ライフサイエンスコーパス: win

1 orithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the

2 controls (with 1 tie), representing a 48.8% "win rate" (95% confidence interval, 38.1%-59.5%) for the

3 A win was signaled if all three lights were set to on, whe

4 A win-win platform was thus attained, on which Cu was reco

5 ng for 'concave' trophic pyramids might be a win-win for people and ecosystems, by providing higher-v

6 Incentivizing carbon storage can be a win-win pathway to conserving biodiversity and mitigatin

7 d accounting for pest control demonstrates a win-win for biodiversity and coffee farmers.

8 In contrast, decision-making following a win was characterized as relatively slow and relatively

9 e insect dispersal, there is potential for a win-win outcome in which both timber production and fore

10 ceable size restriction of >30 cm provides a win:win outcome in the short term, delivering both ecolo

11 orcing of the climate system, representing a win-win for both ozone and climate.

12 We find that a win in the 10 d before Election Day causes the incumbent

13 orcement by developing an approximation to a win-stay/lose-shift rule.

14 that organic amendments were necessary to a win-win strategy for both SOC sequestration and maize pr

15 ryozoan colonies involved in contests with a win/loss outcome, leading to death of the loser) was thr

16 the importance of direct visualization as a winning strategy.

17 environmental deterioration arises because a winning lineage has to compete against more winners in s

18 thms, with a fitness function to determine a winning solution from many.

19 To this end, L.U.St implements a winning sites test allowing ranking of a collection of a

20 sting that co-limitation at equilibrium is a winning strategy.

21 Bayesian model selection revealed a winning model, the architecture of which revealed bidire

22 Here, we quantify how a 'win-win' community-based resource management program ind

23 or optimizing patient care but leading to a 'win-win' situation for medical personnel by improving re

24 d in carbon credit calculations, to achieve "win-win" outcomes, deliberate decisions about project de

25 region in which activity predicted adaptive win-stay/lose-shift behavior.

26 Here, we determined whether adding win-associated audiovisual cues to a rat gambling task (

27 not known whether global warming will affect winning times in endurance events, and counterbalance im

28 A fourth drug, bosutinib, may also win FDA approval in 2011.

29 volume misfolded proinsulin species may also win the passage competition through the ER and move on t

30 ssive Bully line of flies that almost always win fights against the parental wild-type Canton-S stock

31 m damage and multiple scattering will always win over increased contrast at the lowest energies.

32 describe an instrumental loss-avoidance and win-gain reinforcement learning functional magnetic reso

33 on + loss anticipation) versus baseline, and win anticipation versus loss anticipation.

34 to strategically redesign existing drugs and win the race against mutations that lead to drug resista

35 ork for anticipating win-win, lose-lose, and win-lose outcomes as a result of how people manage their

36 ere, we provide a framework for anticipating win-win, lose-lose, and win-lose outcomes as a result of

37 Positive reward anticipation, winning outcome, and evaluation of right choices activat

38 Despite an apparent win-win between conservation and profitability at the ag

39 Given that many elections are won by small margins, our results suggest that a search

40 offs, what distinguishes locations that are "win-win" exceptions from other locations?

41 70 to reduce the classification of losses as wins suggests that D(4) antagonists could be effective i

42 Fit and Strong! is an award winning, evidence-based, multiple-component physical act

43 emory technology of the future and have been winning a great deal of attention due to their ability t

44 ccuracy on the high-probability pair, better win-stay performance (selection of the previously reward

45 e rate and dynamics of adaptation and biases winning mutations toward those with the largest selectiv

46 n in which researchers and participants both win.

47 We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce

48 y" and when the subject expected to lose but won, the trial was defined as "lucky".

49 rlying the nervous system changes induced by winning and losing bouts during agonistic encounters.

50 We propose a novel measure, called "win percentage", for assessing the suitability of machin

51 Given that scurred males cannot win conflicts with normal-horned males, it is unusual th

52 -art homology detection methods and the CASP-winning template-based protein structure prediction meth

53 , and being equipped with multiple challenge-winning text mining algorithms to ensure the quality of

54 tion stores memories of host-pathogen combat won by the virus.

