戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 gy landscape model characterized by a single activation barrier.
2 y a direct role in determining the effective activation barrier.
3 arrangement owing to its significantly lower activation barrier.
4 h is separated from native pepsin by a large activation barrier.
5 ty of the activated C-H bond and reduces C-H activation barrier.
6 egment and refolded pepsin lower the folding activation barrier.
7 driving this first hole transfer reduces the activation barrier.
8 drolysis, leading to large increments in the activation barrier.
9 c on-rate and the location and height of the activation barrier.
10 x sites (Pauling sites) of N-C60 without any activation barrier.
11 ailed experimental study because of its high activation barrier.
12 semibullvalenes and their Cope rearrangement activation barrier.
13 vations only proceed through an irreversible activation barrier.
14 o valence tautomers, while not affecting the activation barrier.
15 s for the height and location of the folding activation barrier.
16 entify the transition state and the required activation barrier.
17 s energy is the principal contributor to the activation barrier.
18 , and often requires a catalyst to lower the activation barrier.
19 ioned in the product metal site, lowered the activation barrier.
20 d is not an inherent requirement for low C-H activation barriers.
21  several channels with significantly reduced activation barriers.
22 d to be close and the paths proposed had low activation barriers.
23 uit of o-quinonoid intermediates with graded activation barriers.
24 n Huckel and Mobius conformers with very low activation barriers.
25  to cyclohexene, resulting in an increase in activation barriers.
26 om the water solution is discouraged by high activation barriers.
27 e favorable interaction, resulting in higher activation barriers.
28 agation follows a radical mechanism with low activation barriers.
29 ement along a free energy landscape with low activation barriers.
30 eviously unrecognized quantitative trends in activation barriers.
31 peting bimolecular reactions that have lower activation barriers.
32 lenyl ether is associated with unusually low activation barriers.
33 ecules) are caught in the act of surmounting activation barriers.
34  in and out of the catalytic site and reduce activation barriers.
35 ptatrienylidenes are found to have very high activation barriers.
36 n is governed by the magnitude of associated activation barriers.
37 lattice architectures yield distinct lattice activation barriers.
38 through a transition state (TS) with a small activation barrier (0.22-0.37 eV).
39 sition resulted in only small changes in the activation barrier (+/-0.3 kcal/mol), with little stereo
40 tates are highly similar and result in large activation barriers (~25 kcal/mol) due to steric interac
41  by a triple bond adds 6-6.5 kcal/mol to the activation barrier; a second triple bond adds 4.3-4.5 kc
42             The calculated rate constant and activation barrier agree well with the experimental data
43 re is presumably associated with the highest activation barrier along the full pathway; therefore, it
44                  The contribution of a lower activation barrier alternative reaction pathway involvin
45 nation transition state, leading to a higher activation barrier and a greater entropy gain for the ra
46 y conformation and modulate the width of the activation barrier and hence the reaction rate.
47           This pathway has a force-sensitive activation barrier and is significantly accelerated by f
48 nisms of thermal quenching - transition over activation barrier and phonon-assisted escape.
49  ionic transport: the softer bonds lower the activation barrier and simultaneously decrease the prefa
50 ve mechanism that can justify the reasonable activation barrier and the associated stereochemical fea
51 f the chemical reaction is determined by the activation barrier and the corresponding reorganization
52                                      The low activation barrier and the deviation from unity of the r
53 ronous transition states, proceed with lower activation barriers and are more exothermic than the ana
54 e to the challenges in dealing with the high activation barriers and complications in handing hydroge
55 gy relationship, with slope 0.8, between the activation barriers and Gibbs free energies for these TI
56 rearrangement has at least 5 kcal/mol higher activation barriers and prohibitively unfavorable produc
57             Quantum chemical calculations of activation barriers and reaction energies for 1,3-dipola
58 rium constants, which reflect the respective activation barriers and reaction enthalpies for these tw
59 with quantum-state multiplicity to allow low activation barriers and robust operation.
