ライフサイエンスコーパス: wildlife

1 xposure to infectious diseases in humans and wildlife.

2 cular disease in cloven-hoofed livestock and wildlife.

3 ction and monitoring of infectious agents in wildlife.

4 oni) after extensive screening of Australian wildlife.

5 e change and shifts in breeding phenology of wildlife.

6 uct habitat, and provide food for humans and wildlife.

7 hogen that causes severe disease in dogs and wildlife.

8 smission dynamics of a bacterial pathogen in wildlife.

9 pathogens for humans, domestic animals, and wildlife.

10 HBCD to alpha-HBCD is detected in humans and wildlife.

11 ransmission to people, domestic animals, and wildlife.

12 irculating concentrations of this hormone in wildlife.

13 es another source of estrogenic exposure for wildlife.

14 lic health, religious faith, fair-trades and wildlife.

15 few cases where nematode parasitism impacts wildlife.

16 as pollutants, can increase disease risk in wildlife.

17 nant factor modulating Hg exposure to Arctic wildlife.

18 es are needed to combat the illegal trade in wildlife.

19 on as a means of reducing disease threats to wildlife.

20 thane emissions and reevaluate production by wildlife.

21 ions can drive the spread of new diseases to wildlife.

22 rom dogs was the main driver of infection in wildlife.

23 potential for bioaccumulation in humans and wildlife.

24 f transmission given contact in free-ranging wildlife.

25 ms need tools to predict mercury exposure of wildlife.

26 tion is an emerging global threat for marine wildlife.

27 estigating the hazardous effects of PFASs on wildlife.

28 alleviation, can be achieved in harmony with wildlife.

29 se and the prevalence of social behaviour in wildlife.

30 imize the negative effects on apes and other wildlife.

31 cted water that contains substances toxic to wildlife.

32 ernational concern about how this may impact wildlife.

33 implications for research and management of wildlife.

34 rstanding the infectious disease dynamics in wildlife.

35 on-insect agents, for example, pathogens and wildlife.

36 vation of apes and other endangered tropical wildlife.

37 ed with adverse health effects in humans and wildlife.

38 ed with adverse health impacts on humans and wildlife.

39 er to fully characterize exposure in aquatic wildlife.

40 of explants to study fat tissue function in wildlife.

41 latives infect Australian and South American wildlife.

42 tentially more accurate method for surveying wildlife.

43 on the global distribution and abundance of wildlife [1, 2], the key question of whether the ranges

44 Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documente

45 oral vaccine technologies protect endangered wildlife against a rising tide of infectious disease?

46 inctions, we have profoundly affected marine wildlife, altering the functioning and provisioning of s

47 display variable atropisomeric enrichment in wildlife and animal models, especially at higher trophic

48 nsider pathogen transmission in free-ranging wildlife and classify them by the model type employed, t

49 Understanding patterns of viral diversity in wildlife and determinants of successful cross-species tr

50 s they have been detected in both humans and wildlife and have been shown to be toxic.

51 nterdisciplinary-based understanding of both wildlife and human diseases.

52 eHg) is a neurotoxic compound that threatens wildlife and human health across the Arctic region.

53 Examples from both wildlife and human systems demonstrate how this framewor

54 des pose a significant environmental risk to wildlife and humans and have been associated with Alzhei

55 has been widely detected in the environment, wildlife and humans, but few studies have ever examined

56 ental media and has adverse health effect on wildlife and humans.

57 wer questions about pathogen transmission in wildlife and identify key gaps in the literature.

58 Deciphering transmission dynamics at wildlife and livestock interface areas is key to develop

59 in infectious diseases at interfaces between wildlife and livestock, to characterize animal species a

60 roductive and developmental abnormalities in wildlife and plants and have been linked to male inferti

61 es of research demonstrate that roads impact wildlife and suggest traffic noise as a primary cause of

62 rth America increases, so do disturbances to wildlife and the habitats they rely upon.

63 thropogenic debris in hundreds of species of wildlife and the toxicity of chemicals associated with i

64 Human actions can affect wildlife and their nematode parasites.

65 understand whether UAVs act as stressors to wildlife and to quantify that impact.

66 re "minimal" bacteria able to infect humans, wildlife, and a large number of economically important l

67 Infectious diseases of humans, wildlife, and domesticated species are increasing worldw

68 dies have reported on OPs in biota including wildlife, and essentially there is no information on OP

69 widespread contamination of the environment, wildlife, and human populations.

