ライフサイエンスコーパス: winning

1 if the extreme strategies have no chance of winning.

2 ction errors modulated by the probability of winning.

3 ntly associated with a higher probability of winning.

4 rger trait value has a higher probability of winning.

5 biases that create a distorted expectancy of winning.

6 rate was associated with decreased chance of winning.

7 though switching doubles the probability of winning.

8 ct that switching doubles the probability of winning.

9 al striatum, the same reward area as seen in winning.

10 lphaGo Zero achieved superhuman performance, winning 100-0 against the previously published, champion

11 Winning a competition engenders subsequent unrelated une

12 Winning a competition increased both explicit and implic

13 Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that winning a competition increases the likelihood of winner

14 Our data indicate that winning a competition lead to more dominant behaviour, a

15 emory technology of the future and have been winning a great deal of attention due to their ability t

16 study 5), cheat to increase their chances of winning a prize (study 6), and endorse unethical behavio

17 l status, including events such as losing or winning a territorial encounter, result in changes in so

18 ded Ebola treatment unit at the Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) campus.

19 d in an ophthalmology clinic at Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) Hospital in Monrovia, Liberia.

20 The Eternal Love Winning Africa (ELWA) outbreak diagnostic laboratory, es

21 Winning aggressive disputes can enhance future fighting

22 Thus, in principle, winning aggressive encounters may cause long-term and co

23 We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce

24 resident does not stand a reliable chance of winning alone.

25 dditional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%.

26 om the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%.

27 rlying the nervous system changes induced by winning and losing bouts during agonistic encounters.

28 lves a period of agonistic activity in which winning and losing decide relative positions in the hier

29 tions--situations in which the likelihood of winning and losing is unknown.

30 Further, we conducted experiments to test if winning and losing probabilities are affected only by th

31 ies fight; (ii) whether flies adopt distinct winning and losing strategies as hierarchical relationsh

32 r, Scissors and by manipulating the value of winning and losing.

33 in which losers eventually have no chance of winning and thus become non-functional.

34 er natural income experiments (e.g., lottery winnings) and other methods that allow better adjustment

35 A) nuclei of the amygdala when compared with winning animals as well as novel cage and home cage cont

36 Interestingly, winning animals had significantly more BDNF mRNA in the

37 is a web service implementing a competition-winning approach utilizing word and syntactic analyses b

38 heir initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying.

39 from the 2004 Olympics to show that similar winning biases occur in contests in which neither contes

40 tainty (i.e., there is no guarantee that the winning bids for such an auction can be found in a "reas

41 the mature 1:1 innervation by selecting the winning calyceal input based on synaptic strength.

42 A class II-specific CD4(+) T cells from the "winning" CBU may contribute to rejection of the "loser"

43 Moreover, selective photo-ablation of the winning CF (that undergoes dendritic translocation) reve

44 rtain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a 'jackpot' signal prior to r

45 Winning clones exhibited shorter doubling times, greater

46 ly and sometimes failed to develop a single "winning" cluster before budding.

47 er density, has the potential to achieve the winning combination of a high energy and power density.

48 iate selection of the strongest input as the winning competitor.

49 ernal validity for our learning task and the winning computational model.

50 s failed to adjust their bets by the odds of winning, consistent with a role of the insular cortex in

51 increased betting regardless of the odds of winning, consistent with a role of vmPFC in biasing heal

52 e (resource value) with perceived chances of winning contests (resource holding potential).

53 the remote food source, and this Nobel Prize-winning discovery revealed the most sophisticated exampl

54 n, Fastqz and Samcomp/Fqzcomp, including the winning entry.

55 Fit and Strong! is an award winning, evidence-based, multiple-component physical act

56 nize with the tectal location receiving the "winning" feedback from Ipc.

57 Thus, winning fights can change brain phenotype in a manner th

58 nd real-time quantitative PCR, we found that winning fights either at home or away increases the expr

59 Analyses of winning (functional) sequences revealed three different

60 it trial winnings plus a portion of previous winnings (high-penalty trials).

61 umans, would fail to maximize their expected winnings in a version of the MHD.

62 in-group trust and cooperation, rather than winning (in)direct intergroup competitions.

63 We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additiona

64 of "chicken." As subjects watched ostensible winnings increase over time, they decided when to press

65 These data suggest mechanisms to select "winning" inputs by regional reinforcement of postsynapti

66 decided when to press a button to bank their winnings, knowing that if they did not stop pursuing mon

67 action to gambles featuring small chances of winning large amounts (called "positively skewed" gamble

68 environmental deterioration arises because a winning lineage has to compete against more winners in s

69 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning marathon times by 2100.

70 demonstrate that the effect holds only when winning means performing better than others (i.e., deter

71 ociated microbial communities along with the winning metabolic strategy Salmonella serovars use to ed

72 mary motor cortex (Bayesian model selection; winning model Bayes factors >17).

