コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 PARPi also potentiated IFN-gamma-induced PD-L1 expressio
2 PARPi also show promising activity in more common cancer
3 PARPi exert their therapeutic effects mainly through the
4 PARPi possess both PARP1 inhibition and PARP1 trapping a
5 PARPi promoted accumulation of cytosolic DNA fragments b
6 PARPi- and cisplatin-resistant clones did not harbor sec
7 PARPi-FL also allowed identification of compromised marg
8 PARPi-FL was further able to differentiate tumor from lo
9 PARPis are not recommended for use in combination with c
10 Inhibitors of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARPi) are highly effective in killing cells deficient i
12 tinum-based therapy, who have not received a PARPi and have a g/sBRCA1/2, or whose tumor demonstrates
13 or patients with EOC who have not received a PARPi and have responded to platinum-based therapy regar
15 in clinically relevant platinum and acquired PARPi-resistant patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models
17 requently not observed in models of acquired PARPi-resistance, suggesting the existence of alternativ
18 volutionary analyses suggested that acquired PARPi resistance arose via clonal selection from an intr
19 The first clinical trial with a single agent PARPi failed to show significant responses, but preclini
20 rapy (second line or more) with single-agent PARPi may be offered for patients with EOC who have not
28 a discordance in sensitivity to platinum and PARPi, with potential implications for previously report
30 as critical regulators of fork stability and PARPi responses in BRCA-deficient cells, which provides
31 n analog to rucaparib, a clinically approved PARPi, and is a candidate biomarker for PARPi response.
33 igh-grade serous ovarian cancer cells become PARPi sensitive, undergo mitotic catastrophe, and die.
36 ccumulation of Rad51 in chromatin induced by PARPi, resulting in DNA damage being channelled through
40 amage sites even in the presence of clinical PARPi, suggesting the persistent foci are not caused by
43 DNA repair processes allow our combinatorial PARPi and DNMTi therapy to robustly sensitize NSCLC cell
44 rapy success of both drug classes, combining PARPi with ICB may be a safe and well-tolerated strategy
46 hibition in GSCs suppressed HR and conferred PARPi sensitivity, with ATR inhibitors synergizing with
47 s common in BRCA1-deficient cancers, confers PARPi resistance and correlates with poor prognosis.
48 Conversely, HOXA9 overexpression confers PARPi resistance to AML1-ETO and PML-RARalpha transforme
50 nces of 53BP1 deficiency, such as diminished PARPi efficacy in BRCA1-deficient cells and altered repa
51 lls, with common repair defects but distinct PARPi responses, reveal gaps as a distinguishing factor.
52 We found that several structurally distinct PARPi drive PARP-1 allostery to promote release from a D
58 nd have shown promising therapeutic effects, PARPi used as single agents are clinically limited to pa
59 ludes with a description of ongoing/emerging PARPi clinical trials in patients with Ewing sarcoma.
60 rase inhibitors (DNMTis) plus PARPis enhance PARPi efficacy in BRCA-proficient AML subtypes, breast,
62 roduce a mechanism-based strategy to enhance PARPi efficacy based on DNA damage-related binding betwe
64 ow elucidate how epigenetic therapy enhances PARPi efficacy in the setting of BRCA-proficient cancer.