70 ause clinical disease in livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans.

71 he resilience of ecosystems, safeguard their wildlife, and protect their capacity to supply vital goo

72 pathogens for humans, domestic animals, and wildlife, and these viruses occasionally cross the speci

73 Europe around the year 2000, but impacts on wildlife appear to vary across species and location.

74 Populations of large wildlife are declining on local and global scales.

75 -world contaminant mixtures to which aquatic wildlife are exposed.

76 chipmunk genotype I isolates from humans and wildlife are genetically similar, and zoonotic transmiss

77 we investigate whether viral communities in wildlife are inherently structured (inferring predictabi

78 However, studies of stress in wildlife are often limited to baseline endocrine measure

79 tes, and the relative roles of livestock and wildlife as hosts in fragmented habitats, limiting the d

80 assessing the impacts from infrastructure on wildlife, based on functional response curves describing

81 These fences represent a major threat to wildlife because they can cause mortality, obstruct acce

82 e cycles can maintain transmission even when wildlife becomes rare.

83 50-1925 to represent baseline conditions for wildlife before heavy exploitation on the Tibetan Platea

84 re with human visitor experience and disrupt wildlife behavior, fitness, and community composition.

85 ions experiencing land-use changes and where wildlife biodiversity (mammal species richness) is high.

86 tion was established in the Wuwei Endangered Wildlife Breeding Centre (WEWBC) in the 1980s.

87 tion and agriculture cause declines for many wildlife, but some species benefit from novel resources,

88 Supplemental food provided to wildlife by human activities can be more abundant and pr

89 ure of piscivorous birds and sport fish when wildlife cannot be directly sampled.

90 We show that wildlife co-infections are frequent, possibly affecting

91 es protection and promotes sustainable human-wildlife coexistence across large multiple-use landscape

92 ting unintentional rewilding and spontaneous wildlife comebacks as underused sources of information.

93 ainforest have severe consequences for local wildlife communities.

94 e areas also have highest threats from human-wildlife conflict.

95 tools to optimize benefits and reduce human-wildlife conflicts.

96 effective mitigation strategies that balance wildlife conservation and sustainable agriculture are st

97 ve action to balance poverty alleviation and wildlife conservation in 4 pastoral ecosystems of East A

98 d have serious implications for agriculture, wildlife conservation, and human health.

99 e the applicability of precision medicine to wildlife conservation, including sea turtles, amphibians

100 ong-term population dynamics is critical for wildlife conservation.

101 different mechanisms is a major challenge in wildlife conservation.

102 thin a species range-which may reflect human-wildlife contact.

103 76-189 Tg yr(-1) ) of methane globally, with wildlife contributions uncertain.

104 can involve simple spillover from enzootic (wildlife) cycles, as in the case of West Nile virus acco

105 icting the indirect effects of anthropogenic wildlife declines and irruptions, and how these effects

106 g stages, such as fungi causing catastrophic wildlife declines on a global scale, must confront lengt

107 s (i) provide experimental evidence of large wildlife defaunation increasing landscape-level disease

108 pathogen persistence is a vital component of wildlife disease ecology and control.

109 be broadly applicable for investigations in wildlife disease ecology.

110 These results carry implications for wildlife disease management and highlight areas for futu

111 nomic breadth and persistent impacts of this wildlife disease on a continental scale.

112 However, wildlife disease research tends to focus on contact hete

113 Here, we use a natural wildlife disease system, house finches and the conjuncti

114 ental factors and parasite co-occurrences on wildlife disease.

115 ry response to strong selection imposed by a wildlife disease.

116 ansmission given contact are key to managing wildlife disease.

117 nes in biodiversity could increase human and wildlife diseases and decrease crop and forest productio

118 derused tool for the management of human and wildlife diseases and pest populations.

119 Research on emerging infectious wildlife diseases has placed particular emphasis on host

120 easible approach to identifying and treating wildlife diseases in a targeted, effective and streamlin

121 ons for understanding and managing human and wildlife diseases.

122 nd how environmental variation can influence wildlife diseases.

123 dictions can be tested by closely monitoring wildlife dispersal through the Arctic Ocean and using mo

124 Cross-species disease transmission between wildlife, domestic animals and humans is an increasing t

125 with critical implications for the health of wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.

