ライフサイエンスコーパス: wolves

1 nonhuman primates (including chimpanzees) or wolves .

2 s (saber-toothed cats) and Canis dirus (dire wolves).

3 l samples) declined with the ratio of elk to wolves.

4 of the Ivolgin mandibles were identified as wolves.

5 monophyletic clade sharing no sequences with wolves.

6 dogs have 2-3% higher genetic load than gray wolves.

7 nces from breed dogs, village dogs, and gray wolves.

8 arvest coincided with the breeding season of wolves.

9 using a 26-year dataset of 387 radiocollared wolves.

10 African and Eurasian golden jackals and gray wolves.

11 ing at least 15,000 y ago from Eurasian gray wolves.

12 n 1,375 dogs (representing 35 breeds) and 19 wolves.

13 n the presence of larger carnivores, such as wolves.

14 heory and data from the study of Yellowstone wolves.

15 ell as diet and feeding behavior, of ancient wolves.

16 mandibles be reliably identified as dogs or wolves?

17 sal is considered the principal way in which wolves adjust their numbers to prey supply or compensate

18 ored that of group-hunting predators such as wolves and chimpanzees (n = 1,382 cases), hostile takeov

19 ct hierarchical population units within gray wolves and coyotes that correspond with geographic and e

20 e highly admixed varieties derived from gray wolves and coyotes, respectively.

21 originated from a substantial number of gray wolves and dog breeds define distinct genetic units that

22 me to recalibrate the molecular timescale of wolves and dogs and find that the mutation rate is subst

23 Here we tested similarly raised wolves and dogs in a cooperative string-pulling task wit

24 rged from the common ancestor of present-day wolves and dogs very close in time to the appearance of

25 d is followed by the divergence of Old World wolves and dogs, confirming that the dog was domesticate

26 However, the socioecology of wolves and dogs, with the former relying more heavily on

27 ages indicated episodes of admixture between wolves and dogs.

28 morphological change are largely similar in wolves and domestic dogs, but differ in two ways.

29 ation in the frequency of encounters between wolves and individual elk, the risk of predation was not

30 hic cascade involving increased predation by wolves and other large carnivores on elk, a reduced and

31 lf (Canis lupus), by simultaneously tracking wolves and the behaviour, body fat, and pregnancy of elk

32 was nonlinear as litter size peaked at eight wolves and then declined, and litter survival increased

33 ent heterozygosity is higher in dogs than in wolves and, on average, dogs have 2-3% higher genetic lo

34 alyses of mitochondrial sequences from dogs, wolves, and a geographically diverse collection of CTVT

35 o), saber-toothed cats, American lions, dire wolves, and coyotes competed for prey resources at Ranch

36 e coyote, Canis latrans, and in Italian gray wolves, and hence our results demonstrate how traits sel

37 isons were made between similar studies with wolves, and inferences were drawn about the relationship

38 When wolves approached within 1 km, elk increased their rates

39 Remarkably, the Late Pleistocene wolves are genetically unique and morphologically distin

40 When wolves are present, elk alter their grouping patterns, v

41 s red foxes outnumber coyotes in areas where wolves are present.

42 ion capabilities of coyotes into areas where wolves are sporadically distributed or at low densities.

43 trol region sequences were analyzed from 162 wolves at 27 localities worldwide and from 140 domestic

44 availability or high removal rates maintain wolves at lower densities, limited inter-pack interactio

45 igrees and estimate recruitment in groups of wolves before and after harvest in Idaho, USA.

46 tors of dogs were separated from present-day wolves before the Last Glacial Maximum.

47 ape of some dog breeds with that of juvenile wolves begs the question if and how ontogenetic changes

48 itter survival increased rapidly up to three wolves, beyond which it increased more gradually.

49 igation strategies for foxes, dogs, coyotes, wolves, bobcats, mountain lions, bears, and birds (buzza

50 For example, in North America, grey wolves Canis lupus are known to kill coyotes Canis latra

51 iation in prey composition and kill rate for wolves Canis lupus living on the Northern Range (NR) of

52 size and group size/composition in Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia, u

53 eder turnover in cooperatively breeding grey wolves (Canis lupus Linnaeus 1758).

