ライフサイエンスコーパス: weighting factor

1 fleet over each route type was assumed as a weighting factor.

2 e very close to the curves using the correct weighting factor.

3 sidues are enhanced by an interface-specific weighting factor.

4 single-section scanners and previous tissue-weighting factors.

5 nd scan mode used and reflect current tissue-weighting factors.

6 ide of the 364-keV photopeak using empirical weighting factors.

7 was achieved by linear regression with a 1/x weighting factor and deuterated internal standards.

8 grees increments), corrected using geometric weighting factors and then summed together to approximat

9 eighted by the NHANES III examination sample weighting factor, and results were adjusted for clusteri

10 forward rate constant for that step, and the weighting factors are simply the reciprocal sum of the f

11 rted with calibration curves using incorrect weighting factors as the concentrations were always repo

12 Weighting factors associated with functional or evolutio

13 However, the use of incorrect weighting factors did impact the assay performance signi

14 ion that 1/x(2) should always be used as the weighting factor for all bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays.

15 Temperature, which serves as a weighting factor for the internal energy (U) and entropy

16 ion method is required to choose the optimal weighting factor for the total penalty function to balan

17 The patterns of results were preserved when weighting factors for intracranial hemorrhage of 1.0 and

18 A simple procedure for selecting the correct weighting factors for linear and quadratic calibration c

19 Protection (ICRP) has established radiation weighting factors for stochastic effects.

20 adiological Protection Publication 60 tissue weighting factors for the standard man and woman.

21 cumulated activity in organs with specified weighting factors greater than 0.05.

22 ed with the volume fraction data and used as weighting factors in calculating an effective particle d

23 mbined application of C-values and suggested weighting factors in the eco-exergy calculation can impl

24 uct of absorbed dose in Gy and the radiation weighting factor is defined as the equivalent dose.

25 The correct weighting factor is determined by the relationship betwe

26 a, and the number of PLS factors raised to a weighting factor is found to perform best.

27 ss percept, consistent with a multiplicative weighting factor located downstream from the limiting in

28 Furthermore, machine learning weighting factors may reflect an objective biomarker of

29 The weighting factor of 1, 1/x, or 1/x(2) should be selected

30 utilized deuterated internal standards and a weighting factor of 1/x (R(2) > 0.998).

31 Finally, the difference between the weighting factors of 1/x(2) and 1/y(2) was discussed.

32 on 1.0); EDs were calculated with the tissue-weighting factors of ICRP103.

33 n a mean effective dose of 3.7 mSv using the weighting factors of the ICRP 103-only slightly above th

34 and 1.28 +/- 0.10 muSv/MBq using the tissue-weighting factors of the International Commission on Rad

35 and 1.26 +/- 0.20 muSv/MBq using the tissue-weighting factors of the International Commission on Rad

36 Optimizing the weighting factor on the penalty function by cross-valida

37 The impacts of using incorrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and

38 ing the hyperfine shift with their Boltzmann weighting factors provided a delta EL value of 185 +/- 2

39 s explicitly modeled leading to an intuitive weighting factor through which the problem can be seen a

40 NLMMRM estimates TE by associating a weighting factor to the data collected in each center.

41 lternative pathways, but by introducing flux-weighting factors to allow for the variable intrinsic co

42 of 814,934-1,557,121 DALYs, depending on the weighting factor used.

43 e vector machine and support vector machine 'weighting factors' (used for making predictions) correla

44 When a weighting factor was used that takes account of differen

45 ble curve could be obtained when the correct weighting factor was used, whereas other curves using in

46 diological Protection publication 103 tissue-weighting factors, was 8.2 mSv, using volume scanning wi

47 ngle photopeak window (338-389 keV), but the weighting factors were found to depend on the object bei

48 s used, whereas other curves using incorrect weighting factors were unstable.

49 Accepted tissue-weighting factors were used to calculate the effective d

50 anked and these data were used to adjust the weighting factors within the database.