ライフサイエンスコーパス: worst

1 ian Compassion Questionnaire (0 = best, 50 = worst).

2 es 17 items, each scored from 1 (best) to 7 (worst).

3 nd gag and partial pol sequences showing the worst.

4 tes and G-G, G-A, and A-A mispairs being the worst.

5 ital disorders such as retinoschisis had the worst.

6 participants and cardiac surgery having the worst.

7 where maternal health outcomes are at their worst.

8 atients with severe sepsis (< 60 yr) had the worst 1- to 5-year and 5- to 10-year mortality (hazard r

9 tiveness of insulin-related glucose control (worst 180-250 mg/dL, best <130 mg/dL) and adverse outcom

10 f patients had improvement in symptom at its worst, 37% at its least, and 33% now.

11 However, the worst 5% of constructs deviated from prediction by 13-fo

12 Cumulative incidence figures suggest at worst a small amount of overdiagnosis.

13 We measured improvement in worst abdominal pain and composite pain score using the

14 l of ADB damage observed in field at the two worst affected (based on assessments in 2015) of the 14

15 health prior to the severe sepsis, with the worst affected reporting lasting impacts on multiple asp

16 ognise and conserve the species likely to be worst affected.

17 n, prompted a substantial research effort in worst-affected countries.

18 outbreak on record, and Sierra Leone is the worst-affected country, with nearly half of the infectio

19 ermined from patients in Liberia, the second worst-affected country.

20 Here we show that in the worst-affected habitats, these pressures reduce within-s

21 The youngest and worst-affected patient harbored compound heterozygous mu

22 ptera frugiperda ranks as one of the world's worst agricultural pests.

23 The June 2013 haze episode was one of the worst air pollution events in SEA.

24 Super learner outperformed the worst algorithm (neural networks) by 44% with respect to

25 0% of beneficiaries in the 4 groups with the worst and best adherence patterns (groups 1, 2, 3, 5) ma

26 optimal losses (i.e., difference between the worst and the least bad losses).

27 rventions were then rank-ordered between 0% (worst) and 100% (best).

28 rest baseline HbA1c values (>/=9.0%) had the worst associated changes in glycemic control following e

29 group who received a transfusion (P < .001), worst base deficit (mean [SD], -3.4 [5.0] vs -7.8 [6.9];

30 scale (FACIT-Pal) instrument (range, 0-184 [worst-best]; minimal clinically important difference [MC

31 The "worst bleeding manifestation since the last visit" (obse

32 best prognosis, while elder patients had the worst both in overall survival (chi(2) = 121.9, P < 0.00

33 no difference between the best (top 25%) and worst (bottom 25%) performance quartiles when comparing

34 Children with severe psoriasis at its worst, but mild at enrollment, showed no significant dif

35 After training, surgeons using Best Case/Worst Case clearly presented a choice between treatments

36 study-enrolled surgeon to use the Best Case/Worst Case communication framework.

37 The worst case complexity of our algorithm is exponential in

38 mation potential was assessed under best and worst case conditions, as required for filter approval u

39 ntion to teach surgeons to use the Best Case/Worst Case framework as a strategy to change surgeon com

40 Using the Best Case/Worst Case framework changed surgeon communication by sh

41 sio-buccal (MB) measures, which reflects the worst case of both B and MB measures; 2) the sum of the

42 2) the sum of the maximum MB measure or the worst case of the MB measure; and 3) the sum of all B an

43 sweat solutions we experimentally realized a worst case scenario for wearing functionalized textiles

44 f up to 67% within 30 years from 2080, under worst case scenario modelling.

45 ed that human exposure to silver (assuming a worst case scenario that all silver is in its most harmf

46 In the worst case scenario, 16,170 additional deaths (13,880-18

47 assuming plateauing or worsening levels, the worst case scenario.

48 quartile range, 26-66) to 74 after Best Case/Worst Case training (interquartile range, 60-81).

49 estimated to be between 0 and 2 m deep when worst case UVA and PAH conditions were considered.

