戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              GIP also reportedly increased glucose uptake and inhibit
2                                              GIP and GLP-1 levels increased both at fast and after OG
3                                              GIP concentrations after pasta consumption were lower th
4                                              GIP depletion in the gip1gip2 knockdown mutant leads to
5                                              GIP did not significantly change (Hedge g -0.213, 95% CI
6                                              GIP induces a downregulation of plasma membrane GIPR by
7                                              GIP induces the expression of the proatherogenic cytokin
8                                              GIP infusion decreased pancreatic but increased small in
9                                              GIP plays pivotal roles in cellular signaling, protein s
10                                              GIP receptor (GIPR) and OPN mRNA levels are higher in ca
11                                              GIP receptor (GIPR) protein and mRNA were decreased in R
12                                              GIP signals through activation of the GIP receptor (GIPR
13                                              GIP stimulated OPN protein expression in a dose-dependen
14                                              GIP(1-42) was modified C-terminally, and the truncated p
15                                              GIP, but not GLP-1, promotes beta cell Tcf7 expression v
16                                              GIP, CCK and OXM molecules appear to offer promising new
17 ental areas under the curve for total GLP-1, GIP, and cholecystokinin (CCK) in plasma.
18 hase, LQT2 patients display increased GLP-1, GIP, and insulin secretion and defective glucagon secret
19 , but neither dose affected glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, cholecystokinin, gastric emptying, or energy intake
20 nal pressures; stimulated plasma CCK, GLP-1, GIP, insulin, and glucagon (all r > 0.57, P < 0.01); and
21 ma concentrations of the gut hormones GLP-1, GIP, PYY, CCK and insulin did not offer an explanation o
22  show that lipid conjugated forms of a GLP-1/GIP/glucagon hybrid peptides stay in circulation for hou
23  (IC50) was determined using [(125)I-Tyr(10)]GIP(1-30) as radioligand and GIP(1-30) as control peptid
24                           Notably, [d-Ala(2)]GIP also reduced the numbers of circulating neutrophils
25 GIP receptor (GIPR) signaling with [d-Ala(2)]GIP in mice and in Y1 adrenocortical cells.
26                                    [d-Ala(2)]GIP increased murine corticosterone levels in a GIPR-dep
27                       In addition, [d-Ala(2)]GIP reduced adipose tissue infiltration of IFN-gamma-pro
28                  Administration of [d-Ala(2)]GIP resulted in adipocytes of increased size, increased
29                       Furthermore, [d-Ala(2)]GIP treatment induced a favorable adipose tissue adipoki
30 ) using the long-acting GIP analog [d-Ala(2)]GIP.
31 p plasma glucose above 2 mmol/L (155 +/- 36 [GIP] vs. 232 +/- 40 [GLP-1] vs. 212 +/- 56 [saline] mg k
32 cited larger glucagon responses (164 +/- 50 [GIP] vs. 23 +/- 25 [GLP-1] vs. 17 +/- 46 [saline] min pm
33 le-blinded order intravenous infusions of A) GIP(3-30)NH(2) (800 pmol/kg/min) plus exendin(9-39)NH(2)
34 hibition of 11beta-HSD1 completely abolished GIP-induced effects on FFA release.
35 -induced obesity (DIO) using the long-acting GIP analog [d-Ala(2)]GIP.
36        Accurate detection of the most active GIP is desirable to assess the potential celiac toxicity
37 GIP-mediated insulin secretion and adipocyte GIP-R expression in subjects with well-controlled T2DM.
38  This study determines if xenin-25 amplifies GIP-mediated GSIS in humans with normal glucose toleranc
39 d neurotensin-related peptide that amplifies GIP-mediated GSIS in hyperglycemic mice.
