ライフサイエンスコーパス: zooplankton

1 etween them via their shared prey community (zooplankton).

2 herms (fish, amphibians, aquatic insects and zooplankton).

3 ich have close relationships with gelatinous zooplankton.

4 een shown to accumulate in phytoplankton and zooplankton.

5 e they were fed with indigenous contaminated zooplankton.

6 pact of anadromous alewife on populations of zooplankton.

7 fast-sinking particles accessible to larger zooplankton.

8 rface waters and propagated up through large zooplankton.

9 astics are ingested by, and may impact upon, zooplankton.

10 the dinoflagellates by deterring grazing by zooplankton.

11 MMHg increased with larger size fractions of zooplankton.

12 external carapace and appendages of exposed zooplankton.

13 ique to this study we also find (110 m)Ag in zooplankton.

14 r approximately 50% of the C incorporated by zooplankton.

15 ediated unsynchronized vertical migration of zooplankton.

16 omass inferred by density and body length of zooplankton.

17 set by grazing losses due to the presence of zooplankton.

18 nt attached to the chitinous exoskeletons of zooplankton.

19 ryonic development among a diverse sample of zooplankton.

20 sed to characterize the genetic diversity of zooplankton.

21 is the chitinous exoskeletons of crustacean zooplankton.

22 respiration of carnivorous and detritivorous zooplankton.

23 ucidate pathways by which climate influences zooplankton.

24 ass and production of both phytoplankton and zooplankton.

25 a total of nine diPAPs were only detected in zooplankton.

26 is a relatively low-quality food source for zooplankton.

27 olism of carbon rich lipids by overwintering zooplankton.

28 4)-10(5.9)) are more variable than those for zooplankton (10(4.6)-10(6.2)) across ranges in DOC (40-5

29 asing algae reduced CH3Hg+ concentrations in zooplankton 2-3-fold.

30 Communities of zooplankton, a critical portion of aquatic ecosystems, c

31 toichiometry, reduces MeHg concentrations in zooplankton, a major source of MeHg for lake fish.

32 up) associations between primary production, zooplankton abundance and fish stock recruitment, this s

33 Zooplankton abundance was reduced the greatest in bluegi

34 oplankton bloom is followed by a peak in the zooplankton abundance.

35 ore waters and compared to changes in marine zooplankton abundance.

36 measured concentrations in phytoplankton and zooplankton across diverse sites from the Northwest Atla

37 erefore needs to be considered as "baseline" zooplankton activity in a changing Arctic ocean [6-9].

38 earlier for all metrics and trophic levels: zooplankton advanced most, and fish least, rapidly.

39 creased mortality of amphibians, gastropods, zooplankton, algae and a macrophyte (reducing taxonomic

40 Zooplankton allochthony (proportion of carbon from terre

41 report that natural populations of Antarctic zooplankton also sustain significant DNA damage [measure

42 local physical forcing affect phytoplankton, zooplankton and an apex predator along the West Antarcti

43 to thousands of km) layers comprise fish and zooplankton and are readily detectable using echosounder

44 explanation for lower CH3Hg+ accumulation by zooplankton and fish in algal-rich relative to algal-poo

45 imary and secondary production likely caused zooplankton and fish MeHg decreases via algal and growth

46 ystem was evaluated in response to declining zooplankton and fish populations.

47 We show that Prymnesium attaches to zooplankton and fish, causing mortality, whereas exposur

48 surface and subsurface waters, as well as in zooplankton and fish, off Japan in June 2011.

49 norganic carbon, particulate organic carbon, zooplankton and fish.

50 olonization that mediates attachment to both zooplankton and human epithelial cells by binding to a s

51 ixing that can be equally effective in small zooplankton and large mammals.

