ライフサイエンスコーパス: Jupiter

1 th masses similar to or greater than that of Jupiter.

2 = 57.0 days) with a mass 0.37 times that of Jupiter.

3 ing the planets and forming a retrograde hot Jupiter.

4 isotopic composition is the same as that of Jupiter.

5 dies in orbit about the Sun between Mars and Jupiter.

6 nterior of Saturn, and to a lesser extent in Jupiter.

7 he Earth's atmosphere has been discovered in Jupiter.

8 enomenon similar to that on the Earth and in Jupiter.

9 ith mass no greater than a few times that of Jupiter.

10 n contrast to a recent claim for another hot Jupiter.

11 her latitudes flow both east and west, as on Jupiter.

12 seasonal scales at mid- and low latitudes on Jupiter.

13 ers and resonances with one another and with Jupiter.

14 4.617 days and a mass at least 0.69 that of Jupiter.

15 l influence of the newly formed giant planet Jupiter.

16 ays and a minimum mass of 1.14 times that of Jupiter.

17 morphologically from those of both Earth and Jupiter.

18 m, possibly not at its present location near Jupiter.

19 es in polygonal patterns around the poles of Jupiter.

20 retrograde co-orbital asteroid of the planet Jupiter.

21 core-accretion process that may have formed Jupiter.

22 ative energy balance on other planets, as on Jupiter.

23 l energy balance in the middle atmosphere of Jupiter.

24 rmation models indicate a mass twice that of Jupiter.

25 chaos and applying it to Mercury and to hot Jupiters.

26 n migration as a mechanism for producing hot Jupiters.

27 System, and contrasts with the isolated hot Jupiters.

28 ons would be implicated as the origin of hot Jupiters.

29 monoxide (CO) have been detected in two hot Jupiters.

30 ms occur with a frequency similar to the hot Jupiters.

31 te a major channel for the production of hot Jupiters.

32 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), 17 802 apparently healthy men and women with l

33 planet's mass is at most three times that of Jupiter; a higher mass would lead to gravitational disru

34 seen from individual volcanoes near Io's sub-Jupiter and anti-Jupiter points.

35 ontrolled trials of both primary prevention (JUPITER and ASCOT) and secondary prevention (CARE and PR

36 st to planets with masses similar to that of Jupiter and higher, the bulk compositions of planets in

37 planet candidate is roughly the same size as Jupiter and is no more than 14 times as massive (with 95

38 emissions associated with the interaction of Jupiter and its satellite Io extend to a surprisingly hi

39 rms of asteroids following the same orbit as Jupiter and located at the L4 and L5 stable Lagrange poi

40 limited by camera sensitivity, distance from Jupiter and long exposures (about 680 milliseconds to 85

41 of small objects orbiting primarily between Jupiter and Neptune--with an equivalent radius of 124 +/

42 .71 and approximately 0.27 times the mass of Jupiter and orbital separations of approximately 2.3 and

43 Retrograde co-orbital asteroids of Jupiter and other planets may be more common than previo

44 itational resonances during the migration of Jupiter and Saturn approximately 4 Gyr ago.

45 buting to the structural differences between Jupiter and Saturn(16-18).

46 y when the orbital effects of large planets (Jupiter and Saturn) and damping mechanisms, such as gas

47 the cloud into scattered patches (as seen on Jupiter and Saturn).

48 itu dust instruments around the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn, but have hitherto not been observed

49 ion on other icy bodies such as the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, has remained undetected in cometary

50 h show that a popular formation scenario for Jupiter and Saturn, in which Jupiter migrates inward fro

51 al differences between the magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, it has been suggested that cryovolca

52 the internal structures and compositions of Jupiter and Saturn, resulting in profound revisions of o

53 to be important for particle acceleration at Jupiter and Saturn, the electric field produced in the i

54 t step in forming gas-giant planets, such as Jupiter and Saturn, was the production of solid 'cores'

55 Unlike on the icy satellites of Jupiter and Saturn, where tidal forces are responsible f

56 tures of the planets are similar to those of Jupiter and Saturn.