50 However, under a "worst case" but still feasible scenario with parameters

51 w flow with stagnation, demonstrating a new "worst case" lead release scenario, contrary to the origi

52 separating power lost (only about 11% in the worst case) as a result of the limited availability of d

53 In our worst case, those requirements are 7-11 Gt C per year an

54 and in [Formula: see text] operations in the worst case, while generating a maximum of [Formula: see

55 ionally hard to find such a schedule, in the worst case.

56 In a low probability-high impact worst-case assessment, almost the whole inhabited world

57 in many patients being overtreated under the worst-case assumption.

58 tion of 18% during the summer months for the worst-case climate change scenario tested.

59 at the performance of the SRM increases when worst-case conditions are replaced by real field data.

60 Tests were conducted considering worst-case conditions, including maximum sensitivity of

61 re a reliable indicator of VI occurrence and worst-case exposure regardless of day or time of year of

62 ular day, it is likely representative of the worst-case exposure scenario.

63 ractions of Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Cr, and As under worst-case extraction conditions in the gastric compartm

64 A worst-case field-realistic dose is 0.44 microg/bee/day.

65 th a genetic algorithm to identify best- and worst-case permutations of habitat loss.

66 use either exact algorithms with exponential worst-case running time or heuristics that do not guaran

67 5 (Italy) and remained very low, even in the worst-case scenario (<1%).

68 When assuming the worst-case scenario (prolonged ICU and in-hospital stay,

69 Sediment showed in our worst-case scenario concentrations ranging from 6.7 mug/

70 bal emissions are tracking above the current worst-case scenario devised by the scientific community,

71 d with the baseline period of 2007-2008, the worst-case scenario is that the risk level increases 4-f

72 o parameterize simulations, projecting best-/worst-case scenario weather conditions and BCI resulted

73 Modeling a worst-case scenario with a calculated terminal landslide

74 In a "worst-case scenario" where overdose was rarely witnessed

75 and was a reminder that preparedness for the worst-case scenario, although challenging, is needed.

76 mately 40 ppm as free-standing MWCNTs in the worst-case scenario.

77 ands, and residences in a best, average, and worst-case scenario.

78 nagement of cases, and to be prepared to the worst-case scenario.

79 ulation abundance under-estimation under the worst-case scenario; 38.6% over-estimation under the bes

80 ch re-identification attacks have focused on worst-case scenarios and spurred the adoption of data-sh

81 the US EPA reference dose (69 mug/kg/day) in worst-case scenarios, but are still at least 1 order of

82 tems, and most perform poorly in theoretical worst-case scenarios.

83 resholds in printing facilities in realistic worst-case scenarios.

84 vival, and a reasonable basis for estimating worst-case, typical, and best-case scenarios for surviva

85 s of revenue for food companies, and--in the worst cases--death.

86 roup, adolescents (ages 13-17 years) had the worst CGS.

87 f mitochondrial genes is associated with the worst clinical outcome across all cancer types and corre

88 highly aggressive phenotype that directs the worst clinical outcomes in patients with GBM.

89 genetic background that defines PTC with the worst clinicopathologic outcomes, providing unique progn

90 e GCM projections that produced the best and worst conditions for malaria transmission in each zone o

91 (i.e., the La and Pr complexes would be the worst conductors).

92 of estimate increases, although many of the worst costs have already been estimated (especially thos

93 uld be instrumental for avoiding some of the worst damages such as harvest failures in developing cou

94 stay greater than 2 weeks who sustained the worst disability and 40% 1-year mortality.

95 SIRS presented the worst discrimination, followed by qSOFA, CRB, mSOFA, CUR

96 d (IES-R; total score range, 0 [best] to 88 [worst]), discussion of patient preferences, hospital len

97 sment Scale (0-10, with 0=no distress and 10=worst distress) at each clinical encounter.

98 2 to 2016, California experienced one of the worst droughts since the start of observational records.

99 The worst Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in history has

100 ect, pleiotropic, and long-lasting, with the worst effects for those who are both victims and bullies

101 997 and alongside 1991 and 1994 as among the worst episodes on record.

102 children aged 1-4 years in the UK was in the worst EU15+ quartile (>75th centile).

103 numeric analog scales (from 0 [best] to 10 [worst]) evaluating dryness, pain, and fatigue.