55 is a web service implementing a competition-winning approach utilizing word and syntactic analyses b

56 Despite this lack of general concordance, "win-win" areas-regions important for both ecosystem serv

57 DD/healthy control subjects) and conditions (win/loss anticipation).

58 However, how certain connections win the competition with others and are subsequently mai

59 n which the minority preference consistently wins globally; that the presence of "extremist" individu

60 After age was controlled, wins alone predicted teacher-rated social dominance.

61 ents with OCD outperformed healthy controls, winning significantly more points.

62 Subjects in the CTL group could win vouchers in prize-bowl drawings, but HIV care behavi

63 We define win percentage as the probability a classifier will perf

64 Tasks included odor-delayed win-shift (nonspatial working and reference memory), win

65 ignificantly more errors in the odor-delayed win-shift, win-stay, and attentional set-shifting tasks

66 ies fight; (ii) whether flies adopt distinct winning and losing strategies as hierarchical relationsh

67 are-associated infections (HAIs) as a double-win that can both improve health outcomes and reduce hea

68 During win events the striatum was underactive in major depress

69 ntromedial prefrontal cortex activity during winning outcomes.

70 and PRM, Gd@C(82)(OH)(22) is shown to easily win the competition over PRM in occupying the active sit

71 patory cues to respond to a target to either win money or avoid losing money.

72 of effort to improve their chances of either winning or avoiding the loss of money.

73 odynamic signal in the caudate during either wins or losses.

74 two males in which her preferred male either won or lost.

75 trade-offs exist under the all-encompassing "win-win" claims.

76 that are better adapted to their environment win the competition for common resources from less well-

77 ERGC wins only when one of the genomes (referential or target

78 could compete with and, in some cases, even win over subtype A and D isolates.

79 antly associated with reduced activation for wins compared with losses in bilateral ventral striatum,

80 This suggests a high potential for 'win-win' forest management strategies, where overall mul

81 the world's energy coming from fossil fuel, winning the battle also requires capturing CO2 from larg

82 Because neither goal wins complete control of behavior, the result may be tha

83 The states and Federal government won't give any grants, and we can't raise rates." Applyi

84 ince then, the field has progressed greatly, winning two Nobel Prizes and seeing the implementation o

85 the National Academy of Sciences, or who had won a major career award--trained significantly fewer wo

86 stic understanding and drug development hard-won by FOP researchers to pediatric neurooncology.

87 These findings suggest that the hard-won lessons of shell shock continue to have relevance to

88 pharmacological S1P receptor antagonist has won approval to control autoimmune neuroinflammation in

89 HCD wins in number of matched peptide-spectrum-matches (958

90 HCD wins together with EThcD in cross-link site calling prec

91 By revealing how win-win decisions elicit responses in dissociable brain

92 However, how winning synapses emerge through competition remains uncl

93 Further, we conducted experiments to test if winning and losing probabilities are affected only by th

94 brain connectivity among regions involved in win/loss anticipation in depressed individuals with bipo

95 n vivo genetic selection (SELEX) resulted in winning sequences that contain an H4a-like stem-loop, wh

96 al striatum, the same reward area as seen in winning.

97 ptimize management practices that result in "win-win" outcomes for grasslands, the environment, and h

98 of the well-known IPD strategies, including win-stay-lose-shift.

99 d magnitude and partial valence information (win vs. loss) but not outcome (favourable vs. unfavourab

100 Instead, win percentage captures the non-zero probability that ea

101 Instead, wins were related to cooperation and display variables.

102 care?," "I'm afraid that my health insurance won't pay for a clinical trial," and "I'm worried that I

103 Interestingly, winning animals had significantly more BDNF mRNA in the

104 Before that battle is won, the tumor may exist within the organ unnoticed by t

105 and negative relationships, leading to joint wins, losses, and trade-offs depending on specific conte

106 nd NMDA receptors causing first winner keeps winning of granule cells, illustrate how fundamental pro

107 r lose money on each trial given three known win probabilities (25, 50, or 75%).

108 ons for folklists, and clarify how the lists win the credence of otherwise skeptical people.

109 When the female saw her preferred male win a fight, SBN nuclei associated with reproduction wer

110 earning and performance of a radial arm maze win-shift task with all 8 arms baited.

111 well practiced performance of a radial maze win-stay task.

112 t (nonspatial working and reference memory), win-stay (habit learning), and attentional set-shifting

113 MeSHLabeler won the first place in Task 2A of 2014 BioASQ challenge,

114 Each picture was paired with a monetary win or loss either congruently or incongruently.

115 ponses associated with experiencing monetary wins and losses.