73 Bayesian model selection revealed a winning model, the architecture of which revealed bidire

74 Root Cause Analysis, an IBI prize-winning module, requires students to use a systematic ap

75 We recovered a set of "winning" molecules that describe solutions to this probl

76 When winning money in the real world, individuals sustaining

77 and when exerting effort in anticipation of winning money.

78 g motor steps backward in synchrony with the winning motor.

79 e rate and dynamics of adaptation and biases winning mutations toward those with the largest selectiv

80 e frame, in which starvation corresponded to winning nothing.

81 ltimately participate in the function of the winning nucleic acid(s)-where recombination is expected

82 nd NMDA receptors causing first winner keeps winning of granule cells, illustrate how fundamental pro

83 of effort to improve their chances of either winning or avoiding the loss of money.

84 ends the children's game to situations where winning or losing can matter more or less relative to ty

85 d expectancies with various probabilities of winning or losing different amounts of money in 15 patie

86 Winning or losing in agonistic encounters can have strik

87 f uncertainty (e.g., when the probability of winning or losing is 50/50 and no particular financial c

88 n of effort independently of the prospect of winning or losing.

89 t overbidding may result from either "joy of winning" or risk aversion.

90 Positive reward anticipation, winning outcome, and evaluation of right choices activat

91 ntromedial prefrontal cortex activity during winning outcomes.

92 d costs (or benefits) of competition for the winning parasitoid reveal that time lags between success

93 rains and a uniform host population-here the winning pathogen strain is that with minimum threshold d

94 trial (low-penalty trials) or forfeit trial winnings plus a portion of previous winnings (high-penal

95 Patients have been key to winning political support.

96 including a voucher for a 1 in 100 chance of winning pound1000 if they attend their appointment).

97 substance-free urine samples; the chances of winning prizes increased with continuous time abstinent.

98 We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bo

99 cidence, or does it reflect convergence to a winning quaternary structure?

100 orithm, our program AlphaGo achieved a 99.8% winning rate against other Go programs, and defeated the

101 f its utility, the scope of this Nobel prize-winning reaction is rather limited when applied to aliph

102 However, all second- and third-round winning replacement sequences folded into hairpins flank

103 natives differ circularly in their number of winning samples.

104 n vivo genetic selection (SELEX) resulted in winning sequences that contain an H4a-like stem-loop, wh

105 n in satC generated three distinct groups of winning sequences.

106 ents with OCD outperformed healthy controls, winning significantly more points.

107 To this end, L.U.St implements a winning sites test allowing ranking of a collection of a

108 thms, with a fitness function to determine a winning solution from many.

109 For non-lethal infections, the winning strain is that which affords the pathogen maximu

110 The winning strategy (discountmachine) relied nearly exclusi

111 erefore be too early to predict the eventual winning strategy for safer anti-inflammatory drugs.

112 to lead to the emergence of a single optimal winning strategy in which individuals maximize their gai

113 timal compensation scheme coincides with the winning strategy of the Red Balloon Challenge.

114 rnations between losing strategies produce a winning strategy, is selected when transitions between d

115 sting that co-limitation at equilibrium is a winning strategy.

116 the importance of direct visualization as a winning strategy.

117 generate conditions that make cooperation a winning strategy.

118 social success rather than a single optimal winning strategy.

119 n the hippocampus may instantiate aspects of winning such as control of a territory in dominant anima

120 ers but wild-type strains were also observed winning, suggesting that the competitive advantage of mu

121 However, how winning synapses emerge through competition remains uncl

122 all interfering RNA (siRNA) is a Nobel prize-winning technology that is now being evaluated in clinic

123 -art homology detection methods and the CASP-winning template-based protein structure prediction meth

124 , and being equipped with multiple challenge-winning text mining algorithms to ensure the quality of

125 the world's energy coming from fossil fuel, winning the battle also requires capturing CO2 from larg

126 d all 10 balloons in less than 9 hours, thus winning the Challenge.

127 market's estimate of a team's probability of winning the game before it occurs to isolate the surpris

128 ficance of the success of Lance Armstrong in winning the Tour de France for the second time.

129 ween 1933 and 2004 did not consistently slow winning times because of high variability in temperature

130 chance of detecting a consistent slowing of winning times by 2100.

131 Marathon to test for an effect of warming on winning times by men and women.

132 not known whether global warming will affect winning times in endurance events, and counterbalance im

133 es and headwinds on the day of the race slow winning times.

134 t to anticipate effects of future warming on winning times.

135 ince then, the field has progressed greatly, winning two Nobel Prizes and seeing the implementation o

136 In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and

137 The probability of winning was conveyed using explicit visual cues (sector

138 These effects of winning were likely exclusive to the neural androgenic s

139 y (i.e., attending to overall probability of winning) were associated with activation in parietal and

140 sociated with a predetermined probability of winning, which was altered repeatedly to examine neural

141 f choice to information about probability of winning; while decreasing discrimination according to ma