52 ma-derived Cs isotopes were also detected in zooplankton and mesopelagic fish, and unique to this stu

53 f ammonium, namely, the daytime excretion by zooplankton and micronekton migrating from the surface t

54 owed that larger fish tended to feed less on zooplankton and more on benthic invertebrates than did s

55 ed in the Lake Mjosa food web in Norway from zooplankton and Mysis to planktivorous and piscivorous f

56 Transparent zooplankton and nekton are often nearly invisible when v

57 tic nanoparticles reduce survival of aquatic zooplankton and penetrate the blood-to-brain barrier in

58 Predation by Mysis shifted zooplankton and phytoplankton community size structure.

59 xperiments that measured the response of the zooplankton and phytoplankton to zooplanktivorous fish t

60 prey population of herring and, indirectly, zooplankton and phytoplankton via top-down control.

61 conducted on lower trophic levels including zooplankton and the subsequent transfer to predators, wh

62 eir main prey), and sediments, while pelagic zooplankton and water were dominated by lower chain acid

63 ations in water and biota (phytoplankton and zooplankton) and the variability of bioconcentration (BC

64 gnified by a factor of 4 from microseston to zooplankton, and both concentrations of MMHg and the fra

65 ations in pore water, benthic invertebrates, zooplankton, and fish (Leuciscus idus melanotus).

66 multiple pathways involving microbes, other zooplankton, and krill predators.

67 sive, intense aggregations of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and micronekton exhibited strong diel patte

68 motaxis and phototaxis, sperm, algae, marine zooplankton, and other microswimmers move on helical pat

69 als and different fish as well as amphipods, zooplankton, and phytoplankton were specifically investi

70 mum), including marine snow, large migrating zooplankton, and their fast-sinking fecal pellets, repre

71 fferent relationships between phytoplankton, zooplankton, and their physical environment appear subje

72 e and open sea, where vertical migrations of zooplankton are driven by lunar illumination.

73 On the other hand, smaller-bodied zooplankton are often preyed upon heavily by invertebrat

74 Pelagic zooplankton are susceptible to consuming microplastics,

75 (insects) and their freshwater counterparts (zooplankton) are nutrient-rich and indistinguishable in

76 cids (omega3-PUFAs), which are important for zooplankton, are significantly correlated to the trophic

77 s (combinations of free-living, particle, or zooplankton associations).

78 Layers of zooplankton began to disappear within 20 minutes of the

79 tivorous fish treatments resulted in reduced zooplankton biomass and increased phytoplankton biomass.

80 (< 0.3) had wide ranges of phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass and production, depending on P load

81 plankton without apparent growth dilution or zooplankton biomass dilution.

82 the ecological succession, phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass dynamics produced bioaccumulation me

83 Zooplankton biomass increased with P load and responded

84 barcoding was positively correlated with the zooplankton biomass inferred by density and body length

85 s with particular local importance where the zooplankton biomass is high and the ocean depth is great

86 As predicted, zooplankton biomass was under strong consumer control bu

87 quent summer for some nutrient variables and zooplankton biomass.

88 lso affects the abundance of marine fish and zooplankton, but it is unclear whether this filters up t

89 ween individual predator and prey meso/micro-zooplankton, but it lowers the capture probability (beca

90 scular periods when light permits feeding on zooplankton, but limits visual detection by piscivores.

91 scular periods when light permits feeding on zooplankton, but limits visual detection by piscivores.

92 OS and PFCA concentrations, respectively, in zooplankton, but not in fish and guillemot eggs.

93 ded as trophic dead-ends mostly inedible for zooplankton, but substantial evidence shows that some gr

94 Moonlight may enable predation of zooplankton by carnivorous zooplankters, fish, and birds

95 Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and the zooplankton Calanus finmarchicus.

96 The PCBs in the lipids of zooplankton Calanus were in equilibrium with those in th

97 Like most zooplankton, Calanus hyperboreus undergoes seasonal migr

98 hat graze on phytoplankton, as well as other zooplankton can accumulate and mediate the transmission

99 s well as active food searching behaviour of zooplankton can modify the type of functional response.

