戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              D. pseudoobscura and D. affinis were used for the betwee
2  for the five loci show that gene flow among D. pseudoobscura populations is sufficient to homogenize
3 aster, D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. ananassae, D. pseudoobscura, D. virilis and D. mojavensis.
4 a: D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. ananassae, D. pseudoobscura, D. virilis, and D. mojavensis.
5 genes (>50 kbp) in D. melanogaster (42%) and D. pseudoobscura (26%) constitute their own TADs, implyi
6 h two other loci, in both D. p. bogotana and D. pseudoobscura, strongly suggest this reduction is due
7 a: D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. erecta and D. pseudoobscura.
8 d and not shared between D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura show that there are separate classes un
9 am protein is present in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura testes, cognate proteins for the gene1/
10 is of gene expression in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.
11 osomal rearrangements between D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura are far higher than those found before
12 atural populations of Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura, together with their sequence divergenc
13 bscura and close relatives D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana has been studied using compara
14 atric species pair Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana.
15 ween the sympatric species D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura pseudoobscura.
16 Drosophila pseudoobscura, D. persimilis, and D. pseudoobscura bogotana.
17 conserved in comparison with D. simulans and D. pseudoobscura.
18 rosophila, D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. pseudoobscura.
19   All species of the Drosophila subgenus and D. pseudoobscura of the Sophophora subgenus completely l
20 nogaster ACPs in D. simulans, D. yakuba, and D. pseudoobscura.
21  the genetic basis of the difference between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis in two courtship song
22 e fraction of amino acid differences between D. pseudoobscura and D. affinis appear to have been fixe
23 lasmic incompatibility system exists between D. pseudoobscura strains BogER and AH162; and, that BogE
24 gned coding and non-coding sequences between D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda, and investigated their
25                                         Both D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis have considerable int
26 lent sites is, on average, very weak in both D. pseudoobscura and D. simulans (magnitude of NS approx
27 on, followed by D. melanogaster, and then by D. pseudoobscura.
28 sophila melanogaster genes, as well as fewer D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis genes, was examined from
29 and accompanying high-resolution TAD map for D. pseudoobscura Comparison of D. pseudoobscura and D. m
30 mated times since speciation are one mya for D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and 2 mya since the f
31 ll as examining available sequence data from D. pseudoobscura.
32 ed the knot wing cis-regulatory element from D. pseudoobscura, which contains a cluster of UBX-bindin
33 ppears to have arisen via introgression from D. pseudoobscura.
34 ionally, we utilized recombination maps from D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda to explore whether chang
35                   We characterized sisA from D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis and studied the timing o
36                                           In D. pseudoobscura, the cluster contains four genes: two A
37 s with the wild-type expression of Est-5B in D. pseudoobscura.
38 ence content of polymorphic Y Chromosomes in D. pseudoobscura We show that Y Chromosomes differ almos
39  D. melanogaster Acp genes are detectable in D. pseudoobscura.
40  expression diminishes across development in D. pseudoobscura, but remains elevated in D. miranda, th
41 ied Est-5 gene duplication and divergence in D. pseudoobscura.
42  to close 69% and improve 12% of all gaps in D. pseudoobscura.
43      They concluded that mtDNA haplotypes in D. pseudoobscura are not always selectively neutral.
44 e level of polymorphism at the Gpdh locus in D. pseudoobscura is comparable to that found at other lo
45 conferring high or low assortative mating in D. pseudoobscura produce the same effects when inserted
46 8 s in D. simulans and retarded by 24 min in D. pseudoobscura.
47  pairs in D. melanogaster are also nested in D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis.
48 act that this ratio is much less than one in D. pseudoobscura is also consistent with the model's pre
49  32 s, and by 11 min, 32 s, respectively, in D. pseudoobscura.
50 iation in crossover rate at a local scale in D. pseudoobscura, little is known about the fine-scale s
51 he sense message is transcribed similarly in D. pseudoobscura males and females and in hybrids of D.