40 udies unmasked a neural relay that amplifies GIP-mediated insulin secretion in a pattern reciprocal t
41 DPP-4 inhibition but reduced total GLP-1 and GIP (feedback inhibition) without affecting the numerica
42 humans, SGLT1 substrates stimulate GLP-1 and GIP and slow gastric emptying, regardless of whether the
43                                    GLP-1 and GIP exert their actions predominantly through unique G p
44                                    GLP-1 and GIP promote beta-cell proliferation and survival in rode
45                      We found that GLP-1 and GIP recruit a highly coordinated subnetwork of beta cell
46 ists AM-1638 and AM-6226 stimulate GLP-1 and GIP secretion from intestinal enteroendocrine cells and
47 sion, sitagliptin increased intact GLP-1 and GIP through DPP-4 inhibition but reduced total GLP-1 and
48                                 In GLP-1 and GIP, a single thioamide near the scissile bond renders t
49        Blood glucose, plasma total GLP-1 and GIP, serum insulin, and gastric emptying were determined
50 ncretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide), resp
51 se, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP.
52  consequence of rapid glucose appearance and GIP hypersecretion.
53 oric intake and improve glucose control, and GIP action to potentiate the incretin effect and buffer
54 usions of GIP, GIP(3-30)NH2, or both GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 During infusion of GIP(3-30)NH2 alone and i
55             Insulin release was greater, and GIP release less, in obese than in lean subjects (both P
56 can result in lower postprandial insulin and GIP concentrations, but not necessarily in a lower glyce
57 however, the observed changes in insulin and GIP suggest early disturbances in the insulin-incretin a
58 ter increase in plasma glucose, insulin, and GIP concentrations after surgery, which was accompanied
59 [(125)I-Tyr(10)]GIP(1-30) as radioligand and GIP(1-30) as control peptide.
60       The interactions of GLP-1 receptor and GIP receptor were characterized with BRET donor saturati
61 somatostatin receptors, GLP-1 receptors, and GIP receptors would allow detecting virtually all NETs a
62 ones using the novel GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH(2) and the well-established GLP-1 receptor a
63 Kaneko and colleagues show that antagonizing GIP signaling in the CNS enhances the weight-reducing ef
64 ew drugs based on other gut hormones such as GIP, ghrelin, oxyntomodulin and peptide YY.
65 mol/kg/min; 20-240 min: 450 pmol/kg/min), B) GIP(3-30)NH(2), C) exendin(9-39)NH(2), and D) saline, re
66                                      Because GIP has antilipolytic and lipogenic effects in adipocyte
67 ification of this unprecedented link between GIP and OPN in adipose tissue might open new avenues for
68  and further elucidated the relation between GIP, 11beta-HSD1, and fatty acid metabolism.
69                                      Blunted GIP responsiveness in Retn(+/-) and Retn(-/-) adipocytes
70 sulinemia, 2) insulinotropic effects of both GIP and GLP-1, 3) additive to supra-additive effects on
71 brane and intracellular compartments of both GIP-stimulated and unstimulated adipocytes.
72 tant infusions of GIP, GIP(3-30)NH2, or both GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 During infusion of GIP(3-30)NH2 alo
73 besogenic consequences of antagonizing brain GIP action.
74 etion and beta-cell exocytosis stimulated by GIP.
75 Distal (GLP-1/PYY/NT), but not proximal (CCK/GIP), enteroendocrine responses were generally greater i
76 sensitization or downregulation of beta-cell GIP receptors (GIP-R).
77 tions of insulin, glucagon, cholecystokinin, GIP, GLP-1, and PYY, and an increase in total energy int
78 onoclonal antibody for selectively depleting GIP in samples from two different gluteomes.
79 increase in circulating intestinally derived GIP, as a consequence of overnutrition, acts in the brai
80 ts without duodenal damage had no detectable GIP.
81                                  Determining GIP concentrations in several urine samples may be an es
82 DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG1), [Lys(16)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG2), and [Nle(14), Lys(30)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(
83 0)NH2 (EG2), and [Nle(14), Lys(30)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG4) were conjugated with Ahx-DOTA via the
84 ides [Lys(30)(aminohexanoic acid [Ahx]-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG1), [Lys(16)(Ahx-DOTA)]GIP(1-30)NH2 (EG2
85 th GIP, whereas it increased fivefold during GIP alone.
86 to maintain the clamp were lower than during GIP alone.
