戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              GFAP and GS concentrations differed significantly across
2                                              GFAP and other markers of enteric glial cells (eg, p75 a
3                                              GFAP concentration was significantly positively correlat
4                                              GFAP expression does not increase with age in chimpanzee
5                                              GFAP expression was significantly reduced in the NAc cor
6                                              GFAP peaked at 20 hours after injury and slowly declined
7                                              GFAP performed consistently in detecting MMTBI, CT lesio
8                                              GFAP successful detection is demonstrated in a clean-buf
9                                              GFAP yielded an AUC of 0.86 for differentiating between
10                                              GFAP(+)-Cre-dependent overexpression of xCT in vDG mimic
11                                              GFAP, Iba1, alphaII-spectrin, and SBDP remained unchange
12                                              GFAP-ARO-KO mice were viable and fertile, with normal gr
13                                    At 1week, GFAP was at the edge of detection, and in some experimen
14 t drastically shifted differentiation to 80% GFAP cells (p < 0.05).
15                                         AAV5-GFAP-Cre-GFP particles were infused into the SN of 8-wee
16                             Infusion of AAV5-GFAP-Cre-GFP vectors into the SN resulted in region-spec
17                                     Abnormal GFAP aggregation also occurs in giant axon neuropathy (G
18 ker NF200, nor glial fibrillary acidic acid (GFAP)-expressing supporting cell marker.
19 tion of astrocyte and microglial activation (GFAP and CD68) and HMGB1 at 2 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr, 3 days, a
20  reveals that an AxD-causing mutation alters GFAP turnover kinetics in vivo and provides an essential
21  signatures and ensuing release of Iba-1 and GFAP into the circulation.
22 n diffuse injury, monitoring serum Iba-1 and GFAP levels can provide clinically relevant insight into
23 o), and glial activation (YKL-40, MCP-1, and GFAP).
24 trikingly similar redistribution of AQP4 and GFAP+ astrocytes transformed into clasmatodendrocytes.
25 istry was performed against amyloid-beta and GFAP.
26 f-L > 25.5pg/ml had 110% faster decline, and GFAP > 232pg/ml had 130% faster decline compared to thos
27 that n-3 PUFAs increased GFAP expression and GFAP positive cell formation.
28          We hypothesise that elevated GS and GFAP levels could identify those double-Ab-seronegative
29 Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of GS and GFAP were measured by ELISA in patients with NMOSD (n=39
30                                       GS and GFAP were significantly correlated, particularly in pati
31 the brain correlated with increased Iba1 and GFAP staining, indicative of microglia and astrocyte rea
32 mparison to immunofluorescence with Iba1 and GFAP.
33 e notable: t-tau 8 to 16 years, and Nf-L and GFAP 4 to 8 years prior to clinical AD.
34 rd ventricular volume, and baseline Nf-L and GFAP were associated with faster decline in cortical thi
35                       Serum t-tau, Nf-L, and GFAP predict the development of sporadic AD and cognitiv
36 for serum concentrations of t-tau, Nf-L, and GFAP were measured in a population sample of 1,327 parti
37 ur results demonstrate that blood UCH-L1 and GFAP are increased early after stroke and distinct bioma
38                             Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP concentrations also strongly predicted poor outcome
39                              Both UCH-L1 and GFAP concentrations were significantly greater in ICH pa
40 rast, the proportions of NeuN(+) neurons and GFAP(+) astrocytes that were immunopositive for activin
41 reasing profile over time in S100B, NSE, and GFAP.
42 find that filamentous proteins, vimentin and GFAP, are expressed by Muller glia, but have different p
43       TDF administered to wild-type (wt) and GFAP-gp120 transgenic (tg) mice caused peripheral neurop
44 Tau (pTau), amyloid precursor protein (APP), GFAP, Iba1, alphaII-spectrin, and spectrin breakdown pro
45          Immunohistochemistry for pTau, APP, GFAP, and Iba1 was performed.
46              In contrast to normal appearing GFAP+ astrocytes, clasmatodendrocytes were swollen and h
47 gradation of some but not all AxD-associated GFAP mutants.
48     Interestingly, BMP4 increased astrocytic GFAP expression, and BMP4-treated astrocytes failed to p
49  cascade through which aberrant astrocytosis/GFAP up-regulation potentiates neurotoxicity and contrib
50 rs in a transgenic mouse model of autoimmune GFAP meningoencephalitis.