60 eviously reported linear correlation between activation barriers and the energy required to distort r
61 tions change the reaction coordinate and the activation barrier, and it is clarified that the corresp
62 lkyl group migration step has a much reduced activation barrier, and its rate is not markedly influen
63 erence in dominating dissociation reactions, activation barriers, and reaction rates.
64 he proposed radical mechanism, with very low activation barriers, and rule out mononuclear mechanisti
65  information about the catalytic mechanisms, activation barriers, and structural evolution of the act
66  and 2-diazenyl-phenylcarbene 16 over modest activation barriers, and the latter carbenes cyclize ver
67 ation contrasts with the view that intrinsic activation barriers are constant.
68 r this purpose) and show that the changes in activation barriers are strongly correlated with the cor
69 olarization combined with increased Z-isomer activation barriers as the selectivity governing factors
70 al states of similar energy separated by low activation barriers, as well as from the mobility of ant
71                                         High activation barriers associated with rate-limiting elemen
72 henius with a single temperature-independent activation barrier at low temperatures and high viscosit
73 d, higher oxygen coverages lead to lower C-H activation barriers, because the basicity of oxygen adat
74  conformational reconfiguration and (ii) the activation barrier being determined principally by entha
75                         We find 2.3 kcal/mol activation barriers between the alpha-helix-like and PPI
76           This result demonstrates very high activation barriers between these solution conformations
77 t only are more exothermic and exhibit lower activation barriers but also are associated with earlier
78 O(2) surface increased the H(2) dissociation activation barrier by ~0.2 eV, in good agreement the dif
79                                        A low activation barrier (calculated approximately 5-6 kcal/mo
80 stigate how well the experimentally obtained activation barriers can be reproduced by the calculation
81 rrections is used to show that these thermal activation barriers can be significantly reduced through
82 leophilic attack is supported by the reduced activation barriers computed with the more electron-rich
83  rhodium carbenoids display potential energy activation barriers consistent with the much higher sele
84                                              Activation barriers correlate closely with both distorti
85                                              Activation barriers decrease on going from methanol to e
86 llylic C-H bonds (Delta(1)J(CH)) and the C-H activation barriers (DeltaDeltaG(*)) has also been deter
87                                          The activation barrier (DeltaG) of 19.6 kcal.mol(-1) for the
88                    For several compounds the activation barriers (DeltaG(double dagger)) of racemizat
89  of 2.0 kcal mol(-1) (0.087 eV) and that the activation barrier, DeltaG (*), is lowered by 4.8 kcal m
90                Measured monomolecular alkane activation barriers depended on catalyst and reactant pr
91       This result is consistent with the low activation barriers determined by computational investig
92 lta(-)) interactions in the SN2 TS lower net activation barriers (E(b)) and enhance reaction rates, w
93         Moreover, to elucidate the origin of activation barriers, energy decomposition analysis calcu
94                               The calculated activation barrier for a concerted four-centered elimina
95 esults provide the first-ever measure of the activation barrier for a structural change that initiate
96 ant polypeptide chains, thereby lowering the activation barrier for beta-sheet formation.
97                             In contrast, the activation barrier for C-H activation increases with dec
98 ificantly greater than the overall concerted activation barrier for C-H bond cleavage in support of t
99 ng interaction that significantly lowers the activation barrier for C-OH bond cleavage from the metal
100          Hence, we propose that lowering the activation barrier for complexation is not a major drivi
101 ulations reveal that Cu4 clusters have a low activation barrier for conversion of CO2 to CH3OH.
102 on of these factors substantially lowers the activation barrier for electron transfer compared to the
103 ability of the intermediate and controls the activation barrier for ene product formation.
