ライフサイエンスコーパス: BYDV

1 BYDV generates three sgRNAs during infection.

2 BYDV titre increased significantly by 36.8% in leaves of

3 translation, eIF4F, is introduced by the 3' BYDV translational enhancer (BTE).

4 heir aphid vectors; and (d) replication of a BYDV satellite RNA.

5 CO2 ; 650 mumol mol(-1) ) on noninfected and BYDV-infected wheat.

6 of the F2 genotypes transmitted CYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV at significantly different rates.

7 transmission efficiency of both CYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV is regulated by a major gene or set of tightly

8 Transmission of CYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV was significantly correlated in the F2 generati

9 ergence in transmission of both CYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV.

10 lations between transmission of CYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV.

11 the 3'TE in cis and capped mRNA lacking any BYDV-PAV sequence was inhibited specifically by added 3'

12 that there are specific interactions between BYDV virions and the aphid's cellular components.

13 derstanding the complex interactions between BYDV virions and their aphid vectors; and (d) replicatio

14 pose a new role for eIF3, where eIF3 bridges BYDV's UTRs, stabilizes the long-range 5'-3' interaction

15 ose a new class of cap-independent TE called BYDV-like TE.

16 emonstrates an in vitro binding affinity for BYDV and its recombinant readthrough polypeptide.

17 V structures when another factor crucial for BYDV translation, eIF4F, is introduced by the 3' BYDV tr

18 it a significant binding affinity either for BYDV or for its recombinant readthrough polypeptide.

19 tures (SLC and SLII) support a new model for BYDV translation initiation that requires the reorientat

20 s determined that sgRNA1 is not required for BYDV RNA replication in oat protoplasts.

21 at neither sgRNA2 nor sgRNA3 is required for BYDV RNA replication.

22 To examine the effects of eIF4F in BYDV translation initiation, BTE mutants with widely dif

23 This eIF3 function in BYDV translation initiation is both reminiscent of and d

24 eased growth did not explain the increase in BYDV titre in these plants.

25 lucidate the potential role of symbionins in BYDV transmission, we have isolated and characterized tw

26 Instead, BYDV utilizes a cruciform cap independent translation el

27 Barley yellow dwarf luteovirus (BYDV) generates three 3'-coterminal subgenomic RNAs (sgR

28 either nucleotide 2670 or nucleotide 2769 of BYDV genomic RNA (gRNA) in two independent studies.

29 competitive hierarchy: the coinoculation of BYDV-PAV lowered CYDV-RPV infection rate, but the revers

30 germ extract accurately reflected control of BYDV RNA translation in the infected cell.

31 condary structures of the sgRNA1 promoter of BYDV play unique roles in sgRNA1 promoter recognition an

32 stioning the role of eIF4F in translation of BYDV.

33 (a) evidence supporting reclassification of BYDVs into two genera; (b) elucidation of gene function

34 n that requires the reorientation of eIF3 on BYDV UTRs.

35 irus species, barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV (BYDV-PAV) and cereal yellow dwarf virus-RPV (CYDV-RPV).

36 noninfective aphids also fed in vitro prefer BYDV-infected plants.

37 translation element (CITE) in its 3'UTR RNA (BYDV-like CITE or BTE) that binds eukaryotic translation

38 initiation that is mediated by a structural BYDV translation element (BTE) located in the 3'-UTR of

39 nd GroEL was used to identify potential SymL-BYDV binding sites.

40 This is the first quantitative evidence that BYDV titre increases in plants grown under elevated CO2

41 The BYDV-PAV 5'UTR was necessary for the 3'TE to function, e

42 the endosymbionts which are harbored by the BYDV aphid vectors Rhopalosiphum padi and Sitobion avena

43 The TNV TE differs from the BYDV TE by having only three helical domains instead of

44 Like the BYDV TE, the TNV TE (i) functions both in vitro and in v

45 s with a full-length infectious clone of the BYDV genome containing mutations in the sgRNA promoter.

46 The presence of the BYDV-like TE in select genera of different families indi

47 The 40S-eIF complex does not bind to the BYDV 5'UTR, suggesting the involvement of additional fac

48 Affinity binding of SymL to BYDV in vitro suggests a potential involvement of endosy

49 Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) adversely affects the yield and quality of economi

50 We used barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) as a model system to study transcriptional control

51 , after acquiring Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) during in vitro feeding, prefers noninfected wheat

52 Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) employs a cap-independent mechanism of translation

53 nt studies of the barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) have revealed eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3

54 Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) is a positive strand RNA virus that lacks the cano

55 coded by ORF 2 of Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) is expressed via minus one (-1) frameshifting from

56 sembles the TE of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), a luteovirus.

57 us (CYDV)-RPV and Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-SGV.

58 Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV)-vector relationships suggest that there are specif

59 genome of the PAV barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV) which stimulates translation from uncapped mRN

60 o show that eIF3 alters its interaction with BYDV structures when another factor crucial for BYDV tra