ライフサイエンスコーパス: zebra

1 's zebra E. grevyi and the mountain zebra E. zebra.

2 id not block the transcriptional function of ZEBRA.

3 g and Asiatic wild ass, to 14 in the Grevy's zebra.

4 known hybrid issue in the endangered Grevy's zebra.

5 d two of its subspecies, as well as mountain zebra.

6 enomes from each living species of asses and zebras.

7 Between 52 and 87% of zebra, 0-15% of springbok and 3-52% of elephants had mea

8 ZEBReplication Activator (ZEBRA), a viral basic zipper protein that initiates the

9 While ZEBRA also plays an obligatory role as an activator of r

10 of Bam HI Z E B virus replication activator (ZEBRA), an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded basic zipper

11 terized 28 microsatellite markers in Grevy's zebra and assessed cross-amplification in plains zebra a

12 ed the induction of EBV early lytic proteins ZEBRA and EA-D in response to NaB, TSA, or AzaCdR.

13 ndicated greater genetic variation in plains zebra and its subspecies than Grevy's zebra, despite pot

14 d EGR3 proteins were kinetically upstream of ZEBRA and Rta proteins.

15 Two transcription factors, ZEBRA and Rta, switch Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) from the

16 n the early dry season, and grazers, such as zebra and suids, contributing more to female diet in the

17 The Grevy's zebra and the mountain zebra are endangered, and hybridi

18 gered, and hybridization between the Grevy's zebra and the plains zebra has been documented, leading

19 a and assessed cross-amplification in plains zebra and two of its subspecies, as well as mountain zeb

20 into captive population genetic diversity in zebras and support the use of these markers for identify

21 the viral transcription factor, Zta (BZLF1, ZEBRA, and EB1), and downstream effectors, while viral g

22 Expression of EGR1, ZEBRA, and Rta proteins were inhibited by bisindolylmale

23 The Grevy's zebra and the mountain zebra are endangered, and hybridization between the Grev

24 Zebras are members of the horse family.

25 Horses, asses, and zebras belong to a single genus, Equus, which emerged 4.

26 Zta (ZEBRA, BZLF1), a key regulator of the EBV lytic cycle, i

27 uidae, including horses, donkeys, mules, and zebras, caused by either of two protozoan parasites, The

28 For zebra chip disease control, aggressive psyllid managemen

29 ive species: quagga (Dreissena bugensis) and zebra (D. polymorpha) mussels.

30 tests on E. coli, A. thaliana and Maylandia zebra data sets, HALC was able to obtain 6.7-41.1% highe

31 plains zebra and its subspecies than Grevy's zebra, despite potential ascertainment bias.

32 d that the ancestor of present-day asses and zebras dispersed into the Old World 2.1-3.4 Mya.

33 One of these patterns is zebra dolomite that is frequently hosting economically i

34 : the plains zebra Equus quagga, the Grevy's zebra E. grevyi and the mountain zebra E. zebra.

35 the Grevy's zebra E. grevyi and the mountain zebra E. zebra.

36 viral bZIP transcription factor, Zta (BZLF1, ZEBRA, EB1), drives some of these changes.

37 here are three species of zebras: the plains zebra Equus quagga, the Grevy's zebra E. grevyi and the

38 , we collected 154 serum samples from plains zebra (Equus quagga), 21 from springbok (Antidorcas mars

39 ibe an elegant model of WHIM syndrome in the zebra fi sh embryo.

40 Additional experiments in the gregarious zebra finch (Estrildidae: Taeniopygia guttata) underscor

41 In the highly gregarious zebra finch (Estrildidae: Taeniopygia guttata), blockade

42 The recent sequencing of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) genome allowed an asse

43 kers against the chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) genomes places the Ppu

44 Here we use the yellowbeak mutation in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) to investigate the gen

45 describe a genome-wide analysis of LD in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) using 838 single nucle

46 lation of Cck in the brain of the adult male zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), a songbird species.