104         In every hydroperoxide examined, the activation barrier for FeO-OH isomerization, in the abse
105 The native state stabilization and decreased activation barrier for folding conferred by N-glycosylat
106  explanation of how these factors affect the activation barrier for growth rates has not been develop
107 s of the HAT step using DFT reveals that the activation barrier for H atom donation from PhSH is sign
108  C(4a)-hydroperoxyflavin markedly reduce the activation barrier for H2O2 elimination relative to the
109  by up to several kBT and thus can lower the activation barrier for interactions involving the DNA su
110                           Consistent with an activation barrier for pointed end polymerization, G-act
111 protonation transition state and reduces the activation barrier for protonation, suggesting a vital r
112 onstrate that 1,2-BN cyclohexane has a lower activation barrier for ring inversion than cyclohexane d
113  surface hydroxyls substantially lowered the activation barrier for rotational motion across the surf
114 variable chain length, demonstrates that the activation barrier for short-range ET is dominated by th
115  indicate that nonresonant photons lower the activation barrier for some pathways relative to others
116  with increasing size, and a lowering of the activation barrier for spin relaxation as the QD is incr
117                        We also found a large activation barrier for steady-state glutamate transport,
118 esult in <=1.0 kcal mol(-1) decreases in the activation barrier for substrate deprotonation.
119                This directly reflects on the activation barrier for surface water diffusion, i.e., ho
120 yloxide with the hydroxyl species lowers the activation barrier for the alpha-dehydrogenation process
121 tified product metal site does not alter the activation barrier for the chemical reaction indicating
122                       A discontinuity in the activation barrier for the chemical reaction is not expe
123 rom a chiral anion dependent lowering of the activation barrier for the desired pathway.
124 s imposed by selected backbones increase the activation barrier for the helical isomerization in (Z,Z
125                               The calculated activation barrier for the highly exothermic reaction to
126 e NH is deprotonated, drastically raises the activation barrier for the nucleophilic attack.
127 ride, which is caused by the significant low activation barrier for the P-F bond formation.
128 f the oxide with Au nanoparticles lowers the activation barrier for the solid-state reaction by appro
129 hree key transition states, with the highest activation barrier for the transfer of oxygen from N2O t
130 a third Mg(2+) in the active site lowers the activation barrier for the water-as-base mechanism, as d
131 halogen bond, its importance in lowering the activation barrier for this reaction, the presence of ra
132                                          The activation barrier for this rearrangement is extremely l
133 vealed that the Pd-Ti interaction lowers the activation barrier for turnover-limiting amine reductive
134 inding are mediated solely by changes in the activation barrier for unfolding.
135 use 1.3-2.0 kcal/mol larger increases in the activation barrier for wildtype ScOMPDC-catalyzed deuter
136                              The much larger activation barrier for XI-catalyzed isomerization of D-x
137 and by following the equilibration kinetics, activation barriers for all reactions were calculated.
138 mercury, were also modeled, and the computed activation barriers for all three organomercurial substr
139                                          Low activation barriers for beta-elimination are offered as
140 -B3LYP reproduce the experimentally observed activation barriers for both olefins very well with very
141 +)-coupled transporters to avoid prohibitive activation barriers for charge translocation.
142 o the oxidopyrylium and alkene groups on the activation barriers for cycloaddition.
143 egative charges on the complexes lowered the activation barriers for desorption of arsenate, and in c
144 e metal ion, which can result in high energy activation barriers for electron transfer.
145 bstantially high temperature to overcome the activation barriers for forming and moving of grain boun
146 metal catalyst design features to reduce the activation barriers for homogeneous CO hydrogenation.
147 e electronic conduction, is anisotropic with activation barriers for lithium hopping of 100-200 meV d
148        We report for the first time that the activation barriers for nucleotide association are the s
149 ce of donor dopants can significantly reduce activation barriers for oxygen reduction on anatase.
150                                          The activation barriers for passage over the 4-substituted r
151 s reveal the underlying factors that control activation barriers for propagation and chain-transfer p
152                                          The activation barriers for rearrangement of acyl thiocyanat
153 ue products, and exhibits different apparent activation barriers for ring opening.