126 Resulting shifts in wildlife ecology can alter infectious disease dynamics a

127 natural resources, and subsequent changes in wildlife ecology can have profound impacts on host-paras

128 t role in the infectious disease dynamics of wildlife, especially in species subject to large populat

129 that promote the integration of small-scale wildlife-friendly habitats might be of limited benefit w

130 ion on biodiversity: land sharing integrates wildlife-friendly habitats within farmland landscapes, a

131 portant to consider the additional stress on wildlife from UAV flights when developing regulations an

132 lected samples are a common source of DNA in wildlife genetic studies.

133 of oil palm plantations has led to extensive wildlife habitat conversion in Southeast Asia [1].

134 s cacao and coffee with shade trees, provide wildlife habitat that supports natural predators, which,

135 scales, which we show to impact estimates of wildlife-habitat associations.

136 derlying the emergence of fungal diseases in wildlife has gained significance as a consequence of dra

137 on, permafrost, and glaciers, but effects on wildlife have been difficult to detect.

138 ditionally, a precision medicine approach to wildlife health has in turn the potential to provide dee

139 e to address the impact of EDCs on human and wildlife health in Africa.

140 Mercury (Hg) is a global threat to wildlife health that can impair many physiological proce

141 s (BDs, for example, insects, pathogens, and wildlife herbivory) substantially affect boreal and temp

142 describing isolation of DD treponemes from a wildlife host, suggesting that the disease may be evolvi

143 ecifically, within-host antibody kinetics in wildlife hosts can be short-lived and produce patterns t

144 nale subsp. centrale strains from cattle and wildlife hosts from South Africa and indicate the utilit

145 persistence of disease resistance among its wildlife hosts in endemic areas.

146 including domestic dogs and an assortment of wildlife hosts.

147 health threat to human seafood consumers and wildlife in coastal regions worldwide.

148 The incidental capture of wildlife in fishing gear presents a global conservation

149 Vs) provide an opportunity to rapidly census wildlife in remote areas while removing some of the haza

150 f the critical environmental concerns facing wildlife in the 21st century.

151 bioaccumulate and the importance of fish and wildlife in the Inuit diet.

152 We find that brucellosis was introduced into wildlife in this region at least five times.

153 inth parasites and other pathogens of Arctic wildlife, in the hope that such models may eventually al

154 is is considered as a significant stress for wildlife including sea turtles.

155 lution by accelerating phenotypic changes in wildlife, including animals, plants, fungi, and other or

156 atures produce a variety of consequences for wildlife, including mass die-offs.

157 ks, environmental contamination, and harm to wildlife, including pollinator species.

158 pothesis that defaunation, the loss of large wildlife, increases zoonotic disease risk by directly or

159 et of management practices aimed at reducing wildlife incursions.

160 nation is essential, especially at livestock-wildlife interfaces.

161 r, the spread of disease from farmed fish to wildlife is a concern.

162 policy on invasive species and parasites of wildlife is fragmented, and the lack of international co

163 CC models currently in use; (ii) output from wildlife is much higher than previously considered; and

164 directionality of pathogen co-occurrences in wildlife is rudimentary.

165 hood issues before addressing more difficult wildlife issues, using strategic and periodic engagement

166 B) is an important and widespread disease of wildlife, livestock and humans world-wide, but long-term

167 An extensive literature search combining wildlife, livestock, disease, and geographical search te

168 ew of research on infectious diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface to date.

169 ltry interface was the most frequently cited wildlife-livestock interface worldwide with other interf

170 The role and significance of wildlife-livestock interfaces in disease ecology has lar

171 Prominent wildlife-livestock interfaces resulted largely from inte

172 s occurring at the wildlife-public health or wildlife-livestock interfaces.

173 that rodent-borne disease responses to large wildlife loss may represent an important context where t

174 ely to intensify as a major driver of marine wildlife loss.

175 To achieve sustainability, future wildlife management should account for this predictable

176 sixth mass extinction is driving innovative wildlife management strategies, including the use of pro

177 stimating animal populations is critical for wildlife management.

178 iciently collect population data critical to wildlife management.

179 Wildlife managers are seeking to determine the frequenci

180 Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge and Federal wildlife managers want grazing to cease, presumably lead

181 n contact structure and ranging behaviour of wildlife may impact disease dynamics.

