戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  11 days after experimental inoculation with M. gallisepticum.
2 upon direct contact of HD-11 cells with live M. gallisepticum.
3 ing the first genome-scale reconstruction of M. gallisepticum.
4 or transmission potential, among isolates of M. gallisepticum.
5 ce of naive juveniles or the introduction on M. gallisepticum.
6 ce increased rapidly after reintroduction of M. gallisepticum.
7 ucidate genomic variability among strains of M. gallisepticum.
8 he GAA repeats in M9/pMGA gene expression in M. gallisepticum.
9  antiserum recognizes a 150-kDa protein from M. gallisepticum.
10 served interaction between house finches and M. gallisepticum.
11 he understanding of the relationship between M. gallisepticum and LPAIV during copathogenesis in the
12 ponses to monoinfection and coinfection with M. gallisepticum and LPAIV highlighted the involvement o
13 genes suggest that coinfection with virulent M. gallisepticum and LPAIV induces decreases in the expr
14  promoterless lacZ gene and transformed into M. gallisepticum by using transposon Tn4001 as a vector.
15 inate catabolism and all genes examined from M. gallisepticum, C. perfringens, and S. pneumoniae were
16                     The initial emergence of M. gallisepticum caused a rapid halving of house finch d
17                                              M. gallisepticum cgMLST represents a standardized, accur
18 5 countries on 4 continents were typed using M. gallisepticum cgMLST.
19                         Southern analysis of M. gallisepticum chromosomal DNA confirmed that the phas
20                               A total of 425 M. gallisepticum conserved genes (49.85% of M. gallisept
21                     For the transformants of M. gallisepticum containing the reporter with deletion o
22 ate that both GapA and CrmA are required for M. gallisepticum cytadherence and pathogenesis.
23 hat CrmA might play an essential role in the M. gallisepticum cytadherence process.
24 at house finch epizootic outbreak strains of M. gallisepticum displayed a greater ability to adhere t
25 gment was used to probe a genomic library of M. gallisepticum DNA.
26 ast isolates of the pathogen collected after M. gallisepticum established itself in western North Ame
27 han proteins important for cytadherence, few M. gallisepticum factors or pathways contributing to hos
28 M permits the comprehensive screening of the M. gallisepticum genome for the identification of novel
29  M. gallisepticum conserved genes (49.85% of M. gallisepticum genome) were selected as core genome ta
30 ces obtained in this manner to the annotated M. gallisepticum genome, the precise locations of transp
31                                A total of 81 M. gallisepticum genomes from 5 countries on 4 continent
32 t of this scheme, a diverse collection of 37 M. gallisepticum genomes was used to identify cgMLST tar
33 e novel insights into inter- and intrastrain M. gallisepticum genomic variability and the genetic bas
34                       House finch-associated M. gallisepticum (HFMG) spread rapidly and increased in
35                                MGA_1199, the M. gallisepticum homologue of the cytadherence-associate
36 rom Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and MGA_0928, the M. gallisepticum homologue of the M. pneumoniae cytoskel
37 re thought to be important for mechanisms of M. gallisepticum-host interaction, pathogenesis, and imm
38 ible that glycerol metabolism is required by M. gallisepticum in a niche that we have yet to study.
39 gallisepticum vaccines, and the detection of M. gallisepticum in game and free-flying song birds has
40 for disease manifestations characteristic of M. gallisepticum infection.
41 the second hypothesis that reintroduction of M. gallisepticum into a multiage group of previously exp
42 house finches and that the reintroduction of M. gallisepticum is sufficient to cause a new outbreak,
43 eproducible method for differentiation among M. gallisepticum isolates.
44   Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the M. gallisepticum live attenuated vaccine strain F and th
45 s related to bacterial infections, including M. gallisepticum, M. synoviae, E. coli, and other gram-n
46                                       Global M. gallisepticum mutagenesis is currently limited to the
47 the experimentally determined growth rate of M. gallisepticum of 0.244+/-0.03[Formula: see text].
