ライフサイエンスコーパス: Arrhenius equation

1 ect and incorrect derivation of the modified Arrhenius equation.

2 f anthocyanin degradation was modeled by the Arrhenius equation.

3 omplicated and could not be explained by the Arrhenius equation.

4 ve reaction rate constants complied with the Arrhenius equation.

5 arge scale modelling efforts uses a modified Arrhenius equation.

6 ependent Phia values were analyzed using the Arrhenius equation.

7 onditions by first order kinetics, using the Arrhenius equation.

8 st exactly by the yields calculated with the Arrhenius equation.

9 ncrease in the thermal energy (k(B)T) in the Arrhenius equation.

10 y on binding enthalpy, in agreement with the Arrhenius equation.

11 be described with an equation similar to the Arrhenius equation.

12 a two-state Markovian process that obeys the Arrhenius equation.

13 (k) for compound 1 were determined using the Arrhenius equation.

14 and 18125.95 min(-1), respectively using the Arrhenius equation.

15 ratures and were largely consistent with the Arrhenius equation (activation energy, 65.4 kJ/mol).

16 Using Arrhenius equation, activation energies of sunflower, so

17 surrounding cavitation bubbles and using the Arrhenius equation, an effective mean temperature of 340

18 t migration rate could be represented by the Arrhenius equation and therefore can be controlled by th

19 rature dependence of chemical reactions, the Arrhenius equation, and related Q(10) temperature coeffi

20 ase the rate of dechlorination, according to Arrhenius' equation, and increase the rate of TCE desorp

21 ith temperature and formulations such as the Arrhenius equation are widely used in earth system model

22 determined to be E(a) = 25 +/- 7 kJ mol(-1) (Arrhenius equation), DeltaH(double dagger) = 23 +/- 7 kJ

23 The widely used Arrhenius equation describes the kinetics of simple two-

24 ium triflate, 17e, were calculated using the Arrhenius equation: E(a) = 26.8 kcal/mol, Delta H(++) =

25 We rederived the modified Arrhenius equation from the source publication from 1942

26 the error in the derivation of the modified Arrhenius equation has impacted the accuracy of predicti

27 8 degrees C, on extrapolation by the derived Arrhenius equation, lead to 8-14 at 25 degrees C.

28 The Arrhenius equation (ln k vs. 1/T) and activated complex

29 pressure independent and gave the following Arrhenius equation: log[(k/(cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1))] =

30 e impact of the rederivation of the modified Arrhenius equation on modelled daily carbon gain causes

31 Here we use the Boltzmann-Arrhenius equation, published estimates of activation en

32 comparing responses against predictions from Arrhenius' equation (Q(10) = 2).

33 ustrates a novel adaptation of the classical Arrhenius equation that accounts for the microscopic ori

34 elation based on the modified version of the Arrhenius equation to estimate the solubility of anti-ca

35 action at elevated temperatures and used the Arrhenius equation to extrapolate the results to room te

36 s time decay data, and these were fit to the Arrhenius equation to give the effective barrier to rela

37 ere we present a theory that generalizes the Arrhenius equation to include static disorder of conform

38 derived from H-B relation parameters and the Arrhenius equation was applied to describe changes in co

39 A re-parametrized form of Arrhenius equation was used in the proposed model to fac

40 the rearrangement step was observed, and the Arrhenius equation was used to ascertain an apparent act

41 ed in the range of 35 to 60 degrees C, using Arrhenius equation, was determined to be 11.32 kcal mol(

42 Using the Arrhenius equation, we analyzed a comprehensive data set

43 Using the widely used Arrhenius equation, we could include the temperature inf

44 urfaces are traditionally described using an Arrhenius equation with energy barrier and pre-exponenti

45 out-of-phase magnetic susceptibility to the Arrhenius equation yields an effective energy barrier, U