57 planets, but nearly all are gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn.

58 earch for microbial life on the icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn.

59 depletion caused by the orbital migration of Jupiter and Saturn.

60 rents of a different nature were observed at Jupiter and their presence inferred at Saturn.

61 These differences between hot Jupiters and other planetary systems denote a distinctly

62 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and performed replication in a meta-analysis of

63 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and synthesized the results with prior trials.

64 isk, and 25 in those at high genetic risk in JUPITER, and 57, 47, and 20, respectively, in ASCOT.

65 the planetary mass at four times the mass of Jupiter, and constrains the planet's tidal luminosity.

66 rther stratify risk in patients eligible for JUPITER, and could be used to target subgroups of patien

67 red during cruise phase outside the orbit of Jupiter, and find a statistical upper limit on the optic

68 explanation for the high obliquities of hot Jupiters, and dynamical interactions would be implicated

69 gration that produces warm Jupiters over hot Jupiters, and they provide evidence for a population of

70 een in the auroral emissions from Saturn and Jupiter are due to scaling differences in the conditions

71 Hot Jupiters are gas-giant planets orbiting with periods of

72 Many exoplanetary systems containing hot Jupiters are observed to have highly misaligned orbital

73 Stars hosting hot Jupiters are often observed to have high obliquities, wh

74 revealed that a considerable fraction of hot Jupiters are on orbits that are misaligned with respect

75 Close-in giant planets (e.g., "hot Jupiters") are thought to form far from their host stars

76 The atmospheres of these 'hot Jupiters' are heated by the immense stellar irradiation.

77 Indeed, isolated 'hot Jupiters' are often misaligned and even orbiting retrogr

78 edictions for the most highly irradiated hot-Jupiter atmospheres.

79 Among such intermediate-risk patients, a JUPITER-based strategy becomes cost-saving at a rosuvast

80 In JUPITER, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD even

81 oid belt lies between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, but the region is not uniformly filled with ast

82 he Jupiter-Sun system (leading and following Jupiter by 60 degrees ).

83 e orbits lie close to their host stars ('hot Jupiters') can largely be accounted for by planetary mig

84 In JUPITER, cholesterol efflux capacity was associated with

85 The hot Jupiters closest to their parent stars, at orbital dista

86 rticular, we predict that liquid iron in the Jupiter core is in the "rigid liquid" state and is highl

87 A hot Jupiter could be the end state of a secularly chaotic pl

88 tween a large planetary embryo and the proto-Jupiter could have shattered its primordial compact core

89 ligned electron beams associated with the Io-Jupiter coupling, for example, create an auroral footpri

90 results from a comparative study of ten hot Jupiters covering the wavelength range 0.3-5 micrometres

91 (JUPITER-Crestor 20 mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Ca

92 (JUPITER-Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Car

93 JUPITER demonstrated that in primary prevention rosuvast

94 ses, the dispersed millisecond pulses called Jupiter dispersed pulses (JDPs) provide evidence of low

95 In images taken in Jupiter eclipse, nonthermal visible-wavelength emission

96 2.6 million women age > or =60 years meeting JUPITER eligibility criteria had fasting LDL-C <130 mg/d

97 Extrapolating JUPITER eligibility to NHANES, an estimated 6.5 million

98 ligible participants, 18.2% (n = 1,621) were JUPITER-eligible (hs-CRP > or = 2.0 mg/l, LDL-C <130 mg/

99 Rosuvastatin treatment for JUPITER-eligible patients appears to be cost-effective,

100 this study is to describe the proportion of "JUPITER-eligible" (Justification for the Use of statins

101 Atheroslcerosis (MESA) met all criteria for JUPITER entry.

102 e equivalent (including diabetes), and other JUPITER exclusions.

103 with observations and in studies of the hot Jupiter exoplanet HD 189733b leads to up to a 20-fold in

104 Recent studies show that some hot-Jupiter exoplanets have much weaker water absorption fea

105 'Hot Jupiter' extrasolar planets are expected to be tidally l

106 rared observations of more than a dozen 'hot-Jupiter' extrasolar planets have now been reported.