87                    In conclusion, endogenous GIP affects postprandial plasma glucose excursions and i
88 ual and combined contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1 to the postprandial changes in glucose and
89 pe 2 diabetes, 1) the capacity of endogenous GIP to lower blood glucose is impaired; 2) the effect of
90 ypoglycemia in patients with T1DM, exogenous GIP increases glucagon responses during the recovery pha
91                                      Fasting GIP concentrations are higher in individuals with a hist
92                                      Fasting GIP levels remained unchanged.
93 randial GLP-1, postprandial PYY, and fasting GIP levels were included.
94               Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GIP and GLP-1 was also done on intestinal biopsies of al
95                           IHC positivity for GIP, but not GLP-1, staining cells in duodenum and colon
96 y beneficial immunoregulatory properties for GIP in DIO and reveal that its augmentation ameliorates
97      Together, these data suggest a role for GIP not only as an incretin hormone but also as a trigge
98 o measure indices of IS, beta-cell function, GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon response.
99 -dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), GIP(3-30)NH2, was recently identified as an antagonist o
100 ic clamps with concomitant infusions of GIP, GIP(3-30)NH2, or both GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 During infusi
101  10(-8)), including variants near the GLP2R, GIP, and HLA-DQA1 genes.
102                              In both groups, GIP, GLP-1, and the magnitude of incretin effect were gr
103 a-cell function despite significantly higher GIP levels.
104 induced secretion of insulinotropic hormone (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) in wild-type an
105                                     However, GIP also enhances glucocorticoid secretion and promotes
106 high potencies to mouse, rat, dog, and human GIP receptors with a Ki of 7 nm for the human GIPr.
107  cell line INR1G9 transfected with the human GIP receptor (INR1G9-hGIPr).
108 tly identified as an antagonist of the human GIP receptor.
109 treotide, (125)I-GLP-1(7-36)amide, or (125)I-GIP(1-30), with the binding using a cocktail of all 3 ra
110                            Our data identify GIP-regulated metabolic pathways that are targeted by fe
111 oligand indicated the feasibility of imaging GIP receptor-positive tumors.
112       After surgery, indices of IS improved, GIP and glucagon levels decreased significantly in both
113 y increased plasma GIP levels, no changes in GIP or GLP-1 were observed after DJB and jejunectomy.
114 (2)]GLP-1/GcG, stimulated cAMP production in GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptor-transfected cells.
115 ine whether resistin has additional roles in GIP-regulated adipocyte functions.
116 (2)]GLP-1/GcG via multiple targets including GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptors.
117           In parallel, we observed increased GIP-R mRNA expression in subcutaneous abdominal adipocyt
118 pogenic effects in adipocytes, the increased GIP-R expression may mediate accretion of fat in patient
119 ed, but the insulinotropic effect of infused GIP was unchanged following 12 weeks of pioglitazone tre
120        In addition, the antagonist inhibited GIP-induced increase in ATBF and decreased the adipose t
121  (SGLT1) with phloridzin partially inhibited GIP, GLP-1 and PYY secretion by 45%, suggesting another
122 13 antagonizes the GIP receptor and inhibits GIP-induced insulin secretion in vitro and in vivo.
123 xpected, sitagliptin augmented plasma-intact GIP substantially and intact GLP-1 modestly.
124 -expressing (DT) mice that specifically lack GIP-producing cells were backcrossed five to eight times
125 ings to the whole Bowland Shale, the maximum GIP equate to potentially economically recoverable reser
126 ltogether, our data show that during mitosis GIPs play a role in gamma-tubulin complex localization,
127 his research advances the idea that multiple GIP signaling pathways and mechanisms exist in the obese
128 ins why GLP-1, which signals via Gq, but not GIP, which signals preferentially via Gs, can effectivel
129 cal actions and therapeutic utility of novel GIP/glucagon/GLP-1 hybrid peptides.
130 and glucoregulatory hormones using the novel GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH(2) and the well-esta
131 (94%) and negative predictive value (97%) of GIP measurements in relation to duodenal biopsy findings
132           This study examined the ability of GIP(3-30)NH2 to antagonize the physiological actions of
133 s beneficial to boost or block the action of GIP to promote weight loss remains an unresolved questio
134 2 to antagonize the physiological actions of GIP in glucose metabolism, subcutaneous abdominal adipos
135 rticoids using pharmacological activation of GIP receptor (GIPR) signaling with [d-Ala(2)]GIP in mice
136 of 22) of patients had measurable amounts of GIP in the urine.
