コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 SHIME model was used to study the effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus 1014 on the fermentation patte
2 combination of several probiotics including Lactobacillus acidophilus 5 (LA5), a potent lactic acid-
3 to pathogens, as the Gram-positive bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus, a natural inhabitant of the i
4 m is proposed on the survival and fitness of Lactobacillus acidophilus, a probiotic microbe, in the h
5 coccus faecalis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus among numerous trans-fatty aci
6 al LB supplementation, carried out by giving Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium infantis (
7 Ss from Maple syrup led to a higher count of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis and
8 d probiotic yogurt containing 10(6) cfu/g of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis str
9 e effect of fermentation in monoculture with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactiplantibacillus planta
10 s study focuses on the S-layer proteins from Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus amylovorus c
11 scores of 0.5 +/- 0.06 and 0.51 +/- 0.05 for Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, respe
12 re the functions of multiple BSHs encoded by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus gasseri Our
13 oward well-known probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum, w
14 as the oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Fusobacterium nucleatum.
16 on with Saccharomyces cerevisiae LPB-287 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 to produce bioethan
17 llaceae species found in the gut microbiota, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactiplantibacil
18 hromosomal integration method, we engineered Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 to display human CD4
19 nducted to establish proteolytic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC(R) 4356), Lactobacillus
20 re of six viable strains including 107 mg of Lactobacillus acidophilus BCMC(R) 12,130, Lactobacillus
21 bjects with and without hypochlorhydria with Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 for 7 d failed to chang
23 esigned to determine whether oral feeding of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 leads to a lactose-tole
24 randomly assigned subjects (n = 18) ingested Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 twice per day for 7 d a
26 uction and symptom scores after ingestion of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 were not significantly
27 estinal bacterial species (Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subs
28 e a multistrain probiotic mixture (including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and
30 A specific probiotic formulation composed of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LB
31 without any exclusion, a probiotic (Bio-K+: Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LB
34 olyticus, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, and Lactobacillus acidophilus did not enhance HIV expression
38 coccus gordonii, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Lactobacillus acidophilus), in planktonic cells or biofi
42 testinal expression of SLC20A1 that binds to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) CdpA cell wal
43 e the lncRNA-miR-mRNA network in response to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) consumption i
44 e isolated and identified from food samples: Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus), L. pentosus,
47 xtracts, some increasing 1.4-2 Log cycles of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium anima
48 d chickpea flour blends were fermented using Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 to assess the effect of l
49 's milk using bacterial cultures comprising, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis
50 herein delved into the microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) into solid lipid micropar
51 L. lactis subsp. cremoris (R704); QLA - with Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5); QLP - with Lactobacill
52 biotics (Streptococcus thermophilus [ST] and Lactobacillus acidophilus [LA]), or the commensal, Bacte
54 ptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus sanguinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Actinomy
55 sed the capacity of four probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactob
57 ts received placebo or a probiotic compound (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifi
61 d that the probiotic Gram-positive bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM is not harmful to C. eleg
62 nnotation of the early draft phase genome of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM revealed the previously d
63 for lipoteichoic acid (LTA) biosynthesis in Lactobacillus acidophilus (NCK2025) rendered this bacter
64 ducts: Infloran (Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus) or Labinic (B. bifidum, B. lo
65 as to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus PTCC 1643 and Lactobacillus fe
66 inase (dAK)-deoxyguanosine kinase (dGK) from Lactobacillus acidophilus R-26 exhibit contrasting confo
67 oxynucleoside kinases required for growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus R-26 exist as heterodimeric pa
68 ial species or strains, a specific strain of Lactobacillus acidophilus, referred to as LA1, uniquely
70 A vaccine strategy was established by using Lactobacillus acidophilus to deliver Bacillus anthracis
71 ium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, L acidophilus W55, Lactic
72 nery involved in carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus was characterized genetically
73 ce of low pH on inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus acidophilus was investigated by the use of
74 By multifactorial analysis, the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus was negatively associated with