ライフサイエンスコーパス: SFM

1 SFM and FFDM images were interpreted independently.

2 SFM images of a very large bacteriophage genome, G, show

3 SFM phenotypes have been discovered in most major verteb

4 SFM stimulation caused an increase in the association of

5 rs from 35 127 FFDM and 52 444 SFM examinations in two Norwegian counties.

6 of alternative protein sources (2.5% CGM, 5% SFM, and 7.5% DDGS) until 35 days of age.

7 eening center performed 8478 FFDM and 31 720 SFM screening examinations, with modality determined by

8 The inclusion of oil affected SFM physical characteristics, including bulk density, ex

9 ntly screened with SFM after SFM, FFDM after SFM, and FFDM after FFDM.

10 r women subsequently screened with SFM after SFM, FFDM after SFM, and FFDM after FFDM.

11 -0.04, -0.04, -0.05, and 0.05 for BSM alone, SFM alone, BSM and SFM together, and the control group,

12 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7, 5.2) and SFM (4.8 per 1000; 95% CI: 4.7, 5.0); however, the rate

13 , and 0.05 for BSM alone, SFM alone, BSM and SFM together, and the control group, respectively).

14 creening-detected cancers missed at FFDM and SFM did not differ significantly.

15 no evidence of differences between FFDM and SFM in terms of detection rates (0.68 [95% confidence in

16 rate has yet been observed between FFDM and SFM.

17 hard-copy image reading performed as well as SFM in terms of process indicators; the meta-analysis wa

18 20% [17 of 86] at FFDM vs 21% [26 of 123] at SFM [P = .946]).

19 33% [16 of 49] at FFDM vs 30% [24 of 81] at SFM [P = .868]; screening-detected cancers missed: 20% [

20 10% (95% CI: 3.3%, 21.8%) of those missed at SFM (P = .070).

21 4% (95% CI: 21.2%, 48.8%) of those missed at SFM (P = .185).

22 t mammographic features than those missed at SFM.

23 as masses was 10.4 mm at FFDM and 13.6 mm at SFM (P = .036).

24 We used a bistable SFM stimulus, which can be perceived in one of two diffe

25 f histone H3 to extended fiber morphology by SFM imaging of progressively trypsinized chromatin fiber

26 owing FBT, specialized intervention content (SFM+) enhanced children's weight outcomes and outperform

27 orce measurements between ligand-derivatized SFM probe and a protein receptor-derivatized surface, sh

28 Findings detected with either SFM or FFDM were evaluated with additional imaging and,

29 y at 60 years of age or younger (pooled FFDM-SFM difference: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.04, 0.18] per 100 screen

30 opsy rate was 1.4% (19 776 of 1 391 188) for SFM and 1.1% (5108 of 446 172) for FFDM (P < .001).

31 call rate was 3.4% (47 091 of 1 391 188) for SFM and 2.9% (13 130 of 446 172) for FFDM (P < .001).

32 onth, islet recovery ratios were greater for SFM-cultured islets than for cryopreserved tissue.

33 ion for the preparation of DNA molecules for SFM imaging.

34 to 490 muM for SFT and 4.0 pM to 520 muM for SFM, with picomolar detection and quantification limits

35 and 1.75 pM for SFT, 0.41 pM and 1.35 pM for SFM, respectively).

36 women aged 40 years and older presenting for SFM.

37 r for CR (5.2%; 95% CI: 4.7%, 5.8%) than for SFM (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.4%, 6.8%); however, the adjusted od

38 r for CR (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.5%, 6.7%) than for SFM (7.4%; 95% CI: 7.3%, 7.5%).

39 (P < .001) for FFDM compared with those for SFM.

40 etection rates at least as high as those for SFM.

41 s temporally associated with the change from SFM to FFDM.

42 After the initial transitional phase from SFM to FFDM, population-based screening with FFDM is ass

43 r remained stable during the transition from SFM to FFDM (when the previous examination was SFM) and

44 HIGH SFM+ vs LOW SFM+ (CONTROL matched the dose of LOW).

45 However, incubation of human BMSCs in SFM prior to in vivo transplantation significantly stimu

46 llow-up, with low social problem children in SFM vs the control group having the best outcomes.

47 me points up to 2 months, islets cultured in SFM showed recovery ratios greater than those for standa

48 was detectable when MCF-7 cells, cultured in SFM, were treated with E2.