107 About 25 per cent of 'hot Jupiters' (extrasolar Jovian-mass planets with close-in

108 rge gaps in compositional maps of Ganymede's Jupiter-facing hemisphere.

109 in situ measurement of the D/H ratio in the Jupiter family comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the RO

110 the direct in situ measurement of N2 in the Jupiter family comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, made by

111 wide range of D/H ratios in the water within Jupiter family objects and preclude the idea that this r

112 rs per second from an orbit close to that of Jupiter-family comets (Tisserand's parameter = 2.8 +/- 0

113 The JUPITER findings are supported by two recent meta-analys

114 Of these locations, Jupiter Florida/Vero Beach has the highest settlement ra

115 ly given the inputs and limits of the model; Jupiter Florida/Vero Beach, the Cape Hatteras Tropical L

116 is has been interpreted as evidence that hot-Jupiter formation is linked to dynamical disruption, as

117 What atmospheric properties distinguish Jupiter from Saturn, which has only one cyclone at each

118 ovided the motivation for our meta-analysis (JUPITER) had little impact on the findings for venous th

119 has only one large satellite, Titan, whereas Jupiter has four large satellites; additional large sate

120 However, radiative forcing on Jupiter has traditionally been attributed to solar heati

121 Europa, the innermost icy satellite of Jupiter, has a tortured young surface and sustains a liq

122 ng outer ice shell about the tidal axis with Jupiter, has been proposed as a possible explanation for

123 If JUPITER hazard ratios were applied to this group, the nu

124 ement between the mass retrieved for the hot Jupiter HD 189733b from transmission spectroscopy with t

125 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), HDL size and HDL-P were measured by nuclear ma

126 ccurred at either pole since Juno arrived at Jupiter in 2016.

127 ity are similar to variations seen closer to Jupiter in Galileo data.

128 l friction, and find that we can produce hot Jupiters in orbits that are retrograde with respect to t

129 tion in the deep metallic hydrogen region of Jupiter is believed to generate its magnetic field, the

130 actions with the solar wind, whereas that at Jupiter is formed through interactions with plasma from

131 Dust near Jupiter is produced when interplanetary impactors collid

132 Thus, Jupiter is the oldest planet of the Solar System, and it

133 cipants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevent

134 vastatin in apparently healthy adults in the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevent

135 luate the cost-effectiveness of applying the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevent

136 Within the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevent

137 or patients with a proinflammatory response, JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevent

138 Rosuvastatin therapy in the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary

139 rdiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm] and JUPITER [Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevent

140 ency (=0.02), and randomized clinical trial (JUPITER [Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary

141 count for the mass loss required to reduce a Jupiter-like gas giant, they can remove a small (a few E

142 ric stability between 0.14 and 0.16 au for a Jupiter-like planet orbiting a solar-type star.

143 guration of these planets, combined with the Jupiter-like size of their host star-named TRAPPIST-1-ma

144 ightness of the host star, combined with its Jupiter-like size, offers the possibility of thoroughly

145 gnetosphere was reduced, resulting in a more Jupiter-like system, in agreement with the dearth of aur

146 95 per cent upper limit on the frequency of Jupiter-mass free-floating or wide-orbit planets of 0.25

147 a large population of unbound or wide-orbit Jupiter-mass planets (reported to be almost twice as com

148 could limit the largest moons of extrasolar Jupiter-mass planets to Moon-to-Mars size.

149 rbital period of 0.94 days and a mass of ten Jupiter masses (10 M(Jup)), resulting in a tidal interac

150 Jupiter radii, and a mass of less than 0.18 Jupiter masses at 3sigma confidence.

151 131399Ab is one of the lowest mass (4 +/- 1 Jupiter masses) and coldest (850 +/- 50 kelvin) exoplane

152 The planet has a minimum mass of 0.46 Jupiter masses, very high for such a small host star, an

153 tudies are incomplete for objects below five Jupiter masses.