116 value information to maximize their monetary wins and minimize their losses.

117 encodes value (greater response to monetary wins than losses during fMRI), while the ventral SN conn

118 la circuitry that also responded to monetary wins; in addition, near-miss-related activity in the ros

119 rarely entering non-rewarded arms, and more win-stay responses by returning to recently rewarded arm

120 Regardless of which motor wins, its stepping rate slows due to the resistive load

121 We recruit Zambian politicians who narrowly won or lost a previous election to play behavioral games

122 ers but wild-type strains were also observed winning, suggesting that the competitive advantage of mu

123 to observed aggression but not to observed "wins" of aggressive bouts.

124 Ochoa won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1959 fo

125 ene-pairs, we show that precise estimates of win percentage (within 1%) can be achieved using a small

126 ement, they are often overlooked in favor of win-wins.

127 and connectivity direction as a function of win or loss anticipation.

128 f a behavioural increase in the magnitude of win-stay strategy and a neural modulation of feedback-re

129 s, these results help resolve the paradox of win-win choices.

130 ing reward task that included the periods of win and loss anticipation.

131 operation, because the deterministic rule of win-stay, lose-shift works best.

132 We illustrate the utility of win percentage using synthetic data, and evaluate six cl

133 and when exerting effort in anticipation of winning money.

134 n the hippocampus may instantiate aspects of winning such as control of a territory in dominant anima

135 resident does not stand a reliable chance of winning alone.

136 in which losers eventually have no chance of winning and thus become non-functional.

137 including a voucher for a 1 in 100 chance of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

138 rate was associated with decreased chance of winning.

139 if the extreme strategies have no chance of winning.

140 study 5), cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize (study 6), and endorse unethical behavio

141 heir initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying.

142 e (resource value) with perceived chances of winning contests (resource holding potential).

143 action to gambles featuring small chances of winning large amounts (called "positively skewed" gamble

144 These effects of winning were likely exclusive to the neural androgenic s

145 biases that create a distorted expectancy of winning.

146 n in satC generated three distinct groups of winning sequences.

147 t overbidding may result from either "joy of winning" or risk aversion.

148 tions--situations in which the likelihood of winning and losing is unknown.

149 natives differ circularly in their number of winning samples.

150 dditional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%.

151 om the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%.

152 We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additiona

153 s failed to adjust their bets by the odds of winning, consistent with a role of the insular cortex in

154 increased betting regardless of the odds of winning, consistent with a role of vmPFC in biasing heal

155 d expectancies with various probabilities of winning or losing different amounts of money in 15 patie

156 f uncertainty (e.g., when the probability of winning or losing is 50/50 and no particular financial c

157 market's estimate of a team's probability of winning the game before it occurs to isolate the surpris

158 In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and

159 The probability of winning was conveyed using explicit visual cues (sector

160 y (i.e., attending to overall probability of winning) were associated with activation in parietal and

161 sociated with a predetermined probability of winning, which was altered repeatedly to examine neural

162 though switching doubles the probability of winning.

163 ct that switching doubles the probability of winning.

164 ction errors modulated by the probability of winning.

165 f choice to information about probability of winning; while decreasing discrimination according to ma

166 n of effort independently of the prospect of winning or losing.

167 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning marathon times by 2100.

168 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning times by 2100.

169 r, Scissors and by manipulating the value of winning and losing.

170 Finally, they examined the relative power of wins and cooperation in predicting 2 measures of social

171 he outcome is positive and when the value of wins are low, highlighting how vulnerable we can be when

172 t lever, which delivered 10 sugar pellets on win trials but a 10-second time penalty on loss trials,

173 rtain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a 'jackpot' signal prior to r

174 Marathon to test for an effect of warming on winning times by men and women.

175 t to anticipate effects of future warming on winning times.

176 when rare, whereas chemical killers can only win in a well-mixed environment when sufficiently abunda

177 eas choices on the other type-featuring only wins (gain only)-were exclusively driven by risk aversio

178 to lead to the emergence of a single optimal winning strategy in which individuals maximize their gai

179 social success rather than a single optimal winning strategy.

180 That is, if one just lost money or won money, this may impact future decisions.

181 rease the yield gap of farmers who can't -or won't- use nitrogen fertilizer.