51 europathological analyses of BACHD and BACHD/GFAP-CreERT2-tam mice.
52 and electrophysiological phenotypes in BACHD/GFAP-CreERT2-tam mice compared to BACHD mice.
53                 Behavioral analyses of BACHD/GFAP-CreERT2-tam mice demonstrate significant improvemen
54  protein in the striatum and cortex of BACHD/GFAP-CreERT2-tam mice.
55 phaB-crystallin in the striatum of the BACHD/GFAP-CreERT2 mice, indicating a cell autonomous effect o
56                   Participants with baseline GFAP > 232pg/ml showed 160% faster decline in hippocampa
57 ural autoantibody, which we discovered to be GFAP-specific, is disease spectrum restricted but not ra
58   AxD is a primary astrocyte disease because GFAP expression is specific to astrocytes in the central
59  cell markers and expressed BDNF, TGF-beta1, GFAP, and IL-6.
60                            Analysis of blood GFAP concentrations using prototype assays on a point-of
61                                         Both GFAP and UCH-L1 were detectible within 1 hour of injury.
62 ted by betaA3/A1-crystallin to modulate both GFAP and VEGF.
63           The number of SVZ stem cells (BrdU+GFAP+) was decreased in SNCA-A30P mice, whereas prolifer
64 ow that TSG-6 is expressed in the rat CNS by GFAP(+) and CD44(+) astrocytes, solely in the mature bra
65 ive overexpression of a single MMP driven by GFAP expressing cells in vivo.
66  FTIR and the glial distribution revealed by GFAP immunohistochemistry.
67 neuronal stem cells (iNSCs) were verified by GFAP.
68 he gene network unique to ependymal CD133(+)/GFAP(-) quiescent cells were enriched for immune-respons
69 e uncovered molecular properties of CD133(+)/GFAP(-) ependymal (E) cells in the adult mouse forebrain
70   Immunohistochemical (anti-human vWF, CD45, GFAP, and Iba-1) and motor neuron histological analyses
71 lts demonstrated a temporal profile of CD68, GFAP, and HMGB1 after TBI relative to sham, which differ
72 stainings using markers against glial cells (GFAP), endothelial cells (CD34) and macrophages (CD68) w
73 Dunn Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare GFAP concentrations between MRI lesion types with Benjam
74  observations that GFAP complexes containing GFAP variants are more resistant to solvent extraction.
75                    Fingolimod also decreased GFAP staining and the number of activated microglia.
76     We compare their capability of detecting GFAP in a clean-buffer and serum-matrix by using gold-co
77  each of whom carried a common but different GFAP mutation (R79C, R239H, or R416W).
78                                       For EV-GFAP, we observed 93% sensitivity, 38% specificity, 74%
79 17) of brain tumor patients showed higher EV-GFAP than the maximum observed in controls.
80                         However, exclusively GFAP differed in ICH compared with IS (p < 0.0001).
81 , particularly in the mucosa, do not express GFAP.
82  Glial fibrillary acidic protein expressing (GFAP(+)) glia modulate nociceptive neuronal activity in
83 sion levels of glial intermediate filaments (GFAP, vimentin) and extracellular matrix components (lam
84 I, 0.67-0.92) to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00)for GFAP and 0.31 (95% CI, 0-0.63) to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.8
85                                      AUC for GFAP in patients with CT-negative and MRI-positive findi
86 e was the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for GFAP in patients with CT-negative and MRI-positive findi
87 imetric and fluorescence based bioassays for GFAP was decreased by ~1000 times using the MAB techniqu
88 blastoma cell lines secrete EVs enriched for GFAP and Tau.
89  a neurosurgical intervention, the range for GFAP was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00) to 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-
90 These novel findings reveal unique roles for GFAP-positive glial and neuronal Panx1 and describe new
91 chemistry demonstrated positive staining for GFAP, Olig2, and a high Ki-67 proliferative index.
92 lop three different detection strategies for GFAP, among the most popular in the biosensing field and
93                The overall bioassay time for GFAP and STX 1 was reduced from 4h using commercially av
94 e selective glial activation in tissues from GFAP::hM3Dq mice evoked electrogenic ion transport to an
95                      In contrast, after GCI, GFAP-ARO-KO mice: (1) lacked the normal elevation of ast
96 tissues in human and mouse, and found a gene-GFAP-related to aging in both human and mouse.
