ライフサイエンスコーパス: FFF

1 FFFs are defined by a minimal number of highly conserved

2 d and neck reconstruction were analyzed; 510 FFFs (49.9%), 376 OCRFFFs (36.8%), and 136 SFFs (13.3%)

3 In this cohort study, EWB after FFF surgery was associated with shorter length of stay,

4 ion to optimize postoperative recovery after FFF surgery.

5 described here is broadly applicable to all FFF methods and improves the quality of FFF-based separa

6 The FYF and FFF mutants were defective in phosphorylating all of the

7 n the YFY mutant but was lost in the FYF and FFF mutants.

8 e-based activation motifs FYY, YYF, FYF, and FFF.

9 demonstrating the efficiency of the MIR and FFF spectroscopies to qualify and quantify the level of

10 ecular dynamics trajectories of the Y16F and FFF mutants reproduced the small conformational changes

11 o in the Y16S mutant and one in the Y16F and FFF mutants, with intermittent hydrogen bonding of one w

12 FkappaB activity was enhanced in the YFY and FFF mutants.

13 s and secretion were enhanced in the YFY and FFF mutants.

14 However, as FFF is applied to more difficult samples, such as those

15 Both FFFs (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.27-2.46) and SFFs (aOR, 1.68;

16 uality attributes of the results obtained by FFF-MALS analysis.

17 ole cells were collected after separation by FFF and further analyzed by MALDI-MS.

18 a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more t

19 ized for asymmetric flow FFF and centrifugal FFF, which separate particles on the basis of different

20 In classical FFF methods, the crossflow rate is either maintained con

21 icrostructures in comparison to conventional FFF channel geometry with an average 50% reduction in pl

22 DEP-FFF does not involve cell-labeling or cell-modification

23 The extended DEP-FFF theory is widely applicable, and the parameter measu

24 own that the revised theory accounts for DEP-FFF elution behavior over a wide range of conditions and

25 lectrophoretic field-flow fractionation (DEP-FFF) has been used to discriminate between particles and

26 lectrophoretic field-flow-fractionation (DEP-FFF) was applied to several clinically relevant cell sep

27 lectrophoretic field-flow-fractionation (DEP-FFF), a cell-separation technique that exploits the diff

28 l physical characteristics directly from DEP-FFF elution data.

29 An extended theory of DEP-FFF is presented that accounts for HDLF.

30 ubpopulations, and the design of optimal DEP-FFF separation conditions.

31 t this method is applicable to two different FFF methods (AF4 and HF5) and various pharmaceutically r

32 There were no differences in DM, FFF, or CSS, but OS was higher with wedge.

33 s asymmetrical flow-FFF (AF4) and electrical FFF (ElFFF) in one channel to electrical asymmetrical fl

34 tionation (FFF), particularly the electrical FFF (ElFFF) method, for ion separations.

35 A consumer-grade fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer was used to construct fluidic devices fo

36 ep multimaterial fused filament fabrication (FFF) approach, the as-printed electrochemical performanc

37 manufactured via fused filament fabrication (FFF) have limited strength and toughness compared to oth

38 In this study, fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing parameters were optimized to improve the s

39 ing 3D printing (fused filament fabrication (FFF), direct ink writing (DIW)) with freeform laser indu

40 oaches including fused filament fabrication (FFF), jetting technologies including inkjet 3D printing,

41 D printing using fused-filament fabrication (FFF), showcasing excellent printability and mechanical r

42 ble and scalable fused filament fabrication (FFF).

43 tailored toward fused filament fabrication (FFF).

44 f the patents on fused-filament-fabrication (FFF), the availability and uses of this 3D-printing tech

45 etastasis (DM), or freedom from any failure (FFF) between the two groups (P > .16).

46 dom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups

47 sumably a cell exudate, was identified by Fl FFF-ICPMS.