154 'Hot Jupiters' (massive, short-period exoplanets) predominant

155 on scenario for Jupiter and Saturn, in which Jupiter migrates inward from a > 5 astronomical units (A

156 artery disease (CAD) in both the WGHS and in JUPITER (N = 8,749), a randomized trial of rosuvastatin

157 tiple mechanisms for generating lightning on Jupiter need to be considered for a full understanding o

158 his efficient separation is the formation of Jupiter, opening a gap in the disk and preventing the ex

159 extrasolar giant planets--the so-called 'hot Jupiters'--orbit within 0.05 au of their primary stars (

160 ere I report the detection of an unusual hot Jupiter orbiting the primary star of a triple stellar sy

161 a number of missions that visited or flew by Jupiter over the past several decades.

162 ersion of tidal migration that produces warm Jupiters over hot Jupiters, and they provide evidence fo

163 n Ceres, the largest object between Mars and Jupiter, over the last 4.55 Gyr.

164 JUPITER participants included 6801 women > or =60 years

165 Among white JUPITER participants treated with potent statin therapy,

166 ith those with eGFR >or=60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), JUPITER participants with moderate CKD had higher vascul

167 h CRP reduction among 3380 placebo-allocated JUPITER participants.

168 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) participants, we tested whether lipids, apolipo

169 spacecraft acquired science observations of Jupiter, passing less than 5000 kilometers above the equ

170 h for planetary companions orbiting near hot Jupiter planet candidates (Jupiter-size candidates with

171 etection of TiO in the atmosphere of the hot-Jupiter planet WASP-19b.

172 in space exploration missions (i.e., Venus &Jupiter planetary exploration, and heliophysics missions

173 o be abundant in the upper atmosphere of hot-Jupiter planets, but is not identifiable here; therefore

174 mary sources of non-continuum opacity in hot-Jupiter planets.

175 Models of these 'hot Jupiter' planets predict a flux peak near 10 microm, whe

176 Yet models of such 'hot-Jupiter' planets predict an abundance of atmospheric wat

177 ual volcanoes near Io's sub-Jupiter and anti-Jupiter points.

178 ng has been seen on other planets, including Jupiter, polar lightning has been known only on Earth.

179 444 (47%) patients in the MESA JUPITER population had CAC scores of 0 and, in this grou

180 association between these quartiles and the JUPITER primary endpoint of first non-fatal myocardial i

181 INTERPRETATION: In the JUPITER primary prevention trial, the cardiovascular and

182 meta-analysis across the WOSCOPS, ASCOT, and JUPITER primary prevention, relative risk reduction in t

183 w exoplanets with sizes between 0.37 and 1.6 Jupiter radii and orbital periods from 3.2 to 4.9 days w

184 o, a giant nebula extending out to about 500 Jupiter radii, and a jet close to Io.

185 of 0.07 astronomical units, a radius of 0.4 Jupiter radii, and a mass of less than 0.18 Jupiter mass

186 of the hot Jupiter, the innermost planet was Jupiter (rather than Mercury) sized, and its chaotic evo

187 intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) reignited attention on the link between statin

188 d spectral measurements over five successive Jupiter rotations at spatial resolutions of 200 to 140 k

189 nvection originating near the 5-bar level of Jupiter's atmosphere (assuming photon scattering from po

190 Radio wavelengths can probe altitudes in Jupiter's atmosphere below its visible cloud layers.

191 Jupiter's atmosphere is stable, so somewhere between 5 a

192 Several observations of Jupiter's atmosphere made by instruments on the New Hori

193 downward, discrete electron acceleration in Jupiter's auroral polar regions.

194 However, preliminary in situ measurements of Jupiter's auroral regions yielded no evidence of such a

195 As such, our results indicate that Jupiter's core grew to approximately 20 Earth masses wit

196 nterior, including the existence and mass of Jupiter's core.

197 quatorial wave, bringing up ammonia gas from Jupiter's deep atmosphere.

198 Jupiter's diluted core, combined with its possible high

199 ximately 2 x 10(-8) is comparable to that of Jupiter's faintest gossamer ring, although its particle

200 The best known exceptions are Jupiter's gossamer rings and Saturn's E ring, broad shee

201 1) has provided an accurate determination of Jupiter's gravitational field(2), which has been used to

202 pirals, each winding up at a rate defined by Jupiter's gravity field.

