ライフサイエンスコーパス: Arrhenius

1 Arrhenius activation parameters for the aldol addition r

2 Arrhenius analyses of the rate constants of opening free

3 Arrhenius analysis demonstrated that in the mutants fewe

4 Arrhenius analysis demonstrates a nearly threefold decre

5 Arrhenius analysis of the data gives similar activation

6 Arrhenius analysis of the temperature dependent excited

7 Arrhenius analysis of the turbidity data reveals two kin

8 Arrhenius analysis reveals two kinetic phases, a slower

9 Arrhenius analysis shows that 1 M NaCl stabilizes the di

10 Arrhenius behavior of the forward and anti-Arrhenius beh

11 Arrhenius behavior was observed, with activation energie

12 Arrhenius plots for the uncatalyzed deamination of cytos

13 Arrhenius plots of the ratio of hydrogens exchanged at 5

14 Arrhenius plots were generated to calculate the respecti

15 Arrhenius pre-exponential factors and activation energie

16 Arrhenius rate expressions were determined for the abstr

17 Arrhenius-based models are currently implemented in envi

18 Arrhenius-type plots of PIEs on protonation of 4-MeO-1 a

19 determined to be E(a) = 25 +/- 7 kJ mol(-1) (Arrhenius equation), DeltaH(double dagger) = 23 +/- 7 kJ

20 same linear relation on an lnk versus T(-1) (Arrhenius) plot.

21 k(i)(T) (i = 1,2) calculated from the above Arrhenius expressions have estimated accuracies of +/- 1

22 ndent, while above 2.5 K thermally activated Arrhenius behavior is apparent with U(eff) = 21(1) cm(-1

23 (down to ca. 77 K), the thermally activated (Arrhenius) ET process dissipates revealing a tunneling m

24 es (down to ~77 K), the thermally activated (Arrhenius) ET process dissipates, and the ET rates becom

25 rements on beta-1b and beta-1a have afforded Arrhenius activation energies of 8.3 and 19.6 kcal mol(-

26 An Arrhenius analysis of diffusion constants was also carri

27 An Arrhenius analysis of these lifetimes from 1150 to 1320

28 An Arrhenius function for reaction of the Cp2Ti(III)Cl-H2O

29 An Arrhenius-type equation was applied to determine the act

30 An Arrhenius-type relationship is used to simultaneously an

31 b) were measured in various solvents, and an Arrhenius function for reaction of 5a in THF was determi

32 utyldodecyl radical (1) were studied, and an Arrhenius function over the temperature range -20 to 47

33 nd a van't Hoff plot for complexation and an Arrhenius plot for the oxidation reaction were construct

34 Since CtNHase is stable to 25 degrees C, an Arrhenius plot was constructed by plotting ln( k cat) vs

35 ecause PtNHase is stable at 60 degrees C, an Arrhenius plot was constructed by plotting ln(k(cat)) ve

36 1 K were collected and used to construct an Arrhenius plot that revealed temperature-independent rel

37 ectron spin resonance spectra and display an Arrhenius temperature dependence.

38 ps to the carbamate linkages and exhibits an Arrhenius activation energy of 111 +/- 10 kJ/mol, which

39 The slow relaxation time exhibits an Arrhenius behavior with no signs of criticality, demonst

40 gly dependent upon temperature, featuring an Arrhenius relationship.

41 Instead, they follow an Arrhenius-like behavior, commonly used to describe secon

42 We have observed that they follow an Arrhenius-type Neel-Brown behaviour.

43 obile surface liquid layer, which follows an Arrhenius dynamic and is able to dominate the flow in th

44 gh temperature viscoelastic phase follows an Arrhenius law and depends significantly on the salt cont

45 COF-5 formation follows an Arrhenius temperature dependence between 60-90 degrees C

46 preexponential factors (An) obtained from an Arrhenius analysis of the unsubstituted OPE k(n)0 versus

47 reement with the value of D inferred from an Arrhenius plot of the magnetic relaxation time versus th

48 of parent radical 3a (aryl = phenyl) gave an Arrhenius function with log k = 9.2 - 4.4/2.3RT (kcal/mo

49 r in glycine) have very similar slopes in an Arrhenius plot of the unfolding rates but very different

50 -line temperature measurements and use of an Arrhenius model for the estimated rate constant gave sig

51 to a semiclassical model based solely on an Arrhenius prefactor ratio.