97 IIbeta positive) and (46.63% +/- 2.5%) glia (GFAP positive), PPA treatment drastically shifted differ
98                                       Higher GFAP levels were associated with stroke severity and his
99         In the presymptomatic period, higher GFAP concentrations were correlated with a lower cogniti
100 xpression of synapsin-Cre or inducible human GFAP-CreERT2.
101 , C3), TLR4, and colabeling with glia (IBA1, GFAP) were examined using gene expression, immunofluores
102               Deletion of Cav1.2 channels in GFAP-positive astrocytes during cuprizone-induced demyel
103       The TSPO-/- mouse showed a decrease in GFAP expression, correlating with a decrease in astrogli
104 ve gliosis, as demonstrated by a decrease in GFAP immunolabeling, and suppressed the activation of ma
105 hich the Cav1.2 alpha subunit was deleted in GFAP-positive astrocytes.
106        We demonstrated that ACBP deletion in GFAP+ astrocytes, but not in Nkx2.1-lineage neural cells
107                            Panx1 deletion in GFAP-positive glia cells prevented hypersensitivity comp
108 beta-actin-GFP drove transgene expression in GFAP(+) astrocytes.
109 -mediated recombination initiated gliomas in GFAP-FLPo mice.
110 ocytes exhibit a cell-autonomous increase in GFAP immunoreactivity without affecting astrocyte or mic
111 fibrogenic chemokine CCL3 and an increase in GFAP(+) fibrogenic cells.
112 with genetically encoded Ca(2+) indicator in GFAP-positive glia or in neurons, both cell populations
113                Targeted deletion of Panx1 in GFAP-positive glia or in neurons revealed distinct effec
114 ice or activating glial calcium responses in GFAP::hM3Dq mice, and tested the effects on colonic barr
115 hat express FLPo recombinase specifically in GFAP-positive cells.
116                 Likewise, in vivo studies in GFAP-Tat tg mice showed increased autophagosome accumula
117                This was confirmed in vivo in GFAP-IR KO mice by using positron emission tomography an
118 mtDNA, reduced MAP2 (neuronal) and increased GFAP (astrocyte) mRNA, relative to NCI.
119 mmatory cell infiltrate as well as increased GFAP and S100B co-expression and decreased HuC/D protein
120 entiation, we found that n-3 PUFAs increased GFAP expression and GFAP positive cell formation.
121 orsal horn, males and females show increased GFAP(+) astrocytic cells; however, only males demonstrat
122 tional knock-out of beta1-integrin increases GFAP expression and astrocytic differentiation by cultur
123 epared from YAP 5SA-expressing cells induced GFAP(+) cell production in vitro, suggesting that a solu
124          We have shown that that Tat induces GFAP expression in astrocytes and that GFAP activation i
125                               Interestingly, GFAP levels in some patients with double-Ab-seronegative
126  We therefore sought to directly investigate GFAP turnover in a mouse model of AxD that is heterozygo
127 RNA-seq) analysis revealed that the ischemic GFAP-ARO-KO mouse hippocampus failed to upregulate the "
128  "dorsal cap" received a mixed group of long GFAP- and vimentin-immunopositive processes from a dista
129  exit layer I, and "typical" ILA with longer GFAP(+) processes that exit layer I.
130 , and decreased phosphorylation of lysosomal GFAP, with no change in macroautophagy.
131 , proper expression of the astrocytic marker GFAP and corticogenesis.
132 ncreased expression of the astrocytic marker GFAP in the cortex of 7-day old pups.
133 led by co-localization with the glial marker GFAP and absence of co-localization with the neuronal ma
134 brillary acidic protein-luc transgenic mice (GFAP-luc mice).
135 cible transgenic GFAP-CreER-Notch1-cKO mice, GFAP-CreER-ETB(R)-cKO mice exhibited a defect in reactiv
136 y, we subjected C3a receptor-deficient mice, GFAP-C3a transgenic mice expressing biologically active
137                                          MKO(GFAP) mice exhibit moderately increased 2-AG and reduced
138 etion of MGL specifically in astrocytes (MKO(GFAP)).
139                             Importantly, MKO(GFAP) mice exhibit reduced brain prostaglandin E2 and pr
140 nor accumulation of 2-AG in the brain of MKO(GFAP) mice does not cause cannabinoid receptor desensiti
141 rmining the relative levels of WT and mutant GFAP in three individuals with AxD, each of whom carried
142 n all three individuals, the level of mutant GFAP was less than that of the WT.