100 of particulate organic carbon and 22-50% of zooplankton carbon are derived from terrestrial sources,

101 om-up control) through copepod herbivores to zooplankton carnivores because of tight trophic coupling

102 rs and polyethylene (PE) beads on freshwater zooplankton Ceriodaphnia dubia.

103 0 and 100 nm nanosilver stocks to freshwater zooplankton (Ceriodaphnia dubia) in presence and absence

104 se in PAHs, elevated primary production, and zooplankton changes, these oil sands lake ecosystems hav

105 and adherence of microplastics in a range of zooplankton common to the northeast Atlantic, and employ

106 Zooplankton communities can be strongly affected by cyan

107 The species composition of zooplankton communities determined by metabarcoding was

108 ing the influence of environmental change on zooplankton communities under field-conditions is hinder

109 of metabarcoding for taxonomic profiling of zooplankton communities was validated by the morphology-

110 pulations of the most abundant member of the zooplankton community (calanoid copepods) were reduced 2

111 e, NY, are strongly driven by changes in the zooplankton community and body size.

112 n clearly distinguish the composition of the zooplankton community between lake and river ecosystems.

113 Our study demonstrates that changes in zooplankton community composition confound the biodiluti

114 of taxonomic aggregation, phytoplankton and zooplankton community composition showed few systematic

115 e concurrent changes in nutrient loading and zooplankton community composition.

116 ysed a data set containing phytoplankton and zooplankton community data from 131 lakes through 9 year

117 oad range of ecosystem properties, including zooplankton community structure and nutrient cycling.

118 st, the copepod, a significant member of the zooplankton community.

119 were largely replaced by a two trophic level zooplankton community.

120 lower variability in MeHg concentrations in zooplankton compared to phytoplankton.

121 s, such as growth/mortality rates, predatory zooplankton concentrations and nutrient levels.

122 tic MeHg concentration by approximately 90%, zooplankton concentrations by 30 to 50%, and in some fis

123 er, unlike the shells of foraminifera, their zooplankton counterparts, coccoliths remain underused in

124 ole of plasticity in rapid adaptation of the zooplankton Daphnia melanica to novel fish predators.

125 Inspired by experimental studies of the zooplankton Daphnia, we model foraging animals as "agent

126 e show that during phytoplankton deficiency, zooplankton (Daphnia magna) can benefit from terrestrial

127 al change for phytoplankton (chlorophyll a), zooplankton (Daphnia) and fish (perch, Perca fluviatilis

128 EE] in fish, benthic macroinvertebrates, and zooplankton declined as a function of their trophic posi

129 ted decline, we observed a small increase in zooplankton densities in response to our experimental in

130 Furthermore, warmer waters and declining zooplankton densities may act together to lower carrying

131 uct of the local functional response and the zooplankton density at this depth.

132 sity occurred in mid-winter, whereas maximum zooplankton density was observed in summer.

133 phytoplankton biovolume and 25.3% of summer zooplankton density.

134 ature and, as a proxy for food availability, zooplankton density.

135 ts have shown how OA can dramatically affect zooplankton development, physiology and skeletal mineral

136 ilability of cyanobacteria to filter feeding zooplankton (e.g. cladocerans).

137 ting the dynamics of nutrients-phytoplankton-zooplankton ecosystems and enhancing accumulation of pho

138 an alter the properties and sinking rates of zooplankton egests and, (3) faecal pellets can facilitat

139 It has been suggested that attachment to zooplankton enhances environmental survival of Vibrio sp

140 % to <30% of the total mesozooplankton, (ii) zooplankton fecal pellets become a minor component of th

141 atom-rich) organic matter packaged mostly as zooplankton fecal pellets.

142 (based on systems of PDEs or coupled ODEs), zooplankton feeding at a given depth is normally compute

143 Extensive experiments on zooplankton feeding in laboratories show non-sigmoid nat

144 ucted extensive literature search of data on zooplankton feeding in situ, I show that vertical hetero

145 r-individual filtration rates than any other zooplankton filter feeder.