49 In wholemount cultures grown in SFM, trigeminal axon projections, growth patterns, and d

50 ulminating in prostate cancer, is reduced in SFM of ESR1 KO compared to WT mice (P </= 0.0007).

51 After visible irradiation, SFM imaging of the photoproducts revealed both the struc

52 HIGH SFM+ vs LOW SFM+ (CONTROL matched the dose of LOW).

53 ing extended (1-2 months) islet culture in M-SFM could significantly enhance islet transplantation by

54 After extended culture of islets in M-SFM for 1 or 2 months, transplanted islets maintained th

55 ee cadaveric donor organs were cultured in M-SFM for 1, 3, or 6 months before transplantation under t

56 trate that human islets can be cultured in M-SFM for extended periods and still retain in vitro and i

57 Prolonged culture in M-SFM had no significant impact on long-term function, ina

58 emonstrate that prolonged islet culture in M-SFM sustained viability and function, and in some instan

59 human islets in Memphis serum-free media (M-SFM) is associated with excellent postculture recovery,

60 of islets in a modified serum-free medium (M-SFM) would sustain function in vivo.

61 cadaveric organ donors and cultured in the M-SFM for up to 2 months, cryopreserved at -70 degrees C w

62 ce (BSM) or social facilitation maintenance (SFM) treatment.

63 n (enhanced social facilitation maintenance [SFM+]) vs a weight-control education condition (CONTROL;

64 the transition from screen-film mammography (SFM) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and second

65 transition period), screen-film mammography (SFM) was gradually replaced by full-field digital mammog

66 ms embodied as structured flows on manifold (SFM) that provide a formal description of behavior as a

67 A solid food matrix (SFM) model system was established to replicate dry food

68 n feed ingredients including sunflower meal (SFM), corn gluten meal (CGM), and dried distillers' grai

69 ment, a rapid single frequency measurements (SFM) was assessed based on recording total impedance |Z|

70 tyrphostin AG879 prevented serum-free media (SFM) induction of cell proliferation.

71 The development of serum-free media (SFM) is critical for advancing the scalability and ethic

72 such as BalanCD and CHO-S serum-free media (SFM)-II, as well as in a defined serum-free, putrescine-

73 arallel in (A) CMRL + ITS (serum-free media; SFM) or (B) CMRL +10% fetal bovine serum (standard media

74 then cultured in serum-free XVIVO-15 medium (SFM) for 7 days with added granulocyte-macrophage colony

75 ontinued to grow in basal serum-free medium (SFM) and spontaneously produced both IL-6 and HGF under

76 or 24, 48, or 72 hours in serum-free medium (SFM) or SFM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, TGF-

77 rainstem were cultured in serum-free medium (SFM) or SFM supplemented with NGF or NT-3 for 3 days.

78 ured with FBS switched to serum-free medium (SFM) was considerably more extensive.

79 cells were maintained in serum free medium (SFM).

80 bes or a potential seminal fluid microbiome (SFM).

81 of a stand-alone scanning force microscope (SFM) scanner with a reflection interference contrast mic

82 imaging under the scanning force microscope (SFM).

83 ier defined, from scanning force microscopy (SFM) and mathematical modeling, a set of simple structur

84 Scanning force microscopy (SFM) of Lp(a) showed, for the first time, a belt-like st

85 We used scanning force microscopy (SFM) to study the binding and excited state reactions of

86 Scanning force microscopy (SFM) was used to image intact, nearly fully elongated la

87 generation (SHG), and sum-frequency mixing (SFM).

88 rther develop the stochastic freezing model (SFM) producing ice nucleation rate coefficients for SSA-

89 -flux radiation absorption-scattering model (SFM).

90 rotation of ambiguous structure from motion (SFM) stimuli.

91 Here we use structure-from-motion (SFM) 3D photogrammetry to generate digital 3D models of

92 Structure-from-motion (SFM) is the perception of three-dimensional shape from m

93 ved three-dimensional structure-from-motion (SFM)-can be stabilized when an otherwise ambiguous objec

94 Resolving the rotation direction of SFM cylinders requires the conjoint decoding of directio

95 eclined during follow-up, but the effects of SFM alone (P = .03; d = 0.45; mean change in BMI z score

96 Screening outcome in the era of SFM (1997-2008), the transition period (2009-2010), and

97 FBT and were then randomized to 8 months of SFM+ (HIGH, n = 59; LOW, n = 56) or CONTROL (n = 57).

98 MT contributes directly to the perception of SFM stimuli and by implication to decoding the specific

99 t radiologists and compared with a review of SFM examinations of 81 interval and 123 screening-detect

100 e perceptual decisions about the rotation of SFM stimuli.