154   The SE and DeltaH(hyd) are correlated with activation barriers for the [3 + 2] cycloaddition of a s
155               This can be ascribed to higher activation barriers for the approach of the singlet carb
156 lize adsorbed intermediates and increase the activation barriers for the bimolecular kinetically rele
157                 Eyring analysis revealed the activation barriers for the C-F hydroxylation reaction f
158  of TIM result in an identical change in the activation barriers for the catalyzed reactions of whole
159 tations result in an identical change in the activation barriers for the catalyzed reactions of whole
160 dscape of an enzyme and then to evaluate the activation barriers for the chemical step in different r
161                  Furthermore, the calculated activation barriers for the coupling of acetaldehyde, th
162                                          The activation barriers for the cycloadditions of phenyl azi
163 heory to predict the force dependence of the activation barriers for the cycloreversions of both isom
164 ional theory calculations, which provide the activation barriers for the formation and bond scission
165 the adsorbed species; the energy balance and activation barriers for the individual reaction steps ar
166                    This work reevaluates the activation barriers for the primary proton transfer (PT)
167                     By comparison, gas phase activation barriers for the rearrangement of acetyl, piv
168                                          The activation barriers for thermal reversion of 2Q-4Q, as d
169                    The reaction energies and activation barriers for three modes of arsenate adsorpti
170                          The correlations of activation barriers for vinyl radical attack with aromat
171 calculations show a reduction in the methane activation barrier from 1.07 eV on Co(0001) to 0.87 eV o
172 ion of nearby V atoms, leading to a range of activation barriers from 34 to 23 kcal/mol.
173  <= 3 in Li(x)TiNb(2)O(7)) is rapid with low activation barriers from NMR and D(Li) = 10(-11) m(2) s(
174 uggedness of the energy landscape and raises activation barriers governing dislocation activities.
175                This is also the order of the activation barriers (high --> low).
176                                              Activation barriers in agreement with experimental rate
177 e predict decomposition mechanisms and their activation barriers in condensed delta-HMX phase, sensit
178 al, or phosphate bonds, occur with very high activation barriers in the gas phase but occur much more
179           The difference between the highest activation barriers in the two pathways was computed to
180              In general, the rates decrease (activation barriers increase) according to the following
181 e isomerization rate constants decreased and activation barriers increased with increasing DPE, as al
182 e significant differences in their rates and activation barriers, indicating that slower reactions ar
183 on of the nitriles by 4, with remarkably low activation barriers, involving precoordination of the ni
184                                     This low activation barrier is discussed in terms of the optimiza
185 sigmatropic shift (2 --> 4), among which the activation barrier is higher for [1,5]H-shift (2 --> 4),
186 at the observed entropic contribution to the activation barrier is of electrostatic origin.
187 h limited phase stabilities yet high kinetic activation barriers is challenging.
188  agreement between experimental and computed activation barriers is within +/-1 kcal mol(-1), with a
189 gram along a reaction coordinate in which an activation barrier limits the rate at which reactants ca
190 tribution to the lowering of the free energy activation barrier (&lt;0.5 kcal/mol), and solvent polariza
191 dard laboratory conditions, its dissociation activation barriers may permit C(CH3)5(+) fleeting exist
192                                          The activation barriers obtained from Arrhenius plots are si
193 of the conditions that we test, the smallest activation barrier occurs for a reaction where a Mg(2+)-
194 removal under H(2) proceeds with an apparent activation barrier of (72 +/- 13) kJ mol(-1).
195 k(1) = 0.17 s(-1) g(cat)(-1) and an apparent activation barrier of (80 +/- 8) kJ mol(-1).
196  PC, is thermally activated with an apparent activation barrier of 105-115 meV.
197 ia N-migratory insertion into the Co-C bond (activation barrier of 2.2 kcal mol(-1)).
198 d 10 kcal/mol (dimer 2), with a cis to trans activation barrier of 20 kcal/mol.
199 idizes ethane to ethanol is found to have an activation barrier of 280 kJ/mol, in contrast to 82 kJ/m
200 ining step is the hydrophosphination with an activation barrier of 31.7 kcal/mol, indicating that the
201 ed by the rotation of biphenyl units with an activation barrier of 38 kcal/mol.
202 , which proceeds with an apparent calculated activation barrier of 53 kJ/mol which is in very good ag
203 ely 7.4 x 10(-7) s(-1), despite an estimated activation barrier of 7.5 kcal mol(-1).
204 ly 1 degrees C accuracy and to determine the activation barrier of a model kinetic trap.