68 e have identified an alternative pathway for PARPi-mediated growth control in BRCA1/2-intact breast c
71 (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), but the role for PARPis in BRCA-proficient cancers is not well establishe
76 for PARP1 expression and, most importantly, PARPi-FL can be used as a topical imaging agent, spatial
77 blish POLE4 as a promising target to improve PARPi driven therapies and hamper acquired PARPi resista
79 i-inflammatory activity, that is enriched in PARPi resistant T127 tumors and markedly decreased by PA
80 t RAD51 loading to DSBs and stalled forks in PARPi-resistant BRCA1-deficient cells, overcoming both r
83 this review, we summarize recent progress in PARPi therapy in brain tumors, and discuss current oppor
87 lus PARPis, versus each drug alone, increase PARPi efficacy, increasing amplitude and retention of PA
89 benefitted from therapy with PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or platinum compounds, but acquired resistance li
91 n-label phase 2 study of the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) rucaparib in relapsed high-grade ovarian carcinom
98 ly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib has been approved for treatment of advan
99 ly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), is approved for the treatment of human epidermal
100 s of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) resistance in BRCA2; p53-deficient mouse mammary
101 m and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy; however, resistance invariably arises in
104 DP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitors (PARPi) to treat cancer relates to their ability to trap
105 unction, the development of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and the evidence for targeting PARP in Ewing sarc
106 As most currently approved PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are MDR1 substrates, prior chemotherapy may preco
111 h initial response rates to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in BRCA-mutated epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC),
114 the combination of TMZ with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) potently elicited double-strand DNA breaks, repli
122 y (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved in multiple diseases, includin
123 ly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) is toxic to cells with defects in homologous reco
124 unomodulatory functions of PARP1 inhibitors (PARPi) underlie their clinical activities in various BRC
125 Poly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have efficacy in triple negative breast (TNBC) an
126 ugh poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising therapeutic effects in TNBC
128 ith poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) is impeded by inevitable resistance and associate
129 Poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) selectively kill breast and ovarian cancers with
130 Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) selectively target cancer cells with DNA repair d
138 ce the clinical response to PARP inhibitors (PARPis), understanding the mechanisms underlying PARPi s
142 ly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) exhibit antitumor immunity that occurs in a stim
143 y-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) selectively kill BRCA1/2-deficient cells, but th
144 y (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), but the role for PARPis in BRCA-proficient canc
145 Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are clinically effective predominantly for BRCA-
146 ough poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) benefit a subset of patients with mCRPC and BRCA
157 but preclinical evidence for combinations of PARPi with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is very promisin
158 as focused on the downstream consequences of PARPi exposure to tackle resistance, the immediate effec
159 Because genomic hmdU is a key determinant of PARPi sensitivity, targeting DNPH1 provides a promising
160 screens which reveal genetic determinants of PARPi response in wildtype or BRCA2-knockout cells.
161 Nevertheless, the preclinical discovery of PARPi synthetic lethality and the route to clinical appr
165 vide a mechanistic rationale for efficacy of PARPi in cancer cells lacking defects in DNA repair whos
166 he mechanism behind the clinical efficacy of PARPi in patients with both BRCA-wild-type and BRCA-muta
174 gs elucidate a novel regulatory mechanism of PARPi resistance in EOC by showing that m(6)A modificati
179 screen, we identified EMI1 as a modulator of PARPi sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC
181 pite initial excitement for the potential of PARPi as single agent therapy in Ewing sarcoma, the emer
183 ta-catenin showed synergistic suppression of PARPi-resistant cells in vitro and in vivo in a xenograf
185 ive biomarkers that advance understanding of PARPi response, and identifies novel pathways of PARPi r
186 ially relevant for a potential future use of PARPi as prophylactic agents in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
188 In addition, determining the optimal use of PARPi within drug combination approaches has been challe
190 is also clinical evidence for the utility of PARPi in breast and ovarian cancers without BRCA mutatio
191 hese studies describe a potential utility of PARPi-induced synthetic lethality for leukemia treatment
192 ng to broaden the therapeutic application of PARPis identified sensitivity biomarkers and rationale c
193 ion forks is key for the lethality effect of PARPis, we investigated the combined effects of SLFN11 e
197 of SLFN11 expression and BRCA deficiency on PARPi sensitivity and ssDNA gap formation in human cance
199 of the MSLN-TTC in combination with ATRi or PARPi was investigated in the OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-8 xenogr
200 ibiting PARylation by either hyperthermia or PARPi induced lethal DSB upon chemotherapy treatment not
205 ciently as pharmacologic inhibitors of PARP (PARPi), producing comparable delay in DNA repair, induct
208 11q protein was capable of promoting partial PARPi and cisplatin resistance relative to full-length B
209 In a mouse xenograft model of human PDAC, PARPi monotherapy combined with targeted silencing of Hu
211 A methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) plus PARPis enhance PARPi efficacy in BRCA-proficient AML sub
215 arbor secondary reversion mutations; rather, PARPi and platinum resistance required increased express
216 ase FZD10 mRNA m(6)A modification and reduce PARPi sensitivity, which correlated with an increase in
217 onstitution of EMI1 expression reestablishes PARPi sensitivity both in cellular systems and in an ort
222 reclinical data now strongly support testing PARPi in combination with chemo/radiotherapy clinically.