143  some toxic threshold rather than the mutant GFAP being inherently toxic.
144 s due to an intrinsic toxicity of the mutant GFAP instead of it acting indirectly by being more stabl
145  of GFAP in AxD patients is that the mutated GFAP variants are more stable than the WT, an attributio
146 paring its signal to that of an added [(15)N]GFAP standard.
147  production of new neurons in socially naive GFAP-thymidine kinase rats showed that loss of 6-week-ol
148 tification of SMI312(+) dystrophic neurites, GFAP(+) reactive astrocytes, and IBA1(+) and CD68(+) act
149               Some cortical NeuN(+) neurons, GFAP(+) glia limitans astrocytes, Iba-1(+) microglia and
150 is to evaluate the discriminative ability of GFAP for positive MRI scans in patients with negative CT
151    We assessed the discriminative ability of GFAP to identify MRI abnormalities in patients with norm
152 on and injury were pronounced, an absence of GFAP staining was consistent with activation-induced cel
153 ng or reversing pathological accumulation of GFAP as a potential therapeutic strategy for AxD and rel
154     A possible mechanism for accumulation of GFAP in AxD patients is that the mutated GFAP variants a
155 s characterized by excessive accumulation of GFAP, known as Rosenthal fibers, within astrocytes.
156 e of the disease is aberrant accumulation of GFAP.
157 t preventing or reducing the accumulation of GFAP.
158 e accumulation of extremely large amounts of GFAP causes many molecular changes in astrocytes, includ
159 tion of proteasome reversed the clearance of GFAP in cells achieved by overexpressing gigaxonin.
160                   Although the clustering of GFAP immunopositive astrocytes around amyloid-beta plaqu
161 igaxonin levels influence the degradation of GFAP in primary astrocytes and in cell lines that expres
162  gigaxonin is involved in the degradation of GFAP.
163 ed the iCrystal system) for the detection of GFAP from mice with brain injuries and STX 1 from a city
164 ioassay platforms for the rapid detection of GFAP in buffer based on colorimetric and fluorescence re
165 ular, these data suggest that elimination of GFAP might be possible and occurs more quickly than prev
166             TDF also increased expression of GFAP and decreased expression of IBA1 in the wt and gp12
167         The conjoint increased expression of GFAP and MMP-9 and a purinergic ATP (P2) receptor antago
168                                Expression of GFAP has been reported in some of the tumor types identi
169 V-TK) mice and epithelial-cell expression of GFAP.
170 ssion or GFAP expression led to formation of GFAP aggregates and induction of unfolded protein respon
171 V-Gfa2-VIVIT had no effects on the levels of GFAP and Iba1, suggesting that synaptic benefits of VIVI
172           We observed higher serum levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in brain-injured children compared with
173 ayed by mice that express elevated levels of GFAP from a human WT GFAP transgene has contributed to t
174 als revealed that, in vivo, the half-life of GFAP in mutant mice (15.4 +/- 0.5 days) was much shorter
175 r damage, we assessed the co-localization of GFAP and AQP4 immunoreactivities in post-mortem brains f
176 rst, we found glial limitans injury, loss of GFAP immunostaining, and infiltration of T cells across
177                        In situ monitoring of GFAP, Ki67, caspase-3, Beclin-1, and LC-3 in the tumor s
178  TSG-6(-/-) mice present a reduced number of GFAP(+) astrocytes when compared with the littermate TSG
179                            Overexpression of GFAP is an indicator of astrogliosis/neuroinflammation i
180 reatment for 1 h increases the percentage of GFAP-positive astrocytes that show enhanced Px1 HC-media
181           We also confirmed the potential of GFAP as a tool for early rule-in of ICH, while UCH-L1 wa
182 ogies which can be linked to the presence of GFAP in blood severely affect the human central nervous
183               Our results point to a role of GFAP and UCH-L1 as candidate biomarkers for pediatric TB
184 rocytes resulted in both the upregulation of GFAP and cytokines that are associated with astrocyte ac
185 this study, we showed that Tat expression or GFAP expression led to formation of GFAP aggregates and
186 , we demonstrated that inhibition of Tat- or GFAP-induced UPR/ER stress by the chemical chaperone 4-p
187  (GFAP) promoter-driven aromatase knock-out (GFAP-ARO-KO) mouse model to deplete astrocyte-derived E2
188  (GFAP) promoter-driven aromatase knock-out (GFAP-ARO-KO) mouse to deplete astrocyte-derived E2 and e
189                                       Plasma GFAP and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentration w
190                                       Plasma GFAP concentration was significantly increased in sympto
191                                       Plasma GFAP concentrations (pg/mL) were measured using a protot
192                                Median plasma GFAP concentration was highest in patients with CT-negat
193 ed to investigate the relationship of plasma GFAP to clinical and imaging measures.