52 They can be approximated by a Ferry or an Arrhenius relation, are much reduced or absent in dehydr

53 erature for all chain lengths, permitting an Arrhenius analysis.

54 The dynamic annealing rate shows an Arrhenius dependence with two well-defined activation en

55 This corresponds to an Arrhenius factor that decreases from approximately 45 k(

56 degrees C, the rate constants fit well to an Arrhenius straight line with, however, an unexpectedly l

57 We used an Arrhenius-type model (Q10) to describe how the rate of a

58 urfaces are traditionally described using an Arrhenius equation with energy barrier and pre-exponenti

59 ing is highly temperature sensitive, with an Arrhenius activation energy 2-3-fold greater than other

60 e availability and microbial biomass with an Arrhenius-type nonlinear temperature response function.

61 ever, empirical data indicate that Q(10) and Arrhenius model are often poor metrics of temperature se

62 The ionic conductivity and Arrhenius activation energy were explored for the LiOH-L

63 Absolute rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for hydrogen abstractions (from car

64 The rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for reactions of 3b indicated that

65 R was employed to measure rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for their dissociation to CO2 and m

66 de of the KIEs is temperature dependent, and Arrhenius analysis of the rate constants reveals that de

67 iscosities were fitted by the Jones-Dole and Arrhenius-like equations.

68 Eyring and Arrhenius analyses yield Delta H++ = 12.9 (4) kcal.mol (

69 rmined at 0.2 mM according to the Eyring and Arrhenius formalisms suggested that the quantum mechanic

70 Eyring and Arrhenius parameters were determined for the thermal clo

71 llowing reaction kinetics to be followed and Arrhenius activation energies (E(a)) to be measured.

72 have essentially the same reaction order and Arrhenius apparent activation energies (28 kJ/mol).

73 Arrhenius behavior of the forward and anti-Arrhenius behavior of the reverse rate constant is a kin

74 This apparent anti-Arrhenius behavior was caused by a decrease in the surfa

75 When protein folding follows anti-Arrhenius kinetics, we observe a speed limit for the num

76 and k(obs,f) correspond to the same apparent Arrhenius prefactor and activation energy (logA(app,f) (

77 Simple model applications (Arrhenius and Q(10)) do not account for observed diel hy

78 examine the data quantitatively, we applied Arrhenius-type analysis to estimate the barriers on the

79 ield of 1 kOe, tau more closely approximates Arrhenius behavior over the entire temperature range.

80 and unfolding pathways, activation barriers, Arrhenius plots, and rate-limiting steps lead to several

81 eds what is predicted from temperature-based Arrhenius calculations.

82 l pressures, the predicted viscosity becomes Arrhenius with a single temperature-independent activati

83 f PhCCl or F5-PhCCl to 1-hexene gave bimodal Arrhenius correlations.

84 The bimodal Arrhenius behavior is proposed to result from carbene-al

85 Here we use the Boltzmann-Arrhenius equation, published estimates of activation en

86 veals that 87% are fit well by the Boltzmann-Arrhenius model.

87 chanism of ATP hydrolysis can be achieved by Arrhenius analysis.

88 ships established more than 100 years ago by Arrhenius.

89 sis of Ru(2)(D(3,5-Cl(2))PhF)(4)N(3), and by Arrhenius/Eyring analysis of the conversion of Ru(2)(DPh

90 dependence on temperature well described by Arrhenius kinetics.

91 barrier for thermal relaxation was found by Arrhenius plot analysis to be approximately 71 kJ/mol, s

92 33 degrees C from 167.7 to 201.6 degrees C, Arrhenius parameters, Ea = 32.8 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1) and

93 Above 35 degrees C, Arrhenius plots of diffusion were parallel for CLSE and

94 degrees C, mostly deviating from the classic Arrhenius-type behavior.

95 ustrates a novel adaptation of the classical Arrhenius equation that accounts for the microscopic ori

96 xception of two carbene/alkene combinations, Arrhenius correlations of ln kaddn vs 1/T were unimodal

97 vation energy (E(a)) and abolish the concave Arrhenius plot normally seen for Schiff base hydrolysis

98 Reaction rate constants, Arrhenius constants, and activation energies have been d

99 ay studies, and these were used to construct Arrhenius plots from which was obtained the effective ba

100 racterized by non-Arrhenius and conventional Arrhenius-type DW motions.