146 thus suggest that circadian clocks increase zooplankton fitness by optimizing the temporal trade-off

147 ant fish species in Windermere and important zooplankton food resources may ultimately affect fish su

148 rcury uptake and transfer exclusively within zooplankton food webs in northern marine waters.

149 evealed the seasonal significance of pelagic zooplankton for somatic growth and gonad development.

150 ariant r(-3) to r(-4)) than that produced by zooplankton for which feeding and propulsion are the sam

151 We suggest that this occurs because zooplankton fragment and ingest half of the fast-sinking

152 strict distinction between phytoplankton and zooplankton from a global model of the marine plankton f

153 Water and zooplankton from a lake that had received (202)Hg-enrich

154 Further, mass sinking of zooplankton from the surface waters and accumulation at

155 croplastic debris can negatively impact upon zooplankton function and health.

156 population genetic structure of the keystone zooplankton grazer, Daphnia pulicaria, using dormant egg

157 eractions between a structured population of zooplankton grazers and their predators.

158 The primary zooplankton grazers decreased, and in the more transpare

159 higher trophic levels, particularly for the zooplankton grazers, whose main food source is composed

160 ator and further south, whereas nitrogen and zooplankton grazing are the primary factors that regulat

161 on makes it difficult to describe adequately zooplankton grazing in models with vertical space.

162 lver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) had an impact on zooplankton grazing on their prey, specifically phytopla

163 sting stronger top-down control, mediated by zooplankton grazing played an important role.

164 ith phytoplankton as well as the capacity of zooplankton grazing to modulate the algal standing crop.

165 tween cell size and (1) nutrient uptake, (2) zooplankton grazing, and (3) phytoplankton sinking.

166 , three phytoplankton functional groups, and zooplankton grazing.

167 tion dynamic are present in the major marine zooplankton group, the graptolites, during the Ordovicia

168 Zooplankton growth and egg production were strongly rela

169 Zooplankton growth dilutes their MeHg body burden, but t

170 oplankton growth was associated with earlier zooplankton growth.

171 at EhVs can accumulate in high titers within zooplankton guts during feeding or can be adsorbed to th

172 Intriguingly, the passage through zooplankton guts prolonged EhV's half-life of infectivit

173 However, diel vertical migration (DVM) of zooplankton has been shown to occur even during the dark

174 Copepods comprise the dominant Arctic zooplankton; hence, their responses to OA have important

175 Sediment, water, zooplankton, herring, sprat, and guillemot eggs were ana

176 Zooplankton (Holopedium, Daphnia, and Leptodiaptomus) ar

177 l outbreaks (Metschnikowia bicuspidata) in a zooplankton host (Daphnia dentifera) among lakes.

178 atives when fit to experimental data using a zooplankton host (Daphnia dentifera) that consumes spore

179 ress this issue using a planktonic system (a zooplankton host, Daphnia dentifera, and its virulent fu

180 nutrient concentrations, resulting in lower zooplankton (i.e., food) densities for the fish.

181 he aquatic environment and is a commensal of zooplankton, i.e., copepods, when combined with the find

182 l methylation and multiple trophic levels of zooplankton in a vertically restricted zone.

183 We compute grazing of zooplankton in each layer depending on feeding activity

184 e organic carbon (TPOC) on phytoplankton and zooplankton in five whole-lake experiments.

185 , and will speed the loss of these important zooplankton in lakes where calcium levels are in decline

186 utcome of grazing control of algal blooms by zooplankton in nutrient-rich ecosystems.

187 hose of baleen whales feeding on herbivorous zooplankton in the Arctic.

