戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1   Mutagenesis of Asp413 to Thr resulted in a GTF which expressed only about 12% of the wild-type acti
2 caffolds or even chromosomes, and includes a GTF/GFF viewer to visualize and manage annotation files.
3 HA) or buffer, and subsequently exposed to a GTF solution.
4 imulation of TBP binding requires additional GTFs, including TFIIB and Srb4.
5      Compared with GTF in solution, adsorbed GTF displayed activity over a much wider range of pH val
6 shed by formation of glucans by the adsorbed GTF.
7         WSHA was more effective in adsorbing GTF than was naked HA.
8  aluminum hydroxide (alum) with buffer, alum-GTF, or alum-GTF together with either Escherichia coli D
9 s also observed after administration of alum-GTF with the P. gingivalis DNA either together or separa
10 roxide (alum) with buffer, alum-GTF, or alum-GTF together with either Escherichia coli DNA, Fusobacte
11 trary to expectation, animals receiving alum-GTF plus bacterial DNA (P. gingivalis in particular) dem
12  GTF compared to animals immunized with alum-GTF alone.
13 gg, increased the amount of GTF activity and GTF antibody-reactive protein ca. fivefold but did not c
14 ae, we perturb Pol II catalytic activity and GTF function and analyze their effects on TSS usage geno
15 hanced the immunological response to CAT and GTF epitopes, but also extended the protective effect of
16 nct domains, also found in GTF180-DeltaN and GTF-SI glucansucrases of glycoside hydrolase family 70.
17 SOCS]), the effects of P. gingivalis DNA and GTF exposure on rat splenocyte production of SOCS family
18 mooth-surface molar caries in the GBP59- and GTF-immunized S. mutans-infected groups were each signif
19       After 71 days of infection, GBP59- and GTF-injected groups had smaller numbers of S. mutans on
20 weeks after the second injection, GBP59- and GTF-injected rats contained significant levels of saliva
21 ct to induce antibody reactive with GbpB and GTF native proteins, rats were injected subcutaneously w
22 yte proliferative responses to CAT, GLU, and GTF were observed after coimmunization with CAT-GLU comp
23 load increased both GOP and SBR, and GOP and GTF were correlated (P < 0.001), suggesting that the two
24  MAP kinase activation stimulated Pol II and GTF promoter binding.
25 moter bound Pol II in addition to Pol II and GTF recruitment.
26 provide conversion utilities for the VCF and GTF formats.
27 e synthesis of the glucans to which GbpA and GTFs can bind and which promote S. mutans attachment to
28 ator, histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and GTFs onto immobilized chromatin and naked DNA templates
29                  However, the polymerase and GTFs were subsequently lost from the promoter in cells e
30 pression of several genomic islands, such as GTF-B/C, TnSmu, CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR2-Cas, was found t
31                     We are able to associate GTFs to nearly half of all putative promoters and show e
32 gnition of S. mutans cell surface-associated GTF by specific antibodies but had no effect on antibodi
33                               Oral bacterial GTFs use sucrose as a substrate in synthesis of either w
34 ental caries can be induced to peptide-based GTF vaccines after mucosal administration if combined wi
35               The majority of glucan made by GTF adsorbed to parotid saliva-coated HA remained attach
36 r-insoluble glucan synthesis from sucrose by GTF was noted at a concentration as low as 7.8 microgram
37 p in our understanding of gene regulation by GTFs for all three domains of life and provides an examp
38 ng immunization and were analyzed for anti-C-GTF activity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
39  The levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-C-GTF activity in the nasal wash from both groups after im
40                            Plasma IgG anti-C-GTF activity was highest in mice immunized by the i.n. r
41                              The IgA1 anti-C-GTF response in nasal wash samples for liposomal antigen
42 a, and vaginal immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-C-GTF responses and higher levels of plasma IgG anti-C-GTF
43                           IgG and IgA anti-C-GTF responses in serum were detected on day 14.
44 en and MPL-AF had higher salivary IgA anti-C-GTF responses than mice immunized with antigen plus MPL-
45                          Salivary IgA anti-C-GTF responses were induced to a lesser extent.
46 onses and higher levels of plasma IgG anti-C-GTF than the orally immunized groups.
47 n preparation rich in glucosyltransferase (C-GTF) from Streptococcus mutans, alone or in liposomes.
48 tococcus mutans crude glucosyltransferase (C-GTF) with or without MPL-AF added to the vaccine or inco
49 and systemic immune responses to liposomal C-GTF following i.n. immunization.