47 ative analysis of the genome sequence of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), which is a songbird b

48 e extend such an analysis to a songbird, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

49 bird species: the pigeon (Columba livia) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

50 The zebra finch also does not show the reduced male-to-femal

51 all structures of the genomes are similar in zebra finch and chicken, but they differ in many intrach

52 In both zebra finch and chicken, the D1A, D1B, and D2 receptors

53 ies being found in chicken, turkey, duck and zebra finch and its expression profile confirmed in both

54 pulation in Africa, and tens of genomes from zebra finch and long-tailed finch populations in Austral

55 Zebra finch and rat CBG crystal structures in complex wi

56 One is inspired by the zebra finch and successfully reproduces songbird singing

57 of 8,424 orthologs in both falcons, chicken, zebra finch and turkey identified consistent evidence fo

58 Here, we infused norepinephrine into the zebra finch auditory cortex and performed extracellular

59 , we describe a population of neurons in the zebra finch auditory cortex that represent vocalizations

60 pectrograms by combining the spike trains of zebra finch auditory midbrain neurons with information a

61 is enrichment in song control neurons of the zebra finch basal ganglia impairs tutor song imitation,

62 Here we cloned from zebra finch brain cDNAs of all avian dopamine receptors:

63 The zebra finch brain features a set of clearly defined and

64 This atlas of the zebra finch brain is expected to become an important too

65 VZ cell proliferation, male and female adult zebra finch brain slices containing the VZ were exposed

66 Cntnap2 protein expression in zebra finch brain supports the hypothesis that this mole

67 iour engages gene regulatory networks in the zebra finch brain, altering the expression of long non-c

68 tein expression in song-related areas of the zebra finch brain.

69 term potentiation, is rapidly induced within zebra finch caudal medial nidopallium (NCM) following no

70 main site of plasma CBG production, and anti-zebra finch CBG antibodies cross-react with CBGs in othe

71 Glycosylation of this asparagine in zebra finch CBG does not influence its steroid-binding a

72 Recombinant zebra finch CBG steroid-binding properties reflect those

73 Substitutions of amino acids within zebra finch CBG that are conserved only in birds reveal

74 Here we show that Zebra Finch chicks (Taeniopygia guttata) are capable of

75 Like other songbirds, the zebra finch communicates through learned vocalizations,

76 neural tracers in the TeO and the Ipc of the zebra finch demonstrated that neurons from the external

77 neuroestrogen levels in the forebrain of the zebra finch depend on calcium influx within presynaptic

78 This study shows that the zebra finch differs from the chicken because it lacks a

79 w well neural spike trains recorded from the zebra finch field L (an analog of mammalian primary audi

80 und that activation of HTR2 receptors in the zebra finch forebrain song premotor structure the robust

81 ing path microarray and identify CNVs in the zebra finch genome relative to chicken; 32 interspecific

82 Access to the zebra finch genome sequence will, therefore, prompt new

83 The wild-type zebra finch genome was found to have three intact genes

84 apped the majority to the recently assembled zebra finch genome.

85 arrangements were reported; (2) to hybridize zebra finch genomic DNA to a chicken tiling path microar

86 st exploited differences between chicken and zebra finch gut morphology to identify the BMP pathway a

87 Songbirds like the zebra finch have become important models to understand t

88 in seasonal songbirds, neurons added to the zebra finch HVC are not part of a replacement process.

89 onses to intracellular current injections of zebra finch HVC neurons.

90 Here we examined the circuit anatomy of zebra finch HVC, a cortical region that generates sequen

91 The zebra finch is an important model organism in several fi

92 te early gene ZENK) during sleep in juvenile zebra finch males that were still learning their songs f

93 , a letter-based name) of juvenile and adult zebra finch males, independent of the song stimulus pres

94 The elastic modulus of the zebra finch ML is 18 kPa at 5% strain, which is comparab

95 Here, we addressed these issues in the zebra finch model by combining intracerebral pharmacolog

96 Birdsong learning in the zebra finch occurs during a sensitive period similar to

97 ted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa cleaves CBG in zebra finch plasma within its reactive center loop and d

98 g techniques, on their ability to identify a zebra finch song in the presence of a background masker

99 thin the spectral and temporal dimensions of zebra finch song structure.

