1 A comparison with 20 type-matched isolates showed all re
2 rt the structural analysis of CCTTTAAAGG and
a comparison with 25 other representative crystal struct
3 A comparison with 30 restriction-site polymorphisms (RSP
4 A comparison with 60 autoantibody-negative relatives sug
5 dical devices in UCTD cases were explored in
a comparison with 660 scleroderma patients who were asce
6 A comparison with a commercial airliner shows that a bus
7 , the CFD results have been verified through
a comparison with a conventional surface solar Scheffler
8 A comparison with a data set for phosphate-deficient pla
9 s required when interpreting the results and
a comparison with a gold standard is required in order t
10 A comparison with a HECT family E3-E2 complex indicates
11 ifferent input feature selection schemes and
a comparison with a hierarchical STDP based ensemble arc
12 he thermostability of htADH are suggested by
a comparison with a homologous mesophilic enzyme (55% id
13 A comparison with a human brain microarray study reveals
14 using various statistical methods, including
a comparison with a multiple regression approach.
15 ntains a putative tRNA in the exit site, and
a comparison with a non-programmed, yeast ribosome sugge
16 A comparison with a population-based approach shows that
17 A comparison with a previous analysis of these genotypes
18 A comparison with a previous study of the yeast mitochon
19 85 typically developing children, permitting
a comparison with a previously published template of nor
20 A comparison with a pure PDMS membrane and DVB/PDMS fibe
21 A comparison with a recently determined complex containi
22 A comparison with a reference method showed no significa
23 ated conformations was carried out, based on
a comparison with a set of ten native-like structures de
24 A comparison with a similar data set from the distantly
25 A comparison with a six-base-pair T tract, a bending sta
26 erformed with human serum samples, including
a comparison with a standard LC-MS/MS method using 120 s
27 A comparison with a traditional foam liner and other com
28 A comparison with ab initio molecular dynamics calculati
29 A comparison with ACH calculated using the mechanical ve
30 A comparison with age-matched control groups revealed th
31 The NOACs were pooled to perform
a comparison with all comparators and among themselves i
32 analytical performance of the new technique,
a comparison with an atmospheric pressure chemical ioniz
33 We further validate our framework in
a comparison with an existing polymer brush model and co
34 advantage of a strictly comparable task and
a comparison with an identical performance benchmark.
35 A comparison with an online quadrupole aerosol chemical
36 A comparison with an untreated cohort suggests that earl
37 A comparison with analogous experiments on the C[UUCG]G
38 beta3-alpha3 loop of CKI1RD was supported by
a comparison with another A. thaliana histidine kinase,
39 A comparison with another ABA-deficient mutant, aba1, re
40 A comparison with another affinity clamp structure showe
41 scribes the value of a good independently of
a comparison with another good.
42 A comparison with antibody and alphabeta TCR V domains r
43 nd increased disease severity indicates that
a comparison with any other group (eg, nonusers or insul
44 A comparison with aptamer beacon systems indicated that
45 A comparison with Arabidopsis microarray studies on subm
46 A comparison with arXiv shows that quantitative biology
47 A comparison with assembled VP1 in the virus capsid reve
48 The simulations and
a comparison with atmospheric observations show that nea
49 A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants
50 approach less biologically informative than
a comparison with CA or IA.
51 one in aqueous solution, not inferable from
a comparison with calculated CCS.
52 A comparison with cAMP-dependent protein kinase suggests
53 nsplant recipients in the United States, but
a comparison with Canadian kidney transplant recipients
54 A comparison with CD161 and CCR6 indicated that analysis
55 A comparison with chromosomal DHFR indicates a number of
56 A comparison with classical "cell culture" techniques in
57 A ranking of donor abilities and
a comparison with classical bidentate ligands is as foll
58 A comparison with closed-channel data leads us to propos
59 A comparison with closely related alpha/beta hydrolase f
60 A comparison with commercial SnO2 nanoparticles confirms
61 s domain structure in solution, and provided
a comparison with controversial folded-back crystal stru
62 We evaluated the LCx assay in
a comparison with conventional culture employing modifie
63 A comparison with conventional cylindrical capillary und
64 Through
a comparison with corresponding histology and OCT images
65 A comparison with crystal structures of HiPIPs from othe
66 A comparison with current national water and sanitation
67 n Mt. Antisana, not Chimborazo, which allows
a comparison with current records.