48 We employed hyperlayer flow FFF (Fl FFF) methodology to separate cells of Shewanella oneiden

49 Thus, Fl FFF interfaced with ICPMS detection is a powerful analyt

50 on can be gained because of the versatile Fl FFF separation range and multielement detection capabili

51 xtraction, flow-field flow fractionation (Fl-FFF) rapidly washes the microspheres as well as separate

52 pite the widespread use of fibula free flap (FFF) surgery for head and neck reconstruction, there are

53 perioperative outcomes of fibula free flaps (FFFs), osteocutaneous radial forearm free flaps (OCRFFFs

54 Flow FFF/MALLS reveals that both the extrusion and detergent

55 hyphenation was realized for asymmetric flow FFF and centrifugal FFF, which separate particles on the

56 The bacterial analysis by flow FFF/MALDI-TOF MS was completed within 1 h with only prel

57 exclusion chromatography), hollow-fiber flow FFF coupled with MALS allows a flow-based fractionation

58 composition of carrier liquid used for flow FFF was selected based on retention of bacterial cells a

59 ution of flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) depends primarily on the crossflow rate and its cha

60 ling the flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) separation technique with detection by matrix-assis

61 ility of flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF) to separate cationic lipid-DNA complexes prepared a

62 method, flow field-flow fractionation (flow FFF), is coupled on-line with multiangle laser light sca

63 We employed hyperlayer flow FFF (Fl FFF) methodology to separate cells of Shewanella

64 The coupling of flow FFF and MALDI-TOF MS was demonstrated for P. putida and

65 del is evaluated for the application of flow FFF in carrier liquids of low ionic strength, where part

66 The effectiveness of OFSC flow FFF was demonstrated using mixtures of monodispersed sta

67 uch as photon correlation spectroscopy, flow FFF allows a detailed examination of subtle changes in t

68 cattering in analyzing bimodal systems, flow FFF/MALLS is shown to resolve vesicle subpopulations tha

69 nto a narrow band near the inlet of the flow FFF channel.

70 st competing, noninvasive methods, this flow FFF/MALLS technique enables measurement of vesicle size

71 ntrated, and separated in a 1 mL volume flow FFF channel.

72 Flow-FFF of these fractured samples shows very broad size dis

73 utions compared to the original SEC and flow-FFF fractions.

74 s presented which combines asymmetrical flow-FFF (AF4) and electrical FFF (ElFFF) in one channel to e

75 one channel to electrical asymmetrical flow-FFF (EAF4) to overcome the restrictions of pure ElFFF.

76 The SEC fractions are well resolved by flow-FFF.

77 Flow-field flow fractionation (flow-FFF) is used to separate single wall carbon nanotubes (S

78 rations with polymer latex particles in flow-FFF are compared to calibrations of hydrodynamic volume

79 ween sample components compared to pure flow-FFF.

80 e potentialities of front-face fluorescence (FFF) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopies coupled with

81 iming of weight-bearing initiation following FFF surgery varies considerably across institutions.

82 ME limitations, become easily accessible for FFF for the first time.

83 Consequently, the material portfolio for FFF is tremendously broadened, allowing material and for

84 ent of insulating thermoplastic required for FFF printers.

85 e alignment using a "fuzzy functional form" (FFF), a three-dimensional descriptor of the active site

86 al site descriptors, fuzzy functional forms (FFFs), were developed to recognize structurally conserve

87 mometry (VPO), and flow field fractionation (FFF).

88 The coupling of field-flow fractionation (FFF) and multiangle light scattering (MAIS) detectors is

89 of end effects in field-flow fractionation (FFF) channels is simulated and demonstrated for a microf

90 GE and centrifugal field-flow fractionation (FFF) coupled with multi-angle light scattering (MALS) an

91 hollow-fiber flow field-flow fractionation (FFF) coupled with multiangle light scattering (MALS) for

92 on for analysis of field-flow fractionation (FFF) data is presented.

93 Field flow fractionation (FFF) is a size-based separation technique applicable to

94 hod and asymmetric field flow fractionation (FFF) shows that the current method provides similar size

95 e potential use of field-flow fractionation (FFF), particularly the electrical FFF (ElFFF) method, fo

96 on of materials by field-flow fractionation (FFF), the experienced analyst understands the importance

97 /characterization (field-flow fractionation (FFF), UV, and multiangle light scattering) with subseque

98 A combination of Field Flow Fractionation (FFF), working in saline carrier and with minimal preproc

99 lier paper, online field flow fractionation (FFF)-Raman analysis with optical trapping was shown to b

100 particles by flow field-flow fractionation (FFF).

101 copy (TEM-EDS) and field flow fractionation (FFF-ICP-MS).

102 The full FFF processing of ABS-vitrimer overcomes the major chall

103 at HD lift force played little role in DEP/G-FFF operation.

