戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ttenuating attachment and colonization of L. acidophilus.
2 tential prebiotic activity mainly towards L. acidophilus.
3 e and complex carbohydrate utilization in L. acidophilus.
4 sporter is unusual and may be specific to L. acidophilus.
5 as used to study the effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus 1014 on the fermentation pattern of the colo
6 g different probiotic cultures, including L. acidophilus 21, L. plantarum 14, and L. rhamnosus 296 al
7 f several probiotics including Lactobacillus acidophilus 5 (LA5), a potent lactic acid-producing bact
8 ia coli, Lactobacillus casei, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus, a Bifidobacterium sp., Lactococcus lactis,
9 as the Gram-positive bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus, a natural inhabitant of the intestine, indu
10 on the survival and fitness of Lactobacillus acidophilus, a probiotic microbe, in the human gastroint
11 s, Bifidobacterium longum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus among numerous trans-fatty acid isomers prod
12 ntation, carried out by giving Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium infantis (LB) to pregnan
13 syrup led to a higher count of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis and resulted in a
14 gurt containing 10(6) cfu/g of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis strains or 300 g/
15 reased from 4.10% to 36.70% and 33.00% in L. acidophilus and L. fermentum treatments, respectively.
16 rmentation in monoculture with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, as well a
17 s on the S-layer proteins from Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus amylovorus common in the m
18 +/- 0.06 and 0.51 +/- 0.05 for Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, respectively.
19 ns of multiple BSHs encoded by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus gasseri Our genetic and bi
20 wn probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum, were evaluated.
21  upon stimulation of dendritic cells with L. acidophilus and reveal that this IFN-beta induction requ
22 l vaginal probiotics (L. casei rhamnosus, L. acidophilus) and 4 reference strains.
23 athogens Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Fusobacterium nucleatum.
24                       However, Lactobacillus acidophilus appears to require cell membrane disruption
25 se features within the genome sequence of L. acidophilus are likely to contribute to the organisms' g
26         L. crispatus and L. jensenii, not L. acidophilus, are the most common species of vaginal lact
27 romyces cerevisiae LPB-287 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 to produce bioethanol (BE) and la
28 s found in the gut microbiota, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
29 ions strongly induce biofilm formation of L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 but not L. plantarum ATCC 14917.
30 egration method, we engineered Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 to display human CD4, the HIV-1 re
31 thesize that surface proteins specific to L. acidophilus ATCC 4356, like S-layer proteins, are respon
32 om three different Lactobacillus species (L. acidophilus ATCC 53544, L. casei ATCC 393, and L. reuter
33 ablish proteolytic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC(R) 4356), Lactobacillus casei (ATCC(R)
34 le strains including 107 mg of Lactobacillus acidophilus BCMC(R) 12,130, Lactobacillus lactis BCMC(R)
35 e, aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin with L. acidophilus being susceptible to penicillin and vancomyc
36 d without hypochlorhydria with Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 for 7 d failed to change breath-hydro
37                                Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 is a strain of lactobacilli with prop
38 ermine whether oral feeding of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 leads to a lactose-tolerant state.
39 ned subjects (n = 18) ingested Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 twice per day for 7 d and stool sampl
40                           Live Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 was recovered in stool samples from 7
41 ptom scores after ingestion of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 were not significantly different from
42 ial species (Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis, Faec
43 n probiotic mixture (including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacteriu
44 ans, Streptococcus mutans, and Lactobacillus acidophilus by direct contact test.
45  that binds to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) CdpA cell wall protein through IL6-JAK-STAT
46 biotic formulation composed of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lact
47 xclusion, a probiotic (Bio-K+: Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lact
48                In rectal cancer patients, L. acidophilus consumption was associated with improved exp
49 in response to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) consumption in rectal cancer patients.
50                                Lactobacillus acidophilus contains unique surface layer proteins (Slps
51 ogical (Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus counts, and functionality of the prebiotics
52  study showed the beneficial influence of L. acidophilus CRL 1014 on microbial metabolism and lactoba
53 adding 5 mL of sterile peptone water with L. acidophilus CRL1014 at the concentration of 10(8) CFU/mL
54 itionally, the cell-free supernatant from L. acidophilus cultured with the A. bisporus polysaccharide
55 ostreptococcus anaerobius, and Lactobacillus acidophilus did not enhance HIV expression.
56 e (>2.4-fold), whereas CM from Lactobacillus acidophilus did not.
57        The efficiency of oral delivery of L. acidophilus expressing a PA-DCpep fusion was evaluated i
58 Sterne compared with mice vaccinated with L. acidophilus expressing PA-control peptide or an empty ve
59                          Vaccination with L. acidophilus expressing PA-DCpep induced robust protectiv
60   Lactobacillus johnsonii is a member of the acidophilus group of lactobacilli.
61                                  Although L. acidophilus has been designated as safe for human consum
62                                Lactobacillus acidophilus has been reported to be the predominant vagi
63     There is also evidence for Lactobacillus acidophilus in the prevention of candidal vaginitis.
64 i, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Lactobacillus acidophilus), in planktonic cells or biofilms.
65    Overall, fermentation using Lactobacillus acidophilus increased plant protein hydrolysis, and legu
66 n effective approach to identify genes in L. acidophilus induced by an environmental stimulus.
67                 Our results indicate that L. acidophilus induces IFN-beta independently of the recept
68 ccus thermophilus and 50% CFS of Pediococcus acidophilus inhibited tyramine production up to 98% by S
69                                Lactobacillus acidophilus is a Gram-positive lactic acid bacterium tha
70                                Lactobacillus acidophilus is a probiotic organism that displays the ab
71 anization indicated that the H+-ATPase of L. acidophilus is a typical F1F0-type ATPase.
