1                                              WON is a common consequence of severe pancreatitis and t

2 tic regression, DPDS [odds ratio (OR) 2.99], WON (OR 3.37), PFC size of 100 mm or more (OR 2.66), and

3 red as an adjunct to endoscopic drainage for WON with deep extension into the paracolic gutters and p

4  70 (19.4%), and occurred more frequently in WON compared to other PFCs (68.3% vs 31.7%; P < 0.001).

5  undergoing endoscopic drainages of infected WON through LAMS (cases) or PS (controls).

6 LAMS for the endoscopic drainage of infected WON.

7 nty-eight total patients were analyzed (mean WON diameter = 14 cm, 64% male, mean age = 51 years) acr

8  (PPs), 75% (12/16) for walled-off necrosis (WON), and 50% (12/24) for acute necrotic collections (AN

9 ocysts, and 149 (41.3%) walled-off necrosis (WON).

10  drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON).

11 my (TGN) for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) in selected patients.

12 atients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON).

13 tectomy) was needed in 50% of ANC and 25% of WON.

14 copic therapy through transmural drainage of WON may be preferred, as it avoids the risk of forming a

15 nt but shared the same response (e.g., ONE + WON).

16  ONE + 1 ) or the same response (e.g., ONE = WON).

17 lent 1-stage surgical option for symptomatic WON in a highly selected group of patients.

18 was the clinical efficacy (resolution of the WON/sepsis), the secondary endpoint was safety (procedur

19      A retrospective review of patients with WON undergoing surgical management at 3 high-volume panc

20 , acute period (<2 weeks), and in those with WON who are too ill to undergo endoscopic or surgical in