101 The convex Arrhenius curves previously reported for ht-ADH are prop

102 Because of curved Arrhenius plots and negative E(X) values, empirical stru

103 type, weakly activated transport with curved Arrhenius plots, a room-temperature resistivity of ~1 Om

104 elaxation displayed a temperature-dependent, Arrhenius-like kinetics, suggestive of the crossing of a

105 8 degrees C, on extrapolation by the derived Arrhenius equation, lead to 8-14 at 25 degrees C.

106 tion water with 100-200 ps dynamics displays Arrhenius behavior and does not undergo a phase transiti

107 belowground processes, we expanded the Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis-Menten model, to apply it consis

108 nformation, such as kinetic solvent effects, Arrhenius parameters, and kinetic isotope effects.

109 To this end, Arrhenius parameters were measured for dissociation of g

110 is observed has enabled us to fit the entire Arrhenius curve simultaneously to three distinct relaxat

111 endency of the methane production to extract Arrhenius parameters for the failure modes of PDMS.

112 luoride, chloride, nitrate, and nitrite face Arrhenius energy barriers during transport through nanof

113 below 100 degrees C, facilitating the first Arrhenius analysis of HDL denaturation by circular dichr

114 ture dependency of relaxation times followed Arrhenius kinetics as temperatures decreased well below

115 ontaneous but thermally activated, following Arrhenius behavior over a broad experimental temperature

116 pressure independent and gave the following Arrhenius equation: log[(k/(cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1))] =

117 drogenases (ht-ADH), presenting evidence for Arrhenius prefactor values that become enormously elevat

118 yeast cytoplasmic dynein showed a break from Arrhenius behavior at a lower temperature ( approximatel

119 ent activation energies were determined from Arrhenius analyses.

120 ermal reversion of 2Q-4Q, as determined from Arrhenius and Eyring plots, are found to correlate nicel

121 nt relaxation and coercivity, deviation from Arrhenius behaviour and blocking of the relaxation, domi

122 correlated with the observed deviations from Arrhenius-type behavior, with compositional changes beco

123 ons of activation energies of diffusion from Arrhenius plots.

124 activation energy of 0.35 eV extracted from Arrhenius plots of resistance versus temperature.

125 d data is practically indistinguishable from Arrhenius law with an activation energy, the entropy bar

126 The activation barriers obtained from Arrhenius plots are significantly less than anticipated

127 opposes proton surface-to-bulk release from Arrhenius plots of (i) protons' surface diffusion consta

128 sed at a lower temperature range with higher Arrhenius coefficients.

129 d Tyr68Ala mutant displays similar breaks in Arrhenius plots of both kinetic and HDX properties that

130 ogen shift in alkyl radicals are compiled in Arrhenius format for x = 2-5.

131 With curvature in Arrhenius plots being one of the three types of experime

132 al procedure for estimating uncertainties in Arrhenius parameters based on a small number of rate con

133 Individual Arrhenius plots, obtained at intervals between pH 4.8 an

134 83 degrees C for both mAbs and divided into "Arrhenius" and "Stochastic" regimes.

135 a strong temperature dependence with inverse Arrhenius behavior and a temperature-dependent enthalpy

136 ependence turns particle dominated, that is, Arrhenius-like, when the silica loading increases to app

137 rogen transfer reactions displaying isotopic Arrhenius prefactor ratios (A(H)/A(D)) of unity are gene

138 28 degrees C, but at the extremities of its Arrhenius growth profile, namely -2.5 degrees C and 39 d

139 mary deuterium kinetic isotope effect on its Arrhenius activation energy (DeltaGTS), where DeltaGTS f

140 The large Arrhenius factor at low temperature comes about from the

141 iscerning any deviation from a straight-line Arrhenius plot: Ea = 28.7 +/- 0.5 (kcal mol(-1)) and log

142 A linear Arrhenius plot of kcat/KM versus 1/T gives the activatio

143 temperature and are characterized by linear Arrhenius plots with activation energies of 27.0 +/- 1.5

144 translocation exhibited a completely linear Arrhenius function with an activation energy of 35.2 kJ

145 or = T < or = 207 K obeys a different linear Arrhenius relation (logA(app,s) (s(-1)) = 13.9, E(a,app,

146 GSL net transfer were determined from linear Arrhenius and van't Hoff plots, respectively.

147 center, calculations predict a nearly linear Arrhenius plot for the KIE--even with the inclusion of a

148 d unusual activation parameters, with linear Arrhenius and Eyring plots over an exceptionally wide te

149 w parallels in insights gleaned from linking Arrhenius and Michaelis-Menten kinetics for both photosy

150 rent kinetic isotope effect, and has a lower Arrhenius activation energy than does ABLM decay.

