ライフサイエンスコーパス: wild population

1 hich may not have been representative of the wild population.

2 s picta, based on data spanning >20 y from a wild population.

3 fine-scale location-based variation within a wild population.

4 taxa were reintroduced into the surrounding wild population.

5 study of baboons from an intensively studied wild population.

6 components of eco-evolutionary feedbacks in wild populations.

7 the processes involved remain unexplored in wild populations.

8 affect the distribution of pathogens within wild populations.

9 s of this hypothesis are rare, especially in wild populations.

10 ersal, but these are difficult to measure in wild populations.

11 life might shape life history strategies in wild populations.

12 ut sensitive strains are the majority in the wild populations.

13 taxa, and little of this work has focused on wild populations.

14 ries is not well understood, particularly in wild populations.

15 e phages) emerging as a dominant 'signal' in wild populations.

16 developing appropriate management tools for wild populations.

17 hose of polymorphisms shared by domestic and wild populations.

18 who studied patterns of genetic variation in wild populations.

19 role in shaping demographic trajectories in wild populations.

20 arvest on the genetics and sustainability of wild populations.

21 neutral loci to assess the genetic health of wild populations.

22 obial consumers influence fruit chemistry in wild populations.

23 more weedy populations when compared to both wild populations.

24 conferring disease refractoriness throughout wild populations.

25 onstrating the impact of this contaminant on wild populations.

26 ups, both of which typically do not hold for wild populations.

27 opriate for reconstructing sibling groups in wild populations.

28 he genetic causes of phenotypic variation in wild populations.

29 ant perennial weed has established itself in wild populations.

30 sms remain poorly understood, especially for wild populations.

31 ystems capable of moving effector genes into wild populations.

32 observe the effects of natural selection in wild populations.

33 sing occurs with at least a low frequency in wild populations.

34 been few attempts to measure their number in wild populations.

35 mation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations.

36 occurring both in laboratory strains and in wild populations.

37 ncies of t haplotypes (approximately 75%) in wild populations.

38 ation of gene drives for the manipulation of wild populations.

39 prerequisite to preventing the extinction of wild populations.

40 ssive alleles under inbreeding conditions in wild populations.

41 and evolution of sex chromosomes systems in wild populations.

42 es on the key drivers of social behaviour in wild populations.

43 r gene flow between cultivated and sympatric wild populations.

44 studies, but they also continue to exist as wild populations.

45 d be accounted for in demographic studies of wild populations.

46 processes have led to genetic structuring in wild populations.

47 require steps to mitigate transgene flow to wild populations.

48 ariation and erosion of genetic structure in wild populations.

49 803 barley landraces to 277 accessions from wild populations.

50 in that it is transmitted naturally through wild populations.

51 that mimics the effects of mortality in many wild populations.

52 conflict and maintains adaptive variation in wild populations.

53 hat measure multivariate maternal effects in wild populations.

54 olutionized quantitative genetic analyses of wild populations.

55 aspects of pair-bond and mating behavior in wild populations.

56 group selection driving collective traits in wild populations.

57 bsorption spectrum, has not been explored in wild populations.

58 influence selection and genetic variation in wild populations?

59 ghtly lower in inbred lines ( = 0.0094) than wild populations ( = 0.0128).

60 at r(2) = 0.50) when compared with the semi-wild populations (19.5 kb at r(2) = 0.22).

61 mid ( approximately 1%) and its frequency in wild populations (38/70).

62 on of foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa in wild populations across its native range (Pacific Northw

63 , potentially due to admixture from Burma in wild populations and demographic events post-captivity.

64 ymmetry in large samples collected from both wild populations and four moderately inbred lines of Dro

65 evolutionary fate of any resistance gene in wild populations and its environmental impacts depend up

66 aracterizing the entire growth trajectory in wild populations and lay the foundation necessary for id

67 s an important diagnostic tool for screening wild populations and private and zoo collections of Medi

68 genome-wide association study in C. elegans wild populations and quantitative trait locus mapping, w

69 for the process of natural divergence among wild populations and species [2].