104 An analysis of the DEP/G-FFF results revealed that the separation exploited the d

105 The DEP/G-FFF technique is potentially applicable to many biologic

106 ravitational field-flow-fractionation (DEP/G-FFF) system using model polystyrene (PS) microbeads is p

107 ravitational field-flow fractionation (DEP/G-FFF) was used to separate cultured human breast cancer M

108 was discussed for the optimization of DEP/G-FFF.

109 Although general FFF theory indicates few advantages from miniaturization

110 These experiments show that a consumer-grade FFF printer can be used to fabricate low-cost fluidic de

111 However, FFF-MALS-UV analysis allowed characterisation of complex

112 r importance when the perturbations to ideal FFF theory, such as those due to the effects of hydrodyn

113 the effect of particle-wall interactions in FFF using an empirically determined interaction paramete

114 esults from poor interlayer adhesion, making FFF parts not suitable for most engineering applications

115 lated and demonstrated for a microfabricated FFF system.

116 g flap types (OCRFFF, 527 [467-591] minutes; FFF, 592 [507-714] minutes; SFF, 691 [610-816] minutes).

117 A new FFF method is presented which combines asymmetrical flow

118 Compared with OCRFFFs, FFFs (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.07-2.91) were associated with

119 Compared with OCRFFFs, FFFs (aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.54) and SFFs (aOR, 1.96;

120 te study concerning multivariate analysis of FFF fingerprint.

121 d-DNA particles with several combinations of FFF carrier liquids and channel membranes was assessed.

122 andomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and sta

123 all FFF methods and improves the quality of FFF-based separations.

124 Utilizing discrete particle simulations of FFF and optical calculations based on both the Mie theor

125 with OCRFFFs compare favorably with those of FFFs and SFFs, with shorter operative times and lower ra

126 ve sites, termed "fuzzy functional forms" or FFFs, are created based on the geometry and conformation

127 population than those undergoing OCRFFFs or FFFs.

128 e level), substitution with phenylalanine (P(FFF)) rendered the protein much less active in transcrip

129 w fractionation multiangle light-scattering (FFF-MALS) method for such characterization.

130 und that flow, electrical, and sedimentation FFF provide adequate separation for accurate particle qu

131 n (CeFFF; more commonly called sedimentation FFF or SdFFF) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

132 ditions and is consistent with sedimentation-FFF when the DEP force is zero.

133 , FAK(Y397F), kinase-defective c-Src, or Shc FFF, all of which express dominant-negative activity.

134 When controlling for SSI, FFFs (aOR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.36-4.51) and SFFs (aOR, 2.95;

135 ange much more frequently for WT KSI and the FFF mutant than for the Y16F and Y16S mutants.

136 ther materials through their behavior in the FFF channel.

137 the Y16F and Y16S mutants but absent in the FFF mutant and significantly less probable in WT KSI.

138 reased flexibility in the application of the FFF family of techniques.

139 ithm is described that is independent of the FFF technique (i.e., independent of field type) and mode

140 Again, the FFFs can specifically identify the functional sites of t

141 First, the FFFs are shown to correctly identify their corresponding

142 Thermal FFF's high molecular weight (MW) selectivity and sensiti

143 Next, these FFFs are used to screen for active sites in low-to-moder

144 ize distribution results on LNPs compared to FFF.

145 rence to analytically available solutions to FFF theory, allowing ad hoc variation of field strength

146 material and formulation optimization toward FFF, independent of a preliminary extrusion process.

147 the outcomes of 1022 patients who underwent FFFs, OCRFFFs, or SFFs for head and neck reconstruction

148 linear accelerators using 6 MV unflattened (FFF) photon beams (HALFFF and TBFFF).

149 e-based, active-site profiling that utilizes FFFs to identify residues located in the spatial environ

150 , they could be evaluated with the validated FFF-MALS method.

151 ent network (ABS-vitrimer) (re)printable via FFF.

152 Owing to their low viscosity, FFF with low print nozzle sizes of 250 mum was achieved

153 ace provides manufacturing throughput, while FFF offers a great selection of materials and multimater

154 ment geometry can lead to parts printed with FFF, with increased strength compared to other post-proc

155 e how conductive composites can be used with FFF printers to generate 3D-printed electrodes (3DEs) fo

156 KSI and the Y16F, Y16S, and Y16F/Y32F/Y57F (FFF) mutants.

157 etreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and

158 between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL.