戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e molecular mechanism of sugar metabolism in Saccharum.
2 me structural polymorphism were found within Saccharum.
3 lutionary step towards high sugar content in Saccharum.
4                             In autopolyploid Saccharum, 36 significant associations between variation
5                   Population genomics of 310 Saccharum accessions clarified the breeding history of m
6 ylogenetic groups, which corresponded to the Saccharum and Erianthus genera through phylogenetic anal
7 spp. hybrids were more diverse than those of Saccharum and Erianthus species.
8 d structure within and between the genera of Saccharum and Erianthus, 79 accessions from five species
9 th minor contributions from other species in Saccharum and other genera.
10 by 242 common probes were homologous between Saccharum and Sorghum.
11 members of the Acer genus, sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and boxelder (Acer negundo), as well as trans
12 c resistance (R(leaf)) for sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and red oak (Quercus rubra) by measuring the
13 luation of the abiotic stress response in A. saccharum are reported.
14 ition and evolution among the species in the Saccharum complex have been elusive owing to the complex
15 tion signals in all plant species within the Saccharum complex, including species in the genera Sacch
16 rocoma are allotetraploid species within the Saccharum complex.
17 d resulted in distinct allopolyploids in the Saccharum complex.
18 s of different species and genera within the Saccharum complex.
19 pecies from four different genera within the Saccharum complex.
20 rangement associated with the species in the Saccharum complex.
21                         We discovered a wild Saccharum contributor to most modern cultivars, likely o
22 modern cultivars, highlighting untapped wild Saccharum diversity as a source of alleles for breeding
23 ter and fine roots at four sugar maple (Acer saccharum)-dominated hardwood forests in the north-centr
24 experiment with litter of four species (Acer saccharum, Drypetes glauca, Pinus resinosa, and Thuja pl
25 in ongoing molecular analysis of the complex Saccharum genome.
26                      Genetic maps of the six Saccharum genotypes, including up to 72 linkage groups,
27 or large-scale genomic rearrangements in the Saccharum genus after two rounds of whole genome duplica
28 ntaneum (Ss(h)), with So(h) dominance in the Saccharum hybrid (S. hybrid).
29       High-density crops, such as sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid), generate field microenvironments with
30 rdeum vulgare]), and ShSUT1 (from sugarcane [Saccharum hybrid]), and results indicate that type I and
31                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum hybrids spp.) is the most important sugar crop
32 in temperature class where cool-adapted Acer saccharum increased and temperature neutral changes wher
33  family in the important sugar-yielding crop Saccharum is available due to its complex genetic backgr
34 d concentrating the sap of sugar maple (Acer saccharum March).
35 erability to cavitation of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) was quantified by measuring the pressu
36 rum complex, including species in the genera Saccharum, Miscanthus, Narenga and Erianthus.
37     One paleo-duplicated chromosomal pair in Saccharum, NpChr5 and NpChr8, underwent fission followed
38 me painting probes for all 10 chromosomes in Saccharum officinarum (2n = 8x = 80).
39                    This study investigated a Saccharum officinarum (Green German or GG, 2n approximat
40 loid genome was divided into subgenomes from Saccharum officinarum (So(h)) and S. spontaneum (Ss(h)),
41 roductive C4 food and biofuel crops, such as Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane), Sorghum bicolor (sorg
42                     Sugarcane is a hybrid of Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum, with min
43                     Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum officinarum contributed to the genetic backgro
44 ected 2460 loci in F1 progeny of the crosses Saccharum officinarum Green German x S. spontaneum IND 8
45                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivation leaves behind arou
46                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a cash crop grown commercia
47 e (HFO)-treated sugarcane bagasse (SCB-HFO) (Saccharum officinarum L.) was investigated.
48                                              Saccharum officinarum Linn.
49           The results provided evidence that Saccharum officinarum was domesticated in the New Guinea
50 ridization between the domesticated species (Saccharum officinarum) and the wild species (Saccharum s
51 orghum bicolor) immature embryos, sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) callus, and indica rice (Oryza sa
52                Three high quality sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) genotypes collected from Kessem s
53 sses, including maize (Zea mays), sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), Misca
54 rasite of rice (Oryza sativa) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum).
55 NA sequencing samples from S. spontaneum and Saccharum officinarum.
56 d stem tissues of the auto-octoploid species Saccharum officinarum.
57 orghum [Sorghum bicolor]), sugar (sugarcane [Saccharum officinarum]), and biofuel (Miscanthus spp.) p
58 al temperatures, growth of species like Acer saccharum, Quercus rubra, and Picea glauca will vary mor
59 . spontaneum each formed a distinct cluster, Saccharum robustum, S. officinarum, hybrid cultivars, an
60 ule grouped together in a major cluster, and Saccharum sinense and S. barberi formed distinct groupin
61 ere found to be different in the Pennisetum, Saccharum, Sorghum and Zea lineages.
62                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum sp.), a world-wide known feedstock for sugar p
63 mong all species groups where Erianthus-like Saccharum species (ELSS), Miscanthus spp., and S. sponta
64           Saccharum spontaneum is a founding Saccharum species and exhibits wide variation in ploidy
65 e appicability in genotype identification of Saccharum species and Saccharum spp. hybrids.
66       The complex polyploid genomes of three Saccharum species have been aligned with the compact dip
67 Zea and of Leviathan elements in Sorghum and Saccharum species suggests that members of these familie
68 sponded for different functions in these two Saccharum species.
69 hesis and sugar accumulation between the two Saccharum species.
70 o photosynthesis capacity divergence in both Saccharum species.
71                                              Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum officinarum contribut
72                                              Saccharum spontaneum has shown a higher net photosynthet
73                                              Saccharum spontaneum is a founding Saccharum species and
74 f autotetraploid wild type sugarcane specie, Saccharum spontaneum is available recently.
75 P markers scored on 90 plants of the species Saccharum spontaneum L. was used to illustrate the const
76 chromosomes of a wild relative of sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum L.) anther culture-derived clone (A
77 h invasion risk for nonnative taxa including Saccharum spontaneum L., a listed Federal Noxious Weed.
78 ylated) formation in wounded wild sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum).
79 Saccharum officinarum) and the wild species (Saccharum spontaneum).
80 ane is a hybrid of Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum, with minor contributions from othe
81 fied and clustered into eight subfamilies in Saccharum spontaneum.
82 s) after the divergence of Sorghum spp. from Saccharum spp.
83 ), six accessions of E. arundinaceus, and 30 Saccharum spp. hybrids were analyzed using 21 pairs of f
84 ers among these 115 accessions revealed that Saccharum spp. hybrids were more diverse than those of S
85                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) accumulates high concentrations
86 ap of stalk storage parenchyma of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) increases by an order of magnitu
87 type identification of Saccharum species and Saccharum spp. hybrids.
88      Genome-wide studies of AS in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) are lacking, mainly due to the absence o
89                                   Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is currently one of the most efficient c
90 rops such as maize (Zea mays) and sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and is a logical complement to distantl
91 mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and rice (Oryza sativa).
92 ecies, such as forage grasses and sugarcane (Saccharum spp.).
93 s probes that foster comparative genomics of Saccharum (sugarcane), Zea (maize), Oryza (rice), Pennis
94 from enhanced growth in Acer rubrum and Acer saccharum to severe growth reductions in Abies balsamea,
95 t two different sites with sugar maple (Acer saccharum), we investigated ascending sap (sugar concent