205 s the dominant motion in all phases, with an activation barrier of approximately 21 meV in the ambien
206 cessible at room temperature, and a computed activation barrier of DeltaE (double dagger)(calcd) = +1
207 h as hexane tumble inside the cavity with an activation barrier of DeltaG(++) =16.2 kcal/mol.
208 to 45 degrees C, we measured a value for the activation barrier of DeltaG(double dagger) = 71 +/- 5 k
209 yst structure, in turn lowering the relative activation barrier of hydride transfer by ~1-2 kcal mol(
210 + 2]-photoaddition on thermodynamics and the activation barrier of the [3,3]-sigmatropic tautomerism.
211 3 atom, is computed to be slow due to a high activation barrier of the C(2v)-symmetric transition sta
212 anti-diradical is equal to or lower than the activation barrier of the concerted reaction.
213 f the substrate significantly influenced the activation barrier of the cyclization, whereas the effec
214 c equivalent PD on the basis of the rate and activation barrier of the decorrelation step.
215 e of the ester functionality in lowering the activation barrier of the key step of the gallium- and i
216 alytic phosphotransfer, and it may lower the activation barrier of the phosphotransfer reaction.
217  compound plays a crucial role to reduce the activation barrier of the reaction pathway.
218 Derived from temperature-dependent CTRs, the activation barrier of the Ru@Pt catalyst for the HER-HOR
219 s-isomer in combination with the low thermal activation barrier of the trans- to cis-isomerization ty
220     Guided by this finding, we determine the activation barrier of the trigger mechanism as a functio
221  quantum yield of photoisomerization and the activation barrier of thermal isomerization of constrain
222 ch indicate that all the rearrangements have activation barriers of <35 kcal/mol, thus making them re
223 located in the interconversion pathways with activation barriers of 27 kcal mol(-1).
224 s-Alder (HDDA) reaction are competitive with activation barriers of approximately 36 kcal/mol.
225 porating the role of water solvation) of the activation barriers of elementary steps, a new path that
226                                   The modest activation barriers of H-assisted CO* dissociation paths
227 s confirm that pi-conjugation lowers the net activation barriers of SN2 allyl (1t, coplanar), benzyl,
228                    The transition states and activation barriers of the 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of
229 c proposals, most works have not related the activation barriers of the different assumed steps to th
230 roup, is responsible for differentiating the activation barriers of top- and bottom-face attack.
231  of chemical transformations by reducing the activation barriers of uncatalyzed reactions.
232                                 Experimental activation barriers on Pt clusters agree with density fu
233  reaction is endothermic and has a very high activation barrier; our quantum chemical calculations po
234 ver, K(3)PO(4) significantly reduces the C-H activation barrier over the decarboxylation reaction bar
235 igher selectivity to aromatics, due to lower activation barriers over the solid acid sites.
236 slates into the equivalent difference in the activation barriers posed by two-dimensional crystals.
237     In contrast, smooth surfaces with higher activation barriers prohibit effective domain nucleation
238 f chemomechanical kinetics--force lowers the activation barrier proportionally to the difference in a
239 bstraction by the incipient HO* radical with activation barriers ranging from 17 to 18 kcal/mol.
240                                          The activation barriers, reaction constants, and correspondi
241 nearly degenerate Cope rearrangement with an activation barrier similar to that of the parent dihydro
242                               The calculated activation barriers strongly correlate with transition s
243 ion of individual residues to the calculated activation barriers suggest that the broad promiscuity o
244 le thermodynamic driving force and a smaller activation barrier than 1 to carry out C-H bond activati
245          Picryl azide has considerably lower activation barriers than phenyl azide.
246 emperature dependent, with a field-dependent activation barrier that becomes negligible at moderate b
247  the concept of a strain-dependent effective activation barrier that is capable of simulating the kin
248 oiety involving three water molecules has an activation barrier that is reduced to 17.11 kcal/mol.
249 e-ring analogue is attributed to the smaller activation barrier that separates the local intrachain s
250 he cyclization TS requires the passage of an activation barrier that should not be higher than 12-13
251 rtion/interaction model is a tool to analyze activation barriers that determine reaction rates.
252 ame time, ambient temperatures help overcome activation barriers that impede diffusion and reactions.