194                                     Positive GFAP expression was detected in the control positive gro
195  of the YAP gene (YAP 5SA) causes productive GFAP(+) cell generation at late embryonic periods, and t
196 oding the intermediate filament (IF) protein GFAP.
197 sitive and/or glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP)-positive progenitor cells of the developing centra
198 (p < 0.05), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (p < 0.05) in the cerebellum, and SYP (p < 0.05) a
199 (NF-L), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) after elective cardiac surgery with the implementa
200 yte marker, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and a protease, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9).
201 pression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and cellular hypertrophy.
202 lial marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and in Slit2 at the glial wedge and indusium grise
203             Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1(IBA
204 ve markers: Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and S100 Calcium-Binding Protein beta (S100beta);
205 etection of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Shiga like toxin (STX 1).
206 ntration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Tau.
207             Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) hav
208 trations of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in
209 ntration of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) correlates with intracranial injury visible on CT
210 o increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression and aggregation and activation of unfol
211 s including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression, surface area, volume, and colocalizati
212  (VEGF) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expressions were detected by immunohistochemical s
213 ions in the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) gene.
214 d with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunohistochemistry to provide a comparison betwe
215             Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a measure of astrogliosis, a known pathological
216             Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an intermediate filament (IF) III protein uniqu
217 te filament glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) lead to the rare and fatal disorder, Alexander dis
218  autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) meningoencephalomyelitis from disorders commonly c
219 remodeling, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter demethylation and a striking lengthening
220 S: When the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter is used to express cellular toxins that e
221 generated a glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter-driven aromatase knock-out (GFAP-ARO-KO)
222 generated a glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter-driven aromatase knock-out (GFAP-ARO-KO)
223 cell marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) to study the incidence and location of clasmatoden
224 (Nf-L), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) with common sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD) and co
225 n (SOM) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker for astrogliosis during neurodegeneratio
226 FL), S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), amyloid-beta (Abeta) 40 and Abeta42, total tau (t
227 e 1 (Iba1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 in DRGs.
228 pression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and the upregulation of genes that have been prev
229  (NSE), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), in addition to multiple inflammatory markers.
230 showed that glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB) and substance P
231 100beta and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), were used as indicator for neural differentiation
232  biomarker, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-breakdown product (GBDPs) in injured cortex were a
233 rs (IRs) in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-expressing cells affects hypothalamic astrocyte mo
234 e developed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-FLP recombinase (FLPo) mice that express FLPo reco
235 sorder with glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-IgG as biomarker was recently characterized.
236 tiation into glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP)-immunoreactive cells over neurons, while overexpre
237  as well as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).
238 te filament glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).
239 ositive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP+) expressed gastrin de novo through a mechanism tha
240 trations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, p = 0.0074) and myelin basic protein (MBP, p = 0.0
241             Glial-fibrillary-acidic-protein (GFAP) has recently drawn significant attention from the
242 L1) and glial fibrillary astrocytic protein (GFAP) in acute stroke patients and healthy controls and
243 yte damage (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) were measured.
244  the mRNA expression of structural proteins (GFAP and AQP4) was compromised.
245    Stereologic methods were used to quantify GFAP-immunoreactive astrocyte density and soma volume in
246                                       Raised GFAP concentrations appear to be unique to GRN-related F
247                                         Rare GFAP-IgG positivity was encountered in serum controls by
248 continuous borders and significantly reduced GFAP density.
249 pendent phosphorylation of the CMA regulator GFAP.
250 ocytosis was astrocyte-specific and required GFAP expression and was mediated by ER stress.
251                                     Resident GFAP(+) glia in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) known as satel
252 alization of aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in retracted GFAP+ astrocytes with disrupted end-feet juxtaposed to m
253 OMCs express glial markers (p75(NTR), S100B, GFAP and oligodendrocyte marker O4), neuronal markers (n
254                  Substance P (SP), S100beta, GFAP, and phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinas
255 er described rudimentary ILA that have short GFAP(+) processes that do not exit layer I, and "typical
256 ) confirmation of IgG reactive with specific GFAP isoforms (alpha, varepsilon, or kappa) by cell-base
257 t with prior experimental and human studies, GFAP, was highest at 6 h post-injury, while no substanti
258 igaxonin as an important factor that targets GFAP for degradation through the proteasome pathway.