52 anda is approximately one-quarter of that in D. pseudoobscura; mean X-linked silent diversity is abou
53 nd the antisense messages are transcribed in D. pseudoobscura, but only the sense message (TRAP100) i
54 of the higher level of sequence variation in D. pseudoobscura can be explained by differences in regi
55 st drastic amplification on the largest Y in D. pseudoobscura independently amplified on a polymorphi
56 the codon usage patterns in D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and D. virilis compared with the rest
57 in different life stages of D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and D. willistoni.
58 th the completed genomes of D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and Drosophila yakuba to show that the
59 t fixed variation across the X chromosome of D. pseudoobscura because, while significant linkage dise
60 n TAD map for D. pseudoobscura Comparison of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster, which are separate
61 y is also present in the sequenced genome of D. pseudoobscura, and homologs have been found in Aedes
62 oobscura males and females and in hybrids of D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
63 upport the hypothesis that the inversions of D. pseudoobscura have emerged as suppressors of recombin
64  estimated by sequencing a second isolate of D. pseudoobscura at shallow coverage.
65 ter, by using the public genome sequences of D. pseudoobscura and D. melanogaster and approximately 5
66 he same under-representation on the neo-X of D. pseudoobscura.
67  Sanger sequencing on gaps from the original D. pseudoobscura draft assembly and shown to be dependen
68  interspecific comparisons with D. simulans, D. pseudoobscura and D.virilis to explore the molecular
69  selective sweeps in or near four of the six D. pseudoobscura Ago2 paralogs.
70 onsible for Y expansion on differently sized D. pseudoobscura Y's.
71 Compared to its well-studied sibling species D. pseudoobscura, D. miranda has much less nucleotide se
72 r by subjecting another polyandrous species, D. pseudoobscura, to 150 generations of experimental mon
73  D. miranda relative to its sibling species, D. pseudoobscura, suggest that it has a much smaller eff
74 om a comparable study of its sister species, D. pseudoobscura.
75  proof-of-principle experiments showing that D. pseudoobscura fosmids can successfully rescue RNAi-in
76  loci surveyed are negative, suggesting that D. pseudoobscura may have experienced a rapid population
77 mportance of young species pairs such as the D. pseudoobscura subspecies studied here.
78 pose possible ancestral arrangements for the D. pseudoobscura C chromosome, which are different from
79   Additionally, many DNA duplications in the D. pseudoobscura genome are flanked by a repetitive sequ
80        A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjace
81        I observed one duplicated gene in the D. pseudoobscura genome that appears to have been genera
82 onsible for recently duplicated genes in the D. pseudoobscura genome, and I observed both retroposed
83 transcriptional regulation of TRAP100 in the D. pseudoobscura lineage and that its underexpression in
84 ter for genes on this chromosomal arm in the D. pseudoobscura lineage, relative to the D. melanogaste
85 buting to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage.
86  nucleotide substitutions for Acp26Aa in the D. pseudoobscura subgroup but not in the D. melanogaster
87  of indel substitution within Acp26Aa in the D. pseudoobscura subgroup were up to several times those
88 ter but with recognizable orthologues in the D. pseudoobscura subgroup.
89                            Nevertheless, the D. pseudoobscura cluster also generates a dicistronic tr
90 ecombination across approximately 43% of the D. pseudoobscura physical genome in two separate recombi
91 ribution of both protein-coding genes on the D. pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome and microRNA genes of
92                In addition, we find that the D. pseudoobscura chromosome with the highest level of in
93 across each of these genomes relative to the D. pseudoobscura reference genome, and use RT-PCR to con
94 tion expansion in D. miranda, in contrast to D. pseudoobscura.
95  undetected losses in the lineage leading to D. pseudoobscura We find that while the original (synten
96 s strongly associated with mating success to D. pseudoobscura females, while intrapulse frequency is
97  predicted direction among 99 alleles of two D. pseudoobscura genes and five alleles of eight D. simu
98 nes within conserved regions of synteny with D. pseudoobscura had highly correlated expression; these
99 is highly variable and shares variation with D. pseudoobscura at other loci, the low level of variati
100 A large amount of variation was found within D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, consistent with hist
101   A survey of nucleotide polymorphism within D. pseudoobscura revealed no amino acid variation in thi

 
Page Top