50                    These results show that C-GTF vaccines were more effective in inducing a local sec
51 tion resulted in an anamnestic response to C-GTF resulting in 10- and 100-fold increases in saliva an
52 idic linkages, whereas the Spp- strain CH107 GTF produced primarily alpha1,6-linked glucans.
53 ng protein-coimmunoprecipitation, ChIP-Chip, GTF perturbation and knockout, and measurement of transc
54  they mediate the recruitment of many common GTFs.
55 ization and were assayed by ELISA for anti-E-GTF activity.
56                  Significantly higher anti-E-GTF responses were detected in saliva and nasal wash sam
57  glucosyltransferase-enriched preparation (E-GTF) administered by nasal or tonsillar topical spray.
58 can-synthesizing glucosyltransferase enzyme (GTF-I) from Streptococcus mutans and thioredoxin from Es
59 s streptococcal glucosyltransferase enzymes (GTF) can provide immunity to dental caries infection.
60  (Taspase1) cleaves a ubiquitously expressed GTF (TFIIA) to enable tissue-specific (testis) transcrip
61 4RPE all had similar levels of extracellular GTF activity, strain CH107 had less than 15% of the pare
62  indicated that the amounts of extracellular GTF protein in all four strains were similar.
63 fferences in a general transcription factor (GTF) binding site motif across several data sets.
64 se II (pol II)-general transcription factor (GTF) complexes are unstable, an assembly of pol II with
65 subunit of the general transcription factor (GTF) TFIIH, drives scanning through its DNA-dependent AT
66  polymerase II general transcription factor (GTF) that has also been implicated in the mechanism of a
67 n of multiple general transcription factors (GTFs) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II).
68 ining all the general transcription factors (GTFs) and the other pol II.
69 licity of generalized transcription factors (GTFs) are required.
70 and conserved general transcription factors (GTFs) assembles and opens DNA upstream of TSSs.
71 zymes and the general transcription factors (GTFs) by activators.
72 (Pol II), and general transcription factors (GTFs) initially occurred at the inducible PPARgamma2 pro
73 e II (Pol II) general transcription factors (GTFs) that are thought to be critical for formation of p
74 teins and the general transcription factors (GTFs) that assemble at TATA-containing promoters.
75 ctivities and general transcription factors (GTFs) to promoters.
76 f a number of general transcription factors (GTFs), all of which have been either cloned or purified
77  of HSFs with general transcription factors (GTFs), as has been described for numerous other transcri
78 ghly purified general transcription factors (GTFs), for differential core promoter-dependent transcri
79 h contain the general transcription factors (GTFs), RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and coactivators.
80 including the General Transcription Factors (GTFs), RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II), co-activators, co
81 ssue-specific general transcription factors (GTFs), such as testis-specific TBP-related factor 2 (TRF
82 se II and its general transcription factors (GTFs).
83  (RNAPII) and general transcription factors (GTFs).
84 y the loss of general transcription factors (GTFs).
85 ) dissociates general transcription factors (GTFs; TFIIA, TFIIB, TBP, TFIIE, TFIIF, and TFIIH) and es
86 x comprising 20 subunits, is among the first GTFs to bind the core promoter.
87 F) or its descendants, gene transfer format (GTF) and GFF3.
88 tein-coding and lncRNA gene transfer format (GTF) annotations to generate enhanced annotations that t
89 erence sequence(s), a Gene Transfer Format (.GTF) file with CDS information and a SNP report(s) in an
90 intermediate in assembly, consisting of four GTFs and promoter DNA, could be isolated and supplemente
91                                    Sera from GTF-immunized rats, assessed for binding to linear pepti
92 for at least 7 of the possible 42 functional GTF pairs.
93              Generalized transfer functions (GTFs) are available to compute the more relevant central
94 0 to -80 Torr, while transfer function gain (GTF) was calculated to assess the linear dynamic relatio
95 PhyloCSF++ annotates coding sequences in GFF/GTF files using precomputed tracks or computes and score
96                         Glucosyltransferase (GTF) enzymes of mutans streptococci are considered virul
97              The enzyme glucosyltransferase (GTF) produced by mutans streptococci is the key factor i
98 ain (GLU) of the enzyme glucosyltransferase (GTF), which is an important virulence factor of Streptoc
99 nd vicinity with GBP59, glucosyltransferase (GTF), or phosphate-buffered saline (sham injection), eac
100 of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferase (GTF).