151 with substitution-type reactions maintaining Arrhenius-type behavior up to higher temperatures than o

152 At lower temperatures, the measured Arrhenius parameters become more normal: Ea = 22 +/- 2 k

153 Three models (Arrhenius, Eyring and Ball) were used to assess the temp

154 arge scale modelling efforts uses a modified Arrhenius equation.

155 We rederived the modified Arrhenius equation from the source publication from 1942

156 the error in the derivation of the modified Arrhenius equation has impacted the accuracy of predicti

157 e impact of the rederivation of the modified Arrhenius equation on modelled daily carbon gain causes

158 ect and incorrect derivation of the modified Arrhenius equation.

159 was used to develop a single enzyme molecule Arrhenius plot, from which the activation energy of the

160 Non-Arrhenius behavior arises because the number of base pai

161 Non-Arrhenius diffusion behavior is observed in the undercoo

162 istinct dynamic regimes characterized by non-Arrhenius and conventional Arrhenius-type DW motions.

163 The kinetics demonstrate non-Arrhenius behaviour, in agreement with DNA hybridization

164 We observe rotational state-dependent non-Arrhenius universal scaling laws in chemi-ionization rea

165 re dynamically heterogeneous and exhibit non-Arrhenius relaxation.

166 GrpE, an inherent thermosensor, exhibits non-Arrhenius behavior with respect to its nucleotide exchan

167 vity is frequency dependent and exhibits non-Arrhenius behavior.

168 au(Q) displays a dynamic cross-over from non-Arrhenius behavior for T > T (W) to Arrhenius behavior f

169 The k(on) values are generally non-Arrhenius, tending to increase with decreasing temperatu

170 heir influence on abnormal grain growth, non-Arrhenius-type diffusion or liquid metal embrittlement.

171 Together, these variants link non-Arrhenius behavior to specific alteration of an H-bondin

172 ) equation is adopted for describing the non-Arrhenius behavior observed in the undercooled liquid.

173 This non-Arrhenius rate law is a result of a strong, approximatel

174 (LUMO) energy levels; that gives rise to non-Arrhenius temperature dependence of the conductance, aff

175 acter litoralis HTCC2594, reveals unique non-Arrhenius behavior in the rate of dark-state cleavage of

176 nisotropy, which accounts for 1) a nonlinear Arrhenius behavior in molecular-level rotational dynamic

177 come through the observation of a nonlinear Arrhenius plot for the CH4 oxidation, presumably due to

178 tein ET decreases strongly, with a nonlinear Arrhenius plot.

179 In addition, the nonlinear Arrhenius plots are explained by the change in heat capa

180 -dependent ET rate constants, with nonlinear Arrhenius plots, but we find that ET is gated across the

181 Restoration of normal Arrhenius behavior in the ht-ADH reaction occurs at elev

182 erature-dependent studies are used to obtain Arrhenius activation parameters for each step of the mec

183 termination of reaction rate constant and of Arrhenius plot) are illustrated with two examples.

184 ular dynamics simulations and computation of Arrhenius plots.

185 Determination of Arrhenius activation parameters revealed that aldol addi

186 A re-parametrized form of Arrhenius equation was used in the proposed model to fac

187 Moreover, the wide range of Arrhenius prefactors (10(9) to 10(11) s(-1)) observed fo

188 KIE, tunneling is suggested by the ratio of Arrhenius pre-exponential factors, log(A(4H)/A(4D)) = -0

189 n energies were determined from the slope of Arrhenius plots.

190 ers between species are reported in terms of Arrhenius E(a) and log A values along with differences i

191 showed a biphasic temperature dependence on Arrhenius plots.

192 While performing Arrhenius studies during H(2) oxidation over Au/TiO(2) c

193 trated here by calculation of high-precision Arrhenius plots and thermodynamic activation parameters

194 The isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors for the intrinsic KIEs were A(H)/A(T)

195 large isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors, and a significant energy of activatio

196 Isotope effects on the preexponential Arrhenius factors, and the activation energy, could be r

197 Kinetic analyses have provided Arrhenius parameters, oxidative stability indexes (OSI),

198 c data over a range of temperatures provided Arrhenius activation energies (DeltaH(double dagger)) an

199 most of the film, while the other is purely Arrhenius, does not depend on local structure, and is st

200 he highest ionic conductivity and reasonable Arrhenius activation energy.