104 The worst-ever cytology diagnosis and the 4-year cumulative

105 icipants were categorized according to their worst-ever DR grading, as having "no DR" (no history of

106 Among patients with the worst expected prognosis (decile 10), 36.0% (95% CI, 34.

107 verage (SD) perimetric mean deviation in the worst eye was -3.5 (1.1) dB, (range, -2.0 to -6.4 dB) an

108 s 85 letters or better (20/20) in 71% of the worst eyes and 77% of the best eyes.

109 59%) had a reduction of two units or more in worst fatigue score in past 24 hours as assessed by the

110 literature survey concluded that none of the worst fears about adverse effects on patients were reali

111 gly, we find that statistical performance is worst for phenotypes in which genetic variance is due ma

112 oss various causes of retinal fluid, but was worst for subretinal fluid compared to intraretinal or s

113 te normalized preference scores (0, best; 1, worst), for varying years of graft duration and risk of

114 in group A (chemotherapy alone) were overall worst grade (ie, all grade 3-5 toxicities; 496 [67%] of

115 Neurologic events of worst grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20 (11%) and four (2%) pa

116 eatment; time-to-event analyses of first and worst grade toxicity; and area under the curve (AUC) ana

117 with a score of 0 and 5 had the best and the worst graft function, respectively, both at 1 and 5 year

118 pertensive patients with proteinuria had the worst graft survival.

119 ber of hospitalizations, and severity of the worst HE episode after embolization in three-quarters of

120 nnaire [SGRQ] scale 0 to 100; 100 represents worst health status; minimum clinically important differ

121 likely the sickest because they also had the worst heart failure-related quality of life.

122 tals in the highest 10th percentile (ie, the worst hospitals) reduced their SSI rates to the rates of

123 Strabismus-20 questionnaire (100-0, best to worst HRQOL) and a diplopia questionnaire in a clinical

124 r health status at 50% before diagnosis (0 = worst imaginable state, 100 = best imaginable state) and

125 ptom scales (0-100 mm; 0, no symptom to 100, worst imaginable), health care attendance, days missed f

126 avioral initiatives intended to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change.

127 s that the impact of imperfect adherence was worst in children, highlighting the importance of advice

128 rmediate visual acuity (UIVA) and DCIVA were worst in group A, with better results in group C (P< 0.0

129 with SPG4 mutations, disease progression was worst in patients with later-onset disease.

130 0.57; Ontime: r = 0.61; P < 0.0001) and were worst in previous OHE patients, compared to the rest and

131 Provision of care continues to be worst in regions with the greatest socioeconomic depriva

132 depression, depressive symptoms are at their worst in the evening, when these arousal systems are at

133 melancholia, depressive systems are at their worst in the morning when arousal systems, such as the C

134 of dengue compared with follow-up, and were worst in the severe group at defervescence.

135 d by the age of recognition of asthma, being worst in those with late asthma onset (after 40 years of

136 status; outcome was best in CALR-mutated and worst in triple-negative patients: median survival, 16 v

137 SD], -3.4 [5.0] vs -7.8 [6.9]; P = .02), and worst international normalized ratio (median [interquart

138 quitofish (Gambusia affinis), one of the 100 worst invasive species, disperse further, suggesting a s

139 assessed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa.

140 Worst joint pain scores decreased by 1.6 points (29%) at

141 Similar patterns were observed for worst joint pain, joint stiffness, pain interference, an

142 tage breast cancer receiving an AI who had a worst joint pain/stiffness score >/= 5 of 10 using the B

143 rted P values were modestly smaller and the "worst" (least statistically significant) reported P valu

144 achieved MARE value is at 4.8%, whereas the worst lies at 25.8%, leading to a standard deviation of

145 nited States in 2014 and 2015 represents the worst livestock disease event in the country, with unpre

146 s with normal-weight central obesity had the worst long-term survival.

147 s with normal weight central obesity had the worst long-term survival: a person with BMI of 22 kg/m2

148 m Assessment Scale (ESAS) (range, 0-90 [best-worst]; MCID, 5.7 points).