68 The discussion includes
a comparison with cyclic adducts of GSH and furan metabo
69 ing resonance Raman spectroscopy and drawing
a comparison with CYP17A1, we have found no significant
70 A comparison with cytochrome P450 indicates that the str
71 A comparison with d-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) demonstrat
72 ility of the protein-bound cluster precluded
a comparison with data from pH and temperature dependenc
73 These conclusions were usually based on
a comparison with data obtained in low-viscous organic s
74 A comparison with databases of gene orthology, conservat
75 ssociation fragments are identified based on
a comparison with density functional theory (DFT) calcul
76 re sequencing for epidemiology by performing
a comparison with DNA methylation quantified using the m
77 A comparison with dynamic light scattering measurements
78 This was designed to provide
a comparison with earlier behavioural studies, in which
79 A comparison with earlier reported results for trivaline
80 alpha-synuclein and validate the results by
a comparison with electron transfer measurements.
81 A comparison with established methods indicates the new
82 In
a comparison with European datasets, we identify eQTLs s
83 In
a comparison with excitation by green (519-nm) pulses, s
84 A comparison with existing structures of the LXRbeta hom
85 A comparison with existing tools that use GO terms sugge
86 s between DNase I from different species and
a comparison with exonuclease III.
87 A comparison with experimental data on bacteria allows u
88 The last step in our validation was
a comparison with experimental values for 22 complex, mu
89 A comparison with experimentally observed base-pairs rev
90 The accuracy of our approach is examined by
a comparison with extensive experiments using thick foil
91 pain palliation of bone metastases; however,
a comparison with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)
92 A comparison with findings in 243 age- and sex-matched p
93 In
a comparison with five other methods performed in four d
94 of the soybean gene expression atlas allowed
a comparison with gene expression documented in the two
95 espective biosynthetic pathway steps allowed
a comparison with glycan structural data and provides su
96 In
a comparison with healthy controls, we found striking gr
97 ines, HepG2, Hep3B, and HuH-7, and performed
a comparison with herpes simplex thymidine kinase (TK).
98 ly determined peptoid structures and provide
a comparison with high-level quantum mechanics calculati
99 esonance sequences to detect them, providing
a comparison with histological findings and discussing t
100 A comparison with homologous lectin-like domains from th
101 A comparison with human AD brain transcriptome data conf
102 A comparison with human and other ape genomes shows that
103 A comparison with human keratin 9 showed an overall nucl
104 A comparison with human LN gene expression revealed simi
105 ted scream variation, and Experiment 3 added
a comparison with human vowel sounds.
106 Additionally,
a comparison with hydrogen bond-based analogues is provi
107 In
a comparison with IFNgammaR-deficient mice, TRPM2(-/-) m
108 A comparison with immotile trypanosomes demonstrates tha
109 A comparison with independent records suggests that the
110 ition of the new human gene, HuAZ2, and make
a comparison with its antizyme 1 homologue.
111 4 regulatory elements and as discussed here,
a comparison with known basolateral sorting sequences id
112 A comparison with laboratory measurements indicates that
113 ow better environmental performance, whereas
a comparison with LCD technology indicates the environme
114 A comparison with legacy data shows the method to be acc
115 Additionally,
a comparison with lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide
116 A comparison with loop positions in substrate complexes
117 A comparison with matched patients with low-grade diseas
118 Finally,
a comparison with microglia annotations from other tissu
119 When
a comparison with MMSE scores was made, (18)F-FDG signif
120 A comparison with modern reanalysis data shows that curr
121 A comparison with mouse Smn circRNAs underscored a clear
122 Moreover,
a comparison with mRNA interaction profiles from a host
123 scovery rates, and false-negative rates, and
a comparison with neuroradiologist interrater reliabilit
124 xD cluster based on cluster organization and
a comparison with noncoding and Hox gene-coding sequence
125 A comparison with normal jaggery is thus provided for it
126 The intact hemifield also allows
a comparison with normal vision.
