ライフサイエンスコーパス: Pseudomonas syringae

1 ly in Arabidopsis thaliana basal immunity to Pseudomonas syringae.

2 tis cinerea, Pectobacterium carotovorum, and Pseudomonas syringae.

3 e resistance after inoculation with virulent Pseudomonas syringae.

4 1D (bzr1-1D) mutants conferred resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.

5 thaliana and its facultative plant pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae.

6 nd pathogenicity) gene regulatory network in Pseudomonas syringae.

7 am immunity to the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

8 tase) was suppressed at high temperatures in Pseudomonas syringae.

9 to increased susceptibility to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

10 r their action, as currently best studied in Pseudomonas syringae.

11 for stomatal immunity against the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

12 ose deposition in response to non-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae.

13 enhanced PTI against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

14 nerea and susceptibility to the hemibiotroph Pseudomonas syringae.

15 es resistance to both Pythium irregulare and Pseudomonas syringae.

16 confer resistance to the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

17 HAA production, we discuss its regulation in Pseudomonas syringae.

18 using a novel hetero-regulation module from Pseudomonas syringae.

19 m1 avirulence gene in the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

20 a virulent strain of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

21 e more susceptible to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

22 the T3SS gene cluster of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

23 basal defense against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

24 of HopI1, a virulence effector of pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae.

25 plants infected with the bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae.

26 sis of 3-thiaglutamate in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

27 hallenged with the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

28 ired for a complete defence response against Pseudomonas syringae.

29 radation, and susceptibility to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

30 ontaining femtomolar INP concentrations from Pseudomonas syringae.

31 during colonization of Phaseolus vulgaris by Pseudomonas syringae.

32 PR1, Constitutive 1 (SNC1) and Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae 2 (RPS2), for ubiquitination and fu

33 ia solanacearum 1 (RRS1-R) and Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae 4 (RPS4) function together to recog

34 of alginate epimerization, the structure of Pseudomonas syringae AlgG has been determined at 2.1-A r

35 per basal immunity to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Although SARD4 knockout plants show

36 mlo2 mlo6 mlo12 triple mutants, as shown for Pseudomonas syringae and Fusarium oxysporum.

37 phid (GPA; Myzus persicae) and the pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis.

38 isplayed compromised resistance to avirulent Pseudomonas syringae and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis.

39 cretion was enhanced in plants infected with Pseudomonas syringae and in response to treatment with s

40 ' vector was functional in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas syringae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and endo

41 The virulence of Pseudomonas syringae and many other proteobacterial path

42 For Pseudomonas syringae and other plant pathogens, regulati

43 encoded in the genomes of several strains of Pseudomonas syringae and other plant pathogens.

44 se responses to the hemibiotrophic pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Phytophthora sojae.

45 ognize two bacterial effectors, AvrRps4 from Pseudomonas syringae and PopP2 from Ralstonia solanacear

46 nt resistance to the hemibiotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic pathogen Botry

47 isease resistance against the hemibiotrophic Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic Pectobacterium

48 responding data for the eubacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the oomycete pathogen Hyalopero

49 disease resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the oomycete pathogen Hyalopero

50 rs during infection with the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the vascular pathogen Ralstonia

51 ced susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and to the fungus Botrytis cinerea

52 mised nonhost resistance to few pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris, but als

53 Plant pathogenic bacteria, like Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris, use the

54 rokiniana but not to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas oryzae.

55 e, Xanthomonas oryzae, Erwinia chrysanthemi, Pseudomonas syringae, and Acidovorax avenae, naringenin

56 ion for environmentally ubiquitous taxa like Pseudomonas syringae, and emphasize that classification

57 important plant pathogens (Botrytis cinerea, Pseudomonas syringae, and Fusarium oxysporum) were used

58 , the hemibiotrophic bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae, and herbivorous larvae of the moth

59 Some strains of the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are adapted for growth and survival

60 In Pseudomonas syringae B728a, expression of the betaine ca

61 Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria in tomato (Solanum lycoper

62 aliana ios1 mutants were hypersusceptible to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria.

63 minant jaz2Deltajas mutants are resistant to Pseudomonas syringae but retain unaltered resistance aga

64 for the activity of INPs from the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae by combining a high-throughput ice

65 The foliar plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae can establish large epiphytic popul

66 The phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae can suppress both pathogen-associat

67 exhibited reduced cell death in response to Pseudomonas syringae carrying avirulent gene avrRpt2, an

68 R863-3p is induced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae carrying various effectors.

69 The bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae causes economically important disea

70 regulation of stomata under free running and Pseudomonas syringae challenge conditions as well as def

71 ilarity to that of the AvrPphB protease from Pseudomonas syringae classified as a C58-protease.

