戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              B. thuringiensis is the most used MCA for control of lep
2 oral administration of antibiotics abolished B. thuringiensis insecticidal activity, and reestablishm
3 trains (B. cereus type strain ATCC 14579 and B. thuringiensis strains) lacked Gal and contained N-ace
4 uringiensis subsp. israelensis (ONR-60A) and B. thuringiensis subsp. morrisoni (PG-14) pathogenic for
5                             B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis are readily distinguished from B. cereu
6  unclear whether B. cereus, B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis are varieties of the same species or di
7 smid-borne specific toxins (B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis) and capsule (B. anthracis).
8 roup, including B. cereus, B. anthracis, and B. thuringiensis.
9 gens, including B. cereus, B. anthracis, and B. thuringiensis.
10  gene is strongly expressed in B. cereus and B. thuringiensis and weakly expressed in B. anthracis.
11 phic fragments) indicates that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis are the closest taxa to B. anthracis, w
12           Transcription of the B. cereus and B. thuringiensis CDC genes is controlled by PlcR, a tran
13                    Even though B. cereus and B. thuringiensis contain the ppk and ppx genes, none of
14 ity, environmental isolates of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis exhibit extensive genetic diversity.
15 rt the proposed unification of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis into one species.
16                                B. cereus and B. thuringiensis sigP and rsiP homologues are required f
17 vealed several closely related B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains that carry sap genes with very
18                                B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, species closely related to B. anthraci
19  genotype Bacillus anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis isolates.
20 elected several B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis strains and compared their cell wall ca
21  transcribed in B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis.
22 present in both B. cereus 43881 (341 kb) and B. thuringiensis ATCC 33679 (327 kb) that hybridized wit
23 B. anthracis, Y. pestis, Vaccinia virus, and B. thuringiensis kurstaki.
24 ene beads, gram-positive Bacillus anthracis, B. thuringiensis, and B. atrophaeus spores, and B. cereu
25    Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis such as B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (ONR-60A) and B. thu
26 arity of natural disease outbreaks caused by B. thuringiensis.
27 gans characterized to date, the infection by B. thuringiensis shows dose-dependency based on bacteria
28 ) mutants to the Cry5B crystal toxin made by B. thuringiensis.
29 cement of host larvae mortality triggered by B. thuringiensis and a Cry toxin.
30 on similar to those in lepidopteran cadherin B. thuringiensis receptors.
31 ithin a collection of over 300 of B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. anthracis isolates, appear clos
32 pectively, of its close relatives B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. mycoides derived from a range o
33 ents from the exosporium of Bacillus cereus, B. thuringiensis and B. anthracis strains and identified
34  with the nonmotile/quorum-sensing-deficient B. thuringiensis strain, with approximately 90% retinal
35             Co-culturing of Cry5B-expressing B. thuringiensis with B. anthracis can result in lethal
36 ix BA strains (four virulent isolates), five B. thuringiensis (BT) isolates, and one isolate each for
37 as 36.6 1.9% biodegradation was observed for B. thuringiensis Berliner with the native microbiome, in
38 roposed HevCaLP as a shared binding site for B. thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1A and Cry1Fa toxins in the mid
39 thod to two closely related toxin genes from B. thuringiensis and created chimeras with differing pro
40  gene, a homologue of vip3A(a) isolated from B. thuringiensis strain AB424 is also reported.
41 from spores of B. subtilis 168, B. globigii, B. thuringiensis subs.
42 re mixtures of B. subtilis 168, B. globigii, B. thuringiensis subs.
43 nomes of two members of the B. cereus group, B. thuringiensis 97-27 subsp. konkukian serotype H34, is
44 is known that the Bt152 gene is expressed in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, we disrupted its fu
45 ortant contribution of host enteric flora in B. thuringiensis-killing activity and provide a sound fo
46 ufficient to replicate a reporter plasmid in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis when ORF156 and ORF1
47  Here we study the effect of Cry proteins in B. thuringiensis pathogenesis of the nematode Caenorhabd
48 this can explain why QS cheaters are rare in B. thuringiensis and its relatives.