149 om score (HADS; score range, 0 [best] to 42 [worst]; minimal clinically important difference, 1.5) ob

150 Pancreatic adenocarcinoma has the worst mortality of any solid cancer.

151 creased, ventilator-free days increased, and worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale score decreased.

152 Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale incidence, worst Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scale score, and poor 6

153 he input assembly to being comparable to the worst of the input assembly.

154 tion high-end chromatographic pump, with the worst of these mixers, imperfect mixing accounted for 99

155 0.26, 95%CI: 0.11-0.59, p = 0.001), but the worst OS was observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSC

156 rtial resection of the MAP(+) region had the worst outcome (p < 0.001).

157 The worst outcome group, accounting for 23% of all cases, wa

158 sing beneficial epidemics and estimating the worst outcome of damaging hybrid epidemics.

159 In the discovery cohort, the worst outcome was found for patients classified as havin

160 f high-potency (skunk-like) cannabis had the worst outcome, indexed as an increased risk for a subseq

161 en receptor-negative breast cancers with the worst outcome.

162 l damage, and advanced comorbidities had the worst outcome.

163 ascular quality of life (VascuQol) score (1 [worst outcome] to 7 [best outcome]), and 36-item Short-F

164 s those classified MetS at follow-up had the worst outcomes (rates for combined endpoint 27% vs. 37%

165 individuals and continues to have one of the worst outcomes of all the lymphomas.

166 nded the most hospital resources and had the worst outcomes, but had several important differences in

167 Patients with >/=3 mutations had the worst outcomes, suggesting that multigene profiling may

168 se at completion of primary therapy have the worst outcomes.

169 al and the combination of the two led to the worst outcomes.

170 ventilation failure was associated with the worst outcomes.

171 RMACS 1 profile repeatedly demonstrating the worst outcomes.

172 Although normal/underweight patients had the worst overall survival (log-rank P=0.04) after STEMI dur

173 TSW cohort and four in TCGA cohort), had the worst overall survival (median 2.1 years, 95% CI 0.3-3.8

174 e, defined as a reduction of >/= 2 points in worst pain by week 4, accompanied by a stable or reduced

175 in the PENFS group had greater reduction in worst pain compared with sham after 3 weeks of treatment

176 whereby 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated worst pain imaginable) measured 3 months after the inter

177 m the FACT-GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale, and a worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inventory.

178 reprocedural pain distress; intensity of the worst pain on the same day, before the procedure; and pr

179 le of 100 mm (range, 0-100 mm; 100 indicates worst pain possible) and hip osteoarthritis confirmed by

180 es were average pain (0 mm, no pain; 100 mm, worst pain possible) and physical function (Western Onta

181 in (numeric rating scale, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]; minimal clinically important diffe

182 Patients reported their worst pain score and analgesic intake at baseline and da

183 rope/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form worst pain score.

184 Median time to progression of worst pain was also longer with abiraterone plus prednis

185 as pain score >/=7 (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain").

186 ain Inventory-Short Form [BPI-SF] question 3 worst pain, score </=3 vs >/=4).

187 ndex (WOMAC) pain score (0 [no pain] to 500 [worst pain]) from baseline to month 24.

188 HIV-1/AIDS remains one of the worst pandemics in human history.

189 and normoxia for all metrics except for the worst PaO2.

190 ymal subtype of human GBMs, characterized by worst patient outcome, suggesting that HCMV pp71-induced

191 rade, poorly-differentiated PanNETs have the worst patient prognosis, and the underlying mechanisms o

192 Importantly, the worst patient survival rate among all GCs analyzed was s

193 of tumor invasion 5) versus a less invasive (worst pattern of tumor invasion 3) pattern of invasion,

194 es between OSCC tumors with a more invasive (worst pattern of tumor invasion 5) versus a less invasiv

195 from both types of error, demonstrating the worst performance.

196 gorized as being among the best or among the worst performers in a cohort study of >1000 subjects age

197 A comparative case study of the worst performing chain identifies hydrogen bond contacts

198 gs suggested in the tutorials were among the worst performing in all outcomes tested.

