ライフサイエンスコーパス: wild animal

1 estimate of the importance of tool use in a wild animal.

2 isease in humans, but can be asymptomatic in wild animals.

3 ight pollution on the health of free-ranging wild animals.

4 g partnership between humans and free-living wild animals.

5 metabolism due to a total lack of studies in wild animals.

6 ourists can be both risky and beneficial for wild animals.

7 the physiological condition and survival of wild animals.

8 ecognized in shaping group differences among wild animals.

9 e in the gut microbiota of domestic and semi-wild animals.

10 ons for an independent transmission cycle in wild animals.

11 e interpretation of stable isotope data from wild animals.

12 e of morbidity and mortality in domestic and wild animals.

13 r pathogens infecting individuals exposed to wild animals.

14 in fine-scale daily foraging patterns among wild animals.

15 umans and analogous diseases in domestic and wild animals.

16 x epidemics causing widespread disease among wild animals.

17 cial intelligence, little is known about how wild animals acquire and store information about social

18 genus Brucella infect many domesticated and wild animals and cause serious zoonotic infection in hum

19 Francisella tularensis infects wild animals and humans to cause tularemia.

20 We sampled 941 healthy wild animals and isolated seventeen H7N2 viruses (eight

21 The genetic enhancement of wild animals and plants for characteristics that benefit

22 Thus, rovers can reduce human disturbance of wild animals and the resulting scientific bias.

23 between the enzootic transmission cycle (in wild animals) and that in domestic animals.

24 ce that noise reduces foraging efficiency in wild animals, and highlights the possible pervasive impa

25 is, a serious disease in domestic livestock, wild animals, and humans, is based on detection of these

26 timates of digestive load:capacity ratios in wild animals are virtually non-existent.

27 otic viruses, originating from and hosted by wild animals, are most likely shaped by commensalism rel

28 ssorted pathogens of human, and domestic and wild animals, but it is as vectors of arboviruses, and p

29 he most common threats for both domestic and wild animals, but little is known about the effects on t

30 recently recognized as potentially common in wild animals, but the extent to which it shapes modern g

31 rm weather patterns on I. hexagonus and uses wild-animal cadavers to illustrate the importance of abi

32 Currently, there is little evidence that wild animals can acquire resistance to these pathogens.

33 When brought into captivity, wild animals can adapt to domestication within 10 genera

34 ng infectious diseases (EIDs) of free-living wild animals can be classified into three major groups o

35 pathogens arising from humans, livestock and wild animals can be enhanced by genome-based investigati

36 In North America and Europe, cats and wild animals cause most human rabies.

37 es, but may not have been observed before in wild animals due to a lack of technology.

38 The movement of wild animals during changing environmental conditions pr

39 Understanding how wild animals, especially those already experiencing phys

40 ed that studies on innate immune function in wild animals exposed to a natural profile of infections,

41 riculture; (ii) the domesticability of large wild animals for food, transport, and agricultural produ

42 uses, we have screened blood samples from 14 wild animals from the Democratic Republic of Congo.

43 s growing interest in the effects of wind on wild animals, given evidence that wind speeds are increa

44 antelope was collected in 2003 from an Ohio wild-animal habitat during the same outbreak when a bovi

45 prophylaxis and the ubiquity of domestic and wild animal hosts makes eradication unlikely.

46 results provide experimental evidence that a wild animal in a natural setting responds adaptively to

47 (QMRA) from fecal pollution of domestic and wild animals in drinking/recreational water catchments.

48 e effects of climate change on morphology in wild animals: in particular, the effects of warming temp

49 Although wild animals increasingly encounter human-produced food

50 e new vector-borne pathogens spill over from wild animals into humans.

51 the complex genetic changes that transformed wild animals into their domesticated forms, and the popu

52 natural system, that survival probability of wild animals is directly related to their level of camou

53 Physiological monitoring of free-ranging wild animals is providing new insights into their adapta

54 the influence of DA toxicosis on behavior in wild animals is unknown.

55 ir history shows exposure to domesticated or wild animals known to be potential carriers of this dise

56 ht the potential synergism between trade and wild animal movement in the emergence and pandemic sprea

57 llenging to capture the contact structure in wild animals, new technology has enabled biologists to o

58 ous process under laboratory conditions, but wild animals often develop in variable and stressful env

59 cultural norms in foraging techniques in any wild animal, our results suggest a much broader taxonomi

60 from a giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in a wild-animal park in the United States.

61 Examining climatic effects on wild animal population dynamics requires ability to trap

62 Domestic and wild animal population movements are important in the sp

63 longitudinal investigations of genetics in a wild animal population to date.

64 The processes promoting disease in wild animal populations are highly complex, yet identify

65 Most wild animal populations are subjected to many perturbati

66 distributions have rarely been considered in wild animal populations as an important component of the

67 ood models for investigating the genetics of wild animal populations because they are: (1) widely dis

68 Identifying the regions where wild animal populations could transmit the Ebola virus s

69 identifying what behaviors qualify as new in wild animal populations has inhibited researchers from u

70 educed genetic variation on the viability of wild animal populations remain controversial.

71 In many wild animal populations, hosts are at risk of parasites

72 drivers of the abundance and distribution of wild animal populations.

73 nce, growth rate, or survival for samples of wild animal populations.

74 on and allocation in influencing survival in wild animal populations.

75 e are often used as a measure of "stress" in wild animal populations.

76 rapid quantitative predictor of survival in wild animal populations.

77 f environmental and anthropogenic drivers in wild animal populations.

78 However, tourist provisioning of wild animals provides them with highly desirable foods.

79 the infectious agents that circulate within wild animal reservoirs is essential for several reasons:

80 Unlike significant wild animal reservoirs of M. bovis that are considered p

81 often circulate as a heterogeneous swarm in wild animal reservoirs prior to their emergence in human

82 y providing an imaging analysis of an awake, wild animal's brain as it performs an adaptive, complex

83 n species, including domesticated as well as wild animals, serve as zoonotic carriers of this infecti

84 ularis aurea) are one of a limited number of wild animal species to use stone tools, with their tool

85 ly in interspecific crosses between outbred, wild animal species.

86 However, in wild animals, such effects of litter sex composition are

87 enemies, these results offer hope that other wild animal taxa threatened by invasive fungi might be r

88 ficient for cognitively complex agents, from wild animals to humans.

89 The ability of wild animals to respond flexibly to anthropogenic enviro

90 Investigating wild animals while minimizing human disturbance remains