戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              B. oleracea and B. rapa rRNA genes also competed equally
2                                              B. oleracea and B. rapa rRNA genes were active when tran
3                                              B. oleracea was able to utilize atmospheric H(2)S as S-s
4 aga, and Siberian kale), 112 B. rapa, and 62 B. oleracea and its wild relatives.
5 ced Brassica loci with a known position on a B. oleracea genetic map to the positions of their putati
6      Soil fertility and damage also affected B. oleracea glucosinolates differently under elevated CO
7                        Elevated CO2 affected B. oleracea but not B. nigra glucosinolates; responses t
8 mutations in target genes of both barley and B. oleracea and show stable transmission of these mutati
9                           In both barley and B. oleracea stable Cas9-induced mutations are transmitte
10 cea ssp. botrytis (domestic cauliflower) and B. oleracea ssp. italica (broccoli), both of which show
11  rapa (containing the Brassica A genome) and B. oleracea (containing the Brassica C genome).
12 in both B. oleracea ssp. acephala (kale) and B. oleracea ssp. oleracea (wild cabbage).
13 family were isolated from Brassica napus and B. oleracea species.
14 , an allotetraploid derived from B. rapa and B. oleracea in which only B. rapa rRNA genes are transcr
15  Myr since the divergence of the B. rapa and B. oleracea lineages).
16 idization events (ca. 20 Myr for B. rapa and B. oleracea relative to Arabidopsis), with an analysis o
17 .IND.a and BolC.IND.a genes from B. rapa and B. oleracea share identical function with Arabidopsis IN
18 ars ago by hybridization between B. rapa and B. oleracea, followed by chromosome doubling, a process
19                     Synteny analysis between B. oleracea, Arabidopsis, and potato provided perception
20 ypic configuration is more conserved between B. oleracea S13 and B. campestris S8, two haplotypes tha
21                  Functional analysis in both B. oleracea and the model Arabidopsis identified and dem
22 lymorphism, however, is also present in both B. oleracea ssp. acephala (kale) and B. oleracea ssp. ol
23 ons of mustard (Brassica nigra) and collard (B. oleracea var. acephala) and the effects of leaf nitro
24 some structural rearrangements differentiate B. oleracea and A. thaliana orthologs.
25  22 chromosomal rearrangements differentiate B. oleracea homologs from one another.
26 re segregating in both wild and domesticated B. oleracea subspecies.
27 n caused the normally silent, under-dominant B. oleracea rRNA genes to become expressed to high level
28 and class 2 TEs is responsible, in part, for B. oleracea genome expansion since divergence from a com
29  binding activities in nuclear extracts from B. oleracea, partial purification and DNA cross-linking
30 ) to supplement an existing BAC library from B. oleracea.
31 s costs were higher on the low-quality host (B. oleracea); and experimental methodology did not influ
32                                           In B. oleracea, targeting of BolC.GA4.a leads to Cas9-induc
33 t had CO2-specific effects on consumption in B. oleracea.
34  the failure of the paternal excess cross in B. oleracea.
35  Based on 186 corresponding loci detected in B. oleracea and A. thaliana, at least 19 chromosome stru
36  nt) were detected from the Bot1 elements in B. oleracea, but the vast majority of the small RNAs fro
37 g this nonsense mutation are nearly fixed in B. oleracea ssp. botrytis (domestic cauliflower) and B.
38        Despite this, the BZR1 functioning in B. oleracea is not elucidated.
39 igation of BoBZR1 structure and functions in B. oleracea, specifically toward regulating plant stress
40 e identified the product of the SRK6 gene in B. oleracea stigmas and have shown that it has character
41   Promoter regions of BoBZR1 family genes in B. oleracea have shown specific cis-elements associated
42 me-wide analysis identified 12 BZR1 genes in B. oleracea, categorized into three groups based on thei
43  in each lineage is almost always greater in B. oleracea.
44 lues of the transposase genes were higher in B. oleracea than in B. rapa.
45 s have amplified to very high copy number in B. oleracea where they have contributed significantly to
46 rst of transposition of Bot1 was observed in B. oleracea, but not in B. rapa.
47 ilar, but not identical, to that observed in B. oleracea.
48 ve involvement in developmental processes in B. oleracea.
49 of gene fragments, as previously reported in B. oleracea, were observed in B. rapa and B. napus, indi
50  family is currently undergoing silencing in B. oleracea, but has already been silenced in B. rapa.
51 principal Speed of Germination QTL (SOG1) in B. oleracea.
52 tion of modified inflorescence structures in B. oleracea.
53 d nucleotide substitution in B. rapa than in B. oleracea.
54  detected at higher rates in B. rapa than in B. oleracea.
55                       It was evident that in B. oleracea there was a poor shoot to root signaling for
56  A. thaliana genome were underrepresented in B. oleracea.
57 te of A. candida race 9 (AcBoT) that infects B. oleracea Thus, effector-triggered immunity conferred
58  morphotypes, turnip (B. rapa) and kohlrabi (B. oleracea).
59  extraction to obtain bioactive compounds of B. oleracea var capitata showed to be a promising altern
60 at most of the phytochemical constituents of B. oleracea leaves are polar and possess strong antioxid
61                       Sulfate deprivation of B. oleracea seedlings induced a rapid increase of the su
62 ork exemplifies how the genetic diversity of B. oleracea may be used by breeders to select for higher
63 uence of A. thaliana with a partial draft of B. oleracea has permitted an estimation of the patterns
64 alogous segments identified in the genome of B. oleracea.
65 s and homoeologous segments of the genome of B. oleracea.
66 h the homoeologous regions of the genomes of B. oleracea and Arabidopsis.
67 manipulation of the aliphatic GSL profile of B. oleracea.
68                A second Ck1 homolog found on B. oleracea (BoCk1b) chromosome 7 served to define anoth
69  studied homozygous lines from a segregating B. oleracea mapping population.
70            In addition, the observation that B. oleracea and A. thaliana share virtually all TE linea
71                                          The B. oleracea orthologous segment was located on chromosom
72  gene content was observed, both between the B. oleracea paralogous segments and between them and the
73 ntact genes in noncollinear positions in the B. oleracea and A. thaliana genomes.
74            Next, we predicted targets in the B. oleracea and M. persicae genomes for these 32 plant m
75 ntified 177 conserved collinear genes in the B. oleracea genome segments.
76               Chromosomal duplication in the B. oleracea genome was strongly suggested by parallel ar
77 egions appear to be located elsewhere in the B. oleracea genome.
78 arrying a nonsense mutation in exon 5 of the B. oleracea CAULIFLOWER (BoCAL) gene are segregating in
79  regions that are collinear with >28% of the B. oleracea genetic map.
80  of the A. thaliana genome and 2.5 cM of the B. oleracea genetic map.
81                  Similar to A. thaliana, the B. oleracea homolog BoRps2 is present in single copy.
82  are consistent with the hypothesis that the B. oleracea genome has been highly rearranged since dive
83 g biochemical and morphological variation to B. oleracea.
84 e exclusive GL breakdown products in the two B. oleracea varieties, since nitriles were also produced
85 ll RNA in aphid gut, we annotated 213 unique B. oleracea miRNAs; 32/213 were present in aphid gut as
86 in B. rapa, as well as four such loci within B. oleracea.
87 mine the degree of genome replication within B. oleracea relative to A. thaliana.