ライフサイエンスコーパス: wild strain

1 ory strain tend to evolve faster than in the wild strain.

2 acity to swarm and did so as robustly as the wild strain.

3 ting extensive mating in both industrial and wild strains.

4 ed heterogeneous stock (WHS) mice from eight wild strains.

5 sion response to 5% ethanol in S288c and two wild strains.

6 amining segregation of markers in crosses of wild strains.

7 nguishable in architecture from those of the wild strain, 3610.

8 y to interrogate genomic DNA diversity in 23 wild strains (accessions) of Arabidopsis thaliana (arabi

9 say, which was based on transfer of trt to a wild strain and screening for transformability in the pr

10 yloid-based yeast prions from laboratory and wild strains and disease-related polyglutamine proteins

11 ressions are absent in the large majority of wild strains and gene ontology analyses indicate that se

12 sequencing of a worldwide collection of 200 wild strains and identified 41,188 SNPs.

13 enetically and phenotypically separated from wild strains and originate from only a few ancestors thr

14 quired ethanol tolerance in a large panel of wild strains and show that most strains can acquire high

15 In contrast, the "selfish" 2mu DNA was in 38 wild strains and the selfish RNA replicons L-BC, 20S, an

16 We find that none of 70 wild strains carry this prion, suggesting that it is not

17 Wild strains carrying [PIN+] are far more likely to be h

18 CeNDR provides the research community with wild strains, genome-wide sequence and variant data for

19 Fully one-third of wild strains harboured them.

20 We find that Rnq1p polymorphisms in wild strains include several premature stop codon allele

21 ired for acquisition of ethanol tolerance in wild strains, including new genes and processes not prev

22 The absence of [URE3] and [PSI+] in wild strains indicates that each prion has a net deleter

23 duction of alleles of degQ and swrA from the wild strain into the domestic strain was sufficient to a

24 hat create new traits have not been found in wild strains, leading to the perception that they are ra

25 f mutated genes was then introduced into the wild strain NCIB 3610 to study their effects on biofilm

26 rkedly attenuated biofilms compared with the wild strain NCIB3610 (3610), even after repair of a muta

27 Bacillus subtilis JH642 and a wild strain of B. subtilis called 22a both produce an an

28 in a cross between a laboratory strain and a wild strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

29 scanning electron microscopy showing that a wild strain of the Gram positive bacterium Bacillus subt

30 Wild strains of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) exhib

31 Much of the flowering time variation in wild strains of Arabidopsis thaliana is due to allelic v

32 We found that in wild strains of B. subtilis, surfactin disrupted vesicle

33 Wild strains of Bacillus subtilis are capable of forming

34 The isolation of wild strains of Caenorhabditis elegans has facilitated t

35 ariation in the acute response to ethanol in wild strains of Caenorhabditis elegans.

36 nations of X chromosomes and cytoplasms from wild strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

37 bda) of bacteriophage lambda was examined in wild strains of Escherichia coli.

38 ct sequences cloned from five laboratory and wild strains of mice and from hamsters and minks.

39 ain that aneuploidy is well tolerated in the wild strains of S. cerevisiae that we studied and that t

40 d that aneuploidy was frequently observed in wild strains of S. cerevisiae.

41 ilar cell types, for example lab strains and wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultured under

42 variation in a cross between laboratory and wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

43 Here we biochemically test approximately 700 wild strains of Saccharomyces for [PSI(+)] or [MOT3(+)],

44 n frequencies differed significantly between wild strains of the fungus Sordaria fimicola isolated fr

45 using embryonic lethality in crosses between wild strains of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans The

46 Wild strains of the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus sub

47 al variants of a prion protein isolated from wild strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

48 a portion of the E protein for a panel of 38 wild strains of YF virus from Africa representing differ

49 ated strain and the deletion of CAP10 from a wild strain resulted in an acapsular phenotype.

50 sequence dissimilarity correlates well with wild-strain segregation.

51 athogen in the presence of the nonpathogenic wild strain showed that the antibody fragments retained

52 ere we show that some Caenorhabditis elegans wild strains switch between two foraging behaviours in r

53 Wild strains that have not undergone domestication in th

54 al [PSI+] variants, the absence of [PSI+] in wild strains, the mRNA turnover function of the Sup35p p

55 rogeny of a cross between a laboratory and a wild strain using flow cytometry and high-content micros

56 These wild strains were able to form robust biofilms both in d

57 ds of Sup35p and Ure2p) were not found in 70 wild strains, while [PIN+] (amyloid of Rnq1p) was found

58 to all offspring in meiosis, its absence in wild strains would imply that it has a net deleterious e

59 ading to the laboratory strain (S288c) and a wild strain (YJM789) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and fou