127 A comparison with Notch1 and Pax5 and Pax8 expression in
128 ate relative to the oxidized state, based on
a comparison with order parameters reported for the bovi
129 A comparison with oseltamivir alone and combination of M
130 A comparison with other algorithms and a different data
131 A comparison with other C(12)H(6) and C(12)H(8) isomers
132 A comparison with other cryptophanes that bind these two
133 method for uterine leiomyomas and to present
a comparison with other currently used methods.
134 A comparison with other domain prediction methods used i
135 A comparison with other JmjC enzymes illustrates that JM
136 A comparison with other known structures reveals that EC
137 A comparison with other known structures reveals that rh
138 A comparison with other methods in terms of coverage and
139 However, based upon
a comparison with other molecules, it is possible that t
140 A comparison with other neural network approaches as wel
141 A comparison with other peripheral membrane proteins elu
142 A comparison with other popular enrichment analysis meth
143 include pathogen risk in LCA and facilitate
a comparison with other potential impacts on human healt
144 In
a comparison with other published estimators of pairwise
145 A comparison with other reference materials in use for t
146 A comparison with other species of TS shows that the vol
147 the effects of optical distortions and (iv)
a comparison with other standard tests.
148 A comparison with other state-of-the-art tools (APPTEST,
149 A comparison with other urine and serum parameters under
150 A comparison with our previously determined NMR structur
151 A comparison with our radio survey of type Ibc supernova
152 A comparison with P450 EryF (CYP107A1) reveals a remarka
153 igation of biodistribution and dosimetry and
a comparison with pathology and GRPr expression.
154 In
a comparison with patients without late diagnosis, hospi
155 A comparison with polarization-resolved SHG highlights t
156 A comparison with present-day Britain indicates that sub
157 It also provides
a comparison with previous studies using hydrodynamic st
158 On the basis of
a comparison with previously determined structures, we i
159 A comparison with previously published data for this sys
160 Based on
a comparison with previously published data, HuNoV exhib
161 A comparison with previously sequenced Chlamydophila gen
162 Through
a comparison with prior complexes of intermediate struct
163 A comparison with PROBE DESIGN within the ARB software p
164 A comparison with profiles from Illumina sequencing reve
165 A comparison with published data revealed that three of
166 ition of hypoxanthine are revealed, allowing
a comparison with published data that describe uracil bi
167 A comparison with published in-gel staining methods show
168 A comparison with published mtDNA lineages from European
169 scores for a range of K values thus enabling
a comparison with real data to remove bias and statistic
170 A comparison with recent data on the beta-amyloid fragme
171 A comparison with recent molecular dynamics simulations
172 on their properties was investigated to make
a comparison with recently published results focused on
173 A comparison with reference synthetic coprecipitates sho
174 The total daily intake was estimated and
a comparison with reference values was indicated.
175 A comparison with related carbaporphyrin complexes witho
176 into the metal activation of AntR and allow
a comparison with related DtxR proteins.
177 A catalytic test for styrene oxidation and
a comparison with relevant nanoclusters reveal the surfa
178 In the end,
a comparison with relevant previous literature indicated
179 The assay was specific for M. leprae in
a comparison with results obtained from 14 species of my
180 In
a comparison with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, efficacy
181 A comparison with SERS revealed that NTERS not only had
182 the performance of the sssHD algorithm, and
a comparison with several existing selection procedures
183 retation of mutant activities and allows for
a comparison with similar structures from the related to
184 d Xe atom is found to be quite unfavorable.)