137 ry of GIP sensitivity following cessation of GIP stimulation.
138 HV resulted in lower plasma concentration of GIP (P<0.001), higher plasma concentration of glucose (P
139 ith an increase of ghrelin and a decrease of GIP-labeled cells.
140 r regulation of the insulinotropic effect of GIP in subjects with T2DM.
141  of the antagonist on the incretin effect of GIP.
142                    We studied the effects of GIP and GLP-1 on glucagon responses to insulin-induced h
143 ependent, we examined whether the effects of GIP on energy balance and glycemia are regulated by gluc
144    Here we demonstrate unexpected effects of GIP signaling in the vasculature.
145 lates with desensitization to the effects of GIP.
146 bition of PI3Kgamma blocked these effects of GIP.
147 tion studies combined with the expression of GIP-green fluorescent protein fusions have shown that GI
148                                  Infusion of GIP increases plasma OPN concentrations in healthy indiv
149 both GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 During infusion of GIP(3-30)NH2 alone and in combination with GIP, insulin
150 g) or placebo, combined with 2) infusions of GIP (1.5 pmol/kg/min), GLP-1 (0.5 pmol/kg/min), or salin
151 linemic clamps with concomitant infusions of GIP, GIP(3-30)NH2, or both GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 During i
152 6, compared with db/+ mice, but injection of GIP did not lead to production of GLP1 or reduce glycemi
153                          The introduction of GIP testing as an assessment technique for GFD adherence
154 a inhibition, demonstrating that the loss of GIP-induced actin depolymerization was indeed limiting i
155 tin was demonstrated to be a key mediator of GIP stimulation of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, in
156  and substantially enhanced SL(predicted) of GIP over control, irrespective of storage conditions.
157 he plasma membrane and a delayed recovery of GIP sensitivity following cessation of GIP stimulation.
158  to investigate the immunoregulatory role of GIP in a murine model of diet-induced obesity (DIO) usin
159 o further understand the biological roles of GIP.
160 2) triggers the glucose-induced secretion of GIP and GLP-1, and 3) triggers the upregulation of GLUT2
161  determinant of the comparative secretion of GIP and GLP-1, as well as the magnitude of the incretin
162 or presence of phloridzin), the secretion of GIP, GLP-1 and PYY was sensitive to K+(ATP)-sensitive ch
163 tial to be used for the in vivo targeting of GIP receptor-positive tumors.
164 -2.9%, 13%; P = 0.22), whereas the effect on GIP again differed between groups (+78% in controls, P <
165 d NT (+71%, P < 0.01), whereas the effect on GIP differed between groups (+90% in controls, P < 0.01;
166 oteins and hydrolysates had little impact on GIP secretion.
167 etermined the effects of 4 sweet preloads on GIP and GLP-1 release, gastric emptying, and postprandia
168 onged in vivo exposure to support studies on GIP biology.
169 -controlled trial of pioglitazone therapy on GIP-mediated insulin secretion and adipocyte GIP-R expre
170 ncretin effect without reduction in GLP-1 or GIP, similar to that seen in adult dysglycemia.
171 cted insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, or GIP.
172 ocytes, suggesting that GIP signaling and/or GIP responsiveness were compromised in Retn(+/-) and Ret
173 lycerol, FFA, insulin, glucose, glucagon, or GIP related to protein type or MC-SFA content.
174                               Paradoxically, GIP levels were also induced in these mice.
175 he insulinotropic glucose-dependant peptide (GIP) and of the beta-microseminoprotein (MSMB) were sign
176 lusively for the gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) receptor and the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) re
177 es glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is characterize
178    Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) induces production of interleukin 6 (IL6) by adipoc
179 nd glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) receptors, can be overexpressed in gut and bronchia
180 , glucose-responsive insulinotropic peptide (GIP), forskolin) that act upon glucose transporters, pot
181 e secretion of gluco-insulinotropic peptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide tyrosi
182 n, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), glucose and acetaminophen.