182 However, wildlife may respond negatively to the UAVs, thereby ske

183 on of human precision medicine approaches to wildlife medicine in order to enhance species conservati

184 Human impacts on wildlife might impair parasites by reducing the abundanc

185 ce provisioning could improve assessments of wildlife most prone to disease risks in changing environ

186 Although wildlife nematodes have many possible responses to human

187 comitant implications for disease control in wildlife of conservation concern, livestock and humans.

188 cure this endangered crane lineage and other wildlife on the Tibetan Plateau.

189 ently pressured to minimize the intrusion of wildlife onto their farm fields by removing surrounding

190 the role of emerging metropolises in driving wildlife overharvesting in forests and inland waters is

191 robatidis (Bd) has caused the greatest known wildlife pandemic, infecting over 500 amphibian species.

192 rns of amphibian declines driven by a global wildlife pandemic.

193 rminants of infectivity and pathogenicity of wildlife pathogens.

194 de: FOSA), into a prevalent compound in most wildlife (perfluorooctanesulfonate: PFOS).

195 s, and fully engage together in pastoral and wildlife policy development.

196 abitat degradation, loss of biodiversity and wildlife population reductions resulting in reduced gene

197 Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs loca

198 Many wildlife populations are declining at rates higher than

199 ronmental contaminants, and their effects on wildlife populations could be exacerbated by climate cha

200 g is the predominant way of controlling many wildlife populations devoid of large carnivores.

201 nal conservation efforts, yet its impacts on wildlife populations inhabiting these ecosystems have no

202 standing the factors that limit and regulate wildlife populations requires insight into demographic a

203 Overexploitation of wildlife populations results in direct consequences, suc

204 t patterns of spatial spread for diseases in wildlife populations with concomitant implications for d

205 onic infections may have negative impacts on wildlife populations, yet their effects are difficult to

206 ical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations.

207 effects of wildfire on sage-grouse and other wildlife populations.

208 ur understanding of the role of parasites in wildlife populations.

209 have significant impacts on the dynamics of wildlife populations.

210 ely recognized to have substantial impact on wildlife populations.

211 lephant interactions in structuring arboreal wildlife populations.

212 ependent pathology have led to extinction in wildlife populations.

213 n for understanding the impact of disease on wildlife populations.

214 ergence in new species, including endangered wildlife, posing challenges for controlling disease in m

215 nderstanding patterns of movement of illegal wildlife products.

216 Tissue residue guidelines for wildlife protection based on lake trout and walleye tota

217 tems, and a lack of studies occurring at the wildlife-public health or wildlife-livestock interfaces.

218 ur results suggest that in MRD areas, forest wildlife rational use for better human nutrition is poss

219 he island is now part of the Alaska Maritime Wildlife Refuge and Federal wildlife managers want grazi

220 (KSC) and associated Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge in east central Florida.

221 a two-day wildfire in the McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge, 125 km southeast of Houston, which was

222 We found no effect of wildlife removal on per capita prevalence of Bartonella

223 Zoonoses originating from wildlife represent a significant threat to global health

224 funding of community-based epidemiology and wildlife research programs led and funded by African ins

225 pean badger (Meles meles) is implicated as a wildlife reservoir and is the subject of control measure

226 The European badger is recognised as a wildlife reservoir for bovine tuberculosis (bTB); the co

227 it is both a protected species and the main wildlife reservoir for bovine tuberculosis infection in

228 les are a protected species and an important wildlife reservoir of bovine tuberculosis.

229 Kingdom (UK) and to examine their role as a wildlife reservoir of infection for susceptible species.

230 pean badger (Meles meles) is implicated as a wildlife reservoir of infection.

231 While eradication is not feasible due to the wildlife reservoir, large scale vaccination activities i

232 erotypes are maintained effectively in their wildlife reservoir, the African buffalo, and individuals

233 ghts the potentially unpredictable impact of wildlife reservoirs for future human pandemics and the n

234 e index cases in humans (i.e. spillover from wildlife reservoirs) occurred mostly in hotspots of fore

235 ion in these foci is traditionally driven by wildlife reservoirs, rising human and livestock populati

236 om their ancestral homes in a central Indian wildlife sanctuary.

237 Wildlife scientists continue to be interested in studyin

238 Wildlife screening values previously published for bird

239 including by consulting with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or National Marine Fisheries Serv

240 The United States Fish and Wildlife Service listed 201 species of salamanders as "i

241 s to obtain detailed temporal information on wildlife social contacts.