70 assay, facilitating monitoring of Vgsc CN in wild populations and the elucidation of association betw

71 ated by mismatches in genome content between wild populations and their better-studied cultured relat

72 ngshan, which were two of the three smallest wild populations and were already severely under-represe

73 ingle nucleotide polymorphism data across 57 wild populations and whole genome re-sequencing, we find

74 services: lake eutrophication, harvest of a wild population, and yield of domestic herbivores on a r

75 ation underlying sexually selected traits in wild populations, and consequently, this phenomenon has

76 Allelic diversity was higher in the wild populations, and F(IS) lower.

77 the difficulty of defining the boundaries of wild populations, and show how two broadly similar speci

78 odel, 20-40% of all mutations in C. elegans wild populations are derived from programmed meiotic dou

79 Rather wild populations are in one of two stable states charact

80 at maintain patterns of genetic variation in wild populations are not completely understood.

81 e recently reported for disease outbreaks in wild populations are not sustainable.

82 t genes contributing to climate tolerance in wild populations are poorly described in number and effe

83 of the genomic numbers of mutant alleles in wild populations are scarce.

84 of mutations favored by natural selection in wild populations are similar to those that contribute to

85 ent genetic optima, but supporting data from wild populations are still scarce.

86 the first population genetic analysis of the wild population as well as of captive-born individuals (

87 may increase the contribution of some small wild populations at the expense of decreasing the contri

88 environments, but the few studies of in situ wild populations available to date rarely find strong su

89 predicted to spread if GM individuals enter wild populations (because of the mating advantage) and u

90 Our study has direct implications for wild populations, because many factors that could drive

91 ed in early life can alter life histories in wild populations, but our understanding of the processes

92 obile DNAs are potent sources of mutation in wild populations, but seem only rarely to have been used

93 sh behavior that could potentially impact on wild populations, but the physiological mechanisms under

94 on are under higher expression constraint in wild populations-but they show elevated rates of gene am

95 Inbreeding in wild populations can have devastating effects on fitness

96 rift between extant domesticated strains and wild populations collected from throughout the USA and M

97 However, pedigrees collected in wild populations commonly contain many individuals with

98 nt evidence of intrasegment recombination in wild populations, consistent with (i).

99 ts from local wild populations suggests that wild populations contributed locally adaptive variation

100 rigins of this crop, with different regional wild populations contributing putative adaptive variatio

101 ology of gestodene-exposed fish suggest that wild populations could be similarly affected.

102 rations made in laboratory organisms through wild populations could be used to address environmental

103 of the toolkit for animal model analyses of wild population data sets.

104 uctive output, provide complementary fits to wild population data: maturation time and early adult gr

105 that the genetic contribution of individual wild populations differs across the genome.

106 ariances in such traits remains difficult in wild populations, especially if related individuals inha

107 The rate of gene flow into the wild population, estimated using genetic markers, is oft

108 volved in the male-to-female sex reversal in wild populations exposed to environmental estrogens, and

109 that threaten to cause local extinctions if wild populations fail to adapt to novel conditions.

110 tudies are set to become widespread in those wild populations for whom appropriate phenotypic data an

111 in owl monkeys, we sequenced this locus in a wild population from the Gran Chaco.

112 ive F2-cross from The Netherlands (NL) and a wild population from the United Kingdom (UK).

113 s of Mexican sunflower landraces and Mexican wild populations from a broad geographic range.

114 des alleles recovered in both cultivated and wild populations from distinct geographic regions.

115 In any case, our analyses show that the wild population has survived for a long period of time w

116 To date, however, social network analysis of wild populations has been limited to static models that

117 e mice and to create new inbred strains from wild populations have the potential to strengthen house

118 ons have fewer unique trnG-trnS alleles than wild populations; however, five haplotypes were absent i

119 decreasing the contributions of other small wild populations, i.e., increasing the Xiaoxiangling con

120 decompositions have not been implemented in wild populations, impeding evolutionary inference.

121 est of phenotypically desirable animals from wild populations imposes selection that can reduce the f

122 nstructed pedigree from a 30-year study of a wild population in which trophy hunting targeted rams wi

123 t of O. niloticus are present in captive and wild populations in Hawaii.