183 ulness of urine gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) as a biomarker monitoring GFD adherence in celiac p
184 fication of the gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) by using G12 mAb.
185 to the relevant gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP).
186 "recovery phase." During the recovery phase, GIP infusions elicited larger glucagon responses (164 +/
187 es used to predict the maximum gas in place (GIP) in the absence of production data.
188          Since the majority of gas-in-place (GIP) is stored as an adsorbed phase in fine pores of coa
189 n, serum C-peptide, plasma GLP-1, and plasma GIP responses (P=0.03-0.001) and decreased plasma glucos
190 rointestinal glucose disposal (GIGD), plasma GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon secretion in health and type 2
191             While ileectomy increased plasma GIP levels, no changes in GIP or GLP-1 were observed aft
192 d stimulated gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels.
193 etion of the gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) prevents high-fat diet (HFD)-induce
194 in increased gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) secretion.
195 vestigation, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), as proof-of-principle peptides to demonstrate the
196 ecystokinin, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and peptide tyros
197 (GLP-1), and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP).
198 lso known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)] and its receptor (GIPR) may link overnutrition to
199 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) action may occur through desensitization or downreg
200 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 are incretins secreted by respective K an
201 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon receptors.
202 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are secreted po
203 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion, on g
204 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were measured.
205 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), is unknown.
206 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are altered in the disease state.
207 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are incretin hormones that control the secretion of
208 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are two incretins secreted from gastrointestinal ce
209 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) gene transcripts were observed in the gut of Hnf1al
210 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in response to oral glucose.
211 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in the splanchnic region in 10 obese patients with
212 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a strong stimulator of adipogenesis and may play
213 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an endogenous hormonal factor (incretin) that, u
214 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone that also plays a regulatory
215 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone that mediates postprandial i
216 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone with extrapancreatic effects
217 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is glucagonotropic, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GL
218 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (G
219 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) prevents weight gain and leads to d
220 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor transduce nutrient-stimulated signals to c
221 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor, and pyruvate carboxylase) that are import
222 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor.
223 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were analyzed.
224 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were measured.
225 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)) are secreted from enteroendocrine cells in the int
226 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), a protein with potential therapeutic activity for
227 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), an incretin hormone secreted from gastrointestinal
228 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and cholecystokinin (leucine study only) were meas
229 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon bind to related members of the same r
230 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and insulin, and improved oral glucose tolerance i
231 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), by inhibiting their breakdown.
232 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), cholecystokinin (CCK), peptide YY (PYY), and neuro
233 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), GIP(3-30)NH2, was recently identified as an antago
234 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), cholecystokinin (
235 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), has garnered much attention as a potential target:
236 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), slow gastric emptying, and reduce postprandial gly
237 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP).
238 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP, also known as gastric inhibitory polypeptide) recep
239 lucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]), whereas metformin may increase GLP-1 levels.
240                   Gingerols infused product (GIP), with 3.67 mg gingerols/100 g and non-infused produ
241 ch is based on Gaussian Interaction Profile (GIP) kernel on the drug-drug interaction profiles and th
242 se and circRNA Gaussian Interaction Profile (GIP) kernel similarity information based on known circRN
243       Human glutaminase interacting protein (GIP), also known as tax interacting protein 1, is unique
244 ulin complex protein 3-interacting proteins (GIPs) in Arabidopsis centromere regulation.
245 r downregulation of beta-cell GIP receptors (GIP-R).
246 me mice were given injections of recombinant GIP, IL6, GLP, a neutralizing antibody against IL6 (anti
247 ele showed protective properties via reduced GIP effects.
248 ese results show PPARgamma agonists regulate GIP-R expression through PPREs in human adipocytes, but
249 th 2-h intravenous administration of saline, GIP, or GLP-1.
250       Studies in rodents and cell lines show GIP-R expression can be regulated through peroxisome pro
251 l/min], a rate that predominantly stimulates GIP but not GLP-1) after sitagliptin versus control in 1
252 fects on insulin secretion when combining SU+GIP and SU+GLP-1, respectively, and 4) increased fasting
253                     Downstream, we find that GIP, much like glucose stimulation, activates the small
254 ts from human beings and mice, we found that GIP induces production of IL6 by alpha cells, leading to
255 -), Retn(+/-), and Retn(+/+) mice found that GIP stimulated the PKB/LKB1/AMPK/LPL pathway and fatty a
256 e adipose tissue TAG uptake, indicating that GIP also plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism.