72 a virulent strain of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, coincident with peak disease sympt

73 sed susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, consistent with a role in inducibl

74 sed susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, consistent with defense-induced li

75 oxaben, displayed enhanced susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 as well as reduced activatio

76 Upon leaf infection with virulent Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, CPLL beads were also used f

77 intact in eds1 mutant plants in response to Pseudomonas syringae delivering the effector protein Avr

78 Pseudomonas syringae delivers a plethora of effector pro

79 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae depends on effector proteins secret

80 Here, we show that the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae deploys an effector protein, HopO1-

81 The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB interacts with four r

82 The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB targets multiple host

83 se (HR) typical of ETI is abolished when the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpt2 is bacterially del

84 penetration, in this study we expressed the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopAI known to inactivate

85 We report that the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopB1 acts as a protease t

86 UDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5), which detects the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein Avirulence protein

87 sistance protein mediates recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrPphB.

88 The Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrRpm1 activates

89 In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the Pseudomonas syringae effector proteins AvrB and AvrRpm1

90 from Solanum pimpinellifolium interacts with Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrPto or AvrPtoB to acti

91 grammed cell death (PCD) upon recognition of Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrPto or AvrPtoB.

92 Virulent Pseudomonas syringae effectors reprogramme NECG expressi

93 tion of AvrRpt2, one of the first identified Pseudomonas syringae effectors, involves cleavage of the

94 stallographic and biochemical studies on the Pseudomonas syringae ethylene-forming enzyme reveal a br

95 n interactions using purified peptides and a Pseudomonas syringae fliC mutant complemented with diffe

96 Strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, for example, produce proteinaceous

97 ing susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (

98 ains of the gram-negative bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae have been used as models for unders

99 Bacterial effectors, such as Pseudomonas syringae HopM1, induce establishment of the

100 higher resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis.

101 scular propagation of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in leaves and, accordingly, some im

102 Interestingly, infection with Pseudomonas syringae in wild-type (WT) plants downregula

103 LR recognizes diverse effector proteins from Pseudomonas syringae, including HopZ1a, and Xanthomonas

104 ted in enhanced susceptibility to pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae, indicating functional redundancy i

105 abidopsis leaves with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae induces the expression of genes inv

106 * sfr6 mutants were more susceptible to both Pseudomonas syringae infection and UV-C irradiation.

107 expression and is necessary for tolerance of Pseudomonas syringae infection and UV-C irradiation.

108 Both insect feeding and Pseudomonas syringae infection increase NATA1 expression

109 iotic and biotic stresses such as drought or Pseudomonas syringae infection induced a similar increas

110 Pseudomonas syringae infection of hybrids demonstrated t

111 kout mutant displayed enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae infection of immature flowers, but

112 id favored closure of stomata in response to Pseudomonas syringae infection.

113 lved in the Arabidopsis thaliana response to Pseudomonas syringae infection: a cytoplasmic localized

114 The bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae injects effector proteins into plan

115 Pseudomonas syringae injects numerous bacterial proteins

116 omato (Solanum lycopersicum) to infection by Pseudomonas syringae involves both detection of pathogen

117 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is a model for exploring the functi

118 The foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is a useful model for understanding

119 have found that normal infection of the host Pseudomonas syringae is dependent on the action of a hos

120 BIK1-mediated PTI to Pseudomonas syringae is modulated by SA, ET, and jasmona

121 The description of the ecology of Pseudomonas syringae is moving away from that of a ubiqu

122 ic in nature, isolates such as the Antarctic Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W exhibit considerable psychroto

123 ce suggest that the bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae manipulates auxin physiology in Ara

124 natine (phytotoxin produced by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae) or fusicoccin (a fungal toxin prod

125 gainst the hemibiotrophic bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae oxr2 mutant plants are more suscept

126 esponse to the injection of avrRpm1-modified Pseudomonas syringae (P = 1.66e-08).

127 JMJ27 is induced in response to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pathogens and is required for resis

128 red after primary leaf infection with either Pseudomonas syringae pathovar japonica (Psj) or Xanthomo

129 During Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) DC3000 infect

130 genes, scd1-1 plants were more resistant to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) DC3000 infect

131 type counterparts to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and Erwinia amylovo

132 Entry of the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato DC3000 (hereafter P

133 ployed T3SS substrates in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000 posse

134 d that TARK1 CRISPR plants were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000-induc

135 riggering the Type Three Secretion System in Pseudomonas syringae pathovars.

136 ith pathogens, such as Soybean mosaic virus, Pseudomonas syringae, Phytophthora sojae, Phakopsora pac

137 fector HopZ1a produced by the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae possesses acetyltransferase activit

138 Pseudomonas syringae produces coronatine, a toxin that m

139 targeted by several effectors, including the Pseudomonas syringae protease effector AvrRpt2.