259 ice, although at a later age (9 months) than GFAP and Abeta.
260 duces GFAP expression in astrocytes and that GFAP activation is indispensable for astrocyte-mediated
261            In addition, we demonstrated that GFAP up-regulation and aggregation in astrocytes were ne
262  an attribution abetted by observations that GFAP complexes containing GFAP variants are more resista
263                                 We show that GFAP-CreERT2 expression in these mice is highly selectiv
264                           Here, we show that GFAP::Cre;Erbb3(F/F) mice, which lack Erbb3 in both radi
265 just prior to symptom onset, suggesting that GFAP may be an important marker of proximity to onset, a
266                                          The GFAP-ARO-KO mice exhibited significantly attenuated reac
267  fluorescent protein (Lck-GFP) driven by the GFAP promoter, coupled with synapsin I immunohistochemis
268 h is caused by heterozygous mutations in the GFAP gene, which is the gene that encodes the major astr
269 osis, was significantly downregulated in the GFAP-ARO-KO hippocampus following GCI.
270 onal damage and microglial activation in the GFAP-ARO-KO mice after GCI, suggesting that the defects
271 evels on gliomagenesis in the context of the GFAP-V12Ha-ras-IRESLacZ (Ras*) model.
272                  Moreover, we found that the GFAP(+) cells were not YAP 5SA-expressing cells themselv
273 -expressing system, we demonstrated that the GFAP-FLPo mouse model enables the analysis of various st
274 GFAP-BDNF mice, which express BDNF under the GFAP promoter.
275                                         This GFAP level is compatible with clinical diagnostics.
276  astrocytes and causes neurotoxicity through GFAP activation and ER stress induction in astrocytes an
277     In addition, gigaxonin directly bound to GFAP, and inhibition of proteasome reversed the clearanc
278                                        Total GFAP+ cells in both the frontal and temporal white matte
279 duce AxD by increasing accumulation of total GFAP above some toxic threshold rather than the mutant G
280 icated that the in vitro half-lives of total GFAP in astrocytes from wild-type and mutant mice were s
281 han WT GFAP and thereby increasing the total GFAP level.
282              Similar to inducible transgenic GFAP-CreER-Notch1-cKO mice, GFAP-CreER-ETB(R)-cKO mice e
283 on of adult neurogenesis in naive transgenic GFAP-thymidine kinase rats resulted in social behavior s
284 lent brain penetration, and efficacy in Tsc1(GFAP)CKO mice qualify 8 as a potential therapeutic candi
285 pal and LC microglial abundance, upregulated GFAP expression, degeneration of LC fibers, decreased st
286 ically activated astrocytes in the DMS using GFAP promoter-driven expression of hM3Dq, the excitatory
287       Ablation of Nsdhl in radial glia using GFAP-cre resulted in live-born, normal appearing affecte
288                   Over the course of 1 week, GFAP demonstrated a diagnostic range of areas under the
289 ein levels were increased after mTBI as were GFAP and IBA-1 markers.
290 ntin- and nestin-immunopositive glia whereas GFAP and the water-channel aquaporin 4 were found at the
291 ts, reovirus antigen did not colocalize with GFAP in infected brains, suggesting that reovirus does n
292 howed a very strong inverse correlation with GFAP levels and ELISA measurements of Abeta, but not wit
293 ional mHTT-expressing BACHD mouse model with GFAP-CreERT2 mice.
294 ministration and extinction were paired with GFAP Westerns, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescent ima
295                      Here, 102 patients with GFAP-IgG positivity are described.
296 on of the L-type amino acid transporter with GFAP-positive astrocytes but not CD68-positive microglia
297 ress elevated levels of GFAP from a human WT GFAP transgene has contributed to the notion that the mu
298 ified a peptide specific to the mutant or WT GFAP in each patient, and we quantified this peptide by
299 ting indirectly by being more stable than WT GFAP and thereby increasing the total GFAP level.
300 ut, Yap(nestin) conditional knockout and Yap(GFAP) conditional knockout mice displayed fewer neocorti

 
Page Top