201 lection rules, are the source of the reduced Arrhenius prefactors associated with CO binding in Mb an

202 aging parameters appear to possess the same Arrhenius activation barrier, which suggests a single do

203 rgely unaffected by the abasic site, showing Arrhenius-type behavior with an activation energy of app

204 ian kinesin-1, exhibited a break from simple Arrhenius behavior below 15 degrees C-just above the res

205 ts an explanation for the similar steep, sub-Arrhenius temperature-velocity curves observed in many m

206 Subsequent Arrhenius analysis of the TrIQ data suggests that, both

207 temperature range, k(obs,s) displays a super-Arrhenius increase with increasing temperature.

208 r dynamics is described by the general super-Arrhenius relation.

209 s III is observed at T > 200 K; it has super-Arrhenius temperature dependence and closely follows the

210 ximately 10(-8) Pa, G(T) and D(T) have super-Arrhenius ("fragile") temperature dependences, but both

211 The Arrhenius activation energies for binding of the two mRN

212 The Arrhenius activation energies for the dimerization of My

213 The Arrhenius activation energy for the (1)H-substrate radic

214 The Arrhenius dependence attenuates at high temperature due

215 The Arrhenius equation (ln k vs. 1/T) and activated complex

216 The Arrhenius law shift of the transition on the source-drai

217 The Arrhenius plot of the adsorption/desorption rate constan

218 The Arrhenius plots show strong curvature, and hence require

219 The Arrhenius prefactor for CO binding to ChCooA and protohe

220 The Arrhenius regimes comprise two thermal regimes whose bre

221 to determine the orders of reaction and the Arrhenius activation energy of polymerization.

222 derived from H-B relation parameters and the Arrhenius equation was applied to describe changes in co

223 the rearrangement step was observed, and the Arrhenius equation was used to ascertain an apparent act

224 emperature is 4 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1), and the Arrhenius function displayed an entropic term (log A ter

225 he sorbitol/IL solution is Newtonian and the Arrhenius, Litovitz, Orrick-Erbar-Type and Vogel-Fulcher

226 ith temperature and formulations such as the Arrhenius equation are widely used in earth system model

227 t migration rate could be represented by the Arrhenius equation and therefore can be controlled by th

228 f anthocyanin degradation was modeled by the Arrhenius equation.

229 omplicated and could not be explained by the Arrhenius equation.

230 cal compounds can be either described by the Arrhenius model for the rate constant (k) or by the D/z

231 This is further supported by the Arrhenius-like temperature dependence of the relaxation

232 ransfer of [Fe(14)] complex demonstrates the Arrhenius-type temperature dependence in the nanosized s

233 The resistivity displays the Arrhenius-type activated behavior expected for a semicon

234 Following the Arrhenius model, activation energies were ranged from 51

235 ngly with temperature, closely following the Arrhenius rate law.

236 The OH reaction rate coefficient follows the Arrhenius trend (280-358 K) and could be modeled through

237 The experimental results from the Arrhenius and the kinetic isotope effect studies allowed

238 phase transformation was determined from the Arrhenius expression to be 152 +/- 60 kJ/mol.

239 e activation energy results derived from the Arrhenius plot as well as the NMR spectroscopy data.

240 From the Arrhenius plot of the kinetic isotope effect, the ratio

241 From the Arrhenius plot of the kinetic isotope effect, the ratio

242 ere we present a theory that generalizes the Arrhenius equation to include static disorder of conform

243 However, the Arrhenius activation energy (E(a)) for VCOP derived from

244 ncrease in the thermal energy (k(B)T) in the Arrhenius equation.

245 ther than CH4 fail to exhibit a break in the Arrhenius plot because binding is always rate limiting i

246 that it is possible to induce a break in the Arrhenius plot for the ethane reaction with Q by using a

247 his conclusion by observing curvature in the Arrhenius plot for the rearrangement of 2c.

248 These results and a curvature in the Arrhenius plot of the isotope effects support the recent

249 ic analysis exhibited discontinuities in the Arrhenius plots, distinguishing the unfolding and aggreg

250 is seen at approximately 35 degrees C in the Arrhenius plots.