188 sent a case study on a community of fish and zooplankton in the Barents Sea to illustrate how a mass

189 ules released by copepods, the most abundant zooplankton in the sea, which play a central role in foo

190 The synergy between microbes and zooplankton in the twilight zone is important to our und

191 C, and N to estimate terrestrial support to zooplankton in two contrasting lakes.

192 racteristics due to increased DOC may impact zooplankton in ways that differ from those observed in s

193 We show that zooplankton, in which feeding and swimming are separate

194 nt studies have demonstrated that a range of zooplankton, including copepods, can ingest microplastic

195 MeHg concentrations in zooplankton increased with an increase in body size and

196 ynchronized short-term vertical migration of zooplankton into the mean-field modelling framework.

197 Acidic digestion by zooplankton is a potential mechanism for iron mobilizati

198 Understanding the colonisation process in zooplankton is crucial for successful restoration of aqu

199 tanding and quantifying iron mobilization by zooplankton is essential to predict ocean productivity i

200 Methylmercury bioaccumulation in zooplankton is higher than in midlatitude ecosystems.

201 onditions, modeled growth dilution in marine zooplankton is insufficient to lower their MeHg concentr

202 arctic lakes showed that diet of herbivorous zooplankton is mainly based on high-quality phytoplankto

203 terrestrial support of pelagic crustaceans (zooplankton) is widespread.

204 The effects of zooplankton layers cascaded even further up the food cha

205 Only around dusk did zooplankton layers overlap with phytoplankton layers.

206 ity, and total abundance of micronekton when zooplankton layers were present with typical patterns re

207 e for each individual more than doubled when zooplankton layers were present.

208 fect the value of such organisms as prey for zooplankton, leading to the unwanted generation of futur

209 he result of lower particle fragmentation by zooplankton, likely due to the almost complete absence o

210 sfer is often inhibited at the phytoplankton-zooplankton link, resulting in an accumulation of phytop

211 ations in pore water, benthic invertebrates, zooplankton, macrophytes, and fish.

212 Complex nature of foraging behaviour of zooplankton makes it difficult to describe adequately zo

213 (between 1980 and 2009), we demonstrate that zooplankton MeHg concentrations in Onondaga Lake, NY, ar

214 e filtration procedure was developed whereby zooplankton, most phytoplankton, and particulates >20 mi

215 l agent of epidemic cholera, is commensal to zooplankton, notably copepods, a simple filtration proce

216 coupled equations for nitrate-phytoplankton-zooplankton (NPZ) concentration, incorporating sub-grid

217 gressive model in combination with long-term zooplankton observations off the California coast, we sh

218 The concentration in the zooplankton of all selected PCBs sharply declined from M

219 Calanus finmarchicus is a marine zooplankton of interest for the aquaculture industry, as

220 The zooplankton of the northern California Current are typic

221 Hg in microseston and four size fractions of zooplankton on the continental shelf, slope, and rise of

222 nkton through food webs vis a vis grazing by zooplankton or other pathways.

223 irect effects on higher trophic levels, from zooplankton organisms to marine mammals and seabirds.

224 likely due to the almost complete absence of zooplankton particle interactions in OMZ waters.

225 eaked during the summer, coinciding with the zooplankton peak and the warmest water temperature.

226 However, for phytoplankton and zooplankton, phenological change was also associated wit

227 icular, the rate of food intake by the whole zooplankton population in the column, as a function of t

228 Gelatinous zooplankton populations are well known for their ability

229 lly we consider the marine phytoplankton and zooplankton populations, and model them as an excitable

230 , and 4.4 L/kg (wet weight) for fish muscle, zooplankton, predatory invertebrates, and nonpredatory i

231 Prymnesium parvum can severely harm fish and zooplankton, presumably through the release of allelopat

232 s the impact of a cubozoan predator on their zooplankton prey, predominantly Copepoda, Pleocyemata, D

233 This indicates that limitation of zooplankton production by this essential fatty acid is o

234 lake, to test the hypothesis that crustacean zooplankton production should subsequently decrease.

235 ts account for a disproportionate portion of zooplankton production.

236 n, while t-POC makes a minor contribution to zooplankton production.