72 ions of lactic acid bacteria, we examined L. acidophilus isolates spanning 92 years and including mul
73 ssion of SLC20A1 that binds to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) CdpA cell wall protein thro
74 iR-mRNA network in response to Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) consumption in rectal cance
75  identified from food samples: Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus), L. pentosus, L. plantarum,
76  food samples: Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus), L. pentosus, L. plantarum, and L. paracase
77  of promoting the growth of the probiotics L.acidophilus, L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus, r
78  distinct lactobacilli strains, including L. acidophilus, L. planetarum, and L. fermentum.
79             The impact of the addition of L. acidophilus La-05 (free cells, microencapsulated with al
80             The impact of the addition of L. acidophilus La-05 (free cells, microencapsulated with al
81          The commercial strain Lactobacillus acidophilus La-05 was used as a control.
82       High counts of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus La-05 were found in yogurts during storage.
83 increasing 1.4-2 Log cycles of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis BB12.
84                          The viability of L. acidophilus LA-5 fell below 10(6)cfu/g in yogurts, howev
85 ur blends were fermented using Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 to assess the effect of lactic acid fer
86 bacterial cultures comprising, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
87 ion by monoculture L. casei (Lc - 01) and L. acidophilus (La - 05) and co-culture (25 and 37 degrees
88 into the microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) into solid lipid microparticles (SLMs)
89 p. cremoris (R704); QLA - with Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5); QLP - with Lactobacillus paracasei s
90 tococcus thermophilus [ST] and Lactobacillus acidophilus [LA]), or the commensal, Bacteroides thetaio
91 ract (JE), and inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA14.
92 inus, Streptococcus sanguinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Actinomyces naeslundii
93 ty of four probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei
94 resence of probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus casei
95 acebo or a probiotic compound (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bi
96                    The data show that the L. acidophilus LTA-negative in LTA (NCK2025) not only down-
97 oic acid (LTA) biosynthesis in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (NCK56) was deleted.
98                              Importantly, L. acidophilus NCFM activates key immune signaling pathways
99  alteration of cell surface components of L. acidophilus NCFM establishes a potential strategy for th
100                           Analysis of the L. acidophilus NCFM genome revealed an msm locus composed o
101          Interestingly, conditioning with L. acidophilus NCFM had a minimal effect on Gram-negative i
102                                Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM is a probiotic bacterium that has been
103                                Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM is an industrially important strain use
104 biotic Gram-positive bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM is not harmful to C. elegans and that L
105 CFM is not harmful to C. elegans and that L. acidophilus NCFM is unable to colonize the C. elegans in
106 onstrate that probiotic conditioning with L. acidophilus NCFM modulates specific C. elegans immunity
107                                           L. acidophilus NCFM possesses a glycogen metabolism (glg) o
108 he early draft phase genome of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM revealed the previously discovered S-la
109                         Conditioning with L. acidophilus NCFM significantly decreased the burden of a
110                           A derivative of L. acidophilus NCFM was constructed by targeted integration
111 oic acid (LTA) biosynthesis in Lactobacillus acidophilus (NCK2025) rendered this bacterium able to si
112 n (Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus) or Labinic (B. bifidum, B. longum subsp.
113 unts, and functionality of the prebiotics L. acidophilus), physicochemical (pH, proteolysis, organic
114                              Although the L. acidophilus probiotic was the most adherent, many clinic
115 tus, 1 L. mucosae, 1 L. vaginalis and the L. acidophilus probiotic.
116  the antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus PTCC 1643 and Lactobacillus fermentum PTCC 1
117 oxyguanosine kinase (dGK) from Lactobacillus acidophilus R-26 exhibit contrasting conformations manif
118 kinases required for growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus R-26 exist as heterodimeric pairs specific f
119  strains, a specific strain of Lactobacillus acidophilus, referred to as LA1, uniquely produced a mar
120                              In addition, L. acidophilus revealed more anti-adhesion ability than L.
121                    Recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus (rLA) has shown great promise in activating
122                                           L. acidophilus's adaptability to environmental conditions l
123 e in both control mice and mice receiving L. acidophilus strain NCK1895 and vaccine strain LaOVA.
124 oted the viability of B. longum BB536 and L. acidophilus strains under simulated gastrointestinal con
125                                           L. acidophilus supplementation confers sensitivity to VSVDe
126 ategy was established by using Lactobacillus acidophilus to deliver Bacillus anthracis protective ant
127 e of LTA and the ability of LTA-deficient L. acidophilus to regulate inflammation and protect against
128 total RNA from untreated and acid-treated L. acidophilus verified the acid inducibility of this opero
129 3, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, L acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus p
130 lactis W51, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, L acidophilus W55, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei W20, Lacti
131 ata set (34 isolate genomes) demonstrated L. acidophilus was a low diversity, monophyletic species wi
132 in carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus was characterized genetically by using whole
133 n inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus acidophilus was investigated by the use of differential
134 torial analysis, the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus was negatively associated with caries.
135        The inhibitor effect of 50% CFS of P. acidophilus was the highest on tyramine production (55%)
136 yoghurts fermented by S. thermophilus and L. acidophilus, which suggest that fermentation by these mi
137 cate that commercial use has domesticated L. acidophilus with genetically stable, invariant strains b

 
Page Top