251 ity is well described by a difference in the Arrhenius pre-exponential factor rather than a change in

252 f flip-flop manifested as an increase in the Arrhenius preexponential factor.

253 tended to reliably predict prefactors in the Arrhenius rate constant for surface reactions involving

254 transport, the G185V enzyme has lowered the Arrhenius activation energy of the transport rate-limiti

255 of the rate constants was found to obey the Arrhenius law in a temperature range of 5-50 degrees C u

256 a two-state Markovian process that obeys the Arrhenius equation.

257 he ht-W87A mutation results in a loss of the Arrhenius break seen at 30 degrees C for the wild-type e

258 Among bacteria, the prefactor A of the Arrhenius dependence unexpectedly varied exponentially w

259 A fit of the Arrhenius plot data gave E(a) = 15.3 kcal mol(-1).

260 The slopes of the Arrhenius plots for CLSE were steeper below 35 degrees C

261 y values were derived from the slopes of the Arrhenius plots of logarithmic mobility vs reciprocal ab

262 A comparison of the Arrhenius plots of the activities of kumamolisin-As with

263 ts of adsorption entropy and enthalpy on the Arrhenius parameters are discussed.

264 rature dependence of chemical reactions, the Arrhenius equation, and related Q(10) temperature coeffi

265 eases the ethane binding rate and shifts the Arrhenius breakpoint into the observable temperature ran

266 ion without changing the mechanism since the Arrhenius lines were parallel.

267 At the same time, the Arrhenius plot of 15 kGy irradiated bones evidenced two

268 out-of-phase magnetic susceptibility to the Arrhenius equation yields an effective energy barrier, U

269 be described with an equation similar to the Arrhenius equation.

270 action at elevated temperatures and used the Arrhenius equation to extrapolate the results to room te

271 surrounding cavitation bubbles and using the Arrhenius equation, an effective mean temperature of 340

272 onditions by first order kinetics, using the Arrhenius equation.

273 and 18125.95 min(-1), respectively using the Arrhenius equation.

274 ependent Phia values were analyzed using the Arrhenius equation.

275 s to 37 degrees C was surprisingly weak: the Arrhenius activation energy Ea was only 14 kcal mol(-1)

276 the N[symbol: see text]N distance, while the Arrhenius prefactor indicates that the electron transfer

277 st exactly by the yields calculated with the Arrhenius equation.

278 y on binding enthalpy, in agreement with the Arrhenius equation.

279 ve reaction rate constants complied with the Arrhenius equation.

280 zabilities had good correspondences with the Arrhenius kinetic (A and E(a)) and Eyring thermodynamic

281 robes at those depths is consistent with the Arrhenius relation for rates found earlier for microbes

282 To remedy this, Arrhenius plots for 14 type species of the family were g

283 ase the rate of dechlorination, according to Arrhenius' equation, and increase the rate of TCE desorp

284 ompensates for the decrease in period due to Arrhenius scaling of the reaction rates.

285 of DNA translocation rates can be fitted to Arrhenius kinetics.

286 s vary with temperature and can be fitted to Arrhenius kinetics.

287 perature dependences, but both cross over to Arrhenius ("strong") behavior with a large activation en

288 The transition from VTF to Arrhenius kinetics occurred between approximately 5 and

289 from non-Arrhenius behavior for T > T (W) to Arrhenius behavior for T < T (W), where T (W) denotes th

290 nal transition state theory, the traditional Arrhenius picture of activation energy as a single point

291 The unusual Arrhenius plots of the very fastest mutant provide an ad

292 The widely used Arrhenius equation describes the kinetics of simple two-

293 range between 65 and 90 degrees C and using Arrhenius plots, to be 96.8 +/- 1.6 kJ mol(-1) (23.1 kca

294 ed in the range of 35 to 60 degrees C, using Arrhenius equation, was determined to be 11.32 kcal mol(

295 h those previously determined at 325 K using Arrhenius analysis.

296 erature regime (T > approximately 3 K) where Arrhenius behavior dominates the relaxation processes, l

297 l for 1 and (4.1 +/- 0.5) kJ/mol for 2, with Arrhenius prefactors of (1.48 +/- 0.04) x 10(8) s(-1) fo

298 influenced by temperature in accordance with Arrhenius law.

299 Our predictions agree with Arrhenius activation energies from experiments using pho

300 he first step is rate-determining and yields Arrhenius barriers that are lower for dimers (114 kJ/mol