182 oited by game shows, yet why watching others win elicits a pleasurable vicarious rewarding feeling in

183 eriod in each trial when the actual outcome (win or loss) was revealed.

184 l reward circuitry during a reward paradigm (win, loss, and control conditions), symptom dimensions,

185 Hence influenza A virus has partially won the battle against this newly identified ZAPL antivi

186 In particular, win percentage provides a single measurement that could

187 and how individuals or their component parts win or lose is poorly understood.

188 lphaGo Zero achieved superhuman performance, winning 100-0 against the previously published, champion

189 activation during all anticipation periods (win anticipation + loss anticipation) versus baseline, a

190 ons from transport offers a potential policy win-win; the magnitude of potential benefits, however, i

191 Controls responded to positive ('win') feedback by a reduction in RT and activation of th

192 ype of gamble-involving weighing a potential win against a potential loss (mixed)-could be driven by

193 ed FN to unpredicted compared with predicted wins (i.e., intact +RPE) and decreased FN to unpredicted

194 For the Signaled group, presenting win signals effectively blocked value discounting for th

195 Thus, in principle, winning aggressive encounters may cause long-term and co

196 Root Cause Analysis, an IBI prize-winning module, requires students to use a systematic ap

197 f its utility, the scope of this Nobel prize-winning reaction is rather limited when applied to aliph

198 all interfering RNA (siRNA) is a Nobel prize-winning technology that is now being evaluated in clinic

199 ww1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/ approximately arief/R/win/.

200 nagement-intensive grazing, may offer a rare win-win strategy combining profitable food production wi

201 reversals completed and selectively reduced win-stay behavior.

202 onment dictates which of the two replicators wins.

203 s learned to select high probability reward (win pound1) and avoid high probability punishment (lose

204 ed that in the 30-year period, 96 scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine or chemistry for work re

205 These data suggest mechanisms to select "winning" inputs by regional reinforcement of postsynapti

206 mary motor cortex (Bayesian model selection; winning model Bayes factors >17).

207 y more errors in the odor-delayed win-shift, win-stay, and attentional set-shifting tasks compared wi

208 ly and sometimes failed to develop a single "winning" cluster before budding.

209 ween 1933 and 2004 did not consistently slow winning times because of high variability in temperature

210 es and headwinds on the day of the race slow winning times.

211 ificantly more errors in the delayed spatial win-shift task, an mPFC-mediated behavior, which suggest

212 ll tournament, where we find that surprising wins and losses affect presidential approval.

213 in-group trust and cooperation, rather than winning (in)direct intergroup competitions.

214 ging that when losses are more frequent than wins, the mPFC error effect disappears, and moreover, ex

215 llowing conflicts that were lost rather than won.

216 utators in all conditions, and mutators that win competitions are on average fitter than nonmutator w

217 Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that winning a competition increases the likelihood of winner

218 nd real-time quantitative PCR, we found that winning fights either at home or away increases the expr

219 Our data indicate that winning a competition lead to more dominant behaviour, a

220 The win-stay/lose-shift heuristic appears not to be a unifie

221 an oil cooperatives aggressively promote the win-win aim of simultaneously benefiting local people an

222 The winning strategy (discountmachine) relied nearly exclusi

223 er density, has the potential to achieve the winning combination of a high energy and power density.

224 ernal validity for our learning task and the winning computational model.

225 iate selection of the strongest input as the winning competitor.

226 d costs (or benefits) of competition for the winning parasitoid reveal that time lags between success

227 n, Fastqz and Samcomp/Fqzcomp, including the winning entry.

228 Moreover, selective photo-ablation of the winning CF (that undergoes dendritic translocation) reve

229 the mature 1:1 innervation by selecting the winning calyceal input based on synaptic strength.

230 We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bo

231 ociated microbial communities along with the winning metabolic strategy Salmonella serovars use to ed

232 g motor steps backward in synchrony with the winning motor.

233 timal compensation scheme coincides with the winning strategy of the Red Balloon Challenge.

234 unding that can be leveraged to promote the "win-win" environmental and development benefits of impro

235 tion of stove programs that can realize the "win-win-win" of health, local environmental quality, and

236 A class II-specific CD4(+) T cells from the "winning" CBU may contribute to rejection of the "loser"

237 nize with the tectal location receiving the "winning" feedback from Ipc.