100 sms regulating sexual differentiation of the zebra finch song system appear to include both genetic a

101 e-related morphological changes in the adult zebra finch song system by focusing on two cortical proj

102 esponsible for sexual differentiation of the zebra finch song system remains unknown but likely invol

103 modulate the sexually differentiation of the zebra finch song system.

104 recisely timed learned motor sequence, adult zebra finch song, to examine motor preparation.

105 ent amounts of statistical information about zebra finch song.

106 s have been reported in adult and developing zebra finch song.

107 in ovo in poultry, and apply it to posthatch zebra finch songbird chicks.

108 Here, we investigated mTOR in juvenile zebra finch songbirds.

109 tions matched to those found across multiple zebra finch songs to yield song spectrograms similar to

110 ow that inbreeding causes early death in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, and among inbred indivi

111 A comparison with zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, chicken Gallus gallus a

112 n mRNA was widely distributed throughout the zebra finch telencephalon, overlapping with song control

113 nd learning-related (Area X) song regions of zebra finch telencephalon.

114 Measurements of CBG mRNA in zebra finch tissues indicate that liver is the main site

115 a size) within brain regions associated with zebra finch vocal learning are affected by late-postnata

116 of histone 4 lysine 16 (H4K16) near MHM, the zebra finch Z chromosome appears to lack the MHM sequenc

117 udy we tested these abilities in a songbird (zebra finch) and a parrot species (budgerigar).

118 and chronic recording methods in the singing zebra finch, a small songbird that relies on auditory fe

119 tnap2 protein expression in the brain of the zebra finch, a songbird species in which males, but not

120 The zebra finch, a songbird, presents a unique opportunity t

121 programs in the four key song nuclei of the zebra finch, a vocal learning songbird.

122 Furthermore, within the zebra finch, all receptors, except for D4, showed differ

123 characterize transcript distribution in the zebra finch, an experimentally tractable songbird for wh

124 ional and experimental data from chicken and zebra finch, and acts to equalize male-to-female express

125 ve immune gene repertoire, as in chicken and zebra finch, and this repertoire has been shaped through

126 The zebra finch, for example, sings a highly stereotyped son

127 tire chromosomes between chicken, turkey and zebra finch, identifying syntenic blocks of at least 250

128 Here we show that in the zebra finch, many auditory midbrain neurons have extra-c

129 In the adult zebra finch, new projection neurons are added to the nuc

130 es for two bird species, the chicken and the zebra finch, provides, for the first time, an ideal oppo

131 In the zebra finch, singing behavior is driven by a sequence of

132 , mounting evidence in one such species, the zebra finch, suggests that forms of plasticity common du

133 resequencing data for two bird species: the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata, and the long-tailed fi

134 ion of CART-immunoreactivity in the brain of zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata, its interaction with N

135 ere we investigated in a songbird model, the zebra finch, the neural substrate for ranging and identi

136 phogen Sonic hedgehog (SHH) in the chick and zebra finch, two species that differ in size during the

137 the ascending projections of the nTTD in the zebra finch, using in vivo injections of biotinylated de

138 on between two bird species, the chicken and zebra finch, with regard to sex bias of autosomal versus

139 ion in the developing embryonic beaks of the zebra finch.

140 s been retained in other bird lineages, like zebra finch.

141 ound in another avian lineage, the passerine zebra finch.

142 erally available cell lines derived from the zebra finch.

143 a high-resolution genetic linkage map of the zebra finch.

144 mparative maps of the genomes of chicken and zebra finch.

145 phalic enlargement in passerines such as the zebra finch.

146 of the avian vocal organ, the syrinx, in the zebra finch.

147 nse elements in orthologous promoters in the zebra finch.

