearing asymmetry and cold hypersensitivity which

37 Pain behavior was measured as weight-bearing asymmetry.

38 After isograft transplantation, weight bearing began by day 17-25 after surgery.

39 Weight bearing began by day 30, but was incomplete in tw

40 mulation are correlated with the recovery of weight-bearing bipedal locomotion and may reflect activa

41 rrent gold standard for the treatment of low weight bearing bone defects.

42 -cord compression or impending fracture of a weight-bearing bone, and imaging guidelines are essentia

43 lication of treatment, avascular necrosis of weight-bearing bones, is still not known.

44 ates a sensor dependent on osteocytes of the weight-bearing bones.

45 ated as early as 2 days after the removal of weight-bearing, but the transcriptional mechanisms are e

46 f T2 relaxation times for the distal femoral weight-bearing cartilage (including epiphyseal and artic

47 tic resonance imaging T2 relaxation times in weight-bearing cartilage in patients with juvenile idiop

48 was detected in the low- as well as the high-weight-bearing cartilage of patients with late-stage OA,

49 ght-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) of both feet.

50 lation of betaMyHC gene expression under non-weight-bearing conditions.

51 roximal tibia, but the removal of functional weight bearing did not significantly alter BFR.

52 al fat mass (AFM) and bone health beyond its weight-bearing effect.

53 ainst osteoporosis, primarily because of its weight-bearing effect.

54 aging upper and lower extremities (including weight-bearing examinations) provides sufficient image q

55 of 22 women who reported long-term vigorous weight-bearing exercise had risks of OA similar to those

56 Weight-bearing exercise helps to maintain bone strength

57 These findings suggest that rhythmic, weight-bearing exercise may be an effective intervention

58 Prescribing effective weight-training and weight-bearing exercise programs for improving bone mass

59 dietary and pharmacologic interventions and weight-bearing exercise to prevent bone fractures.

60 Among daughters, lifetime weight-bearing exercise was a predictor of total and per

61 onsumption, supplemental calcium intake, and weight-bearing exercise were estimated retrospectively b

62 n, calcium intake from supplements, lifetime weight-bearing exercise, and bone mineral density (BMD)

63 eir genetically determined bone mass through weight-bearing exercise, post-menopausal ERT, and adequa

64 intained in adulthood with continued regular weight-bearing exercise.

65 radiographic joint space width (JSW) in the weight-bearing extended and the semiflexed AP views, in

66 JSW in weight-bearing extended-view radiographs of highly sympt

67 ntitative magnetic resonance (MR) T2 maps of weight-bearing femoral and tibial articular cartilage we

68 ant decrease in T2 of the superficial 40% of weight-bearing femoral cartilage after exercise.

69 Tibial and weight-bearing femoral condylar subchondral bone area an

70 bone mass, density and microarchitecture in weight bearing (femur and humerus) and non-weight bearin

71 Anteroposterior weight-bearing films were read for Kellgren and Lawrence

72 an objective measure of fracture healing or weight bearing for lower extremity fractures.

73 limb muscle loading was achieved by removing weight-bearing from the hindlimbs for 10 days followed b

74 and 1,729 community-derived individuals with weight-bearing fully extended tibiofemoral (TF) joint an

75 h scaffold-plus-cells exhibited coordinated, weight-bearing hindlimb stepping.

76 es type II collagen degradation and improves weight bearing in the affected rat joint.

77 mass in contrast with the positive effect of weight-bearing itself.

78 Thus, OA in 1 weight-bearing joint appears to influence the evolution

79 ALL therapy in all but one patient, involved weight-bearing joint(s) in 94% of patients, and was mult

80 Application of T2 mapping techniques to non-weight-bearing joints may provide a means for differenti

81 sk factors are particularly important in the weight-bearing joints, and modifying them may help preve

82 e risk factors are particularly important in weight-bearing joints, and modifying them may present op

83 ollagenous tissues, especially cartilages of weight-bearing joints, leading to a severe osteoarthropa

84 In weight-bearing joints, this growth zone comes to be subd

85 isk for the development of osteoarthritis in weight-bearing joints.

86 Women received anteroposterior weight-bearing knee radiographs at examinations 18 and 2

87 d > or =55 years had baseline interviews and weight-bearing knee radiographs in 1990-1991.

