コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 EPEC also disrupts epithelial barrier function and cause
2 EPEC and EHEC not only induce characteristic attaching a
3 EPEC attaches to the apical surface of small intestine e
4 EPEC induced PepT1 expression and activity in HT29-Cl.19
5 EPEC induced the autophosphorylation of EGFR in intestin
6 EPEC infection (60 minutes-3 hours) inhibited apical Cl(
7 EPEC infection decreased V(max) of the transporter; wher
8 EPEC infection in vivo (1 day) also caused marked redist
9 EPEC infection inhibits RNase L in a T3SS-dependent mann
10 EPEC infection of mice (24 hours) reduced SERT immunosta
11 EPEC is a human-specific pathogen whose pathogenesis can
12 EPEC modulates host cell survival and inflammation, alth
13 EPEC pathogenesis occurs through type III secretion syst
14 EPEC pathogenesis relies on a type III secretion system-
15 EPEC translocates effector molecules into host cells via
16 EPEC was also able to inject effectors into DCs sending
17 EPEC-induced EGFR phosphorylation was blocked by the pha
18 EPEC-mediated Akt phosphorylation, however, was inhibite
19 lar pathotype: 13 (14%) were DEC (10 EAEC, 2 EPEC, 1 ETEC) (12 associated with TD) and 39 (41%) ExPEC
20 roups, including enteropathogenic E. coli 2 (EPEC 2), enterohemorrhagic E. coli 2 (EHEC 2), and EHEC-
23 ound that the BFP biogenesis machine from an EPEC strain that expresses one bundlin type is capable o
24 intestinal epithelial cells infected with an EPEC espZ mutant (DeltaespZ) showed increased levels of
25 Interestingly, infection of cells with an EPEC mutant deficient in espG significantly attenuated t
27 the present study, we investigated CD98 and EPEC interactions in vitro and ex vivo and examined FVB
29 viously reported that the conserved EHEC and EPEC effector EspG disrupts recycling endosome function,
32 enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EHEC and EPEC), as well as the related mouse pathogen Citrobacter
33 as a model of human intestinal epithelia and EPEC-infected C57BL/6J mouse model of infection were uti
34 ffer between EHEC O157:H7, EHEC O26:H11, and EPEC O127:H6 in terms of the number of SH3-binding polyp
35 d the abilities of EHEC EDL933 (O157:H7) and EPEC E2348/69 (O127:H6) flagella to bind to bovine mucus
37 Our analysis suggests that C. rodentium and EPEC/EHEC have converged on a common host infection stra
39 ed, respectively, and revealed that STEC and EPEC strains have emerged in multiple sublineages of the
41 are normally recruited by vaccinia virus and EPEC in the absence of WIP, and neither WIP nor the WIP
42 emphasizes the zoonotic potential of animal EPEC strains and the need for virulence determinant-base
43 mmune response to enteric pathogens, such as EPEC, and its impact on IEC barrier function have not be
48 enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), or atypical EPEC, depending on the presence or absence of the Shiga
51 Tec-family tyrosine kinases localize beneath EPEC and, with Abl-family kinases, comprise a set of red
52 factors, such as bundle-forming pilus (BFP), EPEC secreted protein A, and other EPEC secreted protein
59 ortant for the inhibition of phagocytosis by EPEC and also limits EPEC translocation through antigen-
60 or cycle inhibiting factor (Cif) produced by EPEC and EHEC is able to block host eukaryotic cell-cycl
61 ur results demonstrate inhibition of SERT by EPEC and define the mechanisms underlying these effects.
62 ight similar pathogenic strategies shared by EPEC and vaccinia virus by demonstrating a requirement f
63 n IEC barrier functions that are targeted by EPEC effectors to escape host defense mechanisms and pro
65 n attachment to intestinal epithelial cells, EPEC induces actin-filled membrane protrusions called 'p
67 ing/effacing (A/E) human pathogenic E. coli (EPEC and EHEC) and the natural mouse pathogen Citrobacte
69 ctions in EHEC and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and found that five interactions were conserved.