A comparison with simulation results for the binding of
185 t is solved analytically and is verified via
a comparison with simulations of a Lennard-Jones system
186 A comparison with SKIE for the wild-type enzyme provides
187 onfirmation of our hypothesis was sought via
a comparison with SNP data from the Maasai, an East Afri
188 A comparison with solid phase micro extraction coupled t
189 tributed oxygen sensor (DOS) was assessed by
a comparison with spot optodes.
190 A comparison with step times for elongation shows that R
191 A comparison with Strongylocentrotus purpuratus embryo s
192 sis of ligand PET data should always include
a comparison with structural MRI; such comparisons are g
193 A comparison with studies of dimer formation by other ph
194 A comparison with summer temperature reconstructions fro
195 A comparison with surgical interventions highlighted the
196 A comparison with telomere uncapping caused by the absen
197 rn Ocean, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, based on
a comparison with temperate diatoms.
198 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 1.41) in
a comparison with that of non-supplement users.
199 energy of the interfacial reaction, enabling
a comparison with that reported for the bulk materials.
200 ictive value for hospital mortality and made
a comparison with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healt
201 graminis f.sp. hordei (Blumeria), as well as
a comparison with the analysis of two powdery mildews pa
202 A comparison with the Arabidopsis genes regulating bract
203 ever, were even more extractive, as shown by
a comparison with the Aztec Empire ca. 1492.
204 In
a comparison with the bare planar electrode, the modifie
205 A comparison with the behavior of encapsulated derivativ
206 A comparison with the Cd stable isotope compositions of
207 A comparison with the cheminformatics plug-in RDKit show
208 to evaluate sample heterogeneity by means of
a comparison with the chi(2) distribution.
209 data between ancestral-derivative pairs and
a comparison with the chimpanzee and macaque genome supp
210 A comparison with the closely related Marburg virus show
211 s of the Anopheles gambiae receptors permits
a comparison with the corresponding Drosophila melanogas
212 A comparison with the couplings seen in related, structu
213 A comparison with the crystal structure of higher plant
214 A comparison with the crystal structure of the barnase:b
215 A comparison with the crystal structure of the receptor
216 These results and
a comparison with the dental phenotype of Ank loss-of-fu
217 lculations were carried out in order to have
a comparison with the DFT results.
218 Through
a comparison with the distribution of lipids around a si
219 A comparison with the effect size of established risk fa
220 diated human brain tumor cells; to allow for
a comparison with the effects of radiation on transcript
221 also tested by serum neutralization (SN) as
a comparison with the EIA test results; one serum (negat
222 A comparison with the experimentally determined rate con
223 A comparison with the Galanthus nivalis agglutinin/manno
224 A comparison with the genome sequence of recently isolat
225 rasterstereographic device was evaluated in
a comparison with the gold standard in motion analysis,
226 itrate reduction regulatory protein, through
a comparison with the Haemophilus influenzae genome.
227 Finally,
a comparison with the homologous interactions in the Sal
228 A comparison with the human 4-1BB/4-1BBL complex highlig
229 imodal pattern of tumor development, forcing
a comparison with the human disease.
230 f the mouse FKBP65 gene (Fkbp10) and provide
a comparison with the human ortholog.