54 easured postcranial skeletal morphologies of wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) from Pleis

55 context between dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) has led some researchers to conclud

56 y, recruitment and population growth of grey wolves (Canis lupus) in Denali National Park and Preserv

57 e 14 years of data from a long-term study of wolves (Canis lupus) in Yellowstone National Park, USA,

58 at use for 732 moose (Alces alces) killed by wolves (Canis lupus) over a 50-year period in Isle Royal

59 We explored multiple linkages among grey wolves (Canis lupus), elk (Cervus elaphus), berry-produc

60 In wolves (Canis lupus), empirical evidence for density-dep

61 golden jackals aligned more closely to gray wolves (Canis lupus), which is surprising given the abse

62 rcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei) among grey wolves (Canis lupus).

63 , vigilance, and foraging in the presence of wolves (Canis lupus).

64 Whereas wolves coordinated their actions so as to simultaneously

65 elanistic K locus mutation in North American wolves derives from past hybridization with domestic dog

66 , and rather support the idea that dogs' and wolves' different social ecologies played a role in affe

67 Nevertheless, wolves disappeared from northern North America in the La

68 in genotyping noninvasive samples from grey wolves, European wildcats and brown bears, and we compar

69 that resemble those of consistently younger wolves, even in dog breeds that do not exhibit a 'juveni

70 rn human hunter-gatherers, who competed with wolves for limited prey but also domesticated them, lead

71 ce of genetic diversity for dogs rather than wolves from east Asia, as suggested by mitochondrial DNA

72 ion of multi-locus haplotypes unique to grey wolves from the Middle East, indicating that they are a

73 a to test whether the presence or absence of wolves has caused a continent-wide shift in coyote and r

74 European wolves have a discontinuous range, with large and connec

75 All extant wolves have a surprisingly recent common ancestry and ex

76 y coyotes outnumber red foxes in areas where wolves have been extirpated by humans, whereas red foxes

77 years later and across territory where gray wolves have been historically absent and remnant red wol

78 Ecological interpretations of the wolves have generated a significant amount of debate abo

79 Since their introduction in 1995 and 1996, wolves have had effects on Yellowstone that ripple acros

80 hich is surprising given the absence of gray wolves in Africa and the phenotypic divergence between t

81 e three largest European populations of grey wolves in comparison with other populations worldwide, a

82 e mothers who lost juveniles to recolonizing wolves in North America's Yellowstone region developed h

83 Using 13 years of data on 280 collared wolves in Yellowstone National Park, we assessed the eff

84 Wolves, in contrast, did not hesitate to manipulate the

85 and grizzly bears whereby, in the absence of wolves, increases in elk numbers would increase browsing

86 Together, these data suggest that wolves indirectly affect the reproductive physiology and

87 Harvest of breeding wolves is a highly contentious conservation and manageme

88 The divergence between New and Old World wolves is the earliest branching event and is followed b

89 roup of breeds that is genetically closer to wolves may show different behavioral characteristics whe

90 ffects of domestication, we compared captive wolves (n = 12) and dogs (n = 14) living in packs under

91 ear most closely related to Late Pleistocene wolves of Eurasia.

92 We observed that wolves outperformed dogs in their ability to follow caus

93 ulling task with conspecifics and found that wolves outperformed dogs, despite comparable levels of i

94 bsence on morphological change in coyotes or wolves over long periods of time.

95 tributions from multiple populations of gray wolves probably through backcrossing.

96 ve acquired a more tolerant temperament than wolves, promoting cooperative interactions with humans a

97 s, predicts that at least with conspecifics, wolves should cooperate better than dogs.

98 Sequences from both dogs and wolves showed considerable diversity and supported the h

99 Dogs have influenced the recent history of wolves through admixture and vice versa, potentially enh

100 We examined the evolution of coyotes and wolves through time from the late Pleistocene, during wh

101 anges in the average environment will affect wolves to a greater extent than changes in how variable

102 results suggest that a trophic cascade from wolves to elk to berry production to berry consumption b

103 elk Cervus elaphus (the primary prey for NR wolves) varied among seasons.

104 a sample of 20 Pleistocene eastern-Beringian wolves was shared with any modern wolf, and instead they

105 Our results show that Middle Eastern wolves were a critical source of genome diversity, altho

106 ave been historically absent and remnant red wolves were extirpated in the 1970s.

107 After wolves were reintroduced and with a reduced elk populati

108 isotopic data suggest that eastern-Beringian wolves were specialized hunters and scavengers of extinc

109 diversity and supported the hypothesis that wolves were the ancestors of dogs.

110 everity, moose density and ratio of moose to wolves, which is an index of predation risk.

111 In this study, we found that wolves who were raised by humans do not show these same

112 e found extensive admixture between dogs and wolves, with up to 25% of Eurasian wolf genomes showing