88 es, and acquired posteroanterior and lateral weight-bearing knee radiographs read for Kellgren/Lawren

89 Weight-bearing knee radiographs were obtained in 1983-19

90 maging (MRI) and fluoroscopically positioned weight-bearing knee radiographs.

91 cular cartilage in the anterior, M1, greater weight-bearing location.

92 monkeys, the brain-spine interface restored weight-bearing locomotion of the paralysed leg on a trea

93 , however, regained frequent stepping or any weight-bearing locomotion.

94 alternation, nor does it translate to a non-weight-bearing locomotor activity.

95 d for imaging the extremities, including the weight-bearing lower extremities.

96 l condyle as compared with the posterior non-weight-bearing medial condyle.

97 T1(rho) values of weight-bearing medial femorotibial cartilage in ACL-inju

98 conferred mechanical overload (MOV) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) responsiveness to a chloramphenicol

99 s attribute is readily observable in the non-weight-bearing (NWB) soleus muscle, which undergoes a sl

100 er test, and (3) improvements in balance and weight bearing on a horizontal rope.

101 In both weight-bearing open-field tests and nonweight-bearing sw

102 Poor fitness and low levels of weight-bearing physical activity contribute to low bone

103 Current lean mass and weight-bearing physical activity were more important det

104 On the other hand, current lean mass and weight-bearing physical activity were positively associa

105 Weight-bearing posteroanterior, skyline, and lateral rad

106 ined as a Kellgren/Lawrence score > or =2 on weight-bearing radiographs.

107 tests of quadriceps strength, and underwent weight-bearing radiography and magnetic resonance imagin

108 The patient underwent routine weight-bearing radiography of her left foot and weight-b

109 sion of wild-type Nedd4 in soleus muscles of weight bearing rats caused a decrease in Notch1 protein,

110 es within the epiphyseal cartilage along the weight-bearing region and posterior condyles.

111 ing the 2nd year, signal intensity along the weight-bearing region decreased.

112 he anterior weight-bearing and posterior non-weight-bearing regions of the medial femoral condyle (M1

113 Altered weight bearing should be added to the list of causes of

114 as observed in cartilage obtained from a low-weight-bearing site.

115 To assess PF OA progression, weight-bearing skyline views of the PF compartment were

116 paB activity and a decrease in fiber size of weight-bearing soleus muscles, while muscles overexpress

117 Weight-bearing sports activity in women is associated wi

118 stimulation enabled the man to achieve full weight-bearing standing with assistance provided only fo

119 results in 29% (10 of 35) of rats recovering weight-bearing status compared to 0% (0 of 29) of contro

120 o 28 days after injury, with improvements in weight bearing, step taking, and coordination of steppin

121 two key neurotransmitters changes to achieve weight-bearing stepping after spinal cord injury.

122 terns of sensory information associated with weight-bearing stepping.

123 hythm, step shape consistency, and number of weight-bearing steps were observed in robotically traine

124 een regions subjected to different levels of weight-bearing stresses are unique.

125 lters gait and the effective transmission of weight-bearing stresses through the foot and ankle.

126 riate quartile of percentage of femoral head weight-bearing surface involvement by both readers (weig

127 ercentage of involvement of the femoral head weight-bearing surface was evaluated subsequently for os

128 Larger lesions beneath weight-bearing surfaces should be approached with cautio

129 ecause of the importance of the hip joint in weight bearing the advent of hip disease in a child with

130 Gross motor and sensory reinnervation (weight bearing, toe spread) developed at >60 days in 14/

131 Femoral non-weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular carti

132 showed spatial variation similar to that of weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular carti

133 patellar and distal femoral weight- and non-weight-bearing unossified epiphyseal and articular hyali

134 l plane alignment using photographs of a non-weight-bearing view of both feet of 385 men and women (m

135 ibiofemoral joint on either AP/PA or lateral weight-bearing views, using a semiquantitative scale (wo

136 Weight-bearing was removed from the hindlimbs of mice fo

137 f the knee in 30 degrees of flexion and with weight bearing were obtained at baseline and at 30 month

138 Anteroposterior radiographs of the knee with weight bearing were obtained on 845 women (ages 44-67) o

139 radiographs of the fully extended knee with weight-bearing were read using a standard protocol and e

140 Radiographs of the knee (with weight-bearing) were read for joint space narrowing (sca