コーパス検索結果 (right1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 owed relative error ranging from 5 to 19%, and less than 9% when compared with a commercial glucose meter.
2 genes and showed differences in their chondrogenic capacity when compared with a healthy control iPSC-line.
3 RK2 patients showed differences between both phenotypes and when compared with a sibling control in EMV size and release
4 id not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the TECS protocol when compared with an FTF examination.
5 Distinct VOC profiles where observed for F. tularensis when compared with B. anthracis while the observed profiles o
8 ll-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DCB group when compared with control treatment (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53
10 rotracheal intubation and reduces the risk of complications when compared with direct laryngoscopy.
11 s presented significantly lower levels of LL-37 and HNP 1-3 when compared with diseased sites of non-smokers.
12 gnificant decrease in CI within the spitzoid melanoma group when compared with either the Spitz nevi or atypical Spitz tu
13 ature that differ in physiology and clinical manifestations when compared with exercise-induced changes.
15 rmalizes faster after surgery in eyes with subretinal fluid when compared with eyes with intraretinal fluid.
16 r effort to gain reward but less effort to avoid punishment when compared with healthy age-matched control subjects.
17 suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the tumor microenvironment, when compared with Lys-SNAs and simple mixtures of oxidized l
18 uent granuloma formation and substantially extends survival when compared with mice deficient in all sources of IFN-gamma
21 It is clear that the bat immune system differs when compared with other mammals, yet the role that virus-der
22 cing costs and maximizing the efficiency of radiotracer use when compared with scans performed with a single mouse bed.
23 culoskeletal conditions (6.5 [3.9-11.1] and 8.0 [4.6-14.0]) when compared with siblings of the same age, although all the
25 these participants were older and more likely to be female when compared with the 3026 (22%) patients without hypertensi
26 top scoring approaches on the CAPRI score set (13 targets) when compared with the 37 scoring groups in CAPRI.
27 was greater following completion of the online intervention when compared with the clinical rotation when controlling for
28 as well as high colour stability during a 30-day shelf-life when compared with the commercial colourant E163.
29 se in survival of up to 22% in Nigeria, Zambia, and Uganda, when compared with the contributions of other factors (such a
32 of bacterial gene regulation, our knowledge remains limited when compared with the number of bacterial genomes and regula
35 nd approximately half as many eyes in the FAi-treated group when compared with the sham-treated group underwent IOP-lower
36 patient acuity mitigated attrition in attentional reserves when compared with the traditional rounding method.
37 r mean skill scores in the recall-assisted reflection group when compared with the video-assisted reflection group in the
38 significantly more in the recall-assisted reflection group when compared with the video-assisted reflection group.
39 HN3-T20 retained 73% enzymatic activity when compared with the wild-type immunotoxin in an adenosine
40 oxic agents, colonies reduced their variance in growth rate when compared with their founder cell, indicating a dynamic n
42 g (17%; 95% CI: 7%, 29%; zero of 21 studies) did not differ when compared with use of the same agent with corticosteroid
43 presented a superior lesion detection rate and specificity when compared with visual interpretation by PSMA RADS.
44 ed a stronger genotype effect on the rhizosphere microbiota when compared with wild barley genotypes adapted to desert en
45 bility of A(1)R-G279S(7.44) was enhanced by about 2 and 8 K when compared with wild-type A(1)-receptor and A(1)R-Y288A(7.
46 abilization of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) activity (mumol/min/mg) when compared with WT apoA-I and comparable PON1 activation/s
49 der the curve (AUC) of 0.883 across the 37 circRNA datasets when compared with XGBoost, k-nearest neighbor, support vecto