231 A comparison with the human topoisomerase I-DNA cocrysta
232 Zn2+ adjacent to the FXII-binding site, and
a comparison with the ligand-free gC1qR crystal structur
233 A comparison with the literature showed a correlation be
234 A comparison with the mechanisms documented for vertebra
235 A comparison with the membrane peroxisomal targeting sig
236 A comparison with the metastable hexagonal baseplate of
237 A comparison with the model superbase, which lacks a cav
238 A comparison with the NOESY maps evidence an excellent c
239 vian reproductive behavior is discussed, and
a comparison with the organization of VMH afferents in l
240 s first studied with simulation, followed by
a comparison with the other state-of-the-art dwell time
241 clonal anti-insulin antibody, thus providing
a comparison with the performance of surface plasmon res
242 A comparison with the PIG-L deacetylases led to a propos
243 A comparison with the plant vascular networks shows that
244 A comparison with the plexin B1 RBD/Rnd1 complex structu
245 morphology of the circumstellar material and
a comparison with the predictions of kinematic modelling
246 A comparison with the previously determined structure of
247 A comparison with the previously determined structures o
248 A comparison with the previously reported archaeal and e
249 The main focus is on
a comparison with the previously reported systems CH(3)Y
250 A comparison with the previously well characterized type
251 A comparison with the pristine TiO(2) revealed that the
252 ial green alga Botryococcus braunii and made
a comparison with the properties of the single cellular
253 s on DNA basepairs are required to establish
a comparison with the proton-exchange data.
254 ructural, spectroscopic, and DFT studies and
a comparison with the protonated analogue [Ar'Bi(C(6)H(2
255 de an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including
a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical
256 widely studied collagen model and to provide
a comparison with the recent high-resolution crystal str
257 A comparison with the recently determined cryo-electron
258 A comparison with the recently solved X-ray structure of
259 A comparison with the reported chromatographic method ex
260 e, square-planar Co (2+) complexes, based on
a comparison with the results obtained in our previous s
261 A comparison with the results of other investigators ind
262 Through
a comparison with the rich body of literature regarding
263 pylacrylamide in water was also conducted as
a comparison with the SET-LRP system.
264 By
a comparison with the shock field-induced Joule heating
265 A comparison with the solution structure of the related
266 A comparison with the standard e expansion is made, high
267 A comparison with the state-of-the-art shows reduced mem
268 A comparison with the structural and functional conseque
269 A comparison with the structurally unrelated E. coli per
270 A comparison with the structure of its mature serine pro
271 sen on the basis of previous studies or from
a comparison with the structure of P450(eryF) containing
272 A comparison with the structure of the endogenously liga
273 A comparison with the structure of the mammalian annexin
274 A comparison with the structure of the T7 RNAP initiatio
275 A comparison with the structures of other tyrosine kinas
276 A comparison with the structures of the PDZ2 and PDZ3 do
277 A comparison with the substrate-free structure reveals s
278 fficacy was mediated by glycemia regulation,
a comparison with the sulfonylurea glimepiride was done.
279 llography, and ab initio computations enable
a comparison with the ubiquitous benzoenediynes.
280 A comparison with the widely used line source approximat
281 alysis of the improved NAAAR variant allowed
a comparison with the wild-type enzyme.
282 In
a comparison with the Xenopus TR beta A promoter, we fou
283 A comparison with their classroom peers indicates a leve
284 s ab initio studies on azPro derivatives and
a comparison with their cognate Pro derivatives: 1-acety
285 impanzee-specific L1 subfamily diversity and
a comparison with their human-specific counterparts.
286 ion pattern of Arabidopsis thaliana CRTs for
a comparison with these proposed roles.
287 treated by chemotherapy and/or radiation as
a comparison with this group.
288 at gene and function levels are revealed by
a comparison with those for type 2 diabetes and inflamma
289 Through
a comparison with traditional modeling approaches, we sh
290 e in lactose-free milk was investigated, and
a comparison with two alternative chromatographic method
291 The study also includes
a comparison with two established recombination detectio
292 three-electrode configuration was tested by
a comparison with two purely transvenous two-electrode c
293 A comparison with two recently described ecotin-like gen
294 Moreover,
a comparison with two-dimensional fluorescence spectra o
295 A comparison with UniGene Mouse and Rat databases reveal
296 In
a comparison with values obtained from an established bi
297 NOACs were pooled to perform
a comparison with vitamin K antagonists, calculating poo
298 A comparison with well permit data indicated the majorit
299 ry and spectroscopic characterization and by
a comparison with well-recognized European vinegars.
300 A comparison with zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, chick