124 to 8% having external tuberculous signs, in wild populations in Northumberland and Cheshire, England

125 We identify wild populations in southern China and the Yangtze valle

126 plans, the severely under-represented small wild populations in the current captive panda population

127 the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations into breeding plans, the severely under

128 thesis that the paucity of SIV infections in wild populations is a general feature of this monophylet

129 ore revealing the causes of ASR variation in wild populations is essential for understanding sex role

130 tween genotype, phenotype, and adaptation in wild populations is fundamental to the study of evolutio

131 n the variance of tissue isotope values from wild populations is informative.

132 used to establish the presence of culture in wild populations is the method of exclusion.

133 Because the prevalence of H. cetorum in wild populations is unknown, minimally invasive techniqu

134 ces of the green revolution, particularly in wild populations, is an important frontier in contempora

135 This result, not previously documented in wild populations, is as expected from theory if transmis

136 improve our ability to predict epidemics in wild populations, it will be necessary to separate the i

137 Feral fish outnumber wild populations, leading to a possible loss of local ad

138 ecular evolution (or the molecular clock) in wild populations may be explained by Muller's ratchet (o

139 LD decayed more slowly in inbred lines than wild populations (mean LD declined to 0.32 by 5.5 kbp in

140 es, survival and reproductive performance in wild populations, models of population dynamics often fo

141 ing that when the pollination environment in wild populations necessitates reproductive assurance, se

142 ng-resistant allele generation to suppress a wild population of a given size.

143 This hypothesis was tested in a wild population of brown anole lizards (Anolis sagrei) u

144 rnation emergence date of adult females in a wild population of Columbian ground squirrels in Alberta

145 expression of a lethal recessive allele in a wild population of conservation concern, and provide a g

146 carried out an experiment of this kind on a wild population of cooperatively breeding banded mongoos

147 Here we use natural variation in a wild population of Drosophila melanogaster to investigat

148 h by quantifying floral shape variation in a wild population of Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicacea

149 ith DNA profiling of all of the members of a wild population of field crickets across two generations

150 cimens, we describe the genomic changes in a wild population of honey bees in North America following

151 network of infrared video cameras to study a wild population of individually marked and genotyped fie

152 ference A. darlingi genome, sequenced from a wild population of males and females collected in the Br

153 rn phenotype ('self' or uniform colour) in a wild population of primitive Soay sheep.

154 trait and its association with fitness in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and there w

155 ange of life history traits and fitness in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Scotland

156 d with overall fitness) in an unmanipulated, wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus).

157 counterproductive; (2) in the absence of any wild population of reservoir hosts, the parasite will be

158 -quality territories and male body size in a wild population of side-blotched lizards, Uta stansburia

159 digree and high-density SNP information in a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to investigat

160 In a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries), phenotypic a

161 e self-reactive antibody responsiveness in a wild population of Soay sheep.

162 the genetic effects of supplementation on a wild population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from

163 ring plant, we use shotgun resequencing of a wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to

164 art association patterns across 19 days in a wild population of the New Caledonian crow--a tool-using

165 However, the wild population of Z. tequila did not show a significant

166 se growth data from both hatchery-raised and wild populations of a large freshwater fish (lake trout,

167 wide sample of P. viridiflava collected from wild populations of A. thaliana was investigated using f

168 immunodeficiency virus (SIV) persistence in wild populations of African nonhuman primates (NHPs) may

169 sive melanosis and melanoma (skin cancer) in wild populations of an iconic, commercially-important ma

170 of the variety tested is unlikely to affect wild populations of black swallowtails.

171 winter food supplements on egg production in wild populations of blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus).

172 ency of lethal giant larvae (lgl) alleles in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster was reported

173 s of female baboons (Papio hamadryas) in two wild populations of East Africa and in a large captive p

174 an pathogens, as well as emerging disease in wild populations of endangered species.

175 negative consequences for recruitment within wild populations of largemouth bass and possibly other e

176 Such patterns are common today in wild populations of long-lived birds and mammals.

177 evolution of iron acquisition strategies in wild populations of marine bacteria.