148 We measured telomere length in zebra finches (n = 99) from the nestling stage and at va

149 histological sections from the brain of male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and make them public

150 Male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) are vocal learners t

151 udomedial auditory forebrain of anesthetized zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) at 32 sites simultan

152 we recorded the vocalisations of individual zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) behaving freely in s

153 tory inputs from vocal effectors of juvenile zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) during the stage of

154 ow that short bouts of singing in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) induce persistent in

155 Zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) learn to produce son

156 New neurons are added, too, to the HVC of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that do not learn ne

157 a model for a migrating songbird, we fasted zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that had been dosed

158 In the vocal control system of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) the pre-motor mechan

159 photon calcium imaging in anesthetized adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to examine how learn

160 rners, combining an experimental approach in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) with an analysis of

161 d-eared turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), and mice (Mus muscu

162 The songs of adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), produced as rapid s

163 In adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), the telencephalon o

164 e temporal structure of learned song in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

165 ame) encodes the learned songs of adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

166 ellular recordings of HVC neurons in singing zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

167 enriched in the song control system of adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

168 in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and zebra finches (Taenioypygia guttata), and also reduces t

169 onlinear dynamics to test whether adult male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) use the intrinsic non

170 We developed germline transgenic songbirds, zebra finches (Taneiopygia guttata) expressing human mut

171 he present study we actively immunized adult zebra finches against VIP conjugated to KLH and compared

172 Studies in zebra finches and canaries have now identified the gene

173 ture functional studies we cloned FoxP4 from zebra finches and compared regional and cellular coexpre

174 hicle was administered peripherally to adult zebra finches and sickness behavior was recorded 2 or 24

175 nucleus LMAN during development as juvenile zebra finches are actively engaged in evaluating feedbac

176 nglia-projecting dopamine neurons in singing zebra finches as we controlled perceived song quality wi

177 d an acute regulation of auditory neurons in zebra finches by (1) delineating the extent of the brain

178 ulated NR2B expression in LMAN of adult male zebra finches by increasing its protein levels to those

179 cts on RA projection neurons, but that adult zebra finches can partially compensate for this deficit

180 nd that the dopaminergic reward circuitry of zebra finches can simultaneously promote social cohesion

181 Zebra finches categorized test stimuli with previously h

182 Zebra finches communicate with each other in ways that a

183 uit is enhanced in male compared with female zebra finches due to differential rates of incorporation

184 ffect of ovulation order on TL in embryos of zebra finches experiencing the same controlled incubatio

185 vaeformis (Uva) of the posterior thalamus in zebra finches extend farther rostrally than to Uva, as g

186 vaeformis (Uva) of the posterior thalamus in zebra finches extend farther rostrally than to Uva, as g

187 ivo intracellular recordings in anesthetized zebra finches from the input (nucleus HVC, used here as

188 to its basal ganglia part, Area X, in adult zebra finches has been noted to have no strong effects o

189 The addition of HVC-RA neurons happens in zebra finches housed singly, but becomes more acute if t

190 The neural song system in zebra finches is highly sexually dimorphic; only males s

191 We found that juvenile zebra finches living in flocks socially learned novel fo

192 Much as children learn language, young male zebra finches need to interact socially with an adult tu

193 aHVC based on expression of zRalDH for adult zebra finches of both sexes and for males during the son

194 Here, we show, however, that juvenile zebra finches partway through song learning, singing imm

195 Thus, zebra finches prioritize efficient learning of syllable

196 lencephalic neurogenesis are both delayed in zebra finches relative to quail (Galliformes).