101 d kinetic properties of glucosyltransferase (GTF) adsorbed onto hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces.
102 inding (GLU) domains of glucosyltransferase (GTF) of mutans streptococci has resulted in enhanced lev
103 ed strong inhibition of glucosyltransferase (GTF), in vitro adherence and glucan-induced agglutinatio
104  Streptococcus sobrinus glucosyltransferase (GTF), an enzyme involved in dental caries pathogenesis,
105 Glucans produced by the glucosyltransferase (GTF) of Streptococcus gordonii confer a hard, cohesive p
106 aliva that inhibits the glucosyltransferase (GTF) of Streptococcus mutans, a virulence enzyme involve
107 f Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases (GTF) have been shown to induce protective immunity in Sp
108 m mutans streptococcal glucosyltransferases (GTF) and glucan binding protein B (GbpB).
109   Mutans streptococcal glucosyltransferases (GTF) have been demonstrated to be effective components o
110                        Glucosyltransferases (GTFs) are key virulence factors in this process, as they
111  enzymatic activity of glucosyltransferases (GTFs) of the mutans group streptococci.
112  acid sequences of the glucosyltransferases (GTFs) of mutans streptococci with those from the alpha-a
113 l-terminal domain with glucosyltransferases (GTFs), the enzymes responsible for catalyzing the synthe
114 onfer specificity for one or more homologous GTF proteins.
115                                     However, GTFs are population averages and therefore may not adapt
116 o the binding modes of previously identified GTF inhibitors.
117  produced via the Fenton reaction inactivate GTF, a factor in the production of dental caries.
118                      This response inhibited GTF enzyme function.
119 ylase complex which is capable of inhibiting GTF and may contribute to control of S. mutans colonizat
120 munization as a simple alternative to intact GTF to enhance protective immunity against cariogenic mi
121              In this study, 20 20-mer linear GTF peptides were synthesized, 17 identified on the basi
122 inding of C/EBP activators, Pol II, and most GTFs preceded the interaction of SWI/SNF enzymes with th
123 owever, cross-reacting antibody to S. mutans GTF or GBP59 was not induced by the respective antigen.
124 ruct also inhibited the ability of S. mutans GTF to synthesize glucan.
125 nd glucan-binding (GLU) domains of S. mutans GTF-I encoded by gtfB.
126 and 1183 to 1473, respectively, of S. mutans GTF-I.
127 e inciting peptide and with intact S. mutans GTF.
128  water-soluble glucan synthesis by S. mutans GTFs (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively).
129 hat calculated for the GBDs of two S. mutans GTFs, one of which catalyzes the synthesis of water-solu
130 T-cell proliferation) was observed to native GTF following MAP 11 (amino acids 847 to 866; VVINNDKFVS
131 y that elicited immunoreactivity with native GTF and demonstrated protection against dental caries in
132                               The ability of GTF to synthesize extracellular glucans was inhibited by
133                            The activities of GTF adsorbed to HA and that remaining in solution were m
134 o be involved with the catalytic activity of GTF.
135  adsorbed to HA was reduced by adsorption of GTF to the same surface and was almost completely abolis
136 ry determinant, rgg, increased the amount of GTF activity and GTF antibody-reactive protein ca. fivef
137  functional significance and conservation of GTF primary structure among enzyme isoforms.
138 her Gly or Ala resulted in enzymes devoid of GTF activity, indicating the essential nature of these t
139 22-mer sequence from the catalytic domain of GTF.
140 r sequence from the glucan binding domain of GTF.
141 insoluble and recombinantly expressed GLU of GTF and that this construct was especially effective in
142 bodies to the glucan-binding region (GLU) of GTF by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
143 l insights into the inhibitory mechanisms of GTF-targeting compounds, strengthening their potential a
144  had previously selected peptide subunits of GTF for vaccine development based on putative functional
145                        Truncated variants of GTF-I from Streptococcus downei MFe28 were purified by m
146 odies are capable of inhibiting a variety of GTF activities.
147 als a dynamic state of TFIIH, the largest of GTFs, in PIC/ITC with distinct functional consequences a
148 ng of the RNR3 promoter requires a number of GTFs, mediator and RNA polymerase II.
149 n alteration in Pol II catalytic activity or GTF function.
150 ) and salivary IgA antibody levels to CAT or GTF than rats immunized with either construct alone.