70 ia coli (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) are enteric bacterial pathogens of worldwide impor
71 g E. coli; whereas enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) are LEE+ and often carry the EPEC adherence factor
72 ia coli (STEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) are the major foodborne pathogens that can cause h
75 disease caused by enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is dependent on a delivery system that injects num
76 from its ancestor, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) O55:H7 (sorbitol fermenting [SOR(+)] and beta-gluc
77 to be mistyped as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) owing to share
79 t the adherence of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) to epithelial monolayers, and (4) limit bacterial
80 pic variability in enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), an important human pathogen, both in virulence ac
81 ichia coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), and Citrobacter rodentium Moreover, Salmonella en
82 li (EHEC), typical enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), or atypical EPEC, depending on the presence or ab
83 ic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella e
84 richia coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC), Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella entericaserova
85 enic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC) functions to activate transcription of vi
86 enic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC) share a unique mechanism of colonization
87 enic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC) use a type III protein secretion system (
88 enic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC, respectively), C. rodentium exploits a ty
89 enic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC, respectively), which inhibit Src kinase-d
92 s such as enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and Citrobacter rodentium during mammalian infecti
93 agella of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) might contrib
94 pathogens enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli employ a type 3 secr
95 actors in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and reduced EPEC-induced intestinal damage in vivo
96 tion with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC), also known as
98 pathogens enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and vaccinia virus trigger actin assembly in host
99 he world, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) are a leading cause of death in children with diar
101 sented in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) by EspB and EspD, which are thought to interact an
103 ninvasive enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) colonize the gut using a type three secretion syst
105 pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) forms characteristic actin-filled membranous protr
106 lmarks of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) infection are formation of attaching and effacing
107 llmark of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) infection is the formation of actin-rich pedestal-
110 nfection, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) injects effector proteins into the host cell to ma
111 , typical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is a common cause of diarrhea and is associated wi
116 (BFP) of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is a prototypical T4P and confirmed virulence fact
119 pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is responsible for significant infant mortality an
121 pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) limits the death of infected enterocytes early in
123 (BFP) of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) mediates microcolony formation on epithelial cells
124 osed with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) on the basis of postmortem light microscopic and,
126 ce of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) serotype is of particular concern, as this group o
127 athogens, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) stands out as showing the highest risk for infecti
128 n O119:H2 enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) strain MB80 by subtractive hybridization is encode
130 that the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) type III effector protein EspF nucleates a multipr
131 ng of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) type III secretion system (T3SS) effector transloc
133 pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) uses the type III secretion system (T3SS) effector
135 llmark of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and Citrobacter
136 tility of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), vaccinia, and other vertebrate poxviruses by inte
140 anel were enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC, n = 21), norovirus (n = 21), rotavirus (n = 15), s
141 nic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC/EHEC) manipulate a plethora of host cell processes
142 ic E. coli [ETEC], enteropathogenic E. coli [EPEC], and Shiga-toxigenic E. coli [STEC]), Shigella/ent
143 ve E. coli [EAEC], enteropathogenic E. coli [EPEC], enterotoxigenic E. coli [ETEC], enteroinvasive E.
149 ition of EGFR phosphorylation also curtailed EPEC-induced ERK1/2 (MAP kinase) phosphorylation and, co
154 o visualize uric acid crystals formed during EPEC and STEC infections, we noticed that uric acid crys
