戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1       Daily ZIP code-level estimates of 24-hr average PM2.5 were calculated by averaging concentrations within ZIP code b
2 s between PFP changes and injuries and descriptive analysis were calculated by using logistic regression and Fisher test,
3                  Offspring body mass index z scores (BMIZs) were calculated by using weight and length or height measured
4             The pharmacokinetic parameters of breast cancer were calculated by using the Tofts model with T1 values befor
5                               Multivariable ORs and 95% CIs were calculated by using conditional logistic regression.
6          Health expectancies for the three regions combined were calculated by the Sullivan method, which applies the age
7                                   Direct and indirect costs were calculated by using data from national registries.
8            Effective moisture diffusion coefficients (Deff) were calculated by Fick's diffusion model and their values va
9      Quantitative perfusion parameters, such as blood flow, were calculated by parametric deconvolution for each myocardi
10 idence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for development of HCC were calculated by Cox regression analysis.
11 ia(63-71)-NH2 and the corresponding cross-linked peptide II were calculated by molecular modeling.
12                                                Model inputs were calculated by combining data from representative househo
13              Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Poisson regression.
14                                        Confidence intervals were calculated by using the Wilson method, without correctio
15                      Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated by conditional logistic regression.
16                                Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson regression analysis.
17            The relative energies of the MOLP and OA isomers were calculated by DFT methods, and the possibility of solven
18                                           Fat fraction maps were calculated by using combined compressed sensing and para
19                                     Summary effect measures were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interva
20 nsitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing AUS findings to pathology result
21                                  Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
22 low, distribution volume, and mean transit time) parameters were calculated by placing regions of interest in the largest
23          ORs for the 90th compared with the 10th percentile were calculated by using conditional logistic regression, wit
24  cohort, and predicted prevalence in the general population were calculated by inverting 99% certainty tolerance limits.
25                                                    The PPVs were calculated by determining the ratio of the confirmed cas
26 of complementary DNA target with the immobilized DNA probes were calculated by using kinetic evaluation software, and fou
27 travel times between the beneficiary and the laser provider were calculated by using Google Maps distance and travel time
28                                             Admission rates were calculated by year, age, sex, and county of residence.
29 al driving emissions (RDEs) and fuel consumption (FC) rates were calculated by weighted averaging of the results from eac
30                                      Annual mortality rates were calculated by dividing the Kaplan-Meier 5-year mortality
31                                              National rates were calculated by diagnosis group.
32                               Incidence and remission rates were calculated by calibrating against real-world prevalence
33 cute and elective CS with vaginal delivery as the reference were calculated by using Cox regression.
34      The value of these parameters on predicting responders were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) cu
35          For each tumor, RENAL nephrometry and PADUA scores were calculated by using imaging-derived tumor morphologic da
36 r substantial symptoms (binary outcome) and severity scores were calculated by using Poisson and linear regression, respe
37 al underground nuclear explosions at North Korean test site were calculated by using an empirical Green's function approa
38                                 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using leave-one-out cross validation.
39         In addition to individual spectra, averaged spectra were calculated by accumulating free induction decays over al
40                              Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method.
41                 Overall and rectal cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
42                   Propensity scores for induction treatment were calculated by estimating probability of induction using
43 e intervention or control period and 12 months of follow-up were calculated by using Trimbos and Institute of Medical Tec
44 nally, corrected pore-water-concentration-based EC50 values were calculated by equilibrium partitioning using soil/pore-w
45 insulin were monitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curve (AUC)
46 , and measured meal GI and GL and insulin index (II) values were calculated by using the incremental area under the curve
47 rvals were obtained by using bootstrap resampling; P values were calculated by using a t test.
48  multimedia partition coefficients (lipid-water, air-water) were calculated by applying the new concept of a polymer as r
49            Annualized changes in mean gradient (mm Hg/year) were calculated by dividing the difference between the mean g
50   Age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated by country and sex.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。