199 l models use data on maximum weight, and the worst-performing model uses only data on weight at surve

200 performing quartile and the other was in the worst-performing quartile (absolute difference in readmi

201 est-performing quartile as compared with the worst-performing quartile of hospital readmission perfor

202 It is the worst pest of Apis mellifera, yet its reproductive biolo

203 ts and grasshoppers (acridids) are among the worst pests of crops and grasslands worldwide.

204 =3 with body surface area </=10%) or severe (worst Physician's Global Assessment score >/=3 with body

205 Psoriasis was classified as mild (worst Physician's Global Assessment score </=3 with body

206 of Boxes (CDR-Sum of Boxes; 0 [best] to 18 [worst] points), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [wo

207 The scale ranged from 0 (worst possible experience) to 100 (no adverse effects).

208 CI, 43.7%-51.1%) rated losing vision as the worst possible health outcome.

209 scale (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst possible pain) at week 8; the leg-pain intensity s

210 ich 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

211 s ranging from 0 (best possible scar) to 15 (worst possible scar), based on 6 clinician and 2 patient

212 Rhodes score [range, 0 {no symptoms} to 40 {worst possible symptoms}], 18.76 [SD, 5.48] to 7.06 [SD,

213 dation and hallucinations, 0 = best and 40 = worst possible) between day 4 and baseline.

214 redicted body weight was associated with the worst postoperative PaO2/FIO2, duration of mechanical ve

215 sis]), intermediate (duodenal polyposis) and worst (pre-colectomy).

216 nally, inspection of the structures with the worst predictions pinpoints difficulties in SCR definiti

217 gative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype have the worst prog-nosis.

218 lastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) has among the worst prognoses of any solid malignancy.

219 nodes and multiple sites associated with the worst prognoses.

220 nodes and multiple sites associated with the worst prognoses.

221 alterations in PDGF receptors are markers of worst prognosis and efficient targeting of these recepto

222 orrhage (ICH) is the stroke subtype with the worst prognosis and has no established acute treatment.

223 The worst prognosis categories were age older than 60 years,

224 Patients with ATTR V122I had the worst prognosis compared with other causes of Afro-Carib

225 Widowed patients had the worst prognosis compared with other groups even though t

226 urvival, only one-third of patients with the worst prognosis had DNR orders.

227 and activation, which is associated with the worst prognosis in ovarian cancer.

228 bserved in chemical injury eyes, whereas the worst prognosis is in aniridia, although the latter has

229 Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis of all breast cancers, and women diagnos

230 breast cancer (TNBC), which also carries the worst prognosis of all forms of breast cancer; therefore

231 Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis of any breast cancer subtype.

232 the heart (cardiac amyloidosis) carries the worst prognosis of any involved organ, and light-chain (

233 ons with TTP and CLOVAR mesenchymal profile (worst prognosis).

234 hat does not decrease postresection have the worst prognosis, but the mechanism is unclear.

235 ype includes diffuse-subtype tumors with the worst prognosis, the tendency to occur at an earlier age

236 Patients with low body weight had the worst prognosis.

237 ho bear a large disease burden and carry the worst prognosis.

238 ase (>0 kPa/year) in >/= 14 kPa bLSM had the worst prognosis.

239 cell gene expression are associated with the worst prognosis.

240 ch item, scored on a scale of 1 (best) to 7 (worst), provided the ECAP score.

241 Patients with the worst QoL at baseline (ie, those in the lowest tertile o

242 e, 0-100; 0 being the best and 100 being the worst quality of life; minimal clinically important diff

243 quivalent to the EU15+ median in 1970 to the worst quartile in all age groups by 2008, with 446 annua

244 ed Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening (worst quartile of change, >/=4.5 EDSS points) during the

245 hospitals with HAPU2+ rates in the highest (worst) quartile from administrative data, use of the sur

246 The median hospital in the worst quintile of performers had a risk-adjusted 30-day

247 Analysis of the "worst" quintile hospitals that were targeted in the ince

248 25, 1.84) for people moving from the lowest (worst) quintile of job control to the highest.

249 n eculizumab and placebo, as measured by the worst-rank analysis.

250 The use of a worst-rank analytical approach proved to be an important

251 to week 26 in MG-ADL total score measured by worst-rank ANCOVA.