197 Dopaminergic neurons in anesthetized zebra finches respond more strongly to the bird's own so

198 A study of zebra finches reveals the potential advantages of idiosy

199 output nucleus of this circuit in adult male zebra finches reverses moderate changes in song structur

200 Recent work in zebra finches suggests that genes and hormones may act t

201 sumptive tectum is proportionally smaller in zebra finches than quail before neurogenesis begins, thi

202 g stereotypy is persistently reduced in male zebra finches that have been developmentally exposed to

203 We exposed zebra finches to aversively reinforcing white noise stim

204 ork analysis on microarray data from singing zebra finches to discover gene ensembles regulated durin

205 We manipulated song learning in zebra finches to experimentally control the requirements

206 oped a spatial orientation assay and trained zebra finches to magnetic and/or overhead polarized ligh

207 We exposed male zebra finches to tutor or unfamiliar song.

208 the lateral septum, and sociality in female zebra finches was reduced by OT antagonist infusions int

209 Budgerigars and zebra finches were tested, using operant conditioning te

210 In our first study, juvenile zebra finches were trained to perform one song and then

211 Male and female zebra finches were treated with E2 or control vehicle fr

212 ly from auditory neurons in awake adult male zebra finches with multiple microelectrodes during repea

213 spectrotemporal modulations in the songs of zebra finches).

214 Here, in male and female zebra finches, a combination of aromatase immunohistoche

215 m neurons in area X of singing juvenile male zebra finches, and directly compared their firing patter

216 postnatal auditory environment of developing zebra finches, and then assessed effects on hemispheric

217 llular basis of telencephalic enlargement in zebra finches, and then to compare these findings with w

218 at single neurons, in the auditory cortex of zebra finches, are capable of discriminating the individ

219 halamus exerts diverse behavioral effects in zebra finches, most of which are sexually differentiated

220 field L (primary auditory cortex analog) of zebra finches, previous studies identified a limited set

221 basal ganglia circuit of juvenile songbirds (zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata) during vocal learnin

222 Using intracellular recordings in singing zebra finches, we found that DAF failed to perturb singi

223 In zebra finches, we found that exposure to a tutor's song

224 bilateral coordination for vocal learning in zebra finches, we investigated the anatomical organizati

225 regarious, non-territorial songbirds such as zebra finches, where females have access to numerous mal

226 in vivo imaging to measure spine dynamics in zebra finches, which learn to sing by imitating a tutor

227 manipulating the brain activity of juvenile zebra finches, which learn to sing by memorizing and voc

228 We deafened adult zebra finches, which rely on auditory feedback to mainta

229 We evaluated this question in adult zebra finches, whose premotor neurons in the nucleus rob

230 erization that could impact song behavior in zebra finches.

231 identified HVC projection neurons in singing zebra finches.

232 protein in brains of juvenile and adult male zebra finches.

233 controls learning and production of song in zebra finches.

234 dynamic control of subsyringeal pressure in zebra finches.

235 log FoxP2 disrupts song learning in juvenile zebra finches.

236 n the auditory and sensorimotor forebrain of zebra finches.

237 upper-vocal-tract filtering to the songs of zebra finches.

238 generated neurons into the brain of juvenile zebra finches.

239 ingle HVC axons innervating RA in adult male zebra finches.

240 essary for vocal variability and learning in zebra finches.

241 ing, we analyzed the songs of young juvenile zebra finches.

242 f complex, learned acoustic signals in awake zebra finches.

243 of the arcopallium in brain slices from male zebra finches.

244 rial sections in embryonic and post-hatching zebra finches.

245 ed lentivirus to produce germline transgenic zebra finches.

246 computational complexity of song learning in zebra finches.

247 physiological studies of selected neurons in zebra finches.

248 that ketolation occurs in the integument in zebra finches.

249 oxP2 disrupts song learning in juvenile male zebra finches.

250 human keratinocyte, monocyte, and embryonic zebra fish assays revealed no cytotoxicity.

251 tive erythropoiesis in the rps29(-/-) mutant zebra fish DBA model.

252 l imaging of H2S and in vivo imaging in live zebra fish demonstrated FEPO's potential biological appl

253 dels exist for FPD/AML, as Runx11/2 mice and zebra fish do not develop bleeding disorders or leukemia

254 esterol efflux in endothelial cells controls zebra fish embryonic angiogenesis.

255 both mouse developing cerebral cortices and zebra fish embryos.

256 in mouse macrophages as well as infection of zebra fish embryos.

257 a defective erythropoiesis phenotype using a zebra fish model.