161 we report that IFN-beta is induced following EPEC infection and regulates IEC TJ proteins to maintain
164 examined the role of the host enzyme CD73 in EPEC infection by testing the effect of ecto-5'-nucleoti
165 ed to investigate the genomic differences in EPEC isolates obtained from individuals with various cli
167 n, and luciferase expression was measured in EPEC-infected mice by bioluminescence using an in vivo i
169 . rodentium-specific (without orthologues in EPEC or EHEC) coding sequences, 10 prophage-like regions
171 es that were significantly more prevalent in EPEC isolates of symptomatic and lethal outcomes than in
172 ele, encoding an uncleavable LexA protein in EPEC, resulted in reduced secretion, particularly in the
173 er DRA (SLC26A3) was considerably reduced in EPEC-infected cells, corresponding with decreased Cl(-)/
180 tion of phagocytosis by EPEC and also limits EPEC translocation through antigen-sampling cells (M cel
186 cylation during ectopic expression of NleB1, EPEC infection in vitro, or C. rodentium infection in vi
187 ants, however, did not affect the ability of EPEC to form actin pedestals, arguing against an essenti
188 -BBE cells showed a decrease in adherence of EPEC to Caco2 cells in which CD98 expression was knocked
189 bbit ileal loops, decreased the adherence of EPEC to rabbit ileum, and reduced histopathological dama
196 The present studies examined the effects of EPEC infection on SERT activity and expression in intest
199 owth, caused a decrease in the expression of EPEC protein virulence factors, such as bundle-forming p
201 ons that produced little or no inhibition of EPEC growth, caused a decrease in the expression of EPEC
205 , addition of DNase I reduced the numbers of EPEC bacteria recovered after a 20-h infection and prote
206 ch of what we know about the pathogenesis of EPEC infections is based on the study of one or two prot
207 s into the epidemiology and pathogenicity of EPEC by enabling the detection and tracking of specific
208 apable of directly detecting the presence of EPEC within 5 min, has been developed using a simple mic
211 cum is not only a major colonization site of EPEC but also a site of EPEC effector gene expression in
214 , and our data might explain how a subset of EPEC effector proteins, encoded in cryptic prophages, ar
217 genomes have been fully sequenced: those of EPEC O127:H6 strain E2348/69 (United Kingdom, 1969) and
218 was to determine the prevalence and type of EPEC in kittens and whether infection was associated wit
220 effect of Tir clustering on the viability of EPEC-infected intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) is unkn
222 actin recruitment to sites of attachment, or EPEC-induced epithelial barrier function alteration.
223 us (BFP), EPEC secreted protein A, and other EPEC secreted proteins, and reduced EPEC adherence to ce
224 resistance plasmid were identified in other EPEC strains, including the prototypical O111:NM strain
225 nfection strategy of extracellular pathogens EPEC and EHEC and shed light on the complexities of the
226 zinc was much more efficacious in preventing EPEC-induced fluid secretion in rabbit ileal loops than
228 reports demonstrating that many provisional EPEC and EHEC isolates incriminated in disease outbreaks
236 nal evolution of O157:H7, we fully sequenced EPEC O55:H7 strain RM12579 (California, 1974), which was
240 dard culture methods detected Shigella spp., EPEC, ETEC, and EAEC in smaller proportions of the sampl
241 days postinfection, when map is suppressed, EPEC colonization is significantly reduced, indicating t
247 ce energy transfer-based system we show that EPEC injects effectors into in vitro grown human myeloid
248 Confocal microscopic studies showed that EPEC infection caused a marked redistribution of DRA fro
252 E. coli (EPEC) are LEE+ and often carry the EPEC adherence factor plasmid-encoded bundle-forming pil
256 ic framework for aEPEC in the context of the EPEC pathotype and will facilitate further studies into
259 , we compared the virulence functions of the EPEC T3SS effector NleE and the homologous Shigella prot
260 r targeting the BfpB secretin protein of the EPEC T4P to the OM and describe the ultrastructure of th
262 using RNA sequencing, demonstrated that the EPEC and ETEC virulence genes of these hybrid isolates w
263 f recent EPEC isolates has revealed that the EPEC pathotype is more diverse than previously appreciat
271 G2 play an important role in contributing to EPEC infection-associated inhibition of luminal membrane
272 rid isolates are more genomically-related to EPEC, but appear to have acquired ETEC virulence genes.
277 entium Our murine infant model is similar to EPEC infection in human infants since infant mice are mu
278 secreted effector protein that is unique to EPEC and related "attaching and effacing" (A/E) pathogen
281 ns belonging to this evolutionary model: two EPEC O55:H7 (SOR(+) GUD(+)) strains, two nonmotile EHEC
282 al microbiotas, and anaerobes, but wild-type EPEC and STEC strains were 100 to 1,000 times more resis
283 n of CD80, CD83, and CD86, whereas wild-type EPEC barely elicits cytokine production and shuts off nu
292 insight into the precise mechanisms by which EPEC colonizes the intestine, evades host immunity, and
295 at shares important functional features with EPEC, colonizes mice in colon and cecum and causes infla
297 experimental model of infant infection with EPEC, using the mouse-specific pathogen Citrobacter rode
298 eltanleH1H2 was cleared more rapidly than WT EPEC while complementation of DeltanleH1H2 with either N
299 ith DeltanleH1H2 than those infected with WT EPEC, indicating that NleH1/H2 dampen pro-inflammatory c