238 This paper tests some of these win-win claims.

239 If they won a bet, the wager was doubled in the next round.

240 cipants played a Roulette task in which they won and lost money.

241 hese cells are highly excitable and may thus win the competition to fire.

242 d all 10 balloons in less than 9 hours, thus winning the Challenge.

243 Thus, winning fights can change brain phenotype in a manner th

244 To win, one needs to understand the characteristics of an a

245 re positively associated with the ability to win aggressive contests.

246 ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity to win (t = 2.68) (all P < .05, corrected).

247 left middle prefrontal cortical activity to win compared with 20 healthy youth.

248 rsal anterior cingulate cortical activity to win may reflect heightened reward sensitivity and greate

249 ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity to win may reflect reward insensitivity in youth with disru

250 or cingulate cortical (r = 0.27) activity to win.

251 articipants were exerting physical effort to win monetary incentives.

252 Specifically, when a subject expected to win but lost, the trial was defined as "unlucky" and whe

253 an agent from a numerically larger group to win in a right-of-way competition against an agent from

254 The tendency of resident groups to win contests may help explain how small groups persist i

255 not merely attributable to working harder to win (or not lose) money, although an effect of motivatio

256 ies strategically interacted with the IOM to win several favored scientific and regulatory recommenda

257 y and that these sperm may be more likely to win access to oocytes.

258 flicts, such that winners are more likely to win again (the winner effect) and losers more likely to

259 use males of this species are more likely to win fights after accruing victories in their home territ

260 their preferred candidate is more likely to win the election.

261 dividuals also did not show FN modulation to win (i.e., impaired +RPE).

262 provided them with distinct opportunities to win each of the rewards that comprised the indifference

263 pants stop a rotating clock hand in order to win points.

264 for sensory systems force one population to win out over all others?

265 As expected, the probability to win predicted the choice to engage in high-effort/high-r

266 f response, but only when the probability to win was the highest.

267 tions in reward magnitude and probability to win.

268 e greater reliance on lose-shift relative to win-stay behaviour shown in previous studies were explor

269 often proposed as an essential first step to win-win solutions for poverty alleviation and biodiversi

270 ey may engage in extreme behaviors to try to win acceptance.

271 logy centers around the globe are working to win over the critics.

272 e frame, in which starvation corresponded to winning nothing.

273 tivity (FRN) and P300 for losses compared to wins as well as a volatility driven FRN.

274 atum and encodes salience (equal response to wins and losses).

275 rafficking mechanisms that pathogens use to "win the fight" over zinc and thrive in an otherwise host

276 onger stimuli, the stimulated side tends to 'win' because excitation from a shorter, trigeminal nucle

277 ght excitation transfer and singlet trapping won over fluorescence, radiation-less decay, and triplet

278 n dynamics substantially clarifies how truth wins in groups.

279 How truth wins in social groups is an important open problem.

280 rn by responding more strongly to unexpected wins than losses.

281 The time-to-first event, unmatched win-ratio, and days-alive-and-out-of-hospital composites

282 attack each other, the most numerous usually wins.

283 virus (HIV)/SIV infection, the virus usually wins the race, irreversibly crippling the immune system

284 When winning money in the real world, individuals sustaining

285 demonstrate that the effect holds only when winning means performing better than others (i.e., deter

286 ends the children's game to situations where winning or losing can matter more or less relative to ty

287 Whereas "win-win" projects that achieve both conservation and eco

288 actors to solve the crystal structure, which won me a research studentship to Trinity College Cambrid

289 mong the exquisitely talented scientists who won the Sandra K.

290 (potential) targets in the visual scene will win the competition for attentional resources.

291 Win-win choices cause anxiety, often more so than decisions

292 Win-win interventions that satisfy multiple objectives are a

293 stove programs that can realize the "win-win-win" of health, local environmental quality, and climate

294 A) nuclei of the amygdala when compared with winning animals as well as novel cage and home cage cont

295 h wins on accept trials, and negatively with wins on reject trials, consistent with striatal activity

296 in this same region covaried positively with wins on accept trials, and negatively with wins on rejec

297 of the likelihood that each candidate would win.

298 gambling task predicting whether they would win or lose money on each trial given three known win pr

299 or limiting resources and the largest would "win," explaining why yeast cells always make one and onl

300 ess statements about people in general ("You win some, you lose some.").