257 P within human glioma cells, indicating that GIP might be a potential target for anticancer therapeut
258  Importantly, recent evidence suggested that GIP is a potential suppressor of inflammation in several
259 nly in Retn(+/+) adipocytes, suggesting that GIP signaling and/or GIP responsiveness were compromised
260                       We thus postulate that GIPs are required to ensure CENH3 deposition and/or main
261                                 We show that GIPs form a complex with CENH3 in cycling cells.
262  fluorescent protein fusions have shown that GIPs colocalize with gamma-tubulin, GCP3, and/or GCP4 an
263 e week, urine samples were collected and the GIP concentrations were tested.
264                      Gipg013 antagonizes the GIP receptor and inhibits GIP-induced insulin secretion
265 ed high affinity toward GIP receptor for the GIP conjugates.
266                      A common variant of the GIP receptor (GIPR) (rs10423928) gene was associated wit
267 g target for diabetes, the importance of the GIP receptor (GIPR) for the function of beta cells remai
268        GIP signals through activation of the GIP receptor (GIPR), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)
269                                  Most of the GIP were retained by the G12-agarose and represented the
270                                       On the GIP days, significantly less exogenous glucose was neede
271  both oleic acid and 2-OG contributed to the GIP response.
272  (pmol/L) x 120 min; P = 0.733], whereas the GIP response was higher for olive oil than for C8-dietar
273       The antibody epitope overlaps with the GIP binding site on the GIPr ECD, ensuring competitive a
274 ere identified to be critical for binding to GIP through site-directed mutagenesis studies.
275  troglitazone increased PPARgamma binding to GIP-R PPREs.
276 tcome of beta-cell dysfunction consequent to GIP resistance and hyperglucagonemia.
277 cardiovascular disease in humans responds to GIP stimulation with an exaggerated downregulation from
278 he exocytotic and insulinotropic response to GIP receptor activation, whereas responses to the glucag
279 ed the exocytotic and secretory responses to GIP during PI3Kgamma inhibition, demonstrating that the
280 magnitudes of insulin secretory responses to GIP were similar in all groups, ISRs were not restored t
281 impairs the cytoprotective responsiveness to GIP and enhances the magnitude of apoptotic injury, wher
282 stin treatment rescued LPL responsiveness to GIP.
283 Altogether, we ascribe a central function to GIPs for the proper recruitment and/or stabilization of
284  and augmented total and intact GLP-1, total GIP, and glucagon in type 2 diabetic subjects, with no a
285 uration studies) showed high affinity toward GIP receptor for the GIP conjugates.
286 ulation, 94% (17 of 18) had detectable urine GIP; however, between 60% and 80% were asymptomatic and
287                     We here analyzed whether GIP modifies lipid metabolism and further elucidated the
288  development of obesity, we explored whether GIP directly would stimulate OPN expression in adipose t
289                      We investigated whether GIP regulates GLP1 and glycemia via IL6.
290                      We investigated whether GIP-associated pathways may be targeted by fetal program
291  mouse and human pancreatic alpha cells with GIP induced their production of IL6, leading to producti
292         One of the peptides colocalizes with GIP within human glioma cells, indicating that GIP might
293 f GIP(3-30)NH2 alone and in combination with GIP, insulin levels and the total glucose amount infused
294  increased only slightly in combination with GIP, whereas it increased fivefold during GIP alone.
295 the antagonist alone and in combination with GIP.
296 ndogenous glucose production was higher with GIP and lower with GLP-1 compared with saline (P < 0.02)
297  sorted by flow cytometry and incubated with GIP.
298               Injection of control mice with GIP increased plasma levels of GLP1, insulin, and glucos
299 binding of GLP-1 that could be reversed with GIP addition.
300              The effect of SUs together with GIP or GLP-1, respectively, on insulin and glucagon secr

 
Page Top