252 Worst recall was observed in GBA-positive cases with Par

253 most likely to be rated as the respondent's worst, regardless of other traumatic experiences.

254 Biosolids biochar had the worst relative environmental performance due to energy u

255 PCR calibration models showed worst reliable of prediction than PLS models.

256 A best-worst scaling survey, analyzed by multinomial-logit mode

257 cs on physicians' decision making using best-worst scaling.

258 ratio, 1.16; P=0.59), whereas those with the worst score (4) had poor control (29.4%) and high hazard

259 BDQ-B) score between the starting and nadir (worst) score during treatment.

260 03); and 2.18 (1.36-3.51) for Q1 (P = .001) (worst scores; P for trend <.001) after adjustment for se

261 The worst Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores from th

262 th (measured by life expectancy) between the worst (Sierra Leone) and best (Japan) performing countri

263 as a whole-mouth mean ACH (P = 0.01) and as worst-site ACH loss (P = 0.03).

264 s found of serum E2 with whole-mouth mean or worst-site ACH.

265 ith BOP (27.8 versus 16.7; P = 0.02), higher worst-site AL (5.2 versus 4.0 mm; P <0.01), and more sit

266 rgistic antibiotics can, in practice, be the worst strategy if bacterial clearance is not achieved af

267 The Hedgehog subgroup showed worst survival (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.72, c

268 Patients with LEF had the worst survival outcome, whereas patients with PLF and no

269 lung and pancreatic cancer patients with the worst survival outcome.

270 umpapillary RNFL thickness demonstrating the worst survival probability.

271 weight patients continue to demonstrate the worst survival, suggesting that the potential nonadverse

272 ransplanted from ECMO at age <1 year had the worst survival.

273 number of symptoms 8 (6-11), median grade of worst symptom 3 (2-4).

274 nalysis were obtained from the eyes with the worst tear osmolarity score.

275 erventions can at best only mitigate, and at worst temporarily exacerbate.

276 ifferent vehicle assignments and ranged from worst to best case assignment by more than a factor of 2

277 D) visual analog scale, which ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and has a minimal clinically impor

278 uality of life (KOOS4); scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

279 the Oxford Knee Score, which ranges from 0 (worst) to 48 (best) and has a minimal clinically importa

280 ints), and Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0 [worst] to 25 [best] story units).

281 ce), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0 [worst] to 30 [best] points), Clinical Dementia Rating Su

282 ry outcome was the Oxford Shoulder Score (0 [worst] to 48 [best]) at 6 months, analysed by intention

283 uring (scores for each section range from 1 [worst] to 5 [best]; mean rating, 3.9 in the prior year v

284 e while recognizing that most of the world's worst toxic hot spots are now located in low- and middle

285 t as a criterion to distinguish the best and worst treatments of a bacterium, Escherichia coli.

286 er, the CME group started and ended with the worst VA among the 3 groups.

287 The worst VA and VF categories had the most reduced PF (rang

288 geographic atrophy or scar on FP/FA had the worst VA.

289 ry Prediction Score was calculated using the worst values within the 12 hours before initial critical

290 ise tests were scored on an ordinal scale of worst ventricular arrhythmia observed (0 indicates no ec

291 an time to progression in BPI-SF pain at its worst was 5.7 months (95% CI 5.6-5.7) in the enzalutamid

292 tion for dependence in the draft ICD-11, the worst was in DSM-5.

293 Progression of pain at its worst was less common in the enzalutamide group than in

294 lt equation, and CKD-EPI equation, while the worst was the MDRD equation.

295 symptom scores (TNSS; range; 0 [best] to 12 [worst]) were recorded between 0 and 10 hours after chall

296 12, the United States experienced one of its worst West Nile virus (WNV) epidemics, reporting 5,387 h

297 when both locations were neutrally cued, and worst when the location was uncued.

298 ed all 3 hormone receptors (subtype HR3) and worst when they expressed none of the receptors (subtype

299 quences, BinPacker and Oases-Velvet were the worst, while IDBA-tran, SOAPdenovo-Trans, Trans-ABySS an

300 shows that African American males fared the worst, with lives characterized by incarceration, crimin