戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 olution of a novel organ identity program in Aquilegia.
2 ut the genetic basis of these transitions in Aquilegia.
3 ical B class function has been elaborated in Aquilegia.
4 pression of the PRC2 and VEL PHD families in Aquilegia, a member of the lower eudicot order Ranuncula
5  genetic regulation of leaf morphogenesis in Aquilegia and other flowering plants.
6 r of these genes appear to be single copy in Aquilegia and thus variation in their expression may hav
7 ies that hybridize (Ipomopsis, Diplacus, and Aquilegia) are examined in relation to these predictions
8                                  We focus on Aquilegia as a primary example of these advantages and h
9 ome profiling of early floral development in Aquilegia at four finely dissected developmental stages,
10  group (Polemoniaceae) and Aquilegia formosa-Aquilegia caerulea group (Ranunculaceae) in western Nort
11 phingophilous species: the Aquilegia formosa/Aquilegia caerulea group (Ranunculaceae), the Ipomopsis
12 floral organ primordia initiation and FMT in Aquilegia coerulea (Ranunculaceae).
13 ere, we describe a polymorphic population of Aquilegia coerulea with a naturally occurring floral hom
14 nt phasiRNAs in the basal eudicot columbine (Aquilegia coerulea) are produced by the canonical trigge
15                  We conclude that columbine (Aquilegia coerulea) would be a strong model because of i
16 pre-duplication FUL-like genes in columbine (Aquilegia coerulea).
17 H (STY) family in nectar spur development in Aquilegia coerulea.
18  ortholog AqJAG in the lower eudicot species Aquilegia coerulea.
19                            The basal eudicot Aquilegia (columbine) has an unusual floral structure th
20        Both AqSWN and AqCLF are expressed in Aquilegia endosperm but neither copy is imprinted.
21 cal traits, and demonstrate its use to study Aquilegia flower and pollinator co-evolution.
22 s and sphingophilous flowers in Ipompsis and Aquilegia for nectar foraging by the hummingbird Selasph
23 pomopsis aggregata group (Polemoniaceae) and Aquilegia formosa-Aquilegia caerulea group (Ranunculacea
24 nithophilous and sphingophilous species: the Aquilegia formosa/Aquilegia caerulea group (Ranunculacea
25 ed a combination of sequence searches of the Aquilegia Gene Index, phylogenetic analyses, and the iso
26                                 We find that Aquilegia has a relatively simple PRC2 with only one hom
27                                              Aquilegia has four members of the VEL PHD family, three
28  Previous studies of the lower eudicot model Aquilegia have revealed differential expression patterns
29  this study, we have sought to determine how Aquilegia homologs of the B class genes APETALA3 (AP3) a
30                     Phylogenetic analysis of Aquilegia indicates that flower color transitions procee
31          The petal spur of the basal eudicot Aquilegia is a key innovation associated with the adapti
32                                              Aquilegia is an emerging model organism that is phylogen
33 edicted 84 targets of these newly identified Aquilegia microRNAs including transcription factors and
34 comparative genomics approach to identify 45 Aquilegia microRNAs that comprise 20 separate plant micr
35 ing its role in the initial evolution of the Aquilegia nectar spur, and examining its potential role
36 th during speciation events, suggesting that Aquilegia nectar spurs rapidly evolve to fit adaptive pe
37 role in regulating cell proliferation in the Aquilegia petal during the early phase (phase I) of spur
38 ell elongation and nectary maturation in the Aquilegia petal spur.
39 re a defining feature of the columbine genus Aquilegia (Ranunculaceae), a lineage that has experience
40 ies demonstrate that the protein products of Aquilegia's AP3 and PI homologs can form heterodimers, m
41 netic dissection of other adaptive traits in Aquilegia should also be possible soon as genomic resour
42 ding the adaptive radiation of the New World Aquilegia species.
43 s studies have shown that diversification of Aquilegia spur length can be predominantly attributed to
44 In most ornithophilous taxa of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia, the floral tubes have lengths and widths in t
45                                   (i) In the Aquilegia type, which is widespread, ethological isolati
46 Mode of origin i accounts for the Salvia and Aquilegia types of isolation in nine known species group
47 ed at a relatively constant level throughout Aquilegia vulgaris development, with the VEL PHD family
48 cies-level phylogeny of the columbine genus, Aquilegia, we show a significant evolutionary trend for
49 cies and the newly identified microRNAs from Aquilegia were analyzed in a phylogenetic context reveal