戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sponse rates at different AD thresholds were calculated and were expressed as the percentage of completely responding BMs
2 esent the cumulative average intake across the 5 exams, and were expressed as percentile categories of intake (<=15th, >1
3 ned by ELISA or tandem mass spectrometry, respectively, and were expressed as median (25 - 75% range, mug/mmol creatinine
4 c inverse-variance method with random effects weighting and were expressed as mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean
5                                          Candidate antigens were expressed as recombinant proteins and used to analyze th
6       Thirty of the most immunodominant B. microti antigens were expressed as recombinant proteins in E. coli.
7                          The alpha-zone and beta-zone areas were expressed as a percentage of optic disc area.
8                           Macular ganglion cell asymmetries were expressed as absolute difference and ratios between infe
9         JKH-C7 and the receptor-blocking VHH class (JIK-B8) were expressed as a heterodimeric VHH-based neutralizing agen
10 Recipient CD154+TcM induced by stimulation with donor cells were expressed as a fraction of those induced by HLA nonident
11                                                     Changes were expressed as a percentage of previous baseline levels.
12 rent treatments, weight loss, colour and acrylamide changes were expressed as a function of the thermal effect received b
13 eavy and light chain cDNAs from dominant plasmablast clones were expressed as mAbs and used to purify antigens by using i
14 -sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence i
15 es was poorly characterized when food iodine concentrations were expressed as mean values.
16                            The values of vitamin E contents were expressed as mass equivalent of alpha-tocopherol known a
17                                                    All data were expressed as means +/- standard deviation.
18                                                    All data were expressed as means +/- standard deviations and were comp
19              Using cerebellar gray reference, 18F-T807 data were expressed as standardized uptake value ratio, and 11C-Pi
20                                             Changes (Delta) were expressed as a percentage from the baseline.
21                   The estimates of the intervention effects were expressed as the mean differences in percentages or mill
22                                                All 200 Envs were expressed as a single round of replication pseudoviruses
23 rming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) and epiregulin (EPRG) were expressed as FimH fusion proteins on the surface of E. c
24 d brain measures as outcome variables, and effect estimates were expressed as standardized beta values.
25      Random-effects NMA was performed and summary estimates were expressed as odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (OR
26 ) bivariate analyses were done and risk factors for illness were expressed as matched odds ratios and odds ratios (unmatc
27                                  Arabidopsis ProRS isoforms were expressed as His-tagged recombinant proteins in Escheric
28 plasma, three previously described neutralizing murine mAbs were expressed as mouse-human chimeric antibodies and evaluat
29                                      Biometric measurements were expressed as gestational-age-adjusted z scores.
30                               Hazard ratios from Cox models were expressed as positive or negative, stratified by trial,
31          Unadjusted estimates from linear regression models were expressed as percentage differences.
32                              Results from regression models were expressed as the adjusted percentage difference (95% CI)
33                                             Health outcomes were expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and dir
34 tive risks, comparing patients to the background population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and st
35           Differences in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates were expressed as a fecundity rate ratio with 95% CI, calcula
36                                                     Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficient
37                                                     Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interv
38                                                     Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence interval (
39                                                     Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interva
40                                                     Results were expressed as the fold change in outcome over deciles of
41                                                 The results were expressed as median +/- interquartile range for ipsilate
42                                                Effect sizes were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% conf
43 es, and entropies of adsorbed species and transition states were expressed as a function of surface coverage of the most
44                 The results of the pulmonary function tests were expressed as the percentage of predicted values and were
45                                                   Tradeoffs were expressed as incremental harm-benefit ratios (IHBR, incr
46                                              Summary traits were expressed as weight z scores [weight z score at 3 mo pre
47 iffness, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and R2* values were expressed as means of means.
48  including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), which were expressed as Z scores: weight-for-age, height-for-age an
49 Kv1.3-Kv1.5 channels and point-mutant Kv1.3 channels, which were expressed as GFP- or cherry-fusion proteins.
50 n in a manner that agreed with the model predictions, which were expressed as dose-signaling response curves.