ライフサイエンスコーパス: were expressed as

1 We found that intronic RNAs arising from U3 sLTRs of ERV-9 were expressed as both sense (S) and antisense (AS) transcrip

2 acid (GLA), dihomo-GLA, arachidonic acid, and adrenic acid were expressed as percentage of total fatty acids.

3 sponse rates at different AD thresholds were calculated and were expressed as the percentage of completely responding BMs

4 ned by ELISA or tandem mass spectrometry, respectively, and were expressed as median (25 - 75% range, mug/mmol creatinine

5 c inverse-variance method with random effects weighting and were expressed as mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean

6 Candidate antigens were expressed as recombinant proteins and used to analyze th

7 The alpha-zone and beta-zone areas were expressed as a percentage of optic disc area.

8 JKH-C7 and the receptor-blocking VHH class (JIK-B8) were expressed as a heterodimeric VHH-based neutralizing agen

9 Recipient CD154+TcM induced by stimulation with donor cells were expressed as a fraction of those induced by HLA nonident

10 Changes were expressed as a percentage of previous baseline levels.

11 rent treatments, weight loss, colour and acrylamide changes were expressed as a function of the thermal effect received b

12 es was poorly characterized when food iodine concentrations were expressed as mean values.

13 The values of vitamin E contents were expressed as mass equivalent of alpha-tocopherol known a

14 Costs were expressed as a proportion of the household's annual inco

15 Data were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation (with range).

16 Data were expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS) or standard

17 All data were expressed as means +/- standard deviation.

18 All data were expressed as means +/- standard deviations and were comp

19 Using cerebellar gray reference, 18F-T807 data were expressed as standardized uptake value ratio, and 11C-Pi

20 Changes (Delta) were expressed as a percentage from the baseline.

21 The estimates of the intervention effects were expressed as the mean differences in percentages or mill

22 Treatment effects were expressed as relative reductions.

23 All 200 Envs were expressed as a single round of replication pseudoviruses

24 In one vaccine, termed AdC68-gDMelapoly, the epitopes were expressed as a fusion protein within HSV-1 glycoprotein

25 The variables of CSC growth were expressed as a function of the changes in wall thickness

26 ) bivariate analyses were done and risk factors for illness were expressed as matched odds ratios and odds ratios (unmatc

27 Arabidopsis ProRS isoforms were expressed as His-tagged recombinant proteins in Escheric

28 Fermentation levels were expressed as the number of fermentation days and sum of

29 plasma, three previously described neutralizing murine mAbs were expressed as mouse-human chimeric antibodies and evaluat

30 ion coefficient ( ADC apparent diffusion coefficient ) maps were expressed as a percentage of the total tumor volume.

31 Biometric measurements were expressed as gestational-age-adjusted z scores.

32 Unexpectedly, 69 miRNAs were expressed as non-canonical isomiRs as the dominant AGO-b

33 Hazard ratios from Cox models were expressed as positive or negative, stratified by trial,

34 Results from regression models were expressed as the adjusted percentage difference (95% CI)

35 Treatment effects on DFS and OS were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and treatment effects

36 Health outcomes were expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and dir

37 ressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and treatment effects on pCR were expressed as odds ratios (ORs).

38 tive risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and st

39 Differences in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates were expressed as a fecundity rate ratio with 95% CI, calcula

40 Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence interval (

41 Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interva

42 Results were expressed as the fold change in outcome over deciles of

43 The results were expressed as median +/- interquartile range for ipsilate

44 The results were expressed as mug/g of wet weight (w/w).

45 Effect sizes were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% conf

46 , but they localized to the endoplasmic reticulum when they were expressed as amino-terminal green fluorescent protein fu

47 Summary traits were expressed as weight z scores [weight z score at 3 mo pre

48 including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), which were expressed as Z scores: weight-for-age, height-for-age an

49 Kv1.3-Kv1.5 channels and point-mutant Kv1.3 channels, which were expressed as GFP- or cherry-fusion proteins.

50 n in a manner that agreed with the model predictions, which were expressed as dose-signaling response curves.