49 R spectroscopy and mass spectrometry that in B. thuringiensis, the enzymatic product of Pen and Pal,
50  regulator of secreted enzymes and toxins in B. thuringiensis.
51 nsecticidal protein is the most active known B. thuringiensis toxin against the forest insect pest Ly
52                                    Moreover, B. thuringiensis species can produce bacteriocins with a
53 t expression upon infection with nematicidal B. thuringiensis or treatment with its major pore-formin
54  18 hours after infection, whereas nonmotile B. thuringiensis infections required 30 hours to achieve
55               The defining characteristic of B. thuringiensis that sets it apart from B. cereus and B
56 n of B. sphaericus and to Cry35 and Cry36 of B. thuringiensis, none of which require interaction with
57 quantities of CytA, a cytolytic endotoxin of B. thuringiensis.
58       Surprisingly, the killing mechanism of B. thuringiensis remains controversial.
59  of Bt152, a protein coded for by pBtoxis of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, the plasmid that en
60 x of the seven subgroups and the presence of B. thuringiensis strains in three of the subgroups do no
61 t the finished, annotated genome sequence of B. thuringiensis Al Hakam, which was collected in Iraq b
62                   Whole-genome sequencing of B. thuringiensis 97-27and B. cereus E33L was undertaken
63 s, 27 strains of B. cereus, and 9 strains of B. thuringiensis.
64 acycline and a further six B. cereus and one B. thuringiensis cultures fell into the intermediate cat
65 roximately 100 CFU of wild-type B. cereus or B. thuringiensis or a plcR-deficient mutant.
66               Expression of the B. cereus or B. thuringiensis sigP and rsiP genes in a B. anthracis s
67 thelial cells, which leads to starvation, or B. thuringiensis septicemia.
68                          The insect pathogen B. thuringiensis induced the strongest priming effect.
69 trains, numerous B. cereus strains, and rare B. thuringiensis strains, while clade 2 included the maj
70 s in the midgut microbial community restored B. thuringiensis-mediated killing.
71                                     A single B. thuringiensis spore was optically trapped in a focuse
72                            Strains from some B. thuringiensis serovars were wholly or largely assigne
73 used to discriminate Bacillus spore species, B. thuringiensis and B. atrophaeus, in our previous stud
74 y to distinguish two Bacillus spore species, B. thuringiensis and B.atrophaeus, from one another very
75                 Our results demonstrate that B. thuringiensis-induced mortality depends on enteric ba
76  behind this classification is the fact that B. thuringiensis is found in high numbers in environment
77                         Here, we report that B. thuringiensis does not kill larvae of the gypsy moth
78                                          The B. thuringiensis gene encoding E2 was cloned, and the pu
79 s engineered with the cry genes encoding the B. thuringiensis crystal proteins are the most widely cu
80            Thirty-nucleotide segments in the B. thuringiensis cry1Ac1 gene, encoding parts of helix a
81         Four of the B. cereus and one of the B. thuringiensis cultures were resistant to tetracycline
82 , while clade 2 included the majority of the B. thuringiensis strains together with some B. cereus st
83   Escherichia coli engineered to produce the B. thuringiensis insecticidal toxin killed gypsy moth la
84                                   Unlike the B. thuringiensis 5-endotoxins, whose expression is restr
85                                   Therefore, B. thuringiensis Berliner can act as biodegrader agent a
86 igh populations in hemolymph, in contrast to B. thuringiensis, which appeared to die in hemolymph.
87 mosquito isoline, and is more susceptible to B. thuringiensis subsp.
88                     Infection with wild type B. thuringiensis resulted in complete retinal function l
89 e significantly less virulent than wild-type B. thuringiensis.
90                         We find that whereas B. thuringiensis on its own is not able to infect C. ele