48  of M. synoviae, but not on the sialidase of M. gallisepticum or the sialidases or other enzymes esse
49                           The reemergence of M. gallisepticum outbreaks among poultry, the increased
50          Moreover, molecular epidemiology of M. gallisepticum outbreaks can be performed using RFLP a
51          This construct was transformed into M. gallisepticum PG31.
52 criptomic vlhA gene expression directly from M. gallisepticum populations present on tracheal mucosae
53                     Chickens coinfected with M. gallisepticum R(low) followed by LPAIV H3N8 exhibited
54 fected first with H3N8 and subsequently with M. gallisepticum R(low) Recovery of live M. gallisepticu
55  chickens given a mock infection followed by M. gallisepticum R(low) The transcriptional responses to
56 infected first with LPAIV H3N8 and then with M. gallisepticum R(low), compared to chickens given a mo
57 ons in the natural host compared to virulent M. gallisepticum R(low).
58                  These results indicate that M. gallisepticum regulates gene expression upon exposure
59 d from tracheas of 20 chickens infected with M. gallisepticum Rlow and 20 mock-infected animals at da
60       Fibronectin was found to be present in M. gallisepticum Rlow protein extracts by Western blotti
61 ng and the sequenced genomes compared to the M. gallisepticum Rlow reference genome.
62 nucleotide identity with the pMGA1.1 gene of M. gallisepticum S6.
63  first description of a functional gene from M. gallisepticum showing homology to cytadhesin genes fr
64 was to determine the feasibility of using an M. gallisepticum-specific gene encoding a phase-variable
65 rations, and significantly higher numbers of M. gallisepticum-specific IgG- and IgA-secreting plasma/
66                                   Currently, M. gallisepticum strain differentiation based on sequenc
67 enomic sequence of the virulent, low-passage M. gallisepticum strain R (R(low)) has been reported, ge
68 oinfected or coinfected with either virulent M. gallisepticum strain R(low) or LPAIV H3N8 (A/duck/Ukr
69 ed to investigate transcriptional changes in M. gallisepticum strain R(low) upon exposure to eukaryot
70 tion following challenge with the pathogenic M. gallisepticum strain R(low).
71 ltilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) scheme for M. gallisepticum strains and field isolates.
72 er of cgMLST allowed differentiation between M. gallisepticum strains of the same outbreak.
73 t-MAMA assays varied between 10(1) and 10(4) M. gallisepticum template copies/reaction, while that of
74 adults can initiate an epidemic and transmit M. gallisepticum to naive house finches and that the rei
75 designed to target 5 sequences unique to the M. gallisepticum ts-11 strain: vlhA3.04a, vlhA3.04b, vlh
76 3.05, and mg0359 was able to distinguish the M. gallisepticum ts-11 vaccine strain from field isolate
77 hypothetical protein gene, mg0359, unique to M. gallisepticum ts-11 vaccine strain.
78                      A total of 239 samples (M. gallisepticum vaccine and type strains, pure cultures
79                Analyses of the genome of the M. gallisepticum vaccine strain F revealed numerous diff
80 eld isolates, whole-genome sequencing of the M. gallisepticum vaccine strain ts-11 and several "ts-11
81                            A live attenuated M. gallisepticum vaccine strain, GT5, was previously sho
82 ided in the present study to distinguish the M. gallisepticum vaccine strains and field isolates base
83 nt current approaches to quickly distinguish M. gallisepticum vaccine strains from field isolates.
84 transcriptomic responses to two experimental M. gallisepticum vaccines were assessed during the first
85 aks among poultry, the increased use of live M. gallisepticum vaccines, and the detection of M. galli
86  in an attenuated strain and plays a role in M. gallisepticum virulence.
87 genomic variability and the genetic basis of M. gallisepticum virulence.
88 hat, at epizootic outbreak in house finches, M. gallisepticum was particularly adept at using the int
89 ith M. gallisepticum R(low) Recovery of live M. gallisepticum was significantly higher in chickens in
90 hich have not evolved protective immunity to M. gallisepticum We show using 3 different metrics of vi
91 d reproducible methods for comparisons among M. gallisepticum whole genomes.
92 We recently reported that the interaction of M. gallisepticum with chicken tracheal epithelial cells
93 t the notion that the initial interaction of M. gallisepticum with host respiratory epithelial cells