140 ato, detection by the host Pto kinase of the Pseudomonas syringae proteins AvrPto or AvrPtoB causes l

141 ing proteins (EBPs) HrpR and HrpS (HrpRS) of Pseudomonas syringae (Ps) activate sigma(54)-dependent t

142 rom the Rpg1-b, Rpg3, and Rpg4 loci, against Pseudomonas syringae (Psg) expressing avrB, avrB2 and av

143 A previously unstudied Pseudomonas syringae (Psy) type III effector, HopBB1, in

144 rial causal agent of bleeding canker disease Pseudomonas syringae pv aesculi, and the bark-associated

145 bean (Glycine max) RPG1-B (for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv glycinea) mediates species-speci

146 ble to virulent bacterial pathogens, such as Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola (Psm) and P. syringae

147 Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326) r

148 brassicicola and the bacterial hemibiotroph Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326) w

149 udomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst) and Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326.

150 ns affected growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326.

151 PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE2 (RPS2), RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA1, and RPS5.

152 protein Q), a type III effector secreted by Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola, is widely conserve

153 The bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae B728a (PsyB728a) uses a

154 monas vesicatoria, Pseudomonas corrugata and Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae.

155 ainst several bacterial pathogens, including Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) and the insect pest

156 secretion system-deficient bacterial strain Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000 hrcC(-) and

157 induced by the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000/avrRpt2, and

158 inst a surface-deposited bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000; in contrast

159 The interaction between tomato and Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) is a well-developed

160 sceptibility to the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst).

161 asal resistance to the hemibiotroph pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst).

162 are more resistant to an avirulent strain of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst-AvrRpm1), which was

163 or with an avirulent isolate of the bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (PstavrRpt2).

164 Notably, Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pto) bacterial effectors

165 he Hrp outer protein Q (HopQ1) effector from Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pto) strain DC3000 is co

166 pport increased bacterial growth of virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst) and Pseudomo

167 lant defenses against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst).

168 The virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) respon

169 epigenetically following disease pressure by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000).

170 are confirmed in subsequent experiments with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and Arabidopsis th

171 erived metabolites that induce T3SS genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and report that ma

172 ry but also when leaves were inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and roots with the

173 usceptibility to both the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and the fungal pat

174 expression changes following challenge with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and the nonpathoge

175 and an increased tolerance to the biotrophic Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 bacterium and Beet

176 idopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) infected with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 expressing AvrRpt2

177 Infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 expressing the bac

178 study demonstrated that foliar infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 induced malic acid

179 avirulent strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 results in a drast

180 e induction and enhancement of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 were partially red

181 Empoasca spp.), and (3) bacterial pathogens (Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000), showing that all

182 ea and Alternaria solani, bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000, and larvae of the

183 aling and pattern-triggered immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

184 nd led to increased resistance to pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

185 etained susceptibility to bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

186 Arabidopsis against the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

187 nd resistance against the virulent bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

188 plants with the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000/avrRpt2 induces bi

189 ection with virulent or avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato generates long-distance S

190 lerated hypersensitive response triggered by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato in soybean (Glycine max)

191 istance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, the biotrophic oomycete

192 ersicum) resistance response to its pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato.

193 s either the AvrPto or AvrPtoB effector from Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato.

194 ween Arabidopsis and its bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv.

195 r, led to plants with enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv.

196 Arabidopsis thaliana to the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv.

197 t is suffering from attacks of the bacterial Pseudomonas syringae pv.

198 The introduction of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) severely damag

199 ogenic host range mutants) on the novel host Pseudomonas syringae pv. atrofaciens.

200 in limiting growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Pma) ES4326 and act

201 s important for defense against the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326).

202 opsis thaliana) plants locally infected with Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola Whole transcriptome

203 ) gene expression, to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola.

204 hallenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae, transgenic EFR wheat li

205 nst Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psp) NPS3121.

206 The ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE) from Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2 is a member of

207 rved this phenomenon with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola where isolates tha

208 AvrRps4, an effector protein from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi, triggers RPS4-dependent i

209 study, the role of (p)ppGpp on virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a (PssB728a) was i

210 Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a is a resident on

211 ion and fitness benefits of syringafactin by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a on leaves.

212 The transcript profiles of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a support a model

213 levels of an unknown surfactant produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a that was not det

214 Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae cell densities fluctua

215 mely the halogenase SyrB2 from the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.

216 observed in silenced plants infiltrated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci expressing AvrPto or Hop

217 mimicking coronatine (COR) toxin produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 functions t

218 creases the susceptibility of Arabidopsis to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 independent

219 r disease response to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, including

220 utant of Arabidopsis is hyper-susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, while Arab

221 t basal and effector-triggered resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000.