101 d with DR (n = 220 520), CR (n = 64 210), or SFM (n = 403 688) between 2008 and 2009 were identified

102 Children receiving either BSM or SFM maintained relative weight significantly better than

103 8, or 72 hours in serum-free medium (SFM) or SFM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, TGF-gamma1,

104 were cultured in serum-free medium (SFM) or SFM supplemented with NGF or NT-3 for 3 days.

105 ssion of a STAT3 dominant negative prevented SFM-stimulated cell proliferation of MIA PaCa-2 cells, s

106 These results validate recent SFM application to quantitatively analyze the conformati

107 ly based techniques with the high-resolution SFM imaging presented here will likely produce a high-th

108 ch direction the front surface of a rotating SFM cylinder display was moving.

109 myosin crossbridge kinetics bat and songbird SFM express myosin heavy chain genes that are evolutiona

110 embedded within neural mechanisms specifying SFM.

111 of sulfathiazole (SFT) and sulfamethoxazole (SFM) residues in honey, beef, and egg samples.

112 lower recall rate (11.5%; 568 of 4,945) than SFM (13.8%; 685 of 4,945) (P <.001, McNemar chi(2) model

113 en receiving digital mammography rather than SFM in 2005 was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.91; P < .001) when

114 FFDM has so far led to fewer recalls than SFM.

115 ay-finned fish, birds, and mammals, and that SFM phenotypes operate at a maximum operational speed se

116 Our results show that SFM allows for the long-term culture of islet tissue.

117 Our results suggest that SFM evolved independently in sound-producing organs in r

118 The SFM simultaneously predicts immersion freezing and depos

119 The SFM was further combined with a comprehensive kinetic mo

120 The SFM-RICM combination, when applied to the force measurem

121 sex) for the FBT period (0-4 months) and the SFM+ period (4-12 months), and proportion of children ac

122 Trends over time and variations between the SFM and FFDM periods were expressed by using proportions

123 directly the separation distance between the SFM probe and the sample surface.

124 olution imaging on complex structures in the SFM image with high spatial accuracy.

125 tics and environmental factors influence the SFM may provide the next frontier in male reproductive d

126 ase in bone formation was due to neither the SFM components nor to the proliferation status of BMSCs

127 The bacterial composition of the SFM is influenced according to whether mice have functio

128 t directly involved in the generation of the SFM percept, whereas MT is.

129 itions, the present study indicates that the SFM can be used to determine the persistence length of D

130 Viability studies confirmed that the SFM-cultured islets were able to respond to glucose stim

131 Data showed this SFM model could serve as an effective tool for studying

132 rescence and scanning force microscope (TIRF-SFM) to pinpoint fluorescently labeled human homologous

133 Although DR is equivalent to SFM for breast screening among women aged 50-74 years, t

134 ty in cortical areas V1 and MT is related to SFM perception.

135 For both ambiguous and unambiguous SFM figures, rotation judgments shifted as if we had add

136 nockout (KO) male mice, we describe a unique SFM whose inhabitants differ from gut microbes.

137 For CR versus SFM, specificity was similar while sensitivity was signi

138 For DR versus SFM, sensitivity was similar while specificity was lower

139 M to FFDM (when the previous examination was SFM) and after FFDM was firmly established (when the pre

140 vation upon stimulating quiescent cells with SFM.

141 rformance was compared between cohorts, with SFM as the referent cohort.

142 er 10,000; 95% CI: 12.4, 15.0) compared with SFM (13.0 per 10,000; 95% CI: 12.1, 13.9).

143 sitivity of CR imaging systems compared with SFM, programs should assess the continued use of this te

144 higher than that for findings detected with SFM (19%; 22 of 114), but this difference was not signif

145 Twenty-two cancers were detected with SFM and 21 with FFDM.

146 rom 0.3 per 1000 screening examinations with SFM to 1.1 per 1000 screening examinations with FFDM (P

147 in the Ontario Breast Screening Program with SFM (487,334 screening examinations, 403,688 women), DR

148 FDM and for women subsequently screened with SFM after SFM, FFDM after SFM, and FFDM after FFDM.

149 val cancers in women initially screened with SFM and FFDM and for women subsequently screened with SF

150 tive values after biopsy than screening with SFM.