237 s provide an expectation for the response of zooplankton productivity as DOC concentration increases,

238 sed DOC concentrations may reduce crustacean zooplankton productivity due to reductions in resource q

239 Aquatic invertebrates (chironomid larvae, zooplankton) provided indicators of MMHg bioaccumulation

240 Zooplankton readily ingest microscopic plastic (micropla

241 ne food-webs, the impact of microplastics on zooplankton remains under-researched.

242 of benthic (macroinvertebrate) and pelagic (zooplankton) resource availability, along with short (da

243 till have an incomplete understanding of how zooplankton respond to temporal increases in DOC concent

244 However, the phytoplankton and zooplankton responses to nutrient additions did not foll

245 potential reduction in fitness of Antarctic zooplankton resulting from DNA damage is unknown, we sug

246 ess (measured as Pielou's evenness), whereas zooplankton RUE was positively related to phytoplankton

247 Phytoplankton and zooplankton RUE were high and low, respectively, when Cy

248 Zooplankton should therefore seek to minimize the fluid

249 a Lake and that the presence of large-bodied zooplankton species drives elevated MeHg concentrations.

250 aeuchaeta glacialis, and Themisto abyssorum) zooplankton species from the Canadian High Arctic (Amund

251 uctions in metal concentrations to increased zooplankton species richness over time (p < 0.01) with a

252 uctions of Cu, Ni, and Zn concentrations and zooplankton species richness.

253 making the bloom biomass available to other zooplankton species.

254 moid nature of response for most herbivorous zooplankton species.

255 We propose that zooplankton, swimming through topographically adjacent p

256 es (delta(15)N and delta(13)C) in individual zooplankton taxa collected over a period of eight years

257 CARS) microscopy we identified that thirteen zooplankton taxa had the capacity to ingest 1.7-30.6 mum

258 ower and delta(34)S signatures are higher in zooplankton than in sediment-feeding invertebrates, ther

259 Here we show that zooplankton that contacts and feeds on the luminescent b

260 Copepods are a globally abundant class of zooplankton that form a key trophic link between primary

261 Zooplankton that prey on species such as C. hyperboreus

262 erally small (millimetres or less) animals - zooplankton - that are adrift on the currents.

263 The predatory zooplankton, the spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longiman

264 particulate carbon available to herbivorous zooplankton, this food source accounted for approximatel

265 ceptual discrepancy is due to the ability of zooplankton to feed mostly in layers with high algal den

266 highly conserved in the animal kingdom, from zooplankton to human hunter-gatherers.

267 Hence, the sensitivity of zooplankton to ocean oxygen concentrations can have dire

268 the year, but also a seasonal importance of zooplankton to the diet, somatic growth and gonadal deve

269 l data (U.S. Breeding Bird Survey and marine zooplankton) to identify ecological boundaries, and comp

270 ratio." Fundamental changes in the diatom-to-zooplankton-to-higher trophic level food web should occu

271 pesticides were measured in air, water, and zooplankton tracking the North Atlantic Bloom in May 200

272 to extract microplastics ingested by marine zooplankton under laboratory conditions.

273 Upper-ocean temperature, phytoplankton, and zooplankton varied principally on the approximately 20-d

274 the incorporation of terrestrial carbon into zooplankton was not directly related to the concentratio

275 gill, Lepomis macrochirus) on a shared prey (zooplankton), we conducted a mesocosm experiment.

276 ansferred to the nutritious guts of fish and zooplankton, where they survive digestion and gain effec

277 annual primary production and are grazed by zooplankton, which in turn are suitably sized food items

278 urbances produced by feeding and swimming in zooplankton with diverse propulsion mechanisms and rangi

279 This behavioral response provides zooplankton with the capability to retain the benefits o

280 on was governing the accumulation of MeHg in zooplankton without apparent growth dilution or zooplank

281 ested this theoretical prediction by using a zooplankton-yeast host-parasite system in which ecologic