222 istance to the biotrophic bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000.

223 induced by the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000/avrRpt2, an

224 Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) delivers effector

225 Flagellin, from the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst), contains two MAMP

226 t various pathogens, including the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

227 or Fen kinase to determine immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

228 is highly induced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

229 response to infection of bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

230 resistant to the virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) DC3000.

231 * Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) T1 is pathogenic i

232 he ability to resist COR-producing pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and P. syringae pv. macu

233 The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000) is found

234 h to investigate the role of siderophores in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000) virulenc

235 n filament organization after infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000), dem

236 ld-type plants, against avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst) carrying Av

237 RT2 displayed reduced resistance to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000).

238 characterized the molecular function of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) effector Ho

239 e resistance against the biotrophic bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and for susceptib

240 d contributes to resistance to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the fungal pa

241 9-mediated PCD, as well as non-host pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the general e

242 sed resistance toward the virulent bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the necrotrop

243 Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is a bacterial pa

244 tly increased upon infection with pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 lacking hopQ1-1 [

245 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 must detoxify pla

246 merina BMM (PcBMM), but not to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 or to the oomycet

247 activating jasmonate signalling, for example Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 produces coronati

248 Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 produces the phyt

249 ve been investigating how the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 responds to iron

250 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 suppresses the tw

251 verexpressing this gene were challenged with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, which is a bacte

252 olicin M-like bacteriocin, syringacin M from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.

253 betaCA3) is induced by the virulent pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.

254 persicoides confers resistance to strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato expressing AvrRpt2 and R

255 The interaction of tomato with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is an established model

256 tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is elicited by the inter

257 The agronomical relevant tomato-Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato pathosystem is widely us

258 '-ends of transcripts for the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000.

259 nthamiana, compromised nonhost resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato T1.

260 double mutant showed enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, which is consistent wit

261 a as well as the plant pathogenic bacterium, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.

262 nse in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Pseudomonas syringae relies on the recognition of E3 lig

263 The pathogen Pseudomonas syringae requires a type-III protein secreti

264 us, and that CPSF30 activity is required for Pseudomonas syringae resistance.

265 n of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) with Pseudomonas syringae revealed that LPO is predominantly

266 Pseudomonas syringae secretes c. 30 effectors, some of w

267 Pseudomonas syringae secretes effectors from its type II

268 For example, the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae strain PtoDC3000 uses an indole-3-a

269 ot sim-1, was more susceptible to a virulent Pseudomonas syringae strain, and this susceptibility cou

270 nce genes, host range, and aggressiveness of Pseudomonas syringae strains closely related to the toma

271 ease and acts in immunity against pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae strains only when they carry a term

272 Pseudomonas syringae strategies to alter host auxin biol

273 ry of ice nucleation-active bacteria such as Pseudomonas syringae supports that they have been part o

274 We found that the Pseudomonas syringae T3SS was restricted in its ability

275 PRX33 knockdown line is more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae than wild-type plants.

276 etyltransferase carried by the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae that elicits effector-triggered imm

277 s a toxin produced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae that is known to counteract Arabido

278 or protein from the bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae that suppresses plant immunity by i

279 ra arabidopsidis, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (the latter both in terms of basal

280 creased resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae These results suggest that ANT and

281 ent, avirulent and non-pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae, thus limiting the defense function

282 ipase D beta1 (PLDbeta1)-deficient plants by Pseudomonas syringae tomato pv DC3000 (Pst DC30000) resu

283 dmr6 mutants show loss of susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae, transgenic dmr6 plants expressing

284 hat high humidity can effectively compromise Pseudomonas syringae-triggered stomatal closure in both

285 that SA promotes the interaction between the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrPtoB and NPR1.

286 The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopU1 is a mono-A

287 Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors are known to sup

288 * Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors are known to sup

289 The Pseudomonas syringae type III-secreted effector HopU1 is

290 * Gene expression responses to Pseudomonas syringae, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation,

291 no increased susceptibility to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, unlike gh3.12 mutants, which were

292 Pseudomonas syringae uses the two-component system RhpRS

293 coronatine (COR) promotes various aspects of Pseudomonas syringae virulence, including invasion throu

294 plants and the nonpathogenic hrpA mutant of Pseudomonas syringae was able to grow rapidly in the mut

295 It was further revealed the EmhR ortholog in Pseudomonas syringae was also responsible for indole-ind

296 y data of Arabidopsis thaliana infected with Pseudomonas syringae, we analyzed Arabidopsis defense re

297 bacterial bioreporters of the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae were constructed that couple a QAC-

298 gainst foliar pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae, which normally result from interac

299 wed increased susceptibility to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, with the double mutant showing a s

300 opsis thaliana leaves infected with virulent Pseudomonas syringae within 8 h of infection.