258 maging in positive ion mode of rat brain and zebra fish tissues allowed enhanced detection of compoun

259 Rat brain and zebra fish tissues were investigated with reactive DESI-

260 crystal structures of these compounds in the zebra fish zVDR ligand binding domain as complexes with

261 dopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, or zebra fish, in which a majority of genes have broad-shap

262 pombe, D. melanogaster, C. elegans, Xenopus, zebra fish, mouse and human, for a total of 12,877 tRFs.

263 onditions, most herbivores (primarily plains zebra, Grant's gazelle and hartebeest) favoured sites wi

264 ion between the Grevy's zebra and the plains zebra has been documented, leading to a requirement for

265 s still equivocal, our results indicate that zebra in ENP often survive sublethal anthrax infections,

266 A component of the biologic action of ZEBRA is attributable to binding methylated CpGs in ZREs

267 Gazelle and zebra made decisions based on current light levels and l

268 The underwater adhesion of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) to substrates is a c

269 for the comparison of gene expression during zebra mussel adhesion and non-adhesion.

270 Our findings demonstrated that the zebra mussel byssus cDNA microarray is an efficient tool

271 byssogenesis mechanism, RNA samples from the zebra mussel feet with byssogenesis and without byssogen

272 ctivity of the byssus glands embedded in the zebra mussel feet, byssogenesis is highly active to prod

273 d experimental samples, both assays detected zebra mussel in 94% of spiked samples and 0% of negative

274 f uninfested ballast and harbor samples with zebra mussel tissue to further test each assay's detecti

275 This lifelong activity helps the zebra mussel to firmly attach to substrata underwater, t

276 In unmanipulated samples, zebra mussel was not detected, while quagga mussel was d

277 In an attempt to better understand the zebra mussel's byssus activity, a cDNA microarray (ZMB)

278 e could detect the bioaccumulation of NPs in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) exposed for 1 h at

279 Initially, we searched for a ZEBRA mutant that supports viral replication but not tra

280 ZEBRA mutants directly induced the nuclear aggresome pat

281 s resulted in pollen with remarkably similar zebra phenotypes, distinct from those of other known exi

282 endogenous methoxykaempferol glucoronide in zebra plant (Aphelandra squarrosa) leaves producing a lo

283 ly (Spathiphyllum lynise) and the variegated Zebra plant (Aphelandra squarrosa).

284 der radiation, Lake Tanganyika), Metriaclima zebra (recent radiation, Lake Malawi), Pundamilia nyerer

285 se methods, we identified significantly more zebras responding immunologically to anthrax than have p

286 and activates transcription through heptamer ZEBRA response elements (ZREs) related to AP-1 sites.

287 eins (SC35 and HDAC6) and viral proteins (WT ZEBRA, Rta, and BMLF1) but not other cellular or viral p

288 over a century of interest, the function of zebra stripes has never been examined systematically.

289 n regular, highly structured and unexpected 'zebra stripes', even when the solar-wind activity is low

290 A solution to the riddle of zebra stripes, discussed by Wallace and Darwin, is at ha

291 We compared populations of zebra-tailed lizards and western banded geckos, which ar

292 There are three species of zebras: the plains zebra Equus quagga, the Grevy's zebra

293 se mutant AP-1 proteins acquire functions of ZEBRA; they activate expression of many viral early lyti

294 ead abundance (RRA) ranged from >99% (plains zebra) to <1% (dik-dik).

295 We found that Z(S186A), a mutant of ZEBRA unable to activate transcription of Rta or viral g

296 Wild-type (WT) ZEBRA was diffusely distributed within the nucleus.

297 ybrid populations between Grevy's and plains zebra were simulated to investigate subspecies and hybri

298 men to characterize the genome of the quagga zebra, which was driven to extinction in the early 1900s

299 Co-transfection of WT ZEBRA with aggresome-inducing mutants Z(R183E) and Z(R17

300 Residue S186 of ZEBRA, Z(S186), which is absolutely required for disrupt