151 otective immunity induced by either GBP59 or GTF appears to result from antibodies to independent epi
152 t sufficient, in the context of all purified GTFs and RNA polymerase II, to mediate transcription syn
153 R analyses indicated that partially purified GTFs from the Spp+ strains CH1, CH2RPE, and CH4RPE all p
154 TFIIA (DA) recruits pol II and the remaining GTFs to a model promoter in vitro.
155 are unstable, an assembly of pol II with six GTFs and promoter DNA could be isolated in abundant homo
156  14-day intervals with peptides, S. sobrinus GTF, or phosphate-buffered saline.
157 m the communized group inhibited S. sobrinus GTF-mediated insoluble glucan synthesis in vitro above t
158 ized as above or with Streptococcus sobrinus GTF and then infected with S. sobrinus to explore the ef
159 ibited the ability of Streptococcus sobrinus GTF to synthesize insoluble glucan.
160 lucan synthesis by S. mutans and S. sobrinus GTFs (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively).
161 ants, also bound intact mutans streptococcal GTF in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and inhibite
162  inciting antigen, with mutans streptococcal GTFs, and with a 21-mer peptide (CAT) containing an aspa
163                                    Targeting GTFs has emerged as a promising strategy for preventing
164                      A subset of A. thaliana GTFs have also expanded in number, indicating that GTF d
165 imated central BP with greater accuracy than GTFs in the low PP amplification group (e.g., central sy
166 Temperature-activity profiles indicated that GTF adsorbed to surfaces had a lower temperature optimum
167 ave also expanded in number, indicating that GTF diversification and expansion is a general phenomeno
168                          This indicates that GTFs remain associated with pol II much longer than prev
169                                          The GTF-inhibiting factor (GIF) was initially identified as
170 tions in the region of gtfG that encodes the GTF carboxyl terminus were characterized.
171 constructs from the CAT or GLU region of the GTF of mutans streptococci or coimmunized with a combina
172 the original data that helped popularize the GTF.
173 to induce mucosal antibody in the rat to the GTF peptide vaccines HDS and HDS-GLU after intranasal ad
174 ition of the GbpB-derived SYI peptide to the GTF-derived CAT peptide construct not only enhanced the
175  site-directed mutagenesis approach with the GTF-I enzyme of Streptococcus mutans GS-5, we identified
176 nd that, against expectations, TFIID and the GTFs are not sufficient.
177 n system containing TFIID, Mediator, and the GTFs.
178 the mechanisms of catalysis proposed for the GTFs and related enzymes.
179 t of diverse molecular players including the GTFs, the Mediator complex, and DNA repair factors that
180  present in the glucan-binding domain of the GTFs had little overall effect on enzymatic activity, al
181 iption complex containing RNA and all of the GTFs is unstable and is susceptible to extensive backtra
182 of the postinitiation complexes retained the GTFs when pol II was stalled at position +27 relative to
183                        Here we show that the GTFs IIA, IIB, IIF, and IIE are required for efficient R
184    Promoter DNA was associated only with the GTFs, suspended above the pol II cleft and not in contac
185 support the functional significance of these GTF domains in dental caries pathogenesis and present co
186 among the activator proteins and these three GTFs were not detected with other transcription factors,
187 ns revealed their strong binding affinity to GTF.
188 vels of antibody to the CAT construct and to GTF.
189  of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to GTF or CAT in the CAT-GLU group were significantly great
190 s, suggesting that GIF specifically binds to GTF on S. mutans.
191 cts showed proliferation of T lymphocytes to GTF.
192 ry IgA antibody, and T-cell proliferation to GTF compared to animals immunized with alum-GTF alone.
193 arly in this study, the enhanced response to GTF after immunization with the CAT-GLU construct result
194 d in serum IgG and salivary IgA responses to GTF and CAT which were greater than after coimmunization
195  domains of Fos and Jun abolished binding to GTFs, although the presence of DNA was not required for
196           A similar effect was observed when GTF was adsorbed to naked HA from a mixture with lysozym
197 aliva; however, no enhancement was seen when GTF was adsorbed from a mixture with albumin.
198 ion complex, but little is known about which GTFs other than TBP are required.
199                                Compared with GTF in solution, adsorbed GTF displayed activity over a
200 induce immune responses which interfere with GTF-mediated glucan synthesis in vitro, and can protect
201 induce immune responses which interfere with GTF-mediated glucan synthesis.
202 nvolved in protein-protein interactions with GTFs: one is the repressor domain (RD) located in the N-

 
Page Top