コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nonpathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus).
2 on by the pathogenic Gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus.
3 studies using gram-positive model bacterium Micrococcus luteus.
4 d yeast and interacts with peptidoglycan and Micrococcus luteus.
5 , H2B, and H4, for growth inhibition against Micrococcus luteus.
6 a means to distinguish Escherichia coli from Micrococcus luteus.
7 ium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Micrococcus luteus.
8 d prophenoloxidase activation in response to Micrococcus luteus.
9 y from hemolymph activated by treatment with Micrococcus luteus.
10 the resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) of Micrococcus luteus.
11 enic and highly lysozyme-sensitive bacterium Micrococcus luteus.
12 s whose predicted products resemble Rpf from Micrococcus luteus.
13 the most common erroneous identification was Micrococcus luteus.
14 us epidermidis, Corynebacterium xerosis, and Micrococcus luteus.
15 Four genomic DNAs of differing GC content (Micrococcus luteus, 72% GC; Escherichia coli, 50% GC; ca
17 Transcription termination factor Rho from Micrococcus luteus, a high G + C Gram-positive bacterium
21 opin A gene was induced by the G(+) bacteria Micrococcus luteus and Staphylococcus aureus, but not by
23 , Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus plantarum, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus aureus support th
24 as purified from the Gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus, and the complete gene sequence was d
25 ssessed by qualitative agar plate test using Micrococcus luteus as substrate showing that both the un
26 y against Bacillus subtilis (but not against Micrococcus luteus), as well as against the parental and
27 te inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, and Klebsiella pn
29 exhibit biphasic kinetics in the clearing of Micrococcus luteus cell suspensions, suggesting preferen
31 the D52A and D52A/N46A ChEWL complexes with Micrococcus luteus cells are 3- and 4-fold higher, respe
32 nging from 45% identity for the homolog from Micrococcus luteus (FtsZ[Ml]) to 91% identity for the ho
33 were challenged with Gram-positive bacteria Micrococcus luteus In this setting, osa knockdown had a
36 lf thymus, salmon testes, and the bacterium, micrococcus luteus (lysodeikticus) containing different
39 ricidal activity against both Gram-positive (Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subt
40 e synthesis of a tetrasaccharide fragment of Micrococcus luteus teichuronic acid containing N-acetyl-
44 uence similarity to the Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus UvrA proteins involved in excision re
45 of resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) from Micrococcus luteus, which is an extremely potent anti-do