203 uno's passage over the poles and traverse of Jupiter's hazardous inner radiation belts.

204 he comparatively sparse crater population on Jupiter's icy moon Europa and suggest that this assumpti

205 The New Horizons spacecraft observed Jupiter's icy satellites Europa and Ganymede during its

206 Jupiter's inward migration entrained s greater, similar

207 plasmoids-and contains ions from both Io and Jupiter's ionosphere with intense bursts of H(+) and H(+

208 for example, create an auroral footprint in Jupiter's ionosphere.

209 Ps) provide evidence of low density holes in Jupiter's ionosphere.

210 Intense electromagnetic impulses induced by Jupiter's lightning have been recognised to produce both

211 When the solar wind hits Jupiter's magnetic field, it creates a long magnetotail

212 and the barely understood electron beams in Jupiter's magnetosphere, demonstrate that anti-planetwar

213 conclusively demonstrated by observations in Jupiter's magnetosphere, which--like that of Saturn (but

214 umes on Io's electrodynamic interaction with Jupiter's magnetosphere.

215 ssible source region along the dusk flank of Jupiter's magnetosphere.

216 to Io's atmosphere and its interaction with Jupiter's magnetosphere.

217 Jupiter's magnetospheric dynamics and aurorae are domina

218 Jupiter's magnetotail is the largest cohesive structure

219 This is a weak equivalent of Jupiter's main oval, its relative dimness being due to t

220 Jupiter's main ring shows vertical corrugations reminisc

221 on several moons of the outer planets, with Jupiter's moon Europa having received the most attention

222 We report far-ultraviolet observations of Jupiter's moon Europa taken by Space Telescope Imaging S

223 perature or extreme radiation (e.g. Mercury, Jupiter's moon Europa, near-Sun comets), as well as terr

224 Jupiter's moon Io is known to host active volcanoes.

225 On Jupiter's moon Io, volcanic plumes and evaporating lava

226 te observations of other icy bodies, such as Jupiter's moons Europa and Ganymede, and suggestive of a

227 reminiscent of the Laplace resonance linking Jupiter's moons Io, Europa and Ganymede.

228 Observations of Jupiter's nightside airglow (nightglow) and aurora obtai

229 that inner Oort Cloud objects can penetrate Jupiter's orbit via a largely unexplored dynamical pathw

230 Images of Jupiter's poles show a chaotic scene, unlike Saturn's po

231 within a region extending to nearly half of Jupiter's radius(3,4).

232 Jupiter's relatively steady main aurora has a power dens

233 We exploited Jupiter's rotating magnetic field as a sounding signal a

234 Jupiter's satellite Europa almost certainly hides a glob

235 s that the passage of ring particles through Jupiter's shadow creates the Thebe extension and fully a

236 spacecraft's encounter with Amalthea, one of Jupiter's small inner moons, on 5 November 2002 yield a

237 Several models of Jupiter's structure that fit the probe's data suggest th

238 esults indicate that the interaction between Jupiter's upper atmosphere and near-space environment is

239 to the lack of as large a source of ions as Jupiter's volcanic moon Io.

240 Why Jupiter's vortices occupy this middle range is unknown.

241 plications for the stability and dynamics of Jupiter's weather layer.

242 ave acceleration could also be important for Jupiter, Saturn and other astrophysical objects with mag

243 ults presented have potential application to Jupiter, Saturn and other magnetized astrophysical objec

244 erall properties of the satellite systems of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus arise naturally, and suggest

245 ous ultraviolet imaging we find that, unlike Jupiter, Saturn's aurorae respond strongly to solar wind

246 han being intermediate between the Earth and Jupiter, Saturn's auroral emissions behave fundamentally

247 to those observed at bow shocks upstream of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

248 masses almost equal to 5 to 20 times that of Jupiter, showing they bridge the gap between hotter brow

249 orbiting near hot Jupiter planet candidates (Jupiter-size candidates with orbital periods near 3 d) i

250 st decade, observations of giant exoplanets (Jupiter-size) have provided key insights into their atmo

251 detected atomic and molecular absorption in Jupiter-sized exoplanets, but intense efforts to measure

252 of Earth and Neptune substantially outnumber Jupiter-sized planets.