242 functioning by offering habitat for numerous wildlife species and influencing stand development.

243 of 342 host-parasite interactions across 56 wildlife species and three broad taxonomic groups of par

244 study is the first to confirm that there are wildlife species as sensitive as the chicken and demonst

245 f such bioactive substances to interact with wildlife species at sensitive life stages and affect the

246 us from those in dogs, suggesting that other wildlife species may play a role in a potentially comple

247 With wildlife species such as elk now suffering a CODD-like d

248 Wildlife species such as European starlings (Sturnus vul

249 be used to investigate adipose regulation in wildlife species with large fat reserves, when opportuni

250 deterioration represent the main threats to wildlife species, and are closely linked to the expansio

251 predicted that the gray catbird, a relevant wildlife species, is also highly sensitive.

252 in the behavior and habitat-use patterns of wildlife species, little is known about its influence on

253 in residual virulence for highly susceptible wildlife species.

254 ly characterized and virtually unexplored in wildlife species.

255 vesicular disease in domestic livestock and wildlife species.

256 ly predicting future habitat extent for many wildlife species.

257 and can be applied to lipid tissue of other wildlife species.

258 another recently described environmental and wildlife species.

259 nd in ovo or in utero transfer for any given wildlife species.

260 d States and a key resource for many endemic wildlife species.

261 ely prevented observation of this process in wildlife species.

262 y and computer vision to improve traditional wildlife survey methods.

263 superspreading phenomenon in a free-ranging wildlife system.

264 ave only been modelled in a few well-studied wildlife systems such as rabies and bovine tuberculosis.

265 he extent to which these experiments work in wildlife systems, or whether the results of these indivi

266 nsect stage (e.g., larvae) to assess risk to wildlife that feed on subsequent life stages (e.g., adul

267 rough foodwebs, can reach levels in fish and wildlife that may pose health risks to human consumers.

268 Humans have a long history of moving wildlife that over time has resulted in unprecedented bi

269 directly, by affecting managed livestock and wildlife that provide valuable resources and ecosystem s

270 dies provide emerging evidence of impacts to wildlife, there has been little systematic assessment of

271 eening values, and used to estimate risk for wildlife through fish consumption.

272 mination of water can be toxic to humans and wildlife; thus the development of methods to detect this

273 Understanding the dynamic responses of wildlife to agriculture can help predict current and fut

274 es have examined the behavioral responses of wildlife to aircraft (including UAVs), but with the wide

275 tivity of waterborne pathogens of humans and wildlife to solar UV, and use the DNA action spectrum to

276 s, but little is known about the exposure of wildlife to these contaminants, particularly in birds, i

277 In wildlife tourism settings, animals often experience elev

278 lance declined with increasing distance from wildlife tourists in the two habitats, with a minimum di

279 The presence of wildlife tourists may represent a form of disturbance to

280 e significantly increased in the presence of wildlife tourists.

281 ulturally iconic and sought-after species by wildlife tourists.

282 roduces a new perspective in the analysis of wildlife tracking datasets, with different animal groups

283 Illegal wildlife trade has reached alarming levels globally, ext

284 f key countries will help strategize illegal wildlife trade interventions.

285 twork analysis and a new database, HealthMap Wildlife Trade, to identify the key nodes (countries) th

286 y nodes (countries) that support the illegal wildlife trade.

287 The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the

288 ted 201 species of salamanders as "injurious wildlife" under the Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. section sign 42

289 imal space use is vital to understanding how wildlife use habitat.

290 ant or unacceptable risk of ARs to nontarget wildlife, use of SGARs in most EU member states remains

291 l of 18 OH-PBDE congeners reported in marine wildlife using two in vitro bioassays, namely the classi

292 roughly twofold higher in sites where large wildlife was absent.

293 cause for the outbreak could be determined, wildlife was implicated as a disease vector.

294 ironmental compartments (139/157), including wildlife, water, soil, and air/dust.

295 up of micropollutants that adversely affects wildlife, we applied a bioanalytical approach.

296 hich recognizes that the fate of the world's wildlife will be decided largely by the hospitality of a

297 ese results could help prioritize monitoring wildlife with particular trait profiles in anthropogenic

298 ting putative endocrine disruption in Arctic wildlife with potential population-level effects.

299 gondii is a health risk to humans and marine wildlife, with infections documented in both nearshore a

300 for effective management and conservation of wildlife, yet rarely are estimators compared in their ro