178 Essential oils (EOs) belonging to 25 wild populations of Origanum vulgare L. samples, growing

179 molecular markers (microsatellites) to study wild populations of plant and animals has created the ne

180 Data from studies of wild populations of RNA viruses are also considered, and

181 The sequences confirm that wild populations of S. purpurea are the likely progenito

182 -based data set from longitudinal studies of wild populations of seven primate species, we show that

183 tudy provides the first direct evidence from wild populations of stalk-eyed flies to support the hypo

184 nt an analysis of genetic variation in three wild populations of the barn swallow, Hirundo rustica.

185 ers covary with pollination intensity across wild populations of the biennial Sabatia angularis.

186 Using experimental manipulations in wild populations of the fiddler crab Uca stenodactylus,

187 We exploit wild populations of the marine chordate Ciona intestinal

188 curs with Wolbachia (strain wMel) in certain wild populations of the model organism Drosophila melano

189 Studies of wild populations of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana

190 Wild populations of the neopolyploid Tragopogon mirus (4

191 dea' factors, were found to be widespread in wild populations of Tribolium castaneum collected in Eur

192 crop, and in 212 individuals collected from wild populations of two closely related Manihot species.

193 in the viromes of laboratory fruit flies and wild populations of two insect vectors: mosquitoes and s

194 Studies of evolution in wild populations often find that the heritable phenotypi

195 -friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populations on farmland but may decrease agricultur

196 d approach relies on natural variation among wild populations or crop plants.

197 ble the spread of desirable genes throughout wild populations or to suppress harmful species, and may

198 , but we know little about their strength in wild populations, or the physiological mechanisms that m

199 method for spreading altered traits through wild populations over many generations.

200 genes and their functions has extended into wild populations, providing additional evidence that pig

201 f A. splendens were smaller than that of the wild population; qualitatively similar results were obta

202 sms driving the spread of this resistance in wild populations remain largely unknown.

203 n in the maintenance of genetic variation in wild populations remains a major problem in evolution.

204 stant transgene (VRT) has been introduced to wild populations repeatedly.

205 use of captive-reared parents to supplement wild populations should be carefully reconsidered.

206 ed sites were relatively pure, whereas three wild populations showed some degree of introgression and

207 bulwark against the continued extinction of wild populations, species, and ecosystems.

208 We identify three possible reasons why wild population studies may generally fail to find stron

209 combined with those of the previous work on wild populations, suggest that mating systems in these s

210 amine the causes of dispersal variability in wild populations, suggesting that observed patterns coul

211 Further, sequence similarity between distant wild populations suggests recent fragmentation.

212 in landraces of genomic segments from local wild populations suggests that wild populations contribu

213 o wild relatives and becoming established in wild populations that are not reproductively isolated fr

214 change is currently having a major impact on wild populations, this raises the possibility that life

215 elease of sterilized insects that reduce the wild population through infertile matings.

216 the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations to 6.7-11.2 % for Xiaoxiangling, 11.5-1

217 tter understand the genetic contributions of wild populations to domesticated barley, we compare sing

218 The use of data from wild populations to gauge the error associated with esti

219 to growth and maturation data from nineteen wild populations to generate population-specific estimat

220 diversity arises, we used deep sequencing of wild populations to reveal genetic variation patterns in

221 age those responsible for managing harvested wild populations to take into account possible selective

222 The genetic contributions from different wild populations to the captive panda population were hi

223 large sets of multiple genome sequences from wild populations to understand adaptation, with an empha

224 Fruitflies derived from a wild population vary in their resistance to infection wi

225 uantification of individual heterogeneity in wild populations' vital rates has recently attracted gro

226 solation, and population genetic analysis of wild populations, we set out to determine whether eviden

227 It was found that while wild populations were best described by a lognormal dist

228 These wild populations were domesticated in several distinct N

229 y differential viability of hybrid larvae in wild populations where native California Tiger Salamande

230 after anthesis (before nectar is depleted in wild populations), whereas other floral traits (scent, s

231 Using replicate wild populations with differing levels of sexually antag

232 es about dynamics and mechanistic drivers in wild populations, yet commonly suffers from insufficient