253 , similar to the CVD event rate noted in the JUPITER study placebo group (1.36% per year over 1.9 yea

254 Questions remain after the JUPITER study, including whether the observed cardiovasc

255 the L4 and L5 stable Lagrange points of the Jupiter-Sun system (leading and following Jupiter by 60

256 loss of vast numbers of heavy ions from the Jupiter system.

257 the planet that channels material out of the Jupiter system.

258 ation in this system (and possibly other hot-Jupiter systems) must be much weaker than in the Solar S

259 -orbit misalignments are not confined to hot-Jupiter systems.

260 y flux from discrete acceleration is less at Jupiter than that caused by broadband or stochastic proc

261 Our results reveal a diverse group of hot Jupiters that exhibit a continuum from clear to cloudy a

262 The 'hot Jupiters' that abound in lists of known extrasolar plane

263 of rosuvastatin were 50% of that observed in JUPITER, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would

264 However, in the case of the hot Jupiter, the innermost planet was Jupiter (rather than M

265 The age of Jupiter, the largest planet in our Solar System, is stil

266 For gas giant planets such as Jupiter, the motion of clouds can be compared with radio

267 sibly correlated with Europa's distance from Jupiter through tidal stress variations.

268 nt results comparing the inclinations of hot Jupiters thus produced with observations.

269 at (NNT) by applying the benefit recorded in JUPITER to the event rates within each CAC strata.

270 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), to a target population of trial-eligible patie

271 objects that are more than 10x as massive as Jupiter, to intermediate-mass Neptune-like objects with

272 y healthy men and women participating in the JUPITER trial (87% of full cohort), we prospectively ass

273 This secondary analysis of the JUPITER trial (a placebo-controlled randomized clinical

274 months in a nested case-control study of the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in P

275 ssed in 9612 multiethnic participants in the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in P

276 of treatment effectiveness were based on the JUPITER trial and were varied in sensitivity analyses.

277 We addressed, using the JUPITER trial cohort, whether this association remains w

278 The JUPITER trial found that rosuvastatin reduces vascular e

279 Myalgia was studied in JUPITER trial participants.

280 The JUPITER trial showed that some patients with LDL-cholest

281 dertook an analysis of participants from the JUPITER trial to address the balance of vascular benefit

282 cipants in the randomised placebo-controlled JUPITER trial were adults without diabetes or previous c

283 In the randomised, double-blind JUPITER trial, 17,603 men and women without previous car

284 For 17,802 patients in the JUPITER trial, rosuvastatin 20 mg per day reduced the in

285 to 20 mg/d of rosuvastatin or placebo in the JUPITER trial.

286 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial (NCT00239681).

287 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial before randomization to rosuvastatin 20 m

288 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial of 17,802 initially healthy men and women

289 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial of rosuvastatin users identified a sub-ge

290 Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial.

291 lation that is several times larger than the Jupiter Trojans.

292 identified lightning at high latitudes above Jupiter up to 80 degrees N and 74 degrees S.

293 -wavelength photometry of the transiting hot-Jupiter WASP-12b that reveals C/O >/= 1 in its atmospher

294 In a population eligible for JUPITER, we established whether coronary artery calcium

295 rted into a true mass of 1.85(-0.42)(+0.52)M(Jupiter), which implies that it is a planet, not a brown

296 anomalously large radius (1.35 times that of Jupiter), which may be the result of ongoing tidal dissi

297 n Enceladus and Saturn like that which links Jupiter with Io, Europa and Ganymede.

298 resent evidence that observed eccentric warm Jupiters with eccentric giant companions have mutual inc

299 In contrast, comparison studies of warm Jupiters (with slightly larger orbits) and hot Neptune-s

300 Absolute CVD rates (per 100 person-years) in JUPITER women for rosuvastatin and placebo (0.57 and 1.0