223 oral cavity carcinoma, we demonstrated that PARPi-FL, a fluorescent PARP inhibitor targeting the enz
228 pression, we found that combination with the PARPi niraparib increased DNA damage and downregulated h
229 ient in homologous recombination (HR); thus, PARPi have been clinically utilized to successfully trea
232 estore sensitivity of dnapkcs-exo1- cells to PARPi, indicating redundancy between nucleases that init
233 supresses the sensitivity of exo1- cells to PARPi, indicating this pathway drives synthetic lethalit
237 splice isoforms 11 and 11q can contribute to PARPi resistance by splicing out the mutation-containing
238 )A modification of FZD10 mRNA contributes to PARPi resistance by upregulating the Wnt/beta-catenin pa
239 , our results show that m(6)A contributes to PARPi resistance in BRCA-deficient EOC cells by upregula
240 )A modification of FZD10 mRNA contributes to PARPi resistance in BRCA-deficient EOC cells via upregul
242 e hypomorphic and capable of contributing to PARPi and platinum resistance when expressed at high lev
244 nation (HR) deficient, are hypersensitive to PARPi through the mechanism of synthetic lethality.
246 we investigated the mechanisms that lead to PARPi and platinum resistance in the SUM1315MO2 breast c
251 1-deficient TNBC cells develop resistance to PARPi by downregulating EMI1 and restoring RAD51-depende
252 identify a novel mechanism of resistance to PARPi through regulation of RAD51 protein stability via
253 -deficient cells that acquired resistance to PARPi were resensitized by treatment with hmdU and DNPH1
255 even for low-Myc GSCs that do not respond to PARPi alone, and potentially other PARPi-refractory tumo
258 are any differences in cellular response to PARPi olaparib depending on the BRCA1 mutation type.
259 CA1/2 is the best determinant of response to PARPi, a significant percentage of the patients do not s
262 omplete and durable therapeutic responses to PARPi-ATRi that significantly increase survival are obse
263 SUM1315MO2 cells were initially sensitive to PARPi and cisplatin but readily acquired resistance.
264 ns in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 are sensitive to PARPi because they have a specific type of DNA repair de
268 CA)-mutant cells and enhanced sensitivity to PARPi by up to 250-fold, while overcoming several resist
269 tion affected HR or conferred sensitivity to PARPi or other double-strand break-inducing agents.
270 m-like cells (GSCs) generates sensitivity to PARPi via Myc-mediated transcriptional repression of CDK
271 tion can leverage cancer cell sensitivity to PARPi, facilitating the clinical use of c-myc as a predi
275 5461 has a different sensitivity spectrum to PARPi involving MRE11-dependent degradation of replicati
277 understanding of the favorable responses to PARPis in SLFN11-expressing and BRCA-deficient tumors.
278 contribution of these two mechanisms toward PARPi-induced innate immune signaling, however, is poorl
281 ta provide a preclinical rationale for using PARPi as immunomodulatory agents in appropriately molecu
282 ts provide a mechanistic rationale for using PARPi as immunomodulatory agents to harness the therapeu
283 n of cGAS-STING signaling induced by various PARPi closely depends on their PARP1 trapping activities
284 ctional RAD51 assay correlates with in vitro PARPi sensitivity, clinical platinum sensitivity, and im
286 By tackling the challenges associated with PARPi resistance and exploring novel combination therapi
288 1 is a promising therapy in combination with PARPi in HR-deficient HGSOC and also as a single agent f
294 our results suggest that PARP1 imaging with PARPi-FL can enhance the detection of oral cancer, serve