253 hedral intermediate is rate-limiting and has activation barriers that range from 38 to 41 kcal/mol wi
254       Calculations show that the size of the activation barrier to adsorption caused by the rumpling
255 H group (i.e., the C4-O4 bond) influence the activation barrier to C5-C6 bond rotation due to transie
256 onding partners had different effects on the activation barrier to catalysis, the stability of ribozy
257 (-4) S cm(-1) at room temperature with a low activation barrier to conduction of 25 kJ mol(-1) .
258 hat of c-di-GMP) is probably due to a higher activation barrier to convert from the "open" conformer
259 on, these results require the presence of an activation barrier to describe the incorporation of ammo
260 ould have to surmount a significantly higher activation barrier to facilitate a substrate-assisted pa
261 i-bonded 2-pentene or with the equally large activation barrier to form an alkoxy group via a carbeni
262    Basophil anergy thus seems to function as activation barrier to prevent unwanted reactions against
263  promote polarization and thereby reduce the activation barrier to provide a highly diastereoselectiv
264                                      The low activation barrier to the Cope rearrangement of semibull
265 e mutations result in the same change in the activation barrier to the OMPDC-catalyzed reactions of t
266 nt patterns of complexity--from a cascade of activation barriers to competing dissociation pathways.
267 tion of SNAREs with synaptotagmin lowers the activation barriers to full fusion, and that complexin e
268 nformation on the gearing mechanism, and the activation barriers to gearing were calculated using den
269 tmospheric NPF should be revised to consider activation barriers to individual chemical steps along t
270 idyl transfer and GTP hydrolysis to surmount activation barriers to large-scale conformational change
271                                              Activation barriers to the electrochemical oxidation for
272 ted by the sensitivity of the calculated C-H activation barriers to the external nucleophile and to c
273                                          The activation barriers to these torsional motions range fro
274         For aryl-substituted acetylenes, the activation barrier toward the anti-diradical is equal to
275         For both proteins, ATP increases the activation barrier towards thermal denaturation.
276 eins may undergo downhill folding without an activation barrier under certain thermodynamic condition
277 ate, a unifying framework for predicting C-H activation barriers using a single universal descriptor
278   Density functional theory (DFT) shows that activation barriers vary widely with the number and arra
279                                          The activation barrier versus hydration number follows the E
280 cloadditions due to their considerably lower activation barriers vis-a-vis the gallanediyl monomers,
281 nd in complexes with -2 charges, the highest activation barrier was 65 kJ/mol.
282 gle-turnover kinetic studies showed that the activation barrier was increased by 9.8 and 3.1 kcal/mol
283 tures within these clouds, reactions with an activation barrier were considered too slow to play an i
284 sonance and inductive effects toward the net activation barrier were determined computationally for t
285                             The experimental activation barriers were determined to be E(a) = 25 +/-
286        Regarding their dynamic behavior, low activation barriers were found by DFT calculations for t
287 crepancies in the quantitative prediction of activation barriers were observed, all computational met
288 namics of active sites and even the stepwise activation barriers were obtained, which would be challe
289 d to extrapolate the kinetic rate due to the activation barrier when that free energy difference is z
290  the "inverted parabola" corresponds to zero activation barrier when the electron-transfer reorganiza
291 ethylation reaction, which leads to a higher activation barrier, whereas for the LSMT, its active sit
292 ameters appear to possess the same Arrhenius activation barrier, which suggests a single dominant agi
293 nsolvated (in case of PF(6) (-)) lowered ORR activation barriers with a 200-mV lower overpotential fo
294 vel and (ii) compare experimentally observed activation barriers with computed barriers.
295 senate to ferric hydroxide proceeded with no activation barrier, with Gibbs free energies of reaction
296 ometry of A- to B-type lamins established an activation barrier, with high lamin-A:B producing extrud
297 c substates in the order of their increasing activation barriers, with a distribution width for K to
298 eater than those calculated for outer sphere activation barriers, with deviations between observed an
299 nge of biological design is how to lower the activation barrier without sacrificing a large negative
300  calculating the change in